Wikidata:Requests for deletions

Requests for deletions

Items that do not meet Wikidata's notability policy can be deleted. Please nominate items for deletions on this page under the "Requests" section below. If it is obvious vandalism, just add the page here (gadget available), or ping an administrator to delete it. Contact can also be made with an administrator in #wikidata^connect.

Please use {{Q+}} the first time you mention an item. Unless you use the gadget, please also ping the item's creator in your request (or ping the bot operator, when appropriate) if the user is still active on Wikidata and the user has contributed the majority of information in that item.

Please use Wikidata:Properties for deletion if you want to nominate a property for deletion.

Duplicate items should be merged, not deleted: see Help:Merge.

Do not blank items in anticipation of deletion. In particular, do not remove sitelinks, even if you have requested the deletion of the page in the sitelink's target wiki or if you think that sitelinks of this type should not have Wikidata items.

This is not the place to request undeletion. Please read Wikidata:Guide to requests for undeletion and either contact the deleting admin or use Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard instead.

More information

Add a new request

Translate this header box!

On this page, old requests are archived, if they are marked with {{Deleted}}. An overview of all archives can be found at this page's archive index. The current archive is located at Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2025/02/03.

Requests for deletions

high

_{~129 open requests for deletions.}

Pages tagged with {{Delete}}

Talk:Q132128465

Talk:Q6942570

Talk:Q78781930

if this list is out of date.

Requests

Please add a new request at the bottom of this section, using {{subst:Rfd |1=PAGENAME |2=REASON FOR DELETION }}.

Q47506301

Q47506301: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No wikilinks. See also (Wikipedia:Biểu quyết xoá bài/Đoàn Thị Thanh Mai). eunn (meta · phab) 13:13, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

 Keep Looking at the original article https://web.archive.org/web/20220630153340/https://vi.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C4%90o%C3%A0n_Th%E1%BB%8B_Thanh_Mai she appears to appears to be a national politician and therefore passes Wikidata notability. Piecesofuk (talk) 14:27, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

@Piecesofuk: Could you add any sources to the item to fulfill WD:N #2? --Ameisenigel (talk) 13:54, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

@Ameisenigel I've added a reference from the original Wikipedia article and also linked back to the archived Wikipedia article via described at URL (P973) but I would suggest a Vietnamese speaker update the item to confirm the details Piecesofuk (talk) 17:01, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Q81291303

Thamizhpparithi Maari (Q81291303): Indian academician, writer and wikipedian: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

Non-notable person Belbury (talk) 11:10, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 11:21, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

 Keep Have a sitelink. Need to be deleted on tawiki first. Fralambert (talk) 12:51, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

That is just a subpage in the project namespace. --Ameisenigel (talk) 12:43, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Q76304869

Thalassa Sophie de Burgh-Milne (Q76304869): (born 1985): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This is my name and my personal information which I do not want online. I am currently in the process of having Google and other pages delete my information as well. Thank you. --Edward2024 (talk) 05:11, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:21, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

@Edward2024 Best ask a oversight to delete the item as stated in Wikidata:Living people. I highly doubt it will be deleted here. Fralambert (talk) 14:40, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

What is "an oversight" and how do I ask them to delete it please? Sorry, I have not used Wiki before. 148.252.132.30 19:38, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Wikidata:Oversight is the policy; the email is oversight@wikidata.org (or contact one of the oversighters via a link on the policy page). Although I don't think the oversight feature is approved for this use, all oversighters are also administrators and can delete items according to other policies. Peter James (talk) 21:15, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep Public figure, if they want we can reduce the birthday to as it appears in the gov record for their corporate position. There is no privacy for a corporate officers in the UK, for a reason. The gov wants accountability for corporate officers to prevent malfeasance. That is why they have to be registered. --RAN (talk) 20:37, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete The Peerage person ID (P4638) is not a reliable source and should only be used as an identifier in most cases. I opposed mass deletion of that data import but would have preferred deletion for some categories (e.g. any living person who is not a hereditary peer, life peer or baronet and does not have another reason for notability from another source or Wikipedia article). Companies House officer ID (P5297) is not an indication of notability; information may be available but that doesn't mean it should be made more visible by adding it to Wikidata where it is not maintained . Most people in that database are not public figures and there is no reason to add their information to Wikidata. One of the companies is currently notable as it has a Wikipedia article, but the article has been tagged for notability since 2016. We don't consistently have items for directors of FTSE 100 companies and where we do they are not always linked and are not watched for vandalism; the name of Q69580854, the CEO of Tesco, was changed in 2021 and it had not been reverted until today. I don't think it is private information, as it is from public sources and not the result of hacking or any breach of confidentiality, or even anything that was legitimately published but not intended to be widely available. The living people policy and the ability to maintain Wikidata are still reasons to delete. Peter James (talk) 11:09, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

  Hi Peter James, this is my first time using this page so I don't really understand the comments above. It looks like someone is saying the page about me can't be deleted. How is that possible? I know I am on Companies House, but it doesn't mean I should be forced to have an additional page with my name on it - or have times changed so much that I have no control over pages online that mention me? I have managed to delete several pages already this week, but this Wiki page is confusing. Please let me know if there is anything I can do, thank you so much. 148.252.132.30 19:37, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

  It depends on the outcome of this discussion. Many requests to delete are not successful, but that is usually because there is structural need for an item, such as linking academic articles with their authors. Here the links are only genealogical and from items that are only exist from other genealogical items - and if that is notability, most people are notable. Peter James (talk) 21:15, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

• If someone wants to be a private person, they probably should not be giving interviews. See: https://www.goabroad.com/interviews/thalassa-de-burgh-milne-director-of-intern-madrid How is someone with the screenname "Edward" wanting to delete info on Thalassa Sophie de Burgh-Milne? They wrote: "my name and my personal information", but their screenname is Edward. --RAN (talk) 00:10, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
  • I'm inclined to agree here. Clearly there is public information avalable for this person, and user hasn't really provided any evidence that they are indeed the person in question.StarTrekker (talk) 23:00, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep per StarTrekker & RAN. -- Ooligan (talk) 19:15, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Q128210950

Samuel Joly (Q128210950): Drummer from Quebec, Canada: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Eligibility Rockpeterson (talk) 15:47, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:51, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

 Keep Passes at least WDN3 as he is listed as the drummer for the band L'Oumigmag (Q126485481) in All About Jazz (Q1722580) https://www.allaboutjazz.com/musicians/loumigmag Piecesofuk (talk) 09:29, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request regarding Tech SEO Summit

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 22:22, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

I spend quite some time adding popular online marketing podcasts (see my contribution list) that are all in talk show format, episodes, hosts, prominent talk show guests and background information and multiple of them now show inbound links from this deletion request. Seeing this is quite frustrating. I am quite new to wikidata and don't fully understand why you would want to delete this information. From what I understand some of my entries miss sitelinks to match the notability guidelines and I need to connect them e.g. add the podcasts e.g to the list of german podcasts (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:German_podcasts) so they fullfill the notability guideline. I am willing to work on that.

I also want to make some points about the notability of some items of your deletion list:

Q127775949 - Michael King is the person that exposed one of the biggest leaks about the Google Algorithm from the last years, together with Rand Fishkin (https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Michael+King%22+google+leak)

Q127790498 - Roxana Stingu is quite a public figure in the women in tech movement.

Q125523927 - Audisto and it's CTO / CEO are quite known for their work regarding tech SEO with citation of work published by Audisto in the Wikipedia (https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Awikipedia.org+audisto) going back to 2015. They are especially known for their detailed guides (https://audisto.com/guides/)

-- Q125397892 - This is the german version of an article originally published by Audisto and written by Tobias Schwarz (Q124868557) and Christian Müller (https://audisto.com/guides/canonical/), that is also cited in the English Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canonical_link_element#cite_note-Audisto_GmbH-3)

Most of the other speakers listed at the Tech SEO Summit entry could also be connected to popular podcasts. I would also be willing to work on that. PodcastMage (talk) 05:32, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

I added multiple contributions and references from and to entities of the two batches indicating the affiliation with already existing entities within Wikidata and Wikipedia. For some of the entities there are citations of their work within Wikipedia, however I do not know if the citations should be changed to use the Cite_Q-Template (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Cite_Q) in this case. PodcastMage (talk) 13:52, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

Popularity on its own is not relevant for judging the notability of an item in the Wikidata sense. Linking items together that are not notable without these links is also not a good way to prove notability. Also, self published sources are usually not considered serious as demanded by WD:N #2. Can you add independent coverage from serious sources, e. g. from mainstream media etc.? --Dorades (talk) 19:55, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

Got the point. So with independent coverage from serious sources you mean this (https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q127775949&diff=2222443545&oldid=2222044321), right? Is this the right spot to add these references and is this amount of references adequate (there are plenty more out there, but I only added the ones I considered most relevant to prove the point) or should there be more? Is this enough in terms of notability for you to keep Michael King and how about the fact that he talks about exactly the topic he got the news coverage for at the Tech SEO Summit? If this changes your opinion about some of the items, please update your batches to reflect that and I will see if similar references can be found for the remaining items. Note: First I was only interested in the podcasts and the corresponding items I added, but now you got me hooked to prove the point for more items of your deletion request because to me they are relevant background, but I totally get that they need to be considered relevant by other people e.g. you as well. PodcastMage (talk) 05:59, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

I added references (that are in my opinion serious sources) regarding the notability of Audisto (https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q125523927&diff=2222723884&oldid=2212511540) and also it's CEO (https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q125187894&diff=2222541861&oldid=2222008770). PodcastMage (talk) 16:52, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

Generally speaking, references should support a specific claim, e. g. when someone is called "SEO expert" the respective source should be used for the statement that someone has the occupation (P106): SEO specialist (Q4048723). There is no limit on how many sources can be added (as far as I know), but some contributors think that a handful of references is enough to support one single claim. Only considering the most relevant ones is a good approach in my opinion.

The notability for Michael King (Q127775949) seems borderline to me, based on the references you added. But for me it's enough to mark my RFD for Michael King (Q127775949) as  Withdrawn. I can't judge the reliability of Website Boosting (Q120468799), thus I am also marking Audisto (Q125523927) as  Withdrawn. I am not convinced by the references for Sören Bendig (Q125187894). In the end, it's not up to me to decide to keep or to delete these items, but to the admins. --Dorades (talk) 15:05, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the clarification, this helps me a lot! From my understanding adding the founders and the CEO of a company would be considered "structural need", as it completes important information about a company and therefore makes it more useful, right? With the same intention I added individual episodes to podcasts where persons that I consider important or that already had Wikidata entries appeared. Regarding Sören Bendig (Q125187894): I also added the information that he was deputy chairman and later chairman of one of the committies of the German Association for the Digital Economy (Q1008864), a association where large companies like Deutsche Telekom, ProSiebenSat.1 Media and RTL Deutschland are members (https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/Q1008864). Regarding Michael King (Q127775949): I will try to add more references about him in the future to address your doubts. Regarding Website Boosting (Q120468799): It is a well known magazine in the German online marketing szene since 2010 and with 17,500 copies printed every two months. In addition the editor in chief is a well known professor who founded two degree programs at the FH Würzburg - University of Applied Sciences. I will also try to add more references about him in the future. Hopefully I find some time at the weekend. PodcastMage (talk) 18:39, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

When working on the references for Michael King (Q127775949): I discovered that he is also known as a rapper and there is another Wikidata entry for him Mic King (Q112819455). I think those two entries should be merged. I added some of his music profiles to the first entity. PodcastMage (talk) 11:18, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

I merged the two entities of Michael King. In addition I added references for both, René Dhemant (Q127776614) and Tobias Schwarz (Q124868557). René Dhemant is a lecturer at the AFS Academy, which was launched in 2012 as the first state-approved training course for search engine optimization (https://www.websiteboosting.com/fileadmin/user_upload/2013/_19/PDF/028-029_afs_website_boosting_019.pdf) in Germany. Tobias Schwarz was also a lecturer there in the early days of the academy, as the article shows. I have added the relevant references. I have also added further references for René Dhermant, such as his participation in podcasts, and also some for Tobias Schwarz. I will work on the remaining profiles as soon as I find a little more time, as this is all quite time consuming. PodcastMage (talk) 11:46, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

 Keep I finished my work adding references and background to the main entries of this deletion request and my opinion is to keep the entries as most of them refer to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references. I consider the rest of the entries to fulfill a structural need as they are all clearly connected to other entries that are not marked for deletion and make these entries more valuable. All statements I found in the entries were valid and understandable to me. Most of the persons within this deletion request are well known conference speakers, have appearances as experts in their field of work in multiple podcasts (all listed within the linked podchaser profiles; not all of them are present at Wikidata), are lecturers or have demonstrably held positions in organizations that are already present on Wikidata. If individual entries are still considered not notable, I would welcome separate deletion requests being made for these entries instead of continuing to pursue this bulk deletion request. My work is done here and I'll move on to work on other things now. I consider the state of this ready for a decision by the admins. PodcastMage (talk) 08:10, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

Someone added a hashtag to the entry, which allowed me to add 4 more references that show that the event actually took place. A follow up event seems to be planned for 2025. PodcastMage (talk) 17:59, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

Q105698122

COST Conference (Q105698122): conference series: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Wild mixture of various irrelevant events without clear contunitiy MGChecker (talk) 12:50, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:01, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

Q10508087

Granhammar (Q10508087): farm in Upplands-Bro Municipality, Sweden: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

It was never a human settlement (Q486972) it was always manor estate (Q2116450) as described in Granhammar Castle (Q5595755). Maundwiki (talk) 20:29, 7 August 2024 (UTC) --Maundwiki (talk) 20:29, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

• It appears that one is the building and the other is the land (estate). You can merge if you do not want them apart. We often do this, there may have been multiple building in the history of the land/estate. --RAN (talk) 03:29, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Q7233428

possible carcinogen (Q7233428): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Item that is linked only to en.wiki redirect, no links from other WD items Wostr (talk) 22:01, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep We have about a dozen scientific articles with this name or a synonym in the title. --RAN (talk) 23:44, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:51, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

 Comment Currently this item has no real links. I think "possible carcinogen" is the wrong way to model substances. In principle, a given substance either is or isn't a carcinogen (Q187661), even if we don't currently know which. It would be better to say instance of (P31) carcinogen (Q187661) with qualifier possibly (Q30230067). 73.223.72.200 04:21, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Q27987555

Q27987555: church building in Gorla Minore, Italy: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-existent building Yiyi .... (talk!) 08:12, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

@Yiyi Are you saying this is a made-up building? It's in heritage registers... Ping @Nvitucci the creator of this item. Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 08:25, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

@Vojtěch Dostál It could be a church with a different name, but in Gorla Minore there aren't buildings with this name AND all the other churches in Gorla Minore are yet on Wikidata. I live nearby and I also did some research: definitely it doesn't exist. Yiyi .... (talk!) 12:56, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

What if it existed but was demolished? Then it would still deserve to have an item... Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 14:07, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

@Vojtěch Dostál I think Q116943131 could be the same church. I have no informations about churches demolished in Gorla Minore. Yiyi .... (talk!) 08:06, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Seems like an erroneous duplicate of the preceeding QID Q27987554 Uschoen (talk) 20:05, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

Q111243654

Voorhees (Q111243654): male given name: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not a real given name. --StarTrekker (talk) 10:21, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:11, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

 Keep I was able to find 16 people on Wikidata with this given name (though admittedly, none with it as the first or primary given name). --Quesotiotyo (talk) 14:06, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

@Quesotiotyo: Are you sure these are actual given names, not just someone having two or more surnames?StarTrekker (talk) 14:23, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

@StarTrekker Yes, as the family names for these people were all clearly evident (and only one was a married woman, otherwise they likely would not have more than one surname).

--Quesotiotyo (talk) 14:47, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

@Quesotiotyo: That is very untrue, it's not unusual at all for people to have more than one surname, in several cultures it's even the standard. Even among English speakers it's not unusul for persons to have both a paternal and a maternal family name before marriage.StarTrekker (talk) 16:05, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

@Quesotiotyo: you labeled Abram Voorhees Stout (Q116933137) who was born to Jacob VanDoren Stout and Helen (Voorhees) Stout as having the given name Voorhees.

Richard Voorhees Risley (Q56702133) was born to Mary Coraline Voorhees Risley and John Ewing Risley and you also labeled him as having it as a given name. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 13:23, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

Correct, as those are middle names (second given names). The family names come from their fathers, not their mothers. --Quesotiotyo (talk) 18:55, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

No, they seem very obviously to be cases of family name inherited from mother (Q25918333).StarTrekker (talk) 01:24, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request: 277 Systematic internaliser (SI) items

query

Se background below for what a Systematic internaliser is.

