Analysis of Data Handling Challenges in Edge Computing

doi:10.23940/ijpe.22.03.p4.176187

Abstract

Abstract: Traditional Cloud Computing networks are intensely centralized in which the data is collected at the edges and transmitted back to the central network servers for computation. Due to the dramatic increase of IoT devices, such edges lack the computational power to handle the data collection and storage over the network because of the assumption of devices located closer to the edges. Edge Computing (EC) broadens the cloud computing characteristics of gathering, storing, processing, and analyzing a massive amount of data by locating services close to the edge of the network. Yet, the unique features of Edge Computing have introduced several challenging issues in the data handling process. The paper provides an overview of the data handling challenges faced in the Edge Computing network. It defines the fundamentals of Edge Computing - the basic architecture, how it's different from Cloud Computing, its applications, and discusses the threats encountered in Edge Computing. There are various challenges experienced in EC while storing, managing, and analyzing data over the network through different local Edge Nodes. This paper summarizes the solutions to the proposed problems in EC through different machine learning and deep learning algorithms. It also provides future research directions in edge computing.

Key words: edge computing, machine learning, deep learning, cloud computing, IoT

Sukruta Pardeshi, chetana Khairnar, and Khalid Alfatmi. Analysis of Data Handling Challenges in Edge Computing [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2022, 18(3): 176-187.

Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

References

1. Holst A.Volume of data/information created, captured, copied, and consumed worldwide from 2010 to 2025.Statista, June, 2021.
2. Bernstein D.Containers and Cloud: From LXC to Docker to Kubernetes. IEEE Cloud Computing, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 81-84, 2014.
3. Ren K., Wang C., andWang Q.Security Challenges for the Public Cloud. IEEE Internet computing, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 69-73, 2012.
4. Smeliansky R.Hierarchical Edge Computing. In2018 International Scientific and Technical Conference Modern Computer Network Technologies (MoNeTeC), IEEE, pp. 1-11, 2018.
5. Zeyu H., Geming X., Zhaohang W., andSen Y.Survey on Edge Computing Security. In2020 International Conference on Big Data, Artificial Intelligence and Internet of Things Engineering (ICBAIE), IEEE, pp. 96-105, 2020.
6. Carvalho G., Cabral B., Pereira V., andBernardino J.Edge Computing: Current Trends, Research Challenges and Future Directions. Computing, vol. 103, no. 5, pp. 993-1023, 2021.
7. Chen, J. and Ran, X.Deep Learning with Edge Computing: A Review. Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 107, no. 8, pp. 1655-1674, 2019.
8. Singh S., Sulthana R., Shewale T., Chamola V., Benslimane A., andSikdar B.Machine-Learning-Assisted Security and Privacy Provisioning for Edge Computing: A Survey. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 236-260, 2021.
9. Zhang J., Chen B., Zhao Y., Cheng X., andHu F.Data Security and Privacy-preserving in Edge Computing Paradigm: Survey and Open Issues. IEEE access, vol. 6, pp.18209-18237, 2018.
10. Phung, V.H. and Rhee, E.J.A High-accuracy Model Average Ensemble of Convolutional Neural Networks for Classification of Cloud Image Patches on Small Datasets. Applied Sciences, vol. 9, no. 21, pp. 4500, 2019.
11. Insight A.What Are Edge Computing Applications in Industries? Retrieved from Analytics Insight: https://www.analyticsinsight.net/do-you-know-edge-computing-applications-across-industries/, accessed by February 2022.
12. Gupta L.Trends and Goals in Edge Computing. Retrieved from Edubeas: https://www.edubeas.com/2021/08/17/new-trends-and-goals-in-edge-computing, accessed by February 2022.
13. Reina G. Wiatt, C. C.Manufacturing and Edge Computing. Retrieved from Science Finance Magzine: https://sfmagazine.com/post-entry/april-2021-manufacturing-and-edge-computing/, accessed by February 2022.
14. Carvalho G., Cabral B., Pereira V., andBernardino J.Computation Offloading in Edge Computing Environments using Artificial Intelligence Techniques. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 95, pp. 103840, 2020.
15. Ampadu, H. AI Pool.Retrieved from Random Forest Understanding, https://ai-pool.com/a/s/random-forests-understanding. accessed by February 2022.
16. Yamashita R., Nishio M., Do R.K.G., and Togashi, K. Convolutional Neural Networks: An Overview and Application in Radiology. Insights into imaging, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 611-629, 2018.
17. Lin L., Liao X., Jin H., andLi P.Computation Offloading toward Edge Computing. Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 107, no. 8, pp.1584-1607, 2019.
18. De Lima Pinto, E.M., Lachowski, R., Pellenz, M.E., Penna, M.C., and Souza, R.D. A Machine Learning Approach for Detecting Spoofing Attacks in Wireless Sensor Networks. In2018 IEEE 32nd International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA), IEEE, pp. 752-758, 2018.
19. Reddy P.B.P., Reddy, M.P.K., Reddy, G.V.M., and Mehata, K.M. Fake Data Analysis and Detection Using Ensembled Hybrid Algorithm. In2019 3rd International Conference on Computing Methodologies and Communication (ICCMC), IEEE, pp. 890-897, 2019.
20. Feng, Z. and Hua, C.Machine Learning-based Rf Jamming Detection in Wireless Networks. In2018 third international conference on security of smart cities, industrial control system and communications (SSIC), IEEE, pp. 1-6, 2018.
21. Gao J., Lanchantin J., Soffa M.L., andQi Y.Black-box Generation of Adversarial Text Sequences to Evade Deep Learning Classifiers. In2018 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW), IEEE, pp. 50-56, 2018.
22. Xue, X. and Lu, J.A Compact Brain Storm Algorithm For Matching Ontologies. IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp.43898-43907, 2020.
23. Wang J., Shao Y., Wang Y., Ge Y., andYu R.Physical Layer Authentication based on Nonlinear Kalman Filter for V2X Communication. IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 163746-163757, 2020.

