Abstract
For human ethics, it can convincingly be argued that justice is a central cornerstone and basis. Here, it is suggested that this can, to some extent, similarly be applied to robots. The article makes the argument that Rawls’ veil of ignorance in his conception of justice as fairness can effectively be replaced by a much more natural condition of prudent egoism in a finite world. Observing ones’ own important interests in an encompassing context paves the way for a guideline for the conduct, which is binding for humans, robots and each and every pragmatic agent with a minimum level of rationality. These arguments do not see humans (forever) in any privileged position: any agent, single human, state, alien or artificial with a certain minimum of general cognitive (and effective) capabilities is bound by a universal negative imperative. This entails that precautious procedures are preferable, and some general prudently constrained flexibility is required for self-consistency and survival.
References
[1] L. Floridi, M. Taddeo, Romans would have denied robots legal personhood, Nature, 2018, 557, 30910.1038/d41586-018-05154-5Search in Google Scholar
[2] I. Asimov, Runaround, I, Robot (hardcover) (The Isaac Asimov Collection ed.), New York City: Doubleday, ISBN 0-385-42304-7, 1950Search in Google Scholar
[3] T. Hellström, S. Bensch, Understandable robots, Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics, 2018, 9, 110-12310.1515/pjbr-2018-0009Search in Google Scholar
[4] S. Wachter, B. Mittelstadt, L. Floridi, Transparent, explainable, and accountable AI for robotics, Science Robotics, 2017, 2(6), eaan608010.1126/scirobotics.aan6080Search in Google Scholar
[5] D. Heaven, Robot laws: Why we need a code of conduct for AI – and fast, New Scientist, 4 August 2018, 38-4110.1016/S0262-4079(18)31394-0Search in Google Scholar
[6] Principles of robotics - EPSRC website, retrieved 2018-08-22 https://epsrc.ukri.org/research/ourportfolio/themes/engineering/activities/principlesofrobotics/Search in Google Scholar
[7] W. F. G. Haselager, Robotics, philosophy and the problems of autonomy, Pragmatics & Cognition, 2005, 13(3), 515-53210.1075/pc.13.3.07hasSearch in Google Scholar
[8] W. Barfield, Liability for autonomous and artificially intelligent robots, Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics, 2018, 9, 193-20310.1515/pjbr-2018-0018Search in Google Scholar
[9] S. R. R. Nijssen, B. C. N. Müller, R. B. van Baaren, M. Paulus, Saving the robot or the human? Robots who feel deserve moral care, Social Cognition, 2019, 37(1), 41-5210.1521/soco.2019.37.1.41Search in Google Scholar
[10] N. Baker, H. Lu, G. Erlikhman, P. J. Kellmann, Deep convolutional networks do not classify based on global object shape, Computational Biology, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.100661310.1371/journal.pcbi.1006613Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[11] S. Lapuschkin, S. Wäldchen, A. Binder, G. Montavon, W. Samek, K. R. Müller, Unmasking Clever Hans predictors and assessing what machines really learn, Nature Communications, 2019, Article number 1096, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08987-410.1038/s41467-019-08987-4Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[12] K. Thomsen, The Ouroboros Model in the light of venerable criteria. Neurocomputing 74, 2010, 121-12810.1016/j.neucom.2009.10.031Search in Google Scholar
[13] K. Thomsen, Concept formation in the Ouroboros Model, Third Conference on Artificial General Intelligence, Lugano, Switzerland, March 5-8, 201010.2991/agi.2010.15Search in Google Scholar
[14] K. Thomsen, Gerecht und tolerant aus Vernunft und Eigeninteresse, Aufklärung und Kritik 92, 2017, 82-109Search in Google Scholar
[15] K. Thomsen, Stupidity and the Ouroboros Model, In: J. Bach, B. Goertzel, M. Iklé (Eds.), Artificial General Intelligence, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 7716, (pp. 332-340), Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer, 201210.1007/978-3-642-35506-6_34Search in Google Scholar
[16] K. Thomsen, The Ouroboros Model embraces its sensory-motoric foundations, Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 2015, 41, 105-12510.1515/slgr-2015-0023Search in Google Scholar
[17] J. Rawls, Eine Theorie der Gerechtigkeit (translation Herrmann Vetter), Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, 2014Search in Google Scholar
[18] J. Rawls, Justice as Fairness, a Restatement, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, London, England, 2003Search in Google Scholar
[19] I. Kant, Gesammelte Schriften, Hrsg.: Bd. 1-22 Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Bd. 23 Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, ab Bd. 24 Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Berlin 1900 ff, AA IV, 421 / Weischedel 4, 51 / GMS 51-53Search in Google Scholar
[20] E. Fosch-Villaronga, J. Albo-Canals, “I’ll take care of you,” said the robot, Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics, 2019, 10, 77-9310.1515/pjbr-2019-0006Search in Google Scholar
© 2019 Knud Thomsen, published by De Gruyter
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Public License.