These are the reasons:

• 1) These SIs can change over time and I have not seen anyone interested in keeping this information updated since the import was done.
• 2) they are a role on an existing firm and should never have been imported as separate items IMO. This import was probably not sufficiently discussed before it was done.
• 3) The level of detail in the SI system is not relevant for Wikidata or the WMF projects. It is similar to importing every bench in every protected area in Sweden into Wikidata as an item. That does not make much sense to keep in Wikidata.

If anyone would like to keep this data I suggest they create a financial Wikibase and model the whole thing there based on the companies/markets in Wikidata.

I understand a lot of time and work has gone into this import. I suggest to the importer that they discuss imports more before forging ahead to avoid deletions in the future.

Here is the background: "[...] investment firms can choose to become an SI in a given financial instrument or group of financial instruments. As of 1 September 2018, investment firms will be mandatorily classified as an SI in those financial instruments which they have traded frequently, systematically and substantially. The SI status will be evaluated continuously in terms of business needs and regulatory requirements." source

So SI is a status of a company in a certain market. It was introduced by regulatory bodies in 2018 AFAIK.

It would be a lot of work to to keep this information up to date. Take a look at the products the SI-status apply, see [1] for an example (there are a total of 24 products listed there)

Notifying users which have discussed the import before @BrokenSegue, @Vladimir Alexiev @User:Nataliya Keberle --So9q (talk) 12:01, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

The number of possible items with MIC market code (P7534) is unlikely to be close to "every bench in every protected area in Sweden" (unless Sweden has very few benches). There is also an identifier for them, which is why the items were created; benches are unlikely to be registered with a central authority. I agree they should probably not be separate items, but the identifiers should be moved to existing items or new items. Peter James (talk) 21:49, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

I am firmly against deletion. If MIC found them important enough to issue a MIC ID, then they should be important enough for WD as well.

• "they are a role on an existing firm and should never have been imported as separate items"
  • Let's take Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria Bank (Q806189) as an example. You claim that Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria S.A - Systematic Internaliser (Q93359236) should be merged to it. But are you sure that it's the same company and not a subsidiary?
  • Eg consider Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria S.A. - UK - Systematic Internaliser (Q114587067), it surely is a subsidiary (separate company) since it's in a separate country.
  • By your reasoning, Fundación BBVA (Q30296991) could also be merged: it "only" has a "foundation" status in some jurisdiction ;-)
  • This said, if you know that the SI function of BBVA is done by BBVA itself and not a subsidiary, please do the merge (which will move the type "SI" and the MIC to the BBVA item)
• "not seen anyone interested in keeping this information updated": We've updated MIC import 3x. And can you point to any WD subset of over 1k entities that is completely up to date with its source data?
• "SI is a status of a company in a certain market": That's not true. SIs are a specific sort of stock exchange or market. Many financial institutions perform various services, including specific kinds of exchanges and markets. "SI" is an important role to warrant its own type, just like "stock exchange" or "pension fund"
• "The level of detail in the SI system is not relevant for Wikidata": Do you also argue that "there are too many exchanges", thus they are not interesting?
• "I suggest they create a financial Wikibase": this is just discrimination! Why would you be the person to decide how much financial info is appropriate for WD?

Cheers! -- Vladimir Alexiev (talk) 12:55, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for taking the time to reply.

1. even if they are different companies, they still don't seem relevant to have in WD (from my perspective).
2. the first example you mention is interesting. I found the scope of the BBVA when acting as a SI. Reading that it is clear that SI is a role that is chosen by the entity:

BBVA has voluntarily decided to act as SI for certain bonds and other forms of securitised debt and over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives contracts, in accordance with article 18 of MiFIR.

So a SI is not a company per se. It is a role and that role ONLY applies to certain products and services. They differ between SIs.

IF we were to keep this information a data consumer would DEFINITELY want to know which type of products this entity acts as SI for. In the case of Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria Bank (Q806189) the import was done from a database that did not contain links between the bank and the SI role (voluntarily chosen by the bank). Without this information I would consider this a good example of a bad import. That is an import that inflates the number of items in Wikidata but fails to connect them to other items in a way that makes good sense to keep over time.

I invite others to judge whether these role-items are worth having or if they could be better reduced to a single statement like so on the entity that takes on that role according to some source like the one I provided above:

role -> systematic interalizer -> start time = x, applies to = product x, applies to = service y, MIC market code = BBVA, etc.

Please note that it is much easier to polute a database with half-ass imports than it is to find a good source and add statements like the above for each SI in the database. IMO this should have been discussed in a WikiProject Finance (does not exist yet) or WikiProject Economics, but I assume it has not, please correct me if I'm wrong and provide a link to the discussion about modeling in that case.

I suggest we delete these garbage items and use this an example of how not to do an import. So9q (talk) 09:06, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Q50375445

Ago Endre (Q50375445): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Bot-created Estopedist1 (talk) 21:32, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:41, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

May be mentioned in Kes on kes? Eesti 2000 (an Estonian biographical dictionary? see the reference for P31), I am not sure I am able to check if he was mentioned, but if there is an article about him he has to be notable. --Wolverène (talk) 06:52, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Notable as linked to Sirje Endre (Q12375095) and sourced per above (in Sirje Endre (Q12375095) item father (P22) statement). 178.37.233.37 00:00, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

Q123951730

Iztochna tangenta blvd. (Q123951730): street in Sofia, Bulgaria: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability - this is a proposed reorganization of Q123951730 Nk (talk) 16:31, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

Notability - this is a proposed reorganization of Q123946927 Nk --Nk (talk) 16:53, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

Q130210987

Heather Novak-Peterson (Q130210987): artist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 21:06, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

Added due to adding OpenStreetMap node with her public artwork on a parking garage near me:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12147972009

https://imgur.com/artwork-Aqpo3TE

https://imgur.com/artwork-cFtMBiU Cfeast (talk) 22:04, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

Is there journalistic coverage, e. g. articles in newspapers? --Dorades (talk) 19:18, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Here's a news article about her that mentions the artwork in question:

https://hconews.com/2019/11/26/heather-novak-peterson/ Cfeast (talk) 22:04, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Here's another article about her:

https://canvasrebel.com/meet-heather-novak-peterson/ Cfeast (talk) 22:08, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Those two links look like sponsored content and a republished press release. I'm not sure they're especially serious. William Graham (talk) 23:37, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Q130238784

Statistical Decision Functions. (Q130238784): book review published in March 1951: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This is a review of the book, not the book itself so worthless for us to store So9q (talk) 05:53, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

I can see the merits of your argument. But if we're going to have an entry on everything that was published in academic journals - and from what I can tell, "was published in an academic journal" is a criterion for inclusion - then that includes the book reviews. We have a lot of book reviews. If you want to delete the book reviews, you'll have to bring that up on project chat. DS (talk) 15:57, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Q105966767

Playa Chiquita (Q105966767): beach in Costa Rica: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

I don't think this really fits within the scope of the project. There are many, many beaches in Costa Rica. DS (talk) 14:59, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

It's mentioned in travel guides, and notable enough for Wikidata (and possibly useful for Commons). Peter James (talk) 20:56, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

My comment was based on this being Playa Chiquita, but the original label was "beach, COSTA RICA" and it's possible the beach depicted is Playa Punta Uva, not Playa Chiquita. Peter James (talk) 21:04, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

• I think it should stay, the gps data from the camera shows it at the new name. --RAN (talk) 01:44, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep as long as the only rationale is "There are many, many beaches in Costa Rica". Geographical features are recorded in maps and other databases and they are notable. If the rationale were that this particular beach doesn't exist, or that it is not shown under this name in reliable sources, or that it just a part of a larger more recognised beach, it could be more reasonable.--Pere prlpz (talk) 15:48, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Q130234847

Jenan Younis (Q130234847): British comedian and physician: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

Someone claiming to be Dr Younis requested this entry's deletion, but didn't do it properly. This is just a procedural correction; I'll add her reasoning in a moment. DS (talk) 15:41, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

"I would be grateful if this page could be removed about me (see above)

I was alerted that it was just added.

I am no longer a comedian and no longer a surgeon either and would be grateful if the page could be deleted. I am working full time in the NHS and such pages existing will be considered a breach of professionalism and may result in NHS disciplinary action against me. I don’t know who added the page but would be grateful if it could be taken down as soon as possible. Many thanks

Jenan Younis <email deleted>" DS (talk) 15:42, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Per this interview, Dr. Younis is "a BBC New Voices Competition winner and Funny Women finalist", and a search of Google News shows enough media coverage that she might even meet notability criteria for enwiki. I also note the apparent contradiction between "no longer a surgeon" and "working full time in the NHS". If there is indeed a "breach in professionalism" such that it could result in "disciplinary action", surely it was when she began performing standup, or when she organized and launched a MENA-themed comedy festival; our documentation is only a minimal component thereof. DS (talk) 15:49, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Regarding the contradiction you stated - there are many other professions other than surgeon within the nhs. It’s not unheard of to change specialties/departments. Therefore it’s possible to work full time in the nhs and no longer be a surgeon. I’m sure you can appreciate that I’d rather not share private documentation that would be prove the issue with professionalism/potential disciplinary action that would be lodged against me. If you search online you can see I have no future gigs planned and haven’t had any scheduled for quite some time. I would be most grateful if the entry on me would be deleted. 2.26.231.49 00:42, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

• I do not see anything that would "be considered a breach of professionalism". --RAN (talk) 18:47, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

  It’s also very presumptuous if you to assume you know what consists of a breach of professionalism. This entry is about me and I have asked politely if you could remove it as it poses a risk to my current employment and income on grounds of professionalism. As I explained I am no longer a surgeon nor a comedian so the content of the page itself is also inaccurate. I would be grateful if you would delete it please. I do not want to have to escalate the matter to a legal team. 2.26.231.49 08:59, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

  The sources are out there. Are you going to ask the BBC and the Guardian to take down their coverage of you? DS (talk) 17:53, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Note: Some IP address just posted a comment at Talk:Q130234847. Samoasambia ✎ 19:11, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

 Keep While we should certainly remove any information that is private or unverifiable, it seems like this person is notable. Jamie7687 (talk) 20:14, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

 Keep If there are sources about this person available on the internet, we should keep this one, unless the aforementioned sources have been taken down. David Osipov (talk) 07:49, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:41, 28 November 2024 (UTC)

Q130239214

Abcence C&T Corporation (Q130239214): Indian construction and engineering company: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable, advertisement Bodhisattwa (talk) 07:24, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 07:30, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Q130262936

Erik Laurentz Hogh Pihl (Q130262936): (1925-1998): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Only reference is his memorial service in a local newspaper. A search using the name or his alias doesn't give anything relevant. Dying doesn't make a person notable. Günther Frager (talk) 09:05, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 09:10, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep While English Wikipedia may only be for people that have achieved some sort of fame, Wikidata allows anyone that can be described by serious and public sources to have an entry, so long as they are not involved in self-promotion. A "local newspaper" is both serious and public, and dead people are not involved in self-promotion, because they are dead. There is also a structural need as a descendant of Sophus Pihl, who does have a biography in Wikipedia. See for example: w:Lincoln family where people can use our resources to educate themselves about family relationships. --RAN (talk) 16:02, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

  Just in the US more than 3,000,000 people die per year. There is no point in having every single person that die or all graduates from Harvard or all the descendants of Gengis Khan.None of them are notable just because they belong to one of these groups. Günther Frager (talk) 18:49, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

• And Findagrave is able to manage 226 million human entries and 564,000 cemetery entries that I can search in a few seconds and find the one I am looking for. Wikidata:Notability: "It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity. The entity must be notable, in the sense that it can be described using serious and publicly available references." Is your argument that an obituary is not "serious" or not "publicly available"? Just because 3,000,000 die each year that doesn't mean that someone will take the time to create those entries. It would take 5.7 years to create 3,000,000 entries at one a minute, working 24 hours a day. Please stick to Wikidata rules on notability. The entry also has a Findagrave identifier which shows the person's grave marker that confirms the data in the entry. The entry also has a Familysearch identifier which links to 13 documents that confirm the data in the entry. The FamilySearch database has over 1 billion unique human entries, and again I was able to find the entry for Pihl in a few seconds. --RAN (talk) 19:10, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

  The necrology section of a newspaper is not journalism. The family or the funeral service writes it and pays for its publication. It is the same as someone that pays for a classified advertisement, or someone that writes a blog post about their deceased grandmother. I'm not arguing that we just include all of them before include this particular entry, I'm arguing that we should not add random entries of entities that have no relevance. It is the same as adding an entry about a random company just because it appears in https://annuaire-entreprises.data.gouv.fr/ or because they appeared in a public notice indexed by https://www.masspublicnotices.org/. Günther Frager (talk) 20:07, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

  You mentioned "relevance", since you can't read people's minds or predict what people will be searching for in the future, how do you know what people find relevant? Wikidata does not care what type of "journalism" is involved, it just must be a "serious" and "publicly available" reference. It doesn't matter whether it was written by a Pulitzer Prize winning journalist, or the funeral director, or the person's child. Even if it contains an error, we still use that fact and deprecate it. A public notice or a telephone directory would only give one or two data points. We have a dozen facts about this dead person. If you want to lobby for changing the Notability rules for Wikidata, the way to do that is at Village Pump, not deleting one entry that you do not like. You are also using the strawman argument about companies, this is not about companies. Companies are deleted if they are self promotion or paid promotion. Companies are also registered that may never exist, they are just shell companies. People actually exist and are referenced in "serious" and "publicly available" media. --RAN (talk) 21:14, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

  Please stop being rude claiming that I'm nominating something because "I don't like it". The example with companies is not strawman it is a "clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity". Now you are assuming that people are more "notable" than companies even though they are referenced in the same (or more if we consider the French government) "serious" and "publicly available" media. Günther Frager (talk) 22:29, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

• Yes, you have completely demolished any argument for keeping all entries on every possible company. Yet, we are talking about an entry on a person, not a company, which is what makes it a strawman argument. --RAN (talk) 23:48, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

  I don't see the distinction between them in WD:N, could you quote the place where there is different treatment between people and companies in the policy? Günther Frager (talk) 00:36, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

  A directory, whether of companies or of people is not information dense, it gives just two data points, not enough for a full entry. This entry up for deletion is information dense, not just a name and a telephone number. I think most people would agree that an entry for any human where we only have a name and telephone number or only a company name and a street address would be deleted. --RAN (talk) 04:22, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

  I asked for the policy, not for your opinions or conjetures. Günther Frager (talk) 06:50, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep Wikidata is for collecting databases, this person has links to databases (which are not social media) so I'm inclined to think they pass WD notability.StarTrekker (talk) 21:09, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

 Keep Wikidata is not Wikipedia. I'd support @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) and @StarTrekker arguments here David Osipov (talk) 07:55, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

Q130215613

Rudolf Skowroński (Q130215613): (born 1951): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This person does not seem to meet WD notability criteria: no sitelink, no external id... Wostr (talk) 01:06, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep Multiple sitelinks. --RAN (talk) 01:43, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

  There is no external-id, about almost everyone one can find a few sources on the Internet, but those not mean an item should be created. Citing #2 criterion here is only possible with a very inclusionist interpretation of that point, which I am opposed to. Wostr (talk) 12:44, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

   Comment Insufficient justification, failing to show why the sources are not "serious and publicly available references" (2nd citerion). Wikidata isn't Wikipedia. Someone can have 5 identifiers: profile x, instragram profile, facebook profile etc. - and that doesn't make the item "notable". If there are no external identifiers, statements like described by source (P1343) or described at URL (P973) are sufficient.

  I don't know why I have to explain this to an admin of another wiki project, but okay, let's go.

  Sources used in this item:

  1. https://polskiemiesiace.ipn.gov.pl/mie/form/r93778,Skowronski-Rudolf-Jacek.html - website-project made by Institute of National Remembrance (Q705173) - Polish government-affiliated research institute with lustration prerogatives and prosecution powers.
  2. https://i.pl/rudolf-skowronski-najdrozszy-polski-zaginiony/ar/724953 - leading polish news portal from Polska Press (Q11822473), former "Polska The Times" (author of this article is notable journalist https://oko.press/autor/witoldglowacki).
  3. https://polskieradio24.pl/artykul/2195076,rudolf-skowronski-to-od-lat-poszukiwany-polski-oligarcha - from Polskie Radio 24 (Q21523269), polish public radio station.
  4. https://rejestr.io/osoby/1349163/rudolf-skowronski - a reliable service that presents data from the state and public National Court Register (Q16569346).
  5. https://centrumedu.ipn.gov.pl/ph/archiwum-1/2019/7345,Tajemnice-bezpieki-23-stycznia.html - also IPN - see first source.
  6. https://www.policja.pl/pol/aktualnosci/3352,Rudolf-Skowronski-na-policyjnej-top-liscie.html - official web page of Policja (Q622532).

  There is no doubt that the above sources are publicly available and serious.

  Please do not make requests like this in the future, but read rules and other requests (even if some of them are wrong) first. 178.37.233.37 21:36, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

  I know WD notability guidelines and this item does not meet these criteria. That's all from me. Wostr (talk) 22:06, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

  No one cares that you think something about a topic until you justify it. You don't justify it, which is incompatible with the dignity of a project administrator. 87.205.166.75 14:44, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

Before starting deletion request like this, please read first WD:N. 178.37.233.37 10:50, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

 Keep The item's sources suggest that he is notable: "Rudolf Skowroński has been a wanted Polish oligarch for years.", eg https://polskieradio24.pl/artykul/2195076,rudolf-skowronski-to-od-lat-poszukiwany-polski-oligarcha and https://polskiemiesiace.ipn.gov.pl/mie/form/r93778,Skowronski-Rudolf-Jacek.html Piecesofuk (talk) 14:58, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

Being a wanted criminal does not automatically make someone notable. About a large part of society "something" can be found on the Internet, but it does not automatically make a person notable. As here, we only have a few links and nothing more, not an article in the Wikimedia project, not even a reference to any database/website for which we have a property. The existence of a few links in the item does not exhaust #2 of the guidelines in my opinion. Wostr (talk) 15:09, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

Keep - apart from above, he is mentioned in multiple books (Google Books quick search) and other sources:

Gang, Artur Górski · 2021

... Rudolf Skowroński, a well-known businessman, owner of a company that has houses in Mikołajki. In 2002, Bogdan G. was his employee. Now the businessman is wanted on an arrest warrant. »Klepacki wanted to collect protection money in Mikołajki ...

Provocation - dictators, politicians, agents

By Piotr Gajdziński · 2002

was included in the (in)famous politician's Andrzej Lepper's list, here:

Andrzej Lepper · 2002 · ‎No preview

Mentioned in Polish Wikipedia as a side character (e.g. here: 18 times in one article only)

Mentioned at least once in the English Wikipedia.

Is the sole topic of the discussions organized by the governmental institutions.. . Zezen (talk) 15:36, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep Could possibly even pass Wikipedia GNG.StarTrekker (talk) 18:55, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Q129005532

Mario Kleff: Without Fear (Q129005532): Biography of Mario Kleff, authored by Colin Roberts.: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 19:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 4 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:01, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request: Self promotional items created by User:Designer Mario Kleff

Dubiously notable architect. Created a huge number of items of dubiously notable builds and other personal projects (art writing etc). Related items Q129005532 Q130260444 nominated separately by another user. William Graham (talk) 23:21, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

Adding Q130238815 that was created by the same user prior to registration. William Graham (talk) 23:27, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

Q25583573

Nematollah Akbar (Q25583573): Tajikistani journalist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Spam/promotional Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 13:19, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:25, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

Q130306434

Rossella Agresti (Q130306434): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not meet notability policy --Corgilover365 (talk) 10:54, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 11:01, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

• Keep, meets WD:N, since it has serious sources SBN author ID=LIAV097588, Pontifical University of Salamanca ID=543548 Eduard Ungern (talk) 21:41, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Q130311244

Jun Higaki (Q130311244): Japanese immigrant: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Theoretically has a child with Q232307, who did recently have a child, but I see no reliable public sources that even name him; notability, verifiability, privacy, and/or BLP issues Jamie7687 (talk) 00:52, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 01:01, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

Q123749750

Liip AG (Q123749750): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 19:34, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:41, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Q19342429

14th-century Sienese Painting, room 3 (Q19342429): exhibition hall in the Uffizi, Florence: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No notability, now unused, new organisation, now Q117113015 --Oursana (talk) 14:08, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:11, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Q75601678

Elisheva Jakobovits (Q75601678): (born 1966): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:36, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 8 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. This goes for all those nominated below by the same person. --RAN (talk) 23:21, 29 September 2024 (UTC) --RAN (talk) 23:18, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

  Obviously this is a promotion, a bored kid created items on all his family members, none of the items are needed. אייל (talk) 06:31, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

  • @אייל: No. These are the descendents of en:Immanuel Jakobovits, Baron Jakobovits, former chief rabbi of the UK, admired by Margaret Thatcher, and made a peer in the House of Lords of the UK Government -- an extremely significant figure.

The items are not the creation of a "bored kid" importing "all his family members". The items were created as part of a systematic import of entries from The Peerage (Q21401824), populating property The Peerage person ID (P4638). The information here is in turn sourced to Burke's Peerage (Q1016410), a standard UK reference work, part of the reference collection in every UK main public library. The view was taken that because significant people in public life are so often connected to people listed in this book, it made sense to import the whole website, to make it possible to analyse that connectedness at scale.

As the stats at Property_talk:P4638#Progress indicate, all but about 500 items from that import are still in the system, so it has indeed tended to be kept by the community (and of the 500 items out of 700,000 that have disappeared from the total count, that is largely due to mergers, rather than deletions).

Therefore  Keep for all of them., unless there are specific reasons to delete any of these individuals.

(Note that, given their listing in Burke's Peerage, WD:LP is probably not at issue here, at least as regards existence, names, and family relationship). Jheald (talk) 18:36, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

• The Peerage (Q21401824) is a self-published source and some entries only cite "E-mail message" as a source. Those items should be deleted (unless there is another reason to keep), but the items listed here cite Burke's Peerage. Peter James (talk) 14:29, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete for all of these items per Peter James since they all seem to referenced to a personal genealogical website and Wikidata isn't a personal database of someone's non-notable family members. I don't buy the idea that these items should be kept simply because they created as part of an import either. Imports don't get a special pass from the notability guidelines. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:21, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

  The items here are sourced to a personal website but a better source is cited there and that could probably be used. I agree some items from this import should be deleted, but not the items listed here. Peter James (talk) 00:13, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

Further Jakobovits descendents

The following should all probably be considered together, unless there are particular issues relevant to any particular single entry. Jheald (talk) 18:39, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Q75601683 

Isaac Aryeh Homburger (Q75601683): (born 1992): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:36, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Q75601680 

Pinchos Jacob Homburger (Q75601680): (born 1988): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:37, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Q75601685 

Avigail Esther Homburger (Q75601685): (born 1987): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:37, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Q75601679 

Meir Homburger (Q75601679): (born 1986): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:37, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Q75601677 

Sam Eli Homburger (Q75601677): Peerage person ID=237165: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:37, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 6 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Q75601682 

Yehoshua Homburger (Q75601682): (born 1990): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:37, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Q75601664 

Aviva Jakobovits (Q75601664): (born 1958): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:38, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 10 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Q75601663 

Joseph Samuel Adler (Q75601663): Peerage person ID=237156: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:38, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 8 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Q75601667 

Pierre Adler (Q75601667): (born 1979): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:38, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Q75601668 

Nathan Adler (Q75601668): (born 1980): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:39, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Q75601672 

Ann Adler (Q75601672): (born 1982): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:39, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Q75601673 

Tzippora Adler (Q75601673): (born 1983): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:39, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Q75601675 

Gila Adler (Q75601675): (born 1985): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:39, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Q75601669 

Abraham Adler (Q75601669): (born 1989): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:39, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Q75601671 

Tobi Adler (Q75601671): (born 1992): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:39, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Q75601652 

Jeanette Jakobovits (Q75601652): (born 1956): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 10 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Q75601654 

Norman David Turner (Q75601654): Peerage person ID=237149: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 8 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Q75601656 

Ezriel Turner (Q75601656): (born 1978): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Q75601660 

Hadassa Turner (Q75601660): (born 1979): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Q75601657 

Yehuda Turner (Q75601657): (born 1981): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:42, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Q75601658 

Elie Turner (Q75601658): (born 1983): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:42, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Q75601661 

Ayala Turner (Q75601661): (born 1987): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:42, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Q75632216 

Raphael Turner (Q75632216): (born 1995): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:42, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Q75601660 

Hadassa Turner (Q75601660): (born 1979): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:42, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Q75601662 

Simcha Turner (Q75601662): (born 1994): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:42, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Q75601640 

Esther Jakobovits (Q75601640): (born 1953): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:43, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Q75601641 

Chaim Zundel Pearlman (Q75601641): Rabbi: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:43, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 9 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Q75601643 

Eliezer Pearlman (Q75601643): (born 1974): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:43, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Q75601645 

Ephraim Pearlman (Q75601645): (born 1978): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:43, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Q75601646 

Eliyohu Pearlman (Q75601646): (born 1982): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:44, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Q75601651 

Sarah Pearlman (Q75601651): (born 1988): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:44, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Q75601642 

Yehuda Pearlman (Q75601642): (born 1972): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:44, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Q75601650 

Adina Pearlman (Q75601650): (born 1980): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:44, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Q75601647 

Daniel Pearlman (Q75601647): (born 1985): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:44, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Q75601648 

Zipporah Pearlman (Q75601648): (born 1976): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:45, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Q75601632 

Samuel Jakobovits (Q75601632): (born 1951): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:46, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 7 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Q75601636 

Shraga Feitel Jakobovits (Q75601636): (born 1975): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:46, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

  How does this pass WD:N? Is notability inherited from other family members and a link? _{Kind regards,} Aafi ^(talk) 19:24, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Q75601635 

Yaacov Jakobovits (Q75601635): (born 1979): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:46, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Q75601639 

Yehudit Jakobovits (Q75601639): (born 1988): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:46, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Q75601639 

Yehudit Jakobovits (Q75601639): (born 1988): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:47, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Q75601634 

Ester Gitel Kahana (Q75601634): Peerage person ID=237133: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:47, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 5 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Q75601638 

Zipora Jakobovits (Q75601638): (born 1977): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:47, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Q75601620 

Julian Jakobovits (Q75601620): (born 1950): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:48, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Q75601621 

Michelle Tauber (Q75601621): Peerage person ID=237123: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:48, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 9 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Q75601622 

Nechemya Jakobovits (Q75601622): (born 1974): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:48, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Q75601624 

Nathan Jakobovits (Q75601624): (born 1977): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:48, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Q75601625 

Elie Jakobovits (Q75601625): (born 1982): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:48, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Q75601631 

Sima Jakobovits (Q75601631): (born 1988): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:49, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Q75601629 

Penina Jakobovits (Q75601629): (born 1979): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:49, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Q75601630 

Tzippora Jakobovits (Q75601630): (born 1981): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:49, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Q75601626 

Jeremy Jakobovits (Q75601626): (born 1985): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:49, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. This goes for all those nominated above by the same person. --RAN (talk) 23:20, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

Q75601623 

David Jakobovits (Q75601623): (born 1975): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:49, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. This goes for all those nominated above by the same person. --RAN (talk) 19:36, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

Q116455411

International Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature (Q116455411): code of scientific nomenclature (plant communities): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Duplicate of "International Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature" Q64152139 --JSoos (talk) 19:30, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

 Keep Edition and series are distinct. William Graham (talk) 20:50, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Editions are different because the problem described in the next section ("4th edition" vs "4th ed. Russian translation", see next section "Q116454942") Please look after the topic. There could be only one legal "Code" exist, no more! The latest was accepted by the 4th edition. It is like the "International Code of Zoological Nomenclature" Q13011. there is only one. The difference is that this is part of the botanical (algae, fungi, plants) code Q693148. JSoos (talk) 18:49, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Q116454942

International Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature. 4th ed. (Russian translation) (Q116454942): Russian translation of the original English article, published on 5 december 2022: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Duplicate of "International Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature. 4th edition" Q116454846 --JSoos (talk) 19:55, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:01, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

See previous section (Q116455411), if that is deleted, no link! JSoos (talk) 22:57, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

 Keep Edition and series are distinct. William Graham (talk) 20:50, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

OK, that is true, it is the Russian translation of the original. I tried to link it to Q116454846, but I am not sure I made it properly. Anyhow, 4th edition became vakid since 1 January 2021, so this Russian article should not be listed the same way as the 3rd and 4th editions. That is why element in previous sections has distinct edition list, JSoos (talk) 20:22, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Q38240542

Austin Pool (Q38240542): Canadian actor: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 21:25, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep Meets WD:N since it has seriuos sources
  • Film.ru person ID austin-pool
  • IMDb ID nm0690778
  • Kinobox person ID 360759
  • TMDB person ID 124355 Eduard Ungern (talk) 21:54, 3 October 2024 (UTC) -- @Infovarius: film.ru person to be removed? Eduard Ungern (talk) 22:01, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Why do you consider user-generated content serious? --Dorades (talk) 22:06, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

• Is Wikidata and Wikipedia and Wikisource and Wikiquote serious? They are all user-generated, yet Wikidata itself is used by the Library of Congress and the Virtual International Authority File people as an Identifier. User-generated is not a synonym for unreliable or not-serious. Wikipedia is user-generated and had fewer errors than Encyclopedia Britannica. --RAN (talk) 23:14, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

No, neither Wikidata nor any other Wikimedia project is "serious". That's why we remove references to Wikipedia if there are other references present. That Wikidata is used by other institutions that we consider serious is nice for us. We also link to user-generated content, e.g. social media accounts, which does not mean that this content is "serious".

On a side note: The investigation of error rates in Wikipedia vs. Britannica (got the link from your user page) says otherwise: "The result: 2.9 errors per article for Encyclopaedia Britannica versus 3.9 errors per article in Wikipedia.". --Dorades (talk) 17:23, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

Q38240324

Jared Cook (Q38240324): American actor: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 21:27, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep meets WD:N since it has serious sources
  • Film.ru person ID jared-cook
  • IMDb ID nm0177084
  • Kinobox person ID 176164 Eduard Ungern (talk) 21:56, 3 October 2024 (UTC) -- @Infovarius: film.ru person to be removed? Eduard Ungern (talk) 22:00, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Why do you consider user-generated content serious? --Dorades (talk) 22:06, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Or even bot-generated, in cases of Film.ru and Kinobox which are often take data from IMDb. These are online catalogues which just mention everyone who worked on a film. They do not normally imply notability. They are not enough. --Wolverène (talk) 06:16, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

• Is Wikidata serious? It is user-generated and used by the Library of Congress and the Virtual International Authority File people. User-generated is not a synonym for unreliable or not-serious. Wikipedia is user-generated and had fewer errors than Encyclopedia Britannica. --RAN (talk) 23:16, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

For my answer, please see above on the RfD for Q38240542. --Dorades (talk) 17:28, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

Played a role in Billy Madison (Q372299), so notable by the criterion 3. We only need to connect the item from Q372299. --Wolverène (talk) 06:11, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

I have not watched this movie, but are roles like this ("Ernie (Grade 3)") enough for WD:N #3? His other two roles read similar. --Dorades (talk) 17:28, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

I have not either. There are no contradictions with the policy, especially if it was not a non-credited appearance (which may have a chance to be faked in the catalogues). The criteron 3 does not imply the estimation of a value number in properties, or an importance of values for the subject. Of course, I just would not like the mass creation of items about minor role performers but that is another story. --Wolverène (talk) 02:30, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

You are right, WD:N #3 does not weigh the importance of an item. But in my reading of this criterion, and I may be wrong in this, "structural need" means that the item linking to a item in question benefits from this link. Now I wonder: is it useful (and how?) to have the actor of "Ernie (Grade 3)" listed there? Is this link indeed "needed" and makes "statements made in other items more useful"? --Dorades (talk) 09:20, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

Q120356339

Marc D. Lewis (Q120356339): American executive search professional: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 22:15, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep meets WD:N#2 since it has serious sources Eduard Ungern (talk) 23:39, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Which of the sources do you consider serious? I only see self-published content. --Dorades (talk) 17:18, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:01, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep. I created this item while trying to disambiguate the many authors named Marc Lewis or Mark Lewis. I have made some improvements to the item, and in particular I would highlight that the subject has appeared as a commentator on mainstream television shows, eg. CNBC's Squawk on the Street (Q3473030)[2]. Daask (talk) 19:34, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
•  Comment I'm still learning how the Wikidata community interprets Wikidata:Notability, so perhaps don't take my opinion here too seriously. However, I can provide further information to other editors. I created it to facilitate disambiguation, which seemed to me to be a structural need. The item is further linked as a recorded participant (P11108) from Squawk on the Street (Q3473030), which also could be a structural need. On sources, Marc D. Lewis (Q120356339) certainly wouldn't pass w:en:WP:GNG. There's several passing mentions and quotes in news articles.[3][4][5] Those seem to me to be serious references, although they lack much depth of coverage. I'm not sure how much this matters on Wikidata. Daask (talk) 22:39, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Q97477564

Category:French horn players (Q97477564): Wikimedia category: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 20:09, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:10, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

Could be easily merged into Q7645843, but the Wikimedia Commons has the duplication: m:commons:Category:Horn players from France & m:commons:Category:French horn players. --Wolverène (talk) 04:08, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

@Wolverène c:Category:French horn players is for people (from any country) who play the w:en:French horn. c:Category:Horn players from France is for people who are French and play a horn. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:23, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

Q130298415

Athreya Buddhavarapu (Q130298415): researcher: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

Self-promotion '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 01:58, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 02:01, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Thanks @DeltaBot

I humbly request that my Wikidata page not be deleted as I have also put through original research I have published into Wikidata, and the cited work to that research as well.

