[SECURITY] [DSA 5764-1] openssl security update
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DSA 5764-1] openssl security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-5764-1                   security@debian.org
https://www.debian.org/security/                     Salvatore Bonaccorso
September 03, 2024                    https://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : openssl
CVE ID         : CVE-2024-6119

David Benjamin reported a flaw in the X.509 name checks in OpenSSL, a
Secure Sockets Layer toolkit, which may cause an application performing
certificate name checks to crash, resulting in denial of service.

Additional details can be found in the upstream advisory:
https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20240903.txt

For the stable distribution (bookworm), this problem has been fixed in
version 3.0.14-1~deb12u2.

We recommend that you upgrade your openssl packages.

For the detailed security status of openssl please refer to its security
tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/openssl

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/

Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=KHr5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: