Similar articles

• Longitudinal z Score Distribution in Sonographic Fetal Biometry: Influence of Examiner and Experience.

  Faschingbauer F, Heimrich J, Raabe E, Kehl S, Schneider M, Schmid M, Beckmann MW, Schild RL, Mayr A. Faschingbauer F, et al. J Ultrasound Med. 2017 May;36(5):1021-1028. doi: 10.7863/ultra.16.06031. Epub 2017 Mar 4. J Ultrasound Med. 2017. PMID: 28258637
• Approximate formulae for the percentage points of the incomplete beta function and of the chi 2 distribution.

  THOMSON DH. THOMSON DH. Biometrika. 1947;34(Pt 3-4):368-72. Biometrika. 1947. PMID: 18918708 No abstract available.
• The impact of choice of reference charts and equations on the assessment of fetal biometry.

  Salomon LJ, Bernard JP, Duyme M, Buvat I, Ville Y. Salomon LJ, et al. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jun;25(6):559-65. doi: 10.1002/uog.1901. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005. PMID: 15909324
• Note on the cumulants of Fisher's Z-distribution.

  AROIAN LA. AROIAN LA. Biometrika. 1947;34(Pt 3-4):359. Biometrika. 1947. PMID: 18918704 No abstract available.
• Continuous independent quality control for fetal ultrasound biometry provided by the cumulative summation technique.

  Balsyte D, Schäffer L, Burkhardt T, Wisser J, Zimmermann R, Kurmanavicius J. Balsyte D, et al. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Apr;35(4):449-55. doi: 10.1002/uog.7545. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010. PMID: 20052663