Research in Wikidata:

https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q130384751

https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q130385150

https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q130385157 Athreya Buddhavarapu But if it still should be deleted that's okay as well.

Athreya Buddhavarapu ABuddhavarapu (talk) 02:24, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

• Keep clearly meets WD:N; and in use. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:57, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

  Thanks @Pigsonthewing for your insightful response. Athreya Buddhavarapu ABuddhavarapu (talk) 12:05, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

While Athreya Buddhavarapu (Q130298415) should be notable because of A comparison of three‐film analysis software for stereotactic radiotherapy patient‐specific quality assurance (Q130384751) (peer-reviewed paper), I think Dosimetric evaluation of dual energy computer tomography with iterative metal artefact reduction for radiotherapy planning with bilateral pelvic hip prosthesis (Q130385150) (poster) and A Comparison of Film Analysis Software for Radiotherapy Patient-Specific Quality Assurance (Q130385157) (preprint) should be deleted. --Dorades (talk) 21:53, 13 October 2024 (UTC) rephrased, --Dorades (talk) 19:20, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

@Dorades: On what basis? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:36, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

I don't really understand, basis for what? The paper A comparison of three‐film analysis software for stereotactic radiotherapy patient‐specific quality assurance (Q130384751) is in my view notable because we consider scientific papers that are approved by a serious journal notable (WD:N #2), thus the author Athreya Buddhavarapu (Q130298415) is notable, too (WD:N #3). I don't think that a poster (usually neither peer-reviewed nor published by an editor) (Dosimetric evaluation of dual energy computer tomography with iterative metal artefact reduction for radiotherapy planning with bilateral pelvic hip prosthesis (Q130385150)) nor a preprint (often not peer-reviewed or accepted by a journal) (A Comparison of Film Analysis Software for Radiotherapy Patient-Specific Quality Assurance (Q130385157)) fulfills our notability criteria. --Dorades (talk) 15:56, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Thanks @Pigsonthewing.

@Dorades please be informed that (Dosimetric evaluation of dual energy computer tomography with iterative metal artefact reduction for radiotherapy planning with bilateral pelvic hip prosthesis (Q130385150)) has been peer reviewed by EPSM 2021 (conference) editors.

Also the preprint (A Comparison of Film Analysis Software for Radiotherapy Patient-Specific Quality Assurance (Q130385157)) has been peer reviewed by PESM editors.

Both these articles could not have been published unless peer reviewed. 2001:8004:45E0:619C:15DE:378C:2885:D876 20:08, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Has Dosimetric evaluation of dual energy computer tomography with iterative metal artefact reduction for radiotherapy planning with bilateral pelvic hip prosthesis (Q130385150) been published anywhere else than on ResearchGate? Why is A Comparison of Film Analysis Software for Radiotherapy Patient-Specific Quality Assurance (Q130385157) marked as "Under Review" ("This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal") on Research Square? --Dorades (talk) 20:57, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Dosimetric Evaluation of Dual Energy Computer Tomography for Bilateral Pelvic Hip Prothesis has been published by Springer after peer review and is also available here (P010):
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-021-01094-z

A Comparison of Film Analysis Software for Radiotherapy Patient-Specific Quality Assurance was posted as a preprint on Research Square after passing the 'Research Square Prescreen’ and Springer’s ‘Quality Control Checks’. I think some of those checks include confirming that the research topic is sufficiently novel.

I think both articles are valuable and should not be deleted. Thanks, Wikipedia team. 86.38.70.190 08:26, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Alright, so A Comparison of Film Analysis Software for Radiotherapy Patient-Specific Quality Assurance (Q130385157) is not peer-reviewed at this moment, thus not notable in my view.

The abstract of Dosimetric evaluation of dual energy computer tomography with iterative metal artefact reduction for radiotherapy planning with bilateral pelvic hip prosthesis (Q130385150) was published in the conference proceedings, so probably notable. --Dorades (talk) 16:39, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Q130211432

Antonio Santos Pérez Roldán Gonzalez (Q130211432): Spanish Entrepreneur: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 19:59, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:11, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

Q110918424

CSI universe (Q110918424): narrative universe of the CSI televesion shows and media franchise: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no "CSI universe." The franchise takes place in the United States and there's already Q264198 which this seems to be a duplicate of. So this item should be deleted as an unsourced, made up concept. Adamant1 (talk) 20:17, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:21, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Q110940895

NCIS universe (Q110940895): narrative universe of the NCIS television shows and media franchise: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no "NCIS universe." The franchise takes place in the United States and there's already Q17182743 which this seems to be a duplicate of. So this item should be deleted as an unsourced, made up concept. Adamant1 (talk) 20:19, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:21, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Q64861227

MacFarlane animated universe (Q64861227): fictional universe of the animated television show Family Guy, American Dad!, and the Cleveland Show: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Family Guy takes place in Quahog, Rhode Island and there is no "Family Guy universe" which is why this item is unreferenced. Plus the franchise is already being covered by Q55012102. So this item should be deleted as an unreferenced, made up concept. Adamant1 (talk) 21:43, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:51, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

• Comment Family Guy, American Dad and The Cleveland Show all take place in the same shared universe. Maybe it shoulnd't be called the "Family Guy universe", but a shared universe between these franchises certainly exists.StarTrekker (talk) 18:31, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

@StarTrekker: If there is a fictional universe here I'd say it's the "fictional universe of Quahog, Rhode Island as featured in cartoons created by Seth MacFarlane." Otherwise the whole thing is just circular and makes zero sense. Like what makes The Cleveland Show or American Dad take place in the "Family Guy universe" to begin with and not the other way around? For all we know the universe is "American Dad universe" and Family Guy actually takes place in it or they both take place in "The Cleveland Show universe." Or maybe their separate fictional universes that take place in the fictional universe of each other and it's all just fictional universe inception? --Adamant1 (talk) 20:55, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

@Adamant1: Unless given a unique name fictional universes are generally named after it's initial media, but as I said it probably doesn't need to be named the "Family Guy universe", maybe Seth McFarlene universe or something similar.StarTrekker (talk) 20:58, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

@StarTrekker: At that point your just talking about the Family Guy franchise. Which again there's already Q55012102 for. Per Family Guy (franchise) "Family Guy is an American animated comedy franchise created by Seth MacFarlane and originally developed for Fox. Consisting of two television series: Family Guy (1999–present) and The Cleveland Show." I'd also include American Dad in that, but regardless your just coming up with random synonyms for the Family Guy franchise at this point. "Seth Macfarlane universe" wouldn't work anyway because it insinuates anything and everything created by him takes place in the same universe and he also wrote The Orville, which obviously doesn't take place in the fictional town of Quahog, Rhode Island as depicted in the Family Guy franchise. --Adamant1 (talk) 21:18, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

No, a franchise is not identical to a fictional universe. That's an idea that you're trying to push but I don't think the majority agree on.StarTrekker (talk) 21:20, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

@StarTrekker: I don't see how I'm trying to push anything when I literally quoted Wikipedia and that's what it says. Regardless, if I look up "Family Guy universe" there's literally no results for it on Google Search. There are a few results for "Seth MacFarlane Universe" but both of them are from Fandom. So if anything your the one trying to push their opinion, at least in this case.

Regardless, I don't think I've said anywhere that "fictional universes" don't exist as a concept. All I've said is that there has to be evidence that there's a fictional universe separate from the franchise for specific media franchises and there clearly isn't any in this case. Otherwise be my guest and provide some evidence that there's a Seth MacFarlane or whatever "universe" separate from the Family Guy franchise. The last time I checked Fandom isn't a valid reference and that's all I could find though. "Universes exist so everything's a universe as long as I say it is!!" Right. --Adamant1 (talk) 21:44, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

I posted a link above that already confirms that the shared universe exists for McFarlanes animated shows. And you don't need to keep going on about how the name isn't "Family Guy universe", I already talked about that. I'm not pushing any idea, it provably does exist.StarTrekker (talk) 10:29, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

@StarTrekker: Yeah well, and to quote the article "The Cleveland Show is the first true spinoff of Family Guy. The creators have dropped hints that American Dad! and Family Guy exist in the same universe. But 'crossovers have been limited to the hypothetical scenario played out in the Stewie Kills Lois” episode. I don't think that proves anything. You have to admit that a hypothetical scenario in a single episode of a show is pretty spurious evidence. At that point you could justify creating a "fictional universe" item for just about anything. You clearly have zero standards though. --Adamant1 (talk) 02:55, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

The article is over 10 years old, there has been further crossovers since then.StarTrekker (talk) 15:30, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

OK. Clearly ten year old references are only valid when they support your argument. I'd ask for more recent ones but I'm sure you'd find an excuse to dismiss them to when it turns out they aren't any better. --Adamant1 (talk) 22:40, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

You've been making nonsensical and uncivil claims this whole discussion. The article can not possibly mention something that had not happened yet, your claim that that shows that there isn't a universe does not hold, nor that I'm "dismissing" the source.StarTrekker (talk) 20:33, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

The article can not possibly mention something that had not happened yet Yeah sure, but then your the one who provided that source as evidence that there's a "fictional universe" for Family Guy. So....Anyway, I'm just asking for a source saying there's a fictional universe for Family Guy. That's it and I don't really see why you can't provide one if it's really a thing. Apparently it's nonsensical and uncivil to ask for sources though and you clearly aren't going to provide any. So I think I'm done here. --Adamant1 (talk) 05:20, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

I have no idea what your problem is, the source does say that a shared universe exists, you have just decided that it's not good enough because it operated under the assumptions of it's time.StarTrekker (talk) 20:36, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

•  Oppose per StarTrekker. media franchise (Q196600) and fictional universe (Q559618) are distinct concepts. We even have two distinct properties (media franchise (P8345) and from narrative universe (P1080)) for this! Also, an inaccurate (or even wrong) label is not a valid reason for deletion. Just look for a more suited one. --Horcrux (talk) 14:27, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

Horcrux The problem is that whatever label we go with can't be made up and so far no one has proposed one that doesn't purely come from user generated websites. I guess the label could just be empty, but that kind of defeats the purpose of the whole thing. And BTW, just because "fictional universes" are a distinct concept that doesn't mean everything is a fictional universe or that it has anything to do with if that thing warrants an item on Wikidata. Otherwise your just making a totally baseless, circular argument for keeping the item. --Adamant1 (talk) 22:06, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

 Keep Fictional Universe and Media Franchise are distinct concepts, the latter more to do with the business than where the fiction takes place. The Family Guy wikipedia article refers to the "Family Guy universe" but it's referred to as the "MacFarlane Universe" in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fictional_universes_in_animation_and_comics Piecesofuk (talk) 12:30, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Q101199114

South Park universe (Q101199114): fictional universe of the animated television series South Park: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no "South Park universe." Although the show takes place in the fictional town of fictional town of South Park, Colorado. But that's already covered by Q650733 and the South Park franchise as a whole is covered by Q54622175. So this item should be deleted as an unreferenced, made up duplicate of exiting items. Adamant1 (talk) 21:47, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:51, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Q98539264

Dexter universe (Q98539264): narrative universe of the television series Dexter and it's spin-offs: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no "Dexter Universe" which is why this item is unreferenced and there's already Q98538809 for the media franchise. So this item should be deleted as an unreferenced pointless duplicate of an exiting item. Adamant1 (talk) 21:54, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:00, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

I would  Keep. The Dexter universe clearly exists, Wikipedia refers to it: the first line of the English Wikipedia article of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dexter_Morgan states that: "Dexter Morgan, also known by the in-universe moniker The Bay Harbor Butcher, is a fictional character introduced as the antihero protagonist of the Dexter book series" and the info box is headed "In-universe information". Also multiple sources refer to the "Dexter universe", eg https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/tv/tv-news/dexter-resurrection-series-showtime-michael-c-hall-1235959604/ "Showtime is expanding the Dexter universe with a new series, Dexter: Resurrection", https://deadline.com/2024/07/michael-c-hall-returning-dexter-resurrection-original-sin-series-1236024240/ "Michael C. Hall Returning To ‘Dexter’ Universe For New Series ‘Resurrection’ & ‘Original Sin’ – Comic-Con" Piecesofuk (talk) 09:19, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

Q91628201

Neon Genesis Evangelion universe (Q91628201): fictional universe of the anime television series and media franchise: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no "Neon Genesis Evangelion universe" and the media franchise in general is already covered by Q66834583. So this item should be deleted as a pointless duplicate of Q66834583. Adamant1 (talk) 21:57, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

 Comment Do you have a reason to keep making seperate DRs if the reasoning is going to be an exact copy anyways? Otherwise it's kind of cluttering up the page--Trade (talk) 02:38, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

@Trade: I guess there's no technical reason they can't be combined. Except maybe that they have different links to the items for the franchises. But whatever. I just not sure how to create a bulk deletion request and there's no option for it in the "more options" drop down menu. I have no problem with you or anyone else combining them into a single request though. --Adamant1 (talk) 03:10, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions&action=edit&section=new&preload=Wikidata:Requests%20for%20deletions/Preload_2&editintro=Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions/Editintro_2&nosummary=1 Trade (talk) 03:13, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:00, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Q130234028

Joseph Weaver (Q130234028): (1798-?): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This person existed and was related to other people somehow. That's about it. Run of the mill people that existed at one point in the history. Fails notability. --Graywalls (talk) 23:46, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 23:51, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

For me this would be a borderline keep/delete as he is stated to be the father of Angelina Annetta Weaver (Q95690565) (listed above) However, as she doesn't seem to pass WDN1 or WDN2 (only WDN3) then perhaps he probably shouldn't pass WDN3. But the Wikidata notability guidelines are pretty unclear on this. Piecesofuk (talk) 11:54, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

What's WDN1, 2 3 etc? Graywalls (talk) 05:55, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

@Graywalls These are the three notability criteria as defined in WD:N

1. It contains at least one valid sitelink to a page on Wikipedia, Wikivoyage, Wikisource, Wikiquote, Wikinews, Wikibooks, Wikidata, Wikispecies, Wikiversity, or Wikimedia Commons.

