Associating stylesheets with XML documents

W3C


Associating stylesheets with XML documents

W3C Working Draft 7 April 1999


This version:
http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/xml-stylesheet-19990407
Latest version:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-stylesheet
Previous version:
http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/PR-xml-stylesheet-19990114
Editors:
James Clark ()

Copyright  ©  1999 W3C (MIT, INRIA, Keio), All Rights Reserved. W3C liability, trademark, document use and software licensing rules apply.


Abstract

This specification allows a stylesheet to be associated with an XML document by including one or more processing instructions with a target of xml-stylesheet in the document's prolog.

Status of this document

This document is a Working Draft of W3C. While it is a Working Draft or a Proposed Recommendation it is subject to change. It may be updated, replaced or rendered obsolete by other W3C documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use W3C Working Drafts as reference material or to cite them as other than "work in progress."

This specification has been proposed as a Recommendation before, but the amount of review it received in the time set apart for the review was considered too small, and it was consequently returned to Working Draft status. A new review period will be started towards the end of April 1999.

This work is part of the W3C XML Activity.

Table of Contents

1. The xml-stylesheet processing instruction

Appendices

A. References
B. Rationale (Non-Normative)

1. The xml-stylesheet processing instruction

Stylesheets can be associated with an XML[XML10] document by using a processing instruction whose target is xml-stylesheet. This processing instruction follows the behaviour of the HTML 4.0 <LINK REL="stylesheet">[HTML40].

The xml-stylesheet processing instruction is parsed in the same way as a start-tag, with the exception that entities other than predefined entities must not be referenced.

The following grammar is given using the same notation as the grammar in the XML Recommendation[XML10]. Symbols in the grammar that are not defined here are defined in the XML Recommendation.

xml-stylesheet processing instruction


[1] StylesheetPI ::= '<?xml-stylesheet' (S PseudoAtt)* S? '?>'
[2] PseudoAtt ::= Name S? '=' S? PseudoAttValue
[3] PseudoAttValue ::= '"' ([^"<&] | CharRef | PredefEntityRef)* '"'
      | "'" ([^'<&] | CharRef | PredefEntityRef)* "'"
[4] PredefEntityRef ::= '&amp;' | '&lt;' | '&gt;' | '&quot;' | '&apos;'

In PseudoAttValue, a CharRef or a PredefEntityRef is interpreted in the same manner as in a normal XML attribute value. The actual value of the pseudo-attribute is the value after each reference is replaced by the character it references. This replacement is not performed automatically by an XML processor.

The xml-stylesheet processing instruction is allowed anywhere in the prolog of an XML document. The syntax of XML constrains where processing instructions are allowed in the prolog; the xml-stylesheet processing instruction is subject to these constraints in the same way as any other processing instruction.

The following pseudo attributes are defined

href CDATA #REQUIRED
type CDATA #REQUIRED
title CDATA #IMPLIED
media CDATA #IMPLIED
charset CDATA #IMPLIED
alternate (yes|no) "no"

The semantics of the pseudo-attributes are exactly as with <LINK REL="stylesheet"> in HTML 4.0, with the exception of the alternate pseudo-attribute. If alternate="yes" is specified, then the processing instruction has the semantics of <LINK REL="alternate stylesheet"> instead of <LINK REL="stylesheet">.

HTTP [RFC2068], section 19.6.2.4, allows stylesheets to be associated with XML documents by means of the Link header. Any links specified by HTTP Link headers are considered to occur before the links specified by the xml-stylesheet processing instructions. This is the same as in HTML 4.0 (see section 14.6).

Here are some examples from HTML 4.0 with the corresponding processing instruction:

<LINK href="mystyle.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css">
<?xml-stylesheet href="mystyle.css" type="text/css"?>

<LINK href="mystyle.css" title="Compact" rel="stylesheet"
type="text/css">
<?xml-stylesheet href="mystyle.css" title="Compact" type="text/css"?>

<LINK href="mystyle.css" title="Medium" rel="alternate stylesheet"
type="text/css">
<?xml-stylesheet alternate="yes" href="mystyle.css" title="Medium"
type="text/css"?>

Multiple xml-stylesheet processing instructions are also allowed with exactly the same semantics as with LINK REL="stylesheet". For example,

<LINK rel="alternate stylesheet" title="compact" href="small-base.css"
type="text/css">
<LINK rel="alternate stylesheet" title="compact" href="small-extras.css"
type="text/css">
<LINK rel="alternate stylesheet" title="big print" href="bigprint.css"
type="text/css">
<LINK rel="stylesheet" href="common.css" type="text/css">

would be equivalent to:

<?xml-stylesheet alternate="yes" title="compact" href="small-base.css"
type="text/css"?>
<?xml-stylesheet alternate="yes" title="compact" href="small-extras.css"
type="text/css"?>
<?xml-stylesheet alternate="yes" title="big print" href="bigprint.css"
type="text/css"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="common.css" type="text/css"?>

A. References

HTML40
World Wide Web Consortium. HTML 4.0 Specification. W3C Recommendation. See http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40
RFC2068
R. Fielding, J. Gettys, J. Mogul, H. Frystyk Nielsen, and T. Berners-Lee. Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1.. IETF RFC 2068. See http://info.internet.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc/files/rfc2068.txt.
XML10
World Wide Web Consortium. Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0. W3C Recommendation. See http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/REC-xml-19980210

B. Rationale (Non-Normative)

Use of a processing instruction avoids polluting the main document structure with application specific processing information. This is what processing instructions are designed for.

There was an urgent requirement for a specification for stylesheet linking that could be completed in time for the next release from major browser vendors. Only by choosing a simple mechanism closely based on a proven existing mechanism could the specification be completed in time to meet this requirement.

The mechanism chosen for this version of the specification is not a constraint on the additional mechanisms planned for future versions; there is no constraint that these use processing instructions, nor even that they include the linking information in the source document.