Smooth Pursuit and Saccades after Sport-Related Concussion - PubMed Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan 15;37(2):340-346.
doi: 10.1089/neu.2019.6595. Epub 2019 Oct 11.

Smooth Pursuit and Saccades after Sport-Related Concussion

Nicholas G Murray  1   2 , Brian Szekely  2   3 , Arthur Islas  4 , Barry Munkasy  5 , Russell Gore  6   7 , Marian Berryhill  8 , Rebecca J Reed-Jones  9
Affiliations

Smooth Pursuit and Saccades after Sport-Related Concussion

Nicholas G Murray et al. J Neurotrauma. .

Abstract

Smooth pursuit eye movements (SPEMs) and saccadic eye movements are both commonly impaired following sport-related concussion (SRC). Typical oculomotor assessments measure individual eye movements in a series of restrictive tests designed to isolate features such as response times. These measures lack ecological validity for athletes because athletes are adept at simple tasks designed for the general population. Yet, because eye movement metrics are sensitive and well-characterized neuroanatomically, it would be valuable to test whether athletes exhibit abnormal eye movements with more challenging tasks. To address this gap in knowledge, we collected eye-tracking data during a sport-like task to gain insight on gaze behavior during active self-motion. SPEMs and saccadic eye movements were recorded during a sport-like visual task within 24-48 h following SRC. Thirty-six Division I student-athletes were divided into SRC and control (CON) groups. All participants completed two blocks of the Wii Fit© soccer heading game (WF) while wearing a monocular infrared eye tracker. Eye movement classification systems quantified saccadic amplitude (SA), velocity (SV), and count (SC); as well as SPEM velocity (SPV) and amplitude (SPA). Separate Mann-Whitney U tests evaluated SPA and SC and found no significant effects (SPA, p = 0.11; SC, p = 0.10). A multi-variate analysis of variance (MANOVA) for remaining variables revealed SPV was significantly greater in CON (p < 0.05), but the SRC group had greater SA and SV (p < 0.05). These findings suggest that during a sport-like task, to maintain foveation SRC subjects used larger amplitude, faster saccades, but exhibited slower SPEMs. Measuring oculomotor function during ecologically valid, sport-like tasks may serve as a concussion biomarker and provide insights into eye movement control after SRC.

Keywords: concussion; mTBI; oculomotor control; vision.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No competing financial interests exist.

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Sport-related concussion (SRC) and matched control smooth pursuit eye movement amplitude during the sport-like visual task.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Sport-related concussion (SRC) and matched control smooth pursuit eye movement velocity during the sport-like visual task. *p = 0.019.
FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.
Sport-related concussion (SRC) and matched control saccadic eye movement amplitude during the sport-like visual task. *p < 0.05.
FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.
Sport-related concussion (SRC) and matched control saccadic eye movement velocity during the sport-like visual task. *p < 0.05.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. (2003). Report to Congress on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in the United States: Steps to Prevent a Serious Public Health Problem. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
    1. Sussman E.S., Ho A.L., Pendharkar A.V., and Ghajar J. (2016). Clinical evaluation of concussion: the evolving role of oculomotor assessments. Neurosurg. Focus 40, E7 - PubMed
    1. McCrory P., Meeuwisse W., Dvorak J., Aubry M., Bailes J., Broglio S., Cantu R.C., Cassidy D., Echemendia R.J., Castellani R.J., Davis G.A., Ellenbogen R., Emery C., Engebretsen L., Feddermann-Demont N., Giza C.C., Guskiewicz K.M., Herring S., Iverson G.L., Johnston K.M., Kissick J., Kutcher J., Leddy J.J., Maddocks D., Makdissi M., Manley G.T., McCrea M., Meehan W.P., Nagahiro S., Patricios J., Putukian M., Schneider K.J., Sills A., Tator C.H., Turner M., and Vos P.E. (2017). Consensus statement on concussion in sport-the 5(th) International Conference on Concussion in Sport held in Berlin, October 2016. Br. J. Sports Med. 51, 838–847 - PubMed
    1. Broglio S.P., Collins M.W., Williams R.M., Mucha A., and Kontos A.P. (2015). Current and emerging rehabilitation for concussion: a review of the evidence. Clin. Sports Med. 34, 213–231 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mucha A., Collins M.W., Elbin R.J., Furman J.M., Troutman-Enseki C., DeWolf R.M., Marchetti G., and Kontos A.P. (2014). A brief Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) assessment to evaluate concussions. Am. J. Sports Med. 42, 2479–2486 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types