2. It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references.

3. It fulfills a structural need, for example: it is needed to make statements made in other items more useful. Piecesofuk (talk) 08:16, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete Since the item is only referenced to user generated websites. There should really be more authoritative sources for biographical items outside of user generated content. --Adamant1 (talk) 23:50, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

Q55201066

Got Funk (Q55201066): song by Kevin MacLeod: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Merge with Q66661018 Prototyperspective (talk) 21:46, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:50, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

Q57521465

New Friendly (Q57521465): song by Kevin MacLeod: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Merge with Q66804652 Prototyperspective (talk) 21:47, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:50, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

Q111508854

Rosy McMichael (Q111508854): American beauty vlogger: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable vlogger --2A02:810B:581:C300:D871:768A:48C8:79 18:44, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

Q6735600

Maija DiGiorgio (Q6735600): American stand-up comedian, actress, and film director: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Maija_DiGiorgio&action=edit&redlink=1Expired PROD, concern was: Non-notable, article created and maintained by COI-violating paid editors) WT20 (talk) 03:41, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 03:51, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

 Keep Notable. Passes at least WDN3 as writer and director of Bitter Jester (Q4919009) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitter_Jester Piecesofuk (talk) 07:39, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

Punctuation lexemes

• - (L1371592): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• - (L1315093): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

I'm not convinced that we need lexemes for purely punctuation marks (much less ones restricted to a single language) Mahir256 (talk) 19:05, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

 Delete, I doubt that the hyphen is an individual lexeme in Danish. --Wolverène (talk) 19:42, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Pinging @Fnielsen: (the item's creator). --Wolverène (talk) 20:04, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

 Comment I created the item. I have a problem when describing certain Danish words. There are Danish words where the dash is necessary to have. For instance, it is called IT-afdeling or it-afdeling ('IT department'). It would be odd and not according to authorized spelling to write itafdeling (and Google's results provided few or none examples of itafdeling except for hashtags). The dash is not usually by itself listed in Danish dictionaries, but that should not mean that it is relevant for us to have. Note we also have - (L1315093). — Finn Årup Nielsen (fnielsen) (talk) 13:20, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

@Fnielsen: The "problem" you describe is solved very simply: by including the hyphen in the lemmata and form representations of the lexemes in question—which I see has already been done. And thank you for pointing out the Russian hyphen, which I've added to the nomination above (@Infovarius:). Mahir256 (talk) 21:22, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

 Delete I don't see any reason to keep them. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 07:29, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Q111697679

SMDOT/Contemporary Art (Q111697679): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not meet the notability policy --Gmidun (talk) 14:30, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:41, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Required by Marco Cadioli (Q116472553) it seems. It looks like that would need to go for this one to go. ·addshore· ^{talk to me!} 20:53, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

Q130358048

first cousin once removed (Q130358048): type of kinship: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

It shall never be used. One of these two shall be used instead: "first cousin once removed ascending" (Q19901274) or "first cousin once removed descending" (Q19901611). --Svensson1 (talk) 14:50, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Could first cousin once removed descending (Q19901611) and first cousin once removed ascending (Q19901274) be subclasses of Q130358048? Peter James (talk) 01:03, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

No, Q130358048 is wrong and shall never be used to anything. Svensson1 (talk) 14:34, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep "first cousin once removed" is a commonly-used phrase; "first cousin once removed descending" (or ascending) is not. If external sources are trying to match their data to ours, "first cousin once removed" is useful. If the item should not be used with kinship to subject (P1039), the way to do that is with a none-of constraint (Q52558054) constraint on the property, with a replacement value (P9729) hint = Q19901274, Q19901611. This is better than deleting the item, because it helps people find the items we would prefer them to use. A Wikidata usage instructions (P2559) note can also be added to the item. Jheald (talk) 20:42, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 04:01, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

If a user writes "first cousin once removed" in the search box, six valid types of kinships are shown and the user can read more about each of them. They are "first cousin once removed ascending" and the sub types "second uncle" and "second aunt". And also "first cousin once removed descending" and the sub types "second nephew" and "second niece". To also show an invalid type of kinship in that search result list, that doesn't tell how one person is related to another, will not help anyone. It will result in a mess if we start adding invalid types of kinships in addition to all the very many valid ones. This invalid item, Q130358048, was created by misstake a few days ago. DeltaBot says the item is linked, but there are no links beside from a list that is periodically updated by a bot, so there is no reason to put this delete request on hold. Svensson1 (talk) 23:38, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

Q97070029

Célestin Soucy (Q97070029): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Lucie Paradis was boorn 2000 - its impossible to have grandchildren at this age Bahnmoeller (talk) 16:50, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:51, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Lucie Paradis (Q97070031) was probably born in the 19th century, but a sitelink had been added which was an article about another person with the same name born in 2000. I removed everything that was added based on that link. I'm not sure of the notability of the family, but I would have to check the links between the items, and deletion of individual items would make this more difficult. If the information is correct they are related to at least one notable person Roch Voisine (Q1600132). genealogics.org person ID (P1819) says it does not imply notability, so I'm not sure how it was decided which should be imported. Peter James (talk) 15:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

I went at least 15 items through the tree without finding a notable one, and without reaching Roch Voisine (Q1600132).

Starting at Roch Voisine (Q1600132) that is certainly notable, and I imagine mother and father should remain then, and likely the rest should be deleted? (At least that seems to be the general consnsus around family trees etc) ·addshore· ^{talk to me!} 21:42, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

Q1600132#P22 links to Q97070029 via Q97070006#P22, Q97070008#P25 and Q97070028#P22. Others in the same tree link to Jack Kerouac (Q160534) and Céline Dion (Q5105) via other families. I don't know if they should be deleted, but there are many more and the imports continue. Peter James (talk) 20:48, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Q130339596

Paul Kekai Manansala (Q130339596): Author and blogger: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Clearly self-promotional, same name as main editor. Is it notable? -wd-Ryan (Talk/Edits) 23:17, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 23:21, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete - I wouldn't check on notability when cross-wiki spamming is apparent. See c:Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Paul Kekai Manansala. _{Kind regards,} Aafi ^(talk) 16:59, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

  @Aafi Having interwiki links is useful to admins at individual Wikis when making decisions about whether or not to delete item, so notability checks are still important.

  @Wd-Ryan When it comes to deleting the item, it's heavily interlinked and as such it makes sense look at more than just the individual item. Maybe, Manansala Family (Q130418991) and all the members of that family should be deleted. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 15:55, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

  I noticed this too. Here are the items of interest:

1. Q130339596 (delete | history | links | logs)
2. Q130538697 (delete | history | links | logs)
3. Q130526815 (delete | history | links | logs)
4. Q130491476 (delete | history | links | logs)
5. Q130479894 (delete | history | links | logs)
6. Q130476238 (delete | history | links | logs)
7. Q130427691 (delete | history | links | logs)
8. Q130418991 (delete | history | links | logs)
9. Q130397648 (delete | history | links | logs)
10. Q130396641 (delete | history | links | logs)
11. Q130396463 (delete | history | links | logs)
12. Q130393859 (delete | history | links | logs)
13. Q130393814 (delete | history | links | logs)
14. Q130388104 (delete | history | links | logs)
15. Q130387937 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB) -wd-Ryan (Talk/Edits) 16:04, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

They're all created by the same account, except for Paul Kekai Manansala (Q130339596) which wasn't registered. -wd-Ryan (Talk/Edits) 16:09, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

 Keep The external identifiers suggest that he's notable, eg items with a Library of Congress identifier are usually kept https://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n89298057.html Piecesofuk (talk) 18:15, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Q94369459

Răḣman Mustafai̐ev (Q94369459): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The same as Q30605051. --Yousiphh (talk) 16:14, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:21, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

Duplicate items are merged, not deleted. The nominated item appears to be a conflation of two separate individuals. Deletion of the item is not the solution, neither is the removal of sourced statements and external identifiers. The item was previously nominated for deletion and not done. Please see Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2024/10/09#Q94369459. — Dcflyer (talk) 01:40, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

The problem is that there is two Rahman Mustfayevs - one is a historian and diplomat (the author of the book Azerbaĭdzhan mezhdu velikimi derzhavami (1918-1921)), and the second one is a writer-memoirist and police general (the author of the book Duz i̐ashadym, i̐ashadym...). The Library of Congress merged them together. In my opnion Q94369459 should merge to Q30605051 because both have the same year of birth and the same occupation. I already sent a letter to the Library of Congress about this misunderstanding. Yousiphh (talk) 13:22, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Q96657596

William Little Brown (Q96657596): (1845-1874): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable. The person has a family member for whom a en.wiki entry exists, which was created by another distant extended family member. --Graywalls (talk) 17:39, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:41, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

Q131150179

Bernardino Paredes Martínez (Q131150179): Peruvian artist specializing in portraiture (born in 1886 in La Libertad, Peru and died in 1961 in Lima, Peru): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable and promotional. Ovruni (talk) 04:57, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Although I'd argue with the notion of this entry being promotional, as it is for someone who died in 1961, I cannot find any proper sources regarding this individual DS (talk) 04:48, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

I put promotional because the person in the item seems to be a relative of the user who created the item. (Here he mentions that he is his great-grandfather) --Ovruni (talk) 05:59, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Q2413616

(R)-penam (Q2413616): chemical compound: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

It makes no sense to have an item called (R)-penam, since (S)-penam by definition does not exist. I corrected the human-edited item Q82329450 to contain only data about Penam and not anymore about other substances, that are not to be namen Penam according to SciFinder. Kreuz Elf (talk) 14:00, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

Q2413616 was originally "Penam", I don't know why the label was changed. If they are the same they should be merged. Peter James (talk) 14:20, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 12:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Q117326045

Aristo International Hotel (Q117326045): hotel in Lao Cai, Vietnam: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 22:12, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep Additional identifiers and references added. How is Wikidata made better by removing a real place? Is the nominator fluent in Vietnamese sources? -Animalparty (talk) 03:38, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

The one identifier that you added is a Wikidata property for an identifier that does not imply notability (Q62589320) like the other identifiers present on this item. The article in the Khmer Times doesn't say much about the hotel, definitely not enough to make it notable. Same for the Forbes article (1 mentioning). Why should it be relevant if I speak Vietnamese or not? --Dorades (talk) 22:36, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 03:51, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

Oppose deletion for potentially usefulness in Wikivoyage listings.--GZWDer (talk) 16:02, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

Hm, basically every entity might be notable in the future, even something I made up this moment. --Dorades (talk) 19:44, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

This hotel is not in your imagination. It is a real place, a place where significant events can occur (meetings, deaths, etc.). Its basic existence, history, and ownership is already verified in "serious sources", even if there's no academic monograph documenting the size, layout and color scheme of every room. If this item is deleted, and next week a notable event happens there, the item will need to be recreated, which wastes time and energy. -Animalparty (talk) 02:08, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

As I wrote above, I don't think the references and identifiers present on this item make it notable. Can you show me where any kind of consensus was reached regarding items that might become notable in the future? --Dorades (talk) 17:05, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Q80579024

Carl Zeiss jena camera lens (Q80579024): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 19:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Apparently there's a lot of coverage about the Jena model of camera lens from Carl Zeiss, so...? DS (talk) 04:41, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

That may be the case, right now this item seems to be modeled to represent the Commons category which would not be notable according to WD:N. --Dorades (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

AFAIK, "Jena" is not a model, it's part of the company name: Carl Zeiss Jena GmbH (Q13521884). So the Commons category should be renamed for proper capitalization. --2A02:810B:581:C300:551D:5078:3FD3:855 09:21, 28 November 2024 (UTC)

Q102217072

Q102217072: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not existing object JAn Dudík (talk) 20:01, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

There is https://en.mapy.cz/zakladni?source=base&id=2286529&gallery=1&sourcep=foto&idp=3298798&x=14.3957198&y=48.9785816&z=19 from 2021, or is that somewhere else? Google street view from 2011, 2012, 2019 and 2023 shows what appears to be the base without a cross attached, so it could be a temporary structure on the same base. Peter James (talk) 13:12, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

@JAn Dudík Ping Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 11:49, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Well, some object exists here, so we can kepp it - but dont know how to remove RFD from item. MAybe I will find some sources in future... JAn Dudík (talk) 14:33, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Q106957769

Jeh Cyrus Vandrevala (Q106957769): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Only reference geni, where it is marked as private profile, no given name Child of Hoplamazian Q106967454 (talk) 04:33, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 04:41, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

this item and Cyrus Vandrevala (Q106957771) are notable by criteria 3 (spouse and son of Priya Niranjan Hiranandani (Q106957770)) - yona b (talk) 08:00, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

There is no evidence provided that it is about a son of "Priya Niranjan Hiranandani" and that the person in Geni has the name stored in the label in Wikidata. Child of Hoplamazian Q106967454 (talk) 17:50, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Note that "Child of Hoplamazian Q106967454" is now globally locked. Bovlb (talk) 05:23, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

Q106619290

Kuok Meng Jun (Q106619290): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Only reference geni, where it is marked as private profile, no given name Child of Hoplamazian Q106967454 (talk) 04:37, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 04:41, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Q75253495

Isabella Tennant (Q75253495): born 1964; elder sister of model Stella Tennant: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

For personal reasons Isabella Tennant would like the names of her children and spouse removed from the entry --86.24.224.165 12:48, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 8 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 12:51, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

If it is present on The Peerage website, it is impossible. I can't find it on source websites, but there is archived wersion, which clearly states this data: https://web.archive.org/web/20100719121735/http://www.thepeerage.com/p42972.htm#i429720 94.40.72.241 17:57, 28 November 2024 (UTC)

Q131341947

paternal niece (Q131341947): daughter of a sibling of the father: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This seems a more specific concept than we really need, and the description doesn't seem to reflect the actual concept. Am I missing something? Bovlb (talk) 17:43, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:51, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

By clicking on "edit" I managed to change the description and changed it to "daughter of a sibling of the father". Since when is a wrong description a reason for deletion? Child of Hoplamazian Q106967454 (talk) 17:56, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

The new description is a cousin, not a niece. Bovlb (talk) 18:05, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

@Bovlb These are terms used in Spanish, the opposite of maternal uncle or aunt (Q12446468) and paternal uncle or aunt (Q28017566). Madamebiblio (talk) 20:01, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

So should it be "daughter of a brother"? That would make more sense than either of the offered descriptions. Bovlb (talk) 20:26, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

The usage here is on relative (P1038) with the kinship to subject (P1039) qualifier as a more specific variant of niece (Q3403377). If we can decide what the meaning actually is, then I guess that makes sense, although I can't see a useful application of that sort of specificity. Why not just reify the sibling?

Since when is a wrong description a reason for deletion? Not being able to determine what underlying concept an item refers to is definitely a reason for deletion. Bovlb (talk) 20:51, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Are you not able? Child of Hoplamazian Q106967454 (talk) 00:04, 28 November 2024 (UTC)

• The original creator gave the description "daughter of one's sister", which sounds more like a maternal niece.
• You changed the description to "daughter of a sibling of the father" which is a type of cousin.
• Madamebiblio suggested "daughter of father's brother", which is a more specific type of cousin.
• You later changed the description to "daughter of one's brother", which matches my guess of what the term might mean.

So there doesn't seem to be a clear consensus on what the team means, even according to you. And no-one has addressed my other point. Bovlb (talk) 18:35, 28 November 2024 (UTC)

Both points in your first sentence of the request have been addressed. Rahul Varun Q113589827 (talk) 02:36, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

daughter of father's brother Madamebiblio (talk) 20:55, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

So a cousin and (in most families) not a niece at all. I don't see any agreement here on what this term refers to. Bovlb (talk) 20:58, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

maternal niece (Q131923726): daughter of a sibling of the mother: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Here's another example. The description is "daughter of a sibling of the mother", which appears to describe a cousin. Bovlb (talk) 18:34, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

 Keep The item had a clear original meaning - although it can be clarified or explained better. However, the reason given is "This seems a more specific concept than we really need" but it's a (maybe involuntarily) ethnocentric reason. Please see en:Kinship_terminology#Six_basic_patterns_of_kinship. In a lot of languages and cultures "daughter of one's father" daughter of one's father's brother is a different concept from "daughter of one's mother" daughter of one's mother's brother, although in English both are just female cousins (and "daughter of one's brother" and "daughter of one's sister" are also different concepts for what in English would just be "nieces"). Therefore, this item should be keep and cleaned as needed to clarify its meaning (and settle in one meaning) unless the same meaning already exists in other item and they could be merged.--Pere prlpz (talk) 11:10, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

(Yes, @Bovlb:, it was a typo although it took a couple of months to me to notice it).--Pere prlpz (talk) 19:04, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Perhaps this was just a typo, but I reject the idea that either "daughter of one's father" or "daughter of one's mother" would be considered to be cousins (in most families).

I originally said that "This seems a more specific concept than we really need", and it seems that I need to clarify what I mean by that. This item appears to be intended for use as a qualifier value on relative (P1038)/kinship to subject (P1039), While is is useful to provide meaningful distinctions, there is literally no limit to the number of possible relationships that could be reified, both in distance from the subject and in qualities of the intermediate individuals. This means that we have to draw the line somewhere.

It was suggested above that this term is commonly used in Spanish (and perhaps elsewhere). That's certainly a consideration, but it is not determinative. We should not be reifying every phrase that is commonly used in some language or culture. Such linguistic or ethnocentric bias is not a useful ontological principle. In particular, we should be asking questions like: Will using this representation help us to answer useful questions that we could otherwise not answer? Will using this representation made it harder to write common queries correctly? To what extent is it possible to represent the meaning of this concept ontologically, distinguishing it from its peers?

Looking at the talk page for P1039, there is a long discussion of how specific the qualifiers should be, considering age- and gender-specificity. Interestingly the discussion there seems to favour concepts like maternal cousin (Q42301620) and paternal cousin (Q42301631). Indeed we currently have 9 sub-types of first cousin, and 5 sub-types of niece. This seems to favour retaining this term, but I note that the meaning of "paternal" in "paternal cousin" and "paternal niece" is very different, a point which is reflected in some of the confused definitions that have been offered. Bovlb (talk) 18:55, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

I agree that precise and well defined concepts should be used, and this one has room for improvement.