[1]	Janarthanan Sekar and Ganesh Kumar T. Hyperparameter Tuning in Deep Learning-Based Image Classification to Improve Accuracy using Adam Optimization [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2023, 19(9): 579-586.
[2]	Sanjay Razdan, Himanshu Gupta, and Ashish Seth. D-SVM: A Deep Support Vector Machine Model with Different Kernel Types for Improved Intrusion Detection Performance [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2023, 19(9): 598-606.
[3]	Aashita Rajput, Muskan Yadav, Sachin Yadav, Megha Chhabra, and Arun Prakash Agarwal. Patch-Based Breast Cancer Histopathological Image Classification using Deep Learning [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2023, 19(9): 607-623.
[4]	C. Rohith Bhat and Madhusundar Nelson. Artificial Intelligence Based Credit Card Fraud Detection for Online Transactions Optimized with Sparrow Search Algorithm [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2023, 19(9): 624-632.
[5]	Kavita Pandey, and Dhiraj Pandey. Real-Time Crop Disease Detection and Remedial Suggestion through Deep Learning-based Smartphone Application [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2023, 19(8): 491-498.
[6]	Savita Khurana, Gaurav Sharma, and Bhawna Sharma. Hybrid Machine Learning Model for Load Prediction in Cloud Environment [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2023, 19(8): 507-515.
[7]	K. Eswara Rao, Bala Murali Pydi, T. Panduranga Vital, P. Annan Naidu, U. D. Prasann, and T. Ravikumar. An Advanced Machine Learning Approach for Student Placement Prediction and Analysis [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2023, 19(8): 536-546.
[8]	Babaljeet Kaur and Shalli Rani. Are the Customers Receiving Exact Recommendations from the E-Commerce Companies? Towards the Identification of Gray Sheep Users Using Personality Parameters [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2023, 19(7): 425-433.
[9]	Kshitij Kumar Sinha, Manoj Mathur, and Arun Sharma. Suitability Index Prediction for Residential Apartments Through Machine Learning [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2023, 19(7): 434-442.
[10]	Manpreet Kaur and Shalli Rani. Recommender System: Towards Identification of Shilling Attacks in Rating System Using Machine Learning Algorithms [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2023, 19(7): 443-451.
[11]	Srishti Bhugra and Puneet Goswami. Exploratory Review of Machine Learning-Based Software Component Reusability Prediction [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2023, 19(7): 452-461.
[12]	Harsha Gaikwad, Sanil Gandhi, Arvind Kiwelekar, and Manjushree Laddha. Analyzing Brain Signals for Predicting Students’ Understanding of Online Learning: A Machine Learning Approach [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2023, 19(7): 462-470.
[13]	Rakesh Kumar, Sunny Arora, Ashima Arya, Neha Kohli, Vaishali Arya, and Ekta Singh. Ensemble Learning for Appraising English Text Readability using Gompertz Function [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2023, 19(6): 388-396.
[14]	Manvi Khatri and Ajay Sharma. Deep Learning Approach based on Iris, Face, and Palmprint Fusion for Multimodal Biometric Recognition System [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2023, 19(6): 407-416.
[15]	Pranshu Kumar Soni and Leema Nelson. PCP: Profit-Driven Churn Prediction using Machine Learning Techniques in Banking Sector [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2023, 19(5): 303-311.