However, if we want to avoid ethnocentrism we should aim for the maximum possible granularity. Some cultures use the same word for children of one's brother and children of one's sister while other cultures have the same word for children of one's siblings and for one's own children. Saying that the former distinction is unimportant (so we don't need distinct elements "one's brothers child" and "one's sister's child") but we need different elements for niece and child (son/daughter) is an (undestandable and involuntary) ethnocentric bias. Pere prlpz (talk) 19:11, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

I'm assuming that you mean the finest possible granularity here.

I don't think that's a reasonable goal, as there is no end to the potential qualification. The discussion I linked to supports the idea of coarser granularity. Personally I would be happy to merge "niece" and "nephew"; not all languages make that distinction, and there is a nascent effort to eliminate it in English (see niece or nephew (Q76477)). It's a cultural assumption that you need to verify everyone's gender just to describe a familial relation. Bovlb (talk) 19:31, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

Just a note that "Child of Hoplamazian Q106967454", whom I suspect may have been the original IP who created this item, has now been globally locked. Bovlb (talk) 05:14, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

Q130736822

Still Heroes (Q130736822): Interactive fiction by Exaheva: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non notable software/game/digital comic book. William Graham (talk) 16:09, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

Can it be merged with Still Heroes (Q111726552)? Piecesofuk (talk) 19:48, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

Q20088085

dictionary page in Wikipedia (Q20088085): MediaWiki page: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

A) Wikipedia articles cannot be dictionary pages, otherwise they violate the w:en:Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a dictionary rule. b) Subclass wiki page (Q111279923) explicitly define "different from (P1889) = encyclopedia article (Q13433827)", that are not compatible with "Wikipedia is an encyclopedia" rule. Vladis13 (talk) 22:12, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:21, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

Most instances of this are dictionary pages in the Haitian Creole Wikipedia. Peter James (talk) 10:06, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Q68419912

??? (Q68419912): 1959 journal article: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 21:30, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 5 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:41, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

Probably notable, but requires further research: The SIMBAD reference indicates the item is an article in a 1959 issue of Mitteilungen ueber Veraenderliche Sterne (Q106466689). Possibly the original title has been lost in translation or database maintenance, or the ADS record was corrupted. Someone who reads German and has access to a library holding the journal should be able to investigate and clarify the reference. And note there are similar enigmatic/incomplete bibliographic items such as ??? (Q68666745). -Animalparty (talk) 03:05, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

??? (Q68666745) has the same volume and page number as An objective-prism spectral survey of early-type stars in a region of Cassiopeia (Q68461151), and the articles linking to it have the description "star in the constellation Cassiopeia" or no description, so it's probably a duplicate and one of the years is wrong - other articles in volume 66 are said to have been published in 1989. I couldn't find anything that looked like a duplicate of ??? (Q68419912). Peter James (talk) 03:08, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

Q121833637

Al Anesa Farah – Music from the Original TV Series (Q121833637): 2019 soundtrack album by Adel Hakki: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The IP has a hang-up on Miss Farah and keeps creating made up items, I'm tired of trying to help them Moebeus (talk) 17:35, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:41, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete. The creator is a highly disruptive IP hopper who weirdly conflates international versions of TV shows with their originals. This detritus is just part of it; if there's something salvageable here it is not worth the effort, best to delete and let someone else make a new item in future. —Xezbeth (talk) 16:01, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Q7456546

Seth MacFarlane's Cavalcade of Cartoon Comedy, season 1 (Q7456546): season of television series: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This webseries never had anything more than one "season". There is no need for this item. --StarTrekker (talk) 19:05, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

On second thought, seems like there kinda was a first and second season, the first being released online, and the second released on home video.StarTrekker (talk) 20:56, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:41, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

Q131448763

J. Sam Williams (Q131448763): American pop artist with R&B: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

LTA-created item Chó Vàng Hài Hước (talk) 03:14, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

• Comment: the Vietnamese Wikipedia article appears to be bogus, with references referring to Sam Williams (Q131451385) (an American pop/country singer), but MusicBrainz and Discogs[6] suggest there may be a person who goes by "J. Sam Williams" or "J. Williams" or "Sam Williams", although notability is not fully established and it may be an elaborate hoax of multiple profiles. -Animalparty (talk) 05:20, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

 Delete once the Wikipedia articles are deleted. This is identical with Joseph Williams (Q131137970) and an ongoing spam attempt by numerous sockpuppets (cf. Wikidata:Requests for checkuser/Case/Quotewiki223). --Dorades (talk) 16:31, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

There are now three Wikipedia links. Bovlb (talk) 16:05, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

One left, TEWIKI, still with a deletion notice. Bovlb (talk) 18:53, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Noting that the tewiki article has not been deleted yet. –FlyingAce^✈hello 23:14, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

Q7722807

The Chronicles of Amber (Q7722807): book by Roger Zelazny: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Conflation. Item was originally created for en:The Chronicles of Amber (omnibus), an overview article covering various omnibus and collected editions of the novel series. The article was later turned into a redirect, here's the last proper version. The item's currently modeled like an item for a single novel, with imported data only from the first infobox of the article. The identifiers are for different omnibus/anthology editions. Since each of these books/editions would need it's own separate item, and the redirect doesn't refer to a specific topic that would warrant an item, there's little use in remodeling or keeping this one. --2A02:810B:581:C300:893E:901B:2BAF:72BC 00:31, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Q130518954

Lechitic culture (Q130518954): culture of Medieval Pomerania: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Orphaned, unnecessary and poorly defined item, no incoming links, no notability. Created by banned User:Kriestovo Nysian socks. Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk) 09:05, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

It's sitelinked to commons:Category:Lechitic culture - which has quite a bit of content. Seems notable? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 08:28, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

The wikidata and commons entries are all created by the same accounts to 'prove' the notability of each other. They are nevertheless completely fringe and should be deleted in both wikidata and commons. I strongly support deletion as well. Cplakidas (talk) 16:37, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

For reference on the extent of the disruption, see the sock investigation at Commons Cplakidas (talk) 16:38, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Q90269291

SEO agency (Q90269291): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 00:07, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

Are you suggesting that SEO agencies is not a real thing? Trade (talk) 01:56, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

No, that's not what I am saying. The item currently does not fulfill any of the notability criteria: no sitelinks, no (serious) references and no inlinks. Thus it is currently not notable. Btw, most items that are deleted are real things, but not notable for Wikidata. --Dorades (talk) 09:28, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:11, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Q87188717

Stellata Koppe (Q87188717): artist from the Netherlands: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Request by subject 1Veertje (talk) 12:31, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

Q60447364

Always Hungry (Q60447364): musical artist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This is an interesting case. Duplicate of Q59600601, deleted this last year for lack of notability, but has existed since 2019 and has an in-link. I established that the two items represent the same entity because of the shared Instagram and Twitter handles, and also by examination of photos (check the neck tattoo). Either we should delete this, or undelete and merge. Bovlb (talk) 01:06, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

@Fralambert Bovlb (talk) 01:07, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 01:11, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

 Delete together with YesBabyLisa (Q60445051) and Don't Be Shy (Q60447338). They are only linked to each other --Ameisenigel (talk) 16:02, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Q107139427

Alane Dias (Q107139427): Model and Ballet Dancer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Recreation of Q124331960; has commons category Bovlb (talk) 18:18, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

@The Squirrel Conspiracy Bovlb (talk) 18:18, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:21, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

@Bovlb No sitelinks remaining. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:16, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

~Template:~deleted --DeltaBot (talk) 17:41, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Double-checking this item, I find that it was repurposed from a different entity, Mirla Prado, a Brazilian lawyer who once appeared on Big Brother. Still of marginal notability. Bovlb (talk) 17:49, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Q128122929

NITron (Q128122929): Russian rapper, singer-songwriter and record producer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Recreation of Q113495064, Q117661611, Q116374568; six sitelinks, all under deletion request Bovlb (talk) 22:31, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:41, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Two sitelinks left, both under deletion request. Bovlb (talk) 21:31, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Still two sitelinks left. Bovlb (talk) 17:02, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Q124032127

UCSD Tritons softball scrimmage, November 9, 2019 (Q124032127): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable as an event or a category Quesotiotyo (talk) 22:51, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

It has a well-populated Commons category. Bovlb (talk) 00:16, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Also used by most of the images of this category [7]. Probably not a good use of description, but it need to be deleted in the images first. Fralambert (talk) 23:35, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Q68466327

SCP (Q68466327): video game series: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not a video game series Trade (talk) 07:34, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 07:41, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request regarding Max Nester

1. Q120474865 (delete | history | links | logs)
2. Q120474462 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Not notable. The claim that NPT Label (Q120474462) is one of the record labels of Bizyulka (Q120474324) is supported by a reference in ru.wp, but the given spotify page in this reference does not name that record label. It is also implausible that a label that was founded in 2021 (like stated in the item) should have released an album from 2006. Dorades (talk) 19:40, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Q108861794

Todd Kleine (Q108861794): Interim Chief Information Officer at Dominican University: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability is not demonstrated. Dorades (talk) 19:01, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request regarding Michelina Kozhakova-Hazzan

1. Q131415915 (delete | history | links | logs)
2. Q124801028 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 23:05, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Q131550912

Black Bear Diner's Homemade Chocolate Cream Pie (Q131550912): dessert at Black Bear Diner: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable pie Quesotiotyo (talk) 00:11, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Q131698950

Jeff Radwell (Q131698950): American author, entrepreneur, and scientist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Recreation of Q130946534, but now with better identifiers and sourcing; see en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Radwell Bovlb (talk) 17:19, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

• Camouflet (Q131699544): Technology company specializing in AI-driven pricing solutions: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Bovlb (talk) 17:20, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:22, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Q24023638

Parques Infantiles Multiaventura (Q24023638): park in Spain: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable; not a park as it is in a shopping center; outdated --Aguafluye (talk) 11:46, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

 Keep @Aguafluye Have a sitelink. Fralambert (talk) 13:34, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

ceb:Parques Infantiles Multiaventura is based on https://www.geonames.org/10297246/parques-infantiles-multiaventura.html, which was added by a GeoNames user and does not appear to be based on an official source. Peter James (talk) 17:34, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

There is indeed no park at the cooridnates. With my limited Spanish the title seems to match names of indoor playgrounds for kids. This seems to be an error in Geonames that Lsjbot turned into one of its many, many articles in cebwiki. I also think this is not notable but the WD-item can not be deleted as long as the article in cebwiki exists. Uschoen (talk) 20:24, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

I agree with Uschoen. A deletion request in cebwiki should be filed first. Pere prlpz (talk) 15:56, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request regarding LocationIQ map styles

1. Q121746460 (delete | history | links | logs)
2. Q124748380 (delete | history | links | logs)
3. Q124746368 (delete | history | links | logs)
4. Q126113580 (delete | history | links | logs)
5. Q126113613 (delete | history | links | logs)
6. Q126113091 (delete | history | links | logs)
7. Q126113813 (delete | history | links | logs)
8. Q126113892 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 18:53, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

@DaxServer, WiK14ot0g, Ms040got:. --Dorades (talk) 19:43, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi Dorades, first you mixed up something in your request. Secondly, I understand your focus on deleting stuff you don't find notable or don't understand, but could you please ask/inform myself before you always do a RfD. Third, it is not nice if someone just deletes all your work before talking about it (and more important before I could grab a json of the work, especially often I don't know what you request if it's already deleted, because 12h are to less to react. And wikidata is community work. Without nice communication it's not great to support and improve the project. And I like learning and contributing to the project, but you make it disappointing.

Let us discuss and let me learn.

Thanks Ms040got (talk) 08:43, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

I correct myself, because I did not know and I did not add the Indian people from 4.-8. , but why would you delete the companies? There are so many companies inside wikidata.

So where is the level of notability in them? Maybe the level of notability has to adapt to that de facto fact of that? Is there a discussion about it somewhere? Ms040got (talk) 08:49, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi Ms040got, thank you for your message. I understand that it can be discouraging to invest time and work in something which gets deleted afterwards, especially when you have the feeling of being left out of a discussion.

I think it is important to distinguish two things here:

1. the specific items in question,
2. the deletion process in general.

For the second aspect, the right venue would be WD:PC (like I already said last year). I personally can't change this process and I assume that not many people will read this here. I can also not affect how fast requests here are handled. Since this is the page for deletion requests I think this is the right venue to discuss whether specific items are notable or not or should be deleted for another reason. I don't think it is useful to spread these discussions to user talk pages. To inform you about this discussion I pinged you. All items should comply with WD:N and the people who create the respective items are responsible to demonstrate the notability in the items themselves.

The items in this deletion requests are linking to each other, this is why I nominated them here together. Apart from that, I don't see anything that makes any of these items notable according to our notability criteria. Of course I can be wrong or it turns out that these items are notable, but it's not demonstrated yet. If you think any or all of them are indeed notable, you can present your arguments here. Regards, --Dorades (talk) 23:38, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

I understand the thing with WD:N, but why are you so active in RfD with not having knowledge about the items you request?

Is the "notability not depending of the knowledge of the user? Is that not better to ask the person to correct the items instead of deleting. I mean In OpenStreetMap, you give a hint whats wrong and not delete the item.

First there was wikipedia, than wikidata started. Sure there are not always wikipedia articles for that in the beginning, but I guess there are millions of wikidata entities without wikipedia pages. So how you define "your" notability reasons for RfD?

In my consens, it is notable, because the field of work of the businesses and people is like Mapbox (Q17068357) or Google Maps (Q12013)

They play an important role for switch2OSM (Q122189289) as a contribution to OpenSource, like Wikimedia activities also do.

I understand that wikidata has their goals, but geolocation is part of that. Ms040got (talk) 08:22, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Which knowledge on my side do you miss? I see LocationIQ map styles (Q121746460) which is a "collection of osm map styles" according to its description (series of creative works (Q7725310) is probably the wrong item to use as instance of (P31) btw as it is applicable only to creative works) which is linked to the respective companies by using authority (P797) which is also not applicable here. The companies are linked to their directors/founders/CEOs and these are linked to more companies and these again to their directors/founders/CEOs.

What is important here is that none of these items meet any of the criteria described on WD:N on its own. You are right that most of the Wikidata items do not have a sitelink, but ideally they fulfill WD:N #2 or #3 then. I don't see this demonstrated for the items in question. Now it might be the case that these items are notable, then please add relevant statements/links/references to the items. It's not about my personal idea of notability but about the criteria accepted by the Wikidata community. Contrary, the notability of items must be apparent for everyone and items should be modeled in a manner that anyone can understand what the entity is about and what it describes.

Please also note that not every entity (be it companies, be it people, be it abstract concepts) is notable for Wikidata. We also don't model every detail about Wikidata or Wikipedia. Even if Wikimedians should have their own items is controversial. --Dorades (talk) 21:08, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi,

but maps and all cartographic work is creative work, so also map styles in every derivative version.

a question because of „authority“ because I added it. Is that wrong and how to improve the entry? Thanks. WiK14ot0g (talk) 09:20, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Hm, I don't think so, since. If it is indeed a series, I'd use sequence (Q20937557). Not that series is characterised by being an "ordered set". Maybe group (Q16887380) or collection (Q2668072) is more applicable here?

As for authority (P797): I don't know exactly what you are trying to model here, but I think owned by (P127) could be used. If you just want to say that LocationIQ map styles (Q121746460) is product of LocationIQ (Q124746368), it's enough to have it modeled there.

I'd like to note though that all of this doesn't contribute to demonstrate the notability of these items. --Dorades (talk) 15:45, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

thanks for the answers. I read WD-N again, what does the 2nd criteria ("

It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references.")

exactly mean?

I always refer to another instance which is valid or identify it as an material entity. And if there are public sources (websites, scientific papers, lexixa) it should be fine? Ms040got (talk) 20:47, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

The key point in this sentence is that these references must be "serious". Scientific papers or entries in encyclopedias are for sure serious in this meaning. For websites, it depends; if it is a website by e.g. a state government or major media, it can be considered serious and reliable, too. Not so much if that website is controlled by the entity itself or a social media profiles or other self-published resources. Also state registers of companies, where every company is listed, are not considered serious (cf. Wikidata:What Wikidata is not: "White or Yellow Pages"). --Dorades (talk) 07:45, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Q126394863

clicker game (Q126394863): subtype of incremental games that focus on rapid and repetitive clicking to earn resources, with upgrades to automate and enhance the clicking process: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable on its own. Same as incremental game (Q18351283) --Kim Kelting (talk) 00:29, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 10 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 00:31, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

The genres are different, as evidenced by both reliable sources and many user sources explicitly pointing out the difference between the terms. We've discussed this extensively on my talk page, but the nominator continues to be stubborn, ignoring most of the arguments, insisting that since they are sometimes listed via ‘also known as’ there is no difference. But I've added scholarly articles that explicitly state that one is a sub-genre of the other. Solidest (talk) 07:11, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Q106642728

S. TIMOSHENKO, 69, CHURCH ARCHITECT; Exiled Ukrainian Leader Dies --Had Designed Edifices for Greek Orthodox Faith (Q106642728): obituary of Sergius Timoshenko in the New York Times: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No structural need (entirety of item can be represented in the references at Q9335552) Quesotiotyo (talk) 01:45, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 01:51, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

I would vote to  Keep but I'd be interested to know the official policy on these obituaries. When I've come across them they're usually instance of (P31) scholarly article (Q13442814) and I would add instance of (P31) obituary (Q309481) and I would link to them using stated in (P248)

But re the above item, running a SPARQL query for obituary (Q309481) in The New York Times (Q9684) there seems to be over 20000 of them see https://w.wiki/Ck9V would they all be deleted? Piecesofuk (talk) 18:30, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Q131139947

Love between animal conspecifics (Q131139947): type of affection between animals of the same kind: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This item was created by user:Prototyperspective as an excuse to make File:DALL·E 2023-04-24 21.48.18 - two pigs, hearts, valentine's day.png in use, after the file was listed for deletion on Commons. Fails Wikidata:Notability. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 18:07, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

It wasn't made as an "excuse" for anything. This is an incredibly notable major concept and that is why I made the Wikidata item. I may create a Wikipedia article about it at a later point once I have some time for that. It's clearly notable and I wonder why you can't see that. Also some sources about it are included in the item. Also see w:WP:AGF. Prototyperspective (talk) 21:57, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

 Keep The academic publications provided are clearly "serious and publicly available references" in the sense of WD:N #2. (I also just added another one myself as reference for the statement that this is different from Q2431958.) As for "excuse", that accusation could equally be leveled against the act of nominating a Wikidata item for deletion with the motivation of "winning" a deletion discussion on Commons. But in any case this should be decided on the merits (i.e. applicable Wikidata content policies) rather than based on speculations about editors' motivations. Regards, HaeB (talk) 13:52, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

Q131318709

Danbert Nobacon and The Bad Things (Q131318709): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not much information available, besides Spotify id, they are verified, but only 6 listeners per month. Not sure what makes this band notable. Mbch331 (talk) 12:39, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

This is a project by Nigel "Danbert Nobacon" Hunter (formerly of Chumbawamba). Does that make a difference, I couldn't say. DS (talk) 15:25, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:21, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Q116170766

Madrid city (Q116170766): capital and largest city of Spain: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

Isn't this the same as Q2807? AdamSeattle (talk) 16:50, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:01, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Possibly better than having Q2807 link to itself with capital (P36):Madrid (Q2807). The population is the same for both according to the INE code (P772); if the boundaries are also the same coextensive with (P3403) could be used. Peter James (talk) 20:18, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Q66831776

Arrivo della Madonna Annunziata (Q66831776): religious themed murals in Ficarra, Messina: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Unused, no ref, just a supposed wall painting unfindable GiovanniPen (talk) 18:17, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Q72932755

Emil Cerda (Q72932755): Dominican writer and orator: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Promotional content, deleted several times now in different languages as spam: en, es, fr --Bsckr (talk) 19:23, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:31, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Q121354166

Digital Marketing Tools in the Conditions of Transformation of Communications of the Modern Organization (Q121354166): scientific article published in 2020: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Unclear notability as the DOI doesn't resolve. Dorades (talk) 20:25, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

 Keep It's a real verifiable article in Scientific Journal of Yuriy Fedkovich Chernivtsi National University. Economics (Q131820349). As you know, linkrot and unresolved DOIs are issues unrelated to notability. The article starts on page 32. It's in Ukrainian with an English summary at the end. -Animalparty (talk) 21:47, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Q131814713

Tree 1 (Q131814713): Tree in Park Merwestein, Dordrecht: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

A non-notable individual tree Multichill (talk) 20:56, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

 Keep If you'd taken a few more seconds to look at this item you would've seen it commemorates the founder of the foundation behind this park. Spughetti (talk) 14:40, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

How does that make the tree notable? Multichill (talk) 17:22, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Q131611851

Tree 23 (Q131611851): Tree in Park Merwestein, Dordrecht: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

A non-notable individual tree Multichill (talk) 20:56, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

 Keep Trees in parks are notable, adding each tree in the Merwestein Park to Wikidata preserves the history of this park's nature. Spughetti (talk) 14:38, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

How does that make the tree notable? This item might help the park, but doesn't help Wikidata at all. Multichill (talk) 17:23, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Q131826389

Viktor Melnikov (Q131826389): Russian photographer, active 1980s: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Created by mistake Sabelöga (talk) 21:21, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

 Keep. Mistaken or not, it's identifiable per WD:V#2. As originally created, the item has an identifier for Photographers' Identities Catalog, which references Photography Database (Q107044473). That database indicates the photographer was featured in Comrades and Cameras: Photographs from Latvia and Other Soviet Republics, an art exhibition at the Santa Barbara Museum of Art (Q7419233) described here. It's possible that the exhibition publication itself has more information to further describe the subject. -Animalparty (talk) 23:40, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Q127605516

Josh Wolfe (Q127605516): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable Ameisenigel (talk) 16:18, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:21, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Q55195985

Arishfa Khan (Q55195985): Indian television child actress: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Guwiki article no longer exists Midleading (talk) 03:46, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

 Keep. Wikidata notability is not determined by Guwiki, Enwiki, nor any other Wikipedia. Appears to meet WD:N#2 by verifiable roles in Uttaran (Q2004375), Ek Veer Ki Ardaas...Veera (Q5350254), etc. per celebrity news coverage in Hindustan Times, The Tribune, and other sources. -Animalparty (talk) 04:57, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Has non-empty Commons category. Bovlb (talk) 20:40, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Q99312

Claudia Udenta (Q99312): German director: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

Verletzung Persönlichkeitsrechte, right to be forgotten Conny (talk) 20:03, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Blanking reverted. Users warned.

Previous discussions: Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions/Archive/2025/01/05#Q99312, Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions/Archive/2025/01/20#Q99312

Bovlb (talk) 20:13, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

I have given OP a 1 week partial block from this item for blanking again after warning. There's no previous discussion in the two prior requests about removing any information from this item. If some information needs to be excluded, we can discuss that here. Bovlb (talk) 20:28, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Relevant discussions:

• en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akdemir Udenta
• tr:Vikipedi:Silinmeye aday sayfalar/Akdemir Udenta
• de:Wikipedia:Löschprüfung/Archiv/2024/Woche_51#NiL_Verlag_(erl.,_bleibt_gelöscht)
• de:Wikipedia:Löschprüfung/Archiv/2024/Woche_47#Claudia_Udenta_(gelöscht)
• de:Wikipedia:Löschkandidaten/31._Oktober_2024#NiL_Verlag_(gelöscht)
• de:Wikipedia:Löschkandidaten/22._Dezember_2023#Claudia_Udenta_(bleibt)
• de:Wikipedia:Administratoren/Anfragen/Archiv/2024/November#Artikel_und_Informationen_rund_um_Claudia_Udenta
• de:Wikipedia:Vandalismusmeldung/Archiv/2024/11/06#Seite_Claudia_Udenta_(erl.)
• pl:Wikipedia:Poczekalnia/biografie/2023:12:22:Akdemir Udenta

Bovlb (talk) 21:12, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

@Bovlb: I just reverted edits by an IP on the item. Samoasambia ✎ 00:21, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Thanks. I was afraid that might happen. I've applied a week of semi-protection. Bovlb (talk) 00:29, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

I reviewed the sources on the (deleted) ENWIKI article. Most of the references are now dead links. This interview is very thin. There's some bibliography/filmography, but all red-link or no-link. I can provide more details if required.

From some of the previous discussions, it seems that there's a long history of (someone claiming to be) the subject seeking deletion of articles about them. They don't seem highly notable, but they do have many identifiers. I'm sympathetic to the privacy concerns, but recreation here at Wikidata seems likely while they remain in the other databases. Bovlb (talk) 00:43, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

It doesn't look like the OP has any interest either in explaining why this item should be deleted (specifically what has changed since the last two keeps), or what specific claims should be excluded. Shall we close this as "keep"? If so, we should probably apply some longer semi-protection given the history here. Bovlb (talk) 17:08, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

The information given is mainly incorrect, based on false sources and subjective suggestions. The person of this data entry has not given permission to publish any information relating. There have been several deletion requests this year already for a reason. Please delete this data entry completely as it violates the person's privacy rights and the right to be forgotten. Please respect the rules of the GDPR, LED, and EUDPR. The Wikimedia office in Berlin was informed about it as well. You can verify with them. This entry does not relate to a relevant person. One DNB entry does not create relevance. Thanks. 2A01:599:141:3EE:9C57:3767:1E54:3568 22:53, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Just out of curiosity: How is this page and entry valuable, when "Most of the references are now dead links." (as per your statement on 24 Jan 2025).

What is the use to be transmitting a name (even falsely) into 20 languages. Who is interested in knowing the name of this person in Arabic, Egptian Arabic, Bavarian, Asturian, Welsh, Divehi, Irish, Papiemento or Albanic?

The contents are based on non-existing sources. Without sources, there is no content allowed. This was cleaned up for a reason that does not need to be spread publicly.

You put "protecting" or "archiving" given data before actually seeing the issue at hand.

This Wikidata was derived from Wikipedia which was deleted, because it was violating the given data protection laws.

All details about occupations: director, translator, writer, publisher, etc are false.

And how was the citizenship information produced? Did you see the passport? Is Wikidata a governmental entity now?

Please delete this content. It is illegal and an infringement on personal and privacy rights. You may contact your SV at oversight-de-wp@wikimedia.org to get the confirmation about deleting this data entry. Thanks for understanding. Please delete this entry. 80.187.87.211 23:32, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

This comment appears to be a response to me, and it reflects a confusion about the role I am playing here. I am not taking a position either way, but acting in an administrative and fact-finding capacity. In my responses above, I have attempt to dig up all relevant evidence related to this item, regardless of whether it suggests we should keep or delete it. My suggestion that we might have to close it as "keep" was based on the fact that we have already reached that conclusion twice, and no new arguments had been offered. We're happy to entertain a third discussion, but you should concentrate on actually making new arguments, not on attacking people who are trying to help you. Bovlb (talk) 00:51, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

The identifiers link to the sources. Some have been removed but there are still the Library of Congress and the French and German libraries. GND ID (P227) and Library of Congress authority ID (P244) say they suggest notability but are not expected to be complete; IdRef ID (P269) does not specify but is probably the same. I think that means it's unnecessary to have all records from them, just those that are likely to be useful, and this item in Wikidata is not being used anywhere. Peter James (talk) 19:56, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

please delete: The entry on Claudia Udenta should be deleted from Wikidata due to legal and ethical concerns regarding personal data protection. Under the GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation, Article 17) and the EUDPR (European Union Data Protection Regulation), individuals have the right to request the removal of personal information that is no longer relevant or necessary for public interest. Keeping an entry with unverified or outdated data violates the principle of data minimization, which is a key requirement in European data protection laws. Additionally, the Law Enforcement Directive (LED) emphasizes the need to protect individuals from unauthorized or unnecessary data exposure, particularly when no legal or journalistic justification exists. Given that Wikipedia has already deleted the corresponding article due to a lack of notability, maintaining the entry in Wikidata contradicts established deletion decisions and could expose Wikimedia to legal challenges under European privacy regulations.

The DNB entry alone does not establish lasting notability, as it primarily serves as a cataloging tool rather than a definitive measure of public relevance. Conny (talk) 17:03, 30 January 2025 (UTC).

Q131869371

Red Bull Flugtag 2011 (Moscow) (Q131869371): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No notability of this event for a separate item A.Savin (talk) 10:35, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

 Comment Used in description on Commons, have to be replace there first. Fralambert (talk) 21:10, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

For me its typical event that should be on Wikidata. PMG (talk) 10:45, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request regarding José Rafael Cordero Sánchez

1. Q107341677 (delete | history | links | logs)
2. Q19756574 (delete | history | links | logs)
3. Q104450790 (delete | history | links | logs)
4. Q104450820 (delete | history | links | logs)
5. Q108294362 (delete | history | links | logs)
6. Q110113397 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Fail WP:N, not relevant and not linked to any projects outside Wikidata. The items were created and are related to the cross-wiki LTA José Rafael Cordero Sánchez, who has persistently created autopromotional articles for almost 14 years now (nl:Wikipedia:Checklijst langdurig structureel vandalisme/Josercs1).
See also the previous discussions Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2019/10/11#Q56653802 and User talk:LadyInGrey#Pedido. NoonIcarus (talk) 12:50, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Roxana Chacón (Q19756574) and Q107341677 were repurposed, now reverted, but the original entities did not establish strong notability. Bovlb (talk) 18:15, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Q118732565

Gold (Q118732565): 16th upcoming open movie by the Blender Animation Studio: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

I created this item for an announced short film by the Blender Studio. New information from the Blender Studio is that the project is cancelled. This item is thereby no longer usefull --D-Kuru (talk) 10:19, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 10:21, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

"No longer useful" - we list projects that were announced but then cancelled, yes? DS (talk) 19:50, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

First time in two decades they cancelled a project. It's easier to collect content on commons if you can include an item right away. But don't worry, next time I'll blank it and just say I created this by accident. --D-Kuru (talk) 09:54, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Q11529991

Daisuke Matsuoka (Q11529991): association football player: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. jawiki article has been deleted. Kokage si (talk) 15:13, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Q122954226

TSV 07 Grettstadt (Q122954226): Bavarian sports club: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Article was deleted in the German Wikipedia, no relevance, no article in another Wikipedia --Nordprinz (talk) 17:29, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

The creation of the item is unrelated to the Wikipedia article. https://editgroups.toolforge.org/b/OR/cfca648b5f7/ 702 items created, probably all with no Wikipedia article. Possibly notable for Wikidata but not for German Wikipedia. Peter James (talk) 14:26, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request regarding Freifunk Bodensee

1. Q66089535 (delete | history | links | logs)
2. Q64008116 (delete | history | links | logs)
3. Q64008049 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 20:22, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Along with see-base (Q63729340). --Dorades (talk) 16:39, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Q131904651

Open Government Data License - Bangladesh (Q131904651): OGD Bangladesh: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty. doesn't meet WD:N. Borhan (talk) 07:19, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 07:21, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Q131904751, another one with same reason. Borhan (talk) 07:24, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Template:OGDL-Bangladesh (Q131904751) has a Commons sitelink; Template:OGD-Bangladesh (Q131904622) has none, and both link to Open Government Data License - Bangladesh (Q131904651). Wikidata:Notability contradicts itself on templates with one sitelink: "item must contain at least two such sitelinks", "Items for non-subpages can be created with only one sitelink, but shouldn't be created in great numbers". Peter James (talk) 14:18, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Q12565759

Sergey Tishkov (Q12565759): Soviet-Kazakh athlete: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item --Nurken (talk) 18:39, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

It has two sitelinks and some info, definitely not empty. Ymblanter (talk) 20:34, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Sergey Tishkov (Q131917325) is a Russian skater with a similar name but different date of birth. Might be relevant somehow. -Animalparty (talk) 03:54, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

 Keep There was only a sitelink, which was moved to Sergey Tishkov (Q97277442) leaving Q12565759 empty; that item was merged to Q12565759. Peter James (talk) 14:10, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Q130533236

The Orca's Universe (Q130533236): universe created by Wolfykh: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Overwhelming lack of notability among this fictional universe and its thousands of interconnected items Quesotiotyo (talk) 05:21, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:31, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

My main issue is that i have no clue what any of these items are even about. Trade (talk) 14:25, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

I also don't know what to make of this walled garden. Is it just music? A web series? Both? The creator also made a bunch of items about French musicians such as Pyrorca (Q29345273) and Lok Low (Q88212894), which I'm assuming are all connected to whatever this is. —Xezbeth (talk) 15:32, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Q111270757

Truffle Belly - Gondangdia (Q111270757): restaurant in Indonesia: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability Medelam (talk) 15:24, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Q131925656

Q131925656: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Duplicated of Treason in Japan (Q57552238), thank you for your cooperation --106.178.186.82 12:09, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Q128640626

list of Lot Fire Records artists (Q128640626): Wikimedia list article: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not meet WD:N? Nutshinou (talk) 15:55, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:01, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request: Dj 4Rain

1. Q38260664 (delete | history | links | logs)
2. Q42294829 (delete | history | links | logs)
3. Q42295010 (delete | history | links | logs)
4. Q98060320 (delete | history | links | logs)
5. Q98060556 (delete | history | links | logs)
6. Q100160439 (delete | history | links | logs)
7. Q100160794 (delete | history | links | logs)
8. Q102111953 (delete | history | links | logs)
9. Q104831576 (delete | history | links | logs)
10. Q110476415 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Does not meet WD:N? Nutshinou (talk) 16:05, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Q15631964

Portal:Midi-Pyrénées (Q15631964): Wikimedia portal: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No more wikipedia item Chaoborus (talk) 20:30, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:41, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Q124614350

Mohsen Pakaein (Q124614350): Iranian diplomat: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The same as Q16370602. --Yousiphh (talk) 21:24, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:31, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Q24303408

Delete Because” no description on the subject, appears no being notable. 2600:387:F:7830:0:0:0:6 22:13, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Q131929717

Q131929717: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Repetido Shooke (talk) 00:15, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Q130772344

Diesel Medina (Q130772344): Colombian Actor, Producer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No notability. fake data on imdb. --47.38.138.157 05:50, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 06:01, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Q131757805

Bundesglasfaser (Q131757805): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

I might be missing the joke here, but I don't think that an item about a random telecommunications cord in Berlin meets the notability criteria, especially since the statements are unsourced. For reference, also check the Commons category linked to this item. --Gnom (Diskussion) make Wikipedia green! 09:10, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Also:

HDMI LAN tester (Q131626691): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Heltec (Q131611471): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Heltec (Q131611471): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Weather Gadget (Q131598618): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Maybe @C.Suthorn is confused about the difference between instance of (P31) and subclass of (P279), but that doesn't explain the coordinates. Bovlb (talk) 03:35, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Ich bin confused über P-dies und P-das. Wenn ich also mal das falsche P singe, kannst Du das gerne verbessern. Ich bin bei WM, um Fotos und Videos zur Verfügung zu stellen, damit andere Leute diese auf ihrer Website, in einem Buch einer Broschüre oder in einem MW-Projekt wiederverwenden können. Damit dies geschieht, müssen diese anderen Leute die Bilder erst einmal finden. Auf Commons werden Bilder gefunden über Kategorien, die ein "wikidata infobox"-Template enthalten, das meistens ein Kalenderdatum, ein Beispielbild, bei geograf. Objekten eine Landkarte enthält und über depict-items, die an die einzelnen Bilder angehängt werden. Für beides wird ein Q-item auf wikidata benötigt. Da die wikidata-community nicht nach commons kommt um nachzusehen, welche q-items dafür nötig sind, lege ich fehlende q-items halt selber an. Wikidata ist aber nicht mein Projekt. Ich bin nur hier, um Bilder und Videos beizutragen, damit Menschen die diese Bilder und Videos gebrauchen können, sie auch beziehen können. C.Suthorn (@Life_is@no-pony.farm - p7.ee/p) (talk) 08:42, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Dieser Glasfaserkasten ist nicht zufällig. Er befindet sich in einer Sichtlinie mit Kanzleramt, Reichstag, Paul-Löbe-Haus und wurde für die Feiern zum 75 Jahrestag des Grundgesetzes dort aufgestellt um die Infostände der Bundesministerien und weiterer Bundesbehörden wie dme Statistischen Bundesamt und der Antidiskriminierungsstelle des Bundes mit Internet zu versorgen. Es gibt im Regierungsviertel (das mit unterirdischer Infrastruktur versorgt wird und keine Wohnbebauung enthält, die mit Internet versorgt werden müsste) keinen weiteren derartigen Anschlusskasten. Nach der Feier vor vielen Monaten wurde er offenbar schlicht vergessen und spiegelt den bedauerlichen Zustand der Digitalpolitik (mit wiederkehrenden Data und Privacy Breaches bei Politik, Gesundheitsinstitutionen, Parteien wider). C.Suthorn (@Life_is@no-pony.farm - p7.ee/p) (talk) 05:46, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

That is all very nice, but does not make the item notable. Gnom (Diskussion) make Wikipedia green! 07:23, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Hat das was mit dem Vorwurf auf Commons zu tun, ich würde nicht "wollen, dass die Bilder gefunden werden"? Die WMF hat als Nachfolger für die kaputten Commons-Kategorien "SDC" erschaffen. Damit eine Kategorie auf Commons eine "wikidata"-Infobox haben kann (und alle Kategorien auf Commons sollen eine solche haben!), benötigt die Kategorie ein Q-item auf Wikidata. Damit eine semantische Suche nach den Bildern mmöglich ist, benötigen die Bilder einen depict-Eintrag, der ein Q-Item auf commons referenziert. Ohne verschlechtern sich die Möglichkeiten ein Bild zu finden und dann auch nachzunutzen erheblich. C.Suthorn (@Life_is@no-pony.farm - p7.ee/p) (talk) 08:30, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Die Commons-Kategorie wird auch gerade gelöscht. Gnom (Diskussion) make Wikipedia green! 09:22, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

• Nonsensical content,  Delete please. --A.Savin (talk) 21:20, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Q112997611

This EHPAD is closed since 2022 (see https://annuaire-entreprises.data.gouv.fr/etablissement/26381006100881), the building is now used to shelter Ukrainian refugees (see https://www.entraide-pierrevaldo.org/nos-implantations/, column 2, line 3) and this kind of shelters is (currently) useless in wikidata database Yunan973 (talk) 16:49, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Q86727631

Q86727631: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Only a Wiktionary redirect (ja:同等). Peter James (talk) 19:13, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Q131723668

Adam L Redolfi (Q131723668): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No notability --47.38.138.157 09:03, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Q131952578

Skoblewski (Q131952578): family name: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 22:09, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 00:01, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

 Withdrawn. --Dorades (talk) 23:50, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Q131952682

Sapohova (Q131952682): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Exists already (under Q4408094 ) I created it by mistake, difficult to find because Ukrainian spelling quite different, and difficulty to read cyrillic alphabeth --Kbamert (talk) 22:54, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request: Mahathir Mohamad in ... commons categories

1. Q131938984 (delete | history | links | logs)
2. Q131939098 (delete | history | links | logs)
3. Q131939157 (delete | history | links | logs)
4. Q131939039 (delete | history | links | logs)
5. Q131977875 (delete | history | links | logs)
6. Q131977574 (delete | history | links | logs)
7. Q131977289 (delete | history | links | logs)
8. Q131938928 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

These items for categories @commons with photographs of Mahathir Mohamad (Q181383) in various countries are not notable. Lymantria (talk) 06:29, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Q113713796

rinsed milk mixtures (Q113713796): dairy waste product produced during cleaning of processing equipment in a dairy plant: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails notability --141.22.73.116 11:20, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Q56513601

Jean-Michel Amor (Q56513601): Business leader: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This item should be deleted for multiple compelling reasons: 1) Clear lack of notability - No significant media coverage or reliable secondary sources; professional activities appear routine rather than exceptional; LinkedIn and social media presence alone do not establish notability 2) Data quality - Zero references for 8/10 claims; no labels/descriptions in any language; claims cannot be verified against reliable sources 3) Privacy considerations - Subject appears to be private individual; contains personal data from social media without clear public interest justification 4) Maintenance - Creates unnecessary administrative overhead; sets problematic precedent for including non-notable individuals 5) Policy violations - Falls below notability threshold; violates verifiability principle with most claims unreferenced; similar items previously deleted --LuminaireGaulois (talk) 11:29, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

If you think they are reasons for deletion why have you created Q131983860 (which was already deleted as Q126951783) and added a date and place of birth without a reference? Q56513601#P39 is possibly less routine than anything in that item and has less personal information - Q131983860#P166 is possibly notable (there are items for the 2019 and 2020 recipients) but I'm not sure as it was deleted before. The only thing I'm not sure about is if everything in Q56513601 is about the same person. Peter James (talk) 12:48, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Peter James: Thank you for raising these points. Let me address the specific evidence regarding Q56513601:

The only verifiable reference is a single La Dépêche article (27/12/2013) which actually strengthens the case for deletion:

1. Limited Role & Duration

- The article documents a brief 3-month tenure (September-December 2013) as president of TMB

- The position ended in removal due to internal conflicts

- Subject remained only as a minority shareholder afterward

2. Verification Issues

- The second claimed reference (lejournaltoulousain.fr) is a dead link

- 8 out of 10 claims in the item remain completely unreferenced

- Claims about education, language abilities, and career history have no sources

- The image file lacks source and copyright information

3. Notability Concerns

- The only verified activity is a brief, unsuccessful leadership position at a local sports club

- No evidence of lasting impact or broader recognition

- No reliable secondary sources beyond this single local news coverage

- Coverage focuses on internal administrative disputes rather than notable achievements

4. Privacy & Data Quality

- Most biographical content appears sourced from social media

- Contains personal data (education, languages, social media IDs) without public interest justification

- Several unverified claims about professional activities

This case clearly falls below Wikidata's notability threshold and maintaining such entries creates unnecessary administrative overhead. Request for deletion stands.  Delete

LuminaireGaulois (talk) 18:41, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Blanking reverted. OP warned. Bovlb (talk) 17:31, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Q108420858

Robert Duncan's grave (Q108420858): grave in Kolkata, India: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

I see no indication of notability. --StarTrekker (talk) 19:27, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

If deleted, it should be with Robert Duncan (Q108349825). Seem someone wnated to create all the tombs from this cemetery. Fralambert (talk) 23:59, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

 Delete. Yes, over 1000 "grave of X" items were created by Indrajitdas, based apparently solely on entries in Find a Grave, Commonwealth War Graves Commission, and other similar databases, e.g. Cecil John Yates's grave (Q108519468). They should all be deleted as redundant, frivolous, non-notable, non-needed items, that are best expressed as properties of the person items they represent with place of burial (P119). Everyone who has ever lived has a birth date, height, and most have had hair and a death date, but we need not and should not exponentially create increasingly granular items for every conceivable aspect of every conceivable human for "birth date of X", "hair color of X", "death date of X", "height of X", etc. The only exceptions would be if the grave/burial plot itself (not the cemetery or the person interred) is independently notable, e.g. an historic landmark. Not every tomb is equivalent to, nor warrants the same treatment as, Grant's Tomb (Q1025105). -Animalparty (talk) 00:17, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

Q131304666

Q131304666: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No label defined, subjects exists at new label Q131584253 --Surayeproject3 (talk) 21:19, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Q47487959

Ilula-Niinemets (Q47487959): family name: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Two separate family names were mistakenly combined into one (see Q16406348) Quesotiotyo (talk) 21:46, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request: Favoursimon11

@Favoursimon11

This user has created 75 items. Eight have a link to https://thehospitalbook.com/ so we might choose to keep those as they could be argued to fulfill half of N2, but the rest have no indication of notability. They have not responded to feedback.

Item creations by Favoursimon11

Bovlb (talk) 00:32, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Q66480449

Wikimedia surname disambiguation page (Q66480449): type of Wikimedia disambiguation page: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

Old RFD (Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions/Archive/2020/01/21#Wikimedia_disambiguation_page_subclasses) ended due to "withdrawn". For me this surname disambiguation page seems to be existing because of solo project of svwiki sv:Kategori:Efternamnsförgreningssidor. Surnames are different from DAB stuff and shouldn't be messed with each other Estopedist1 (talk) 08:00, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:01, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Also courtesy ping for the creator: user:Moebeus--Estopedist1 (talk) 08:02, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

I appreciate the courtesy and won't be protesting your request:) Moebeus (talk) 12:38, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

Q124427614

Category:Blue street signs in Tyumen (Q124427614): Wikimedia category: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Commons categories are not notable on their own, see WD:N 1.4; AFAICT the item isn’t used anywhere except in the Wikidata infobox at c:Category:Blue street signs in Tyumen, where it doesn’t add much value either Lucas Werkmeister (talk) 12:00, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

And I think this also applies to many other categories this user created in February 2024 :( @RG72 – I’m thankful for your other edits, many of which look good, but all these category items (Category:Hand sanitizers during the COVID-19 pandemic in Tyumen (Q124739423), Category:Sculptures of Korean dragons in Tyumen (Q124608469), Category:Photographs of flags of South Korea in Tyumen (Q124570519), Category:COVID-19 vaccination centers in Tyumen (Q124458408), Category:Solar panels in Tyumen (Q124435892), Category:Off-road vehicles of TyumenNIIgiprogas (Q124418028), Category:Videos of automobiles in Tyumen (Q124418025), etc. etc.) should not have been created. Commons categories are mostly only notable if they’re also found in other projects (like Category:People from Tyumen (Q7930503)) or in a few other special cases (see the notability policy for details). Lucas Werkmeister (talk) 12:15, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

 Delete Clear bulk delete. But should be left open for a few days so RG72 sees the ping. Infrastruktur (talk) 13:06, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

I created these and other categories based on the fact that Commons is an important project that has independent value, and therefore it is important to classify materials so that they can be found as quickly and easily as possible - for use in other wiki projects or outside the wiki, which also happens often. Otherwise, huge categories with hundreds of images are formed, in which it is difficult to find what is needed for a particular case. RG72 (talk) 14:37, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

As an example, I took the category system for Ukraine, Taiwan and Japan, which is very developed in Commons and often such categories have entries in Wikidata, which allows you to create information boxes in Commons, as in Shop windows in Ukraine. If this is against the rules, I apologize, I just followed the above examples. RG72 (talk) 05:17, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

Q120749551

Q120749551: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Unclear and unused, maybe unexisting sculpture, no ref GiovanniPen (talk) 14:57, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

It's a wooden sculpture of a winged lion. It's described on the sculptor's website (via archive.org) https://web.archive.org/web/20230719112143/https://www.martalar.it/2023/05/12/leone-alato/ There are a few sources that describe it and where it was located https://www.7comunionline.it/2023/10/02/arriva-a-gallio-il-leone-alato-di-vaia-di-marco-martalar/ https://www.mart.tn.it/en/mostre/martalar-collective-space-natural-space-153684 https://www.asiago.it/en/video/art_the_leone_alato_of_vaia-marco_martalars_sculpture_made_on_the_asiago_plateau_and_on_display_at_the_venice_film_festival/ https://www.jesolosandnativity.it/en/il-leone-alato-di-vaia-rimane-a-jesolo/ Piecesofuk (talk) 20:17, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Q16050427

Afshar Kasimlu (Q16050427): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The same as Q16366370. --Yousiphh (talk) 18:54, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Wrong request. They are two different people. Yousiphh (talk) 18:59, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Q110047743

Lai-Fatt (Q110047743): family name: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 20:16, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

I believe this may be a misspelling of "LaiFatt" (the surname of performer Kerry LaiFatt). DS (talk) 01:08, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

I can't tell for sure, but it's definitely related to Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions/Archive/2025/01/27#Q108518526 and the user apparently tried to link this non-notable person to notable persons like the one you mentioned. --Dorades (talk) 17:12, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

Q20110665

Ali Akbar (Q20110665): male given name: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The same as Q60937650. --Yousiphh (talk) 09:53, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

 Merged - yona b (talk) 15:49, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

Q16378491

Əbülqasim (Q16378491): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The same as Q108689265. --Yousiphh (talk) 12:46, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

@Yousiphh:, are you sure? Q16378491 look like to be about someone there Q28712525 is a disambiguation page. - yona b (talk) 15:34, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

Yes, you are right. My bad. Yousiphh (talk) 21:08, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

Q28712525

Abolghasem (Q28712525): Wikimedia disambiguation page: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The same as Q108689265. --Yousiphh (talk) 12:46, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

merge with Abolghasem (Q104854495) - yona b (talk) 15:32, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:41, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

Q132126344

Emma Olsson (Q132126344): Editor-in-Chief for Casinotopplistan.com: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Unnotable persion. 0x0a (talk) 16:11, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

ORCID, Researcher ID, P6005, P7893 and others id. 94.40.175.64 21:33, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

Q111960246

Lauren Buchman (Q111960246): American marketer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable individual. Marbletan (talk) 19:37, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:41, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

Q132108985

ABJ Broadcasting Services (Q132108985): Philippine subsidiary company: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Hoax station/network perpetuated by probable sockpuppet of en:Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Bertrand101. Bluemask (talk) 20:22, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

Q109186555

Q109186555: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This was just test page on plwikisource, which was deleted (https://pl.wikisource.org/wiki/Tropy/ca%C5%82o%C5%9B%C4%87_short). It's not any real part of literary work. --94.40.175.64 21:25, 3 February 2025 (UTC)