This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
A scoping review of reporting gaps in FDA-approved AI medical devices
npj Digital Medicine Open Access 03 October 2024
-
Recommendations for the use of pediatric data in artificial intelligence and machine learning ACCEPT-AI
npj Digital Medicine Open Access 06 September 2023
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
9,800 Yen / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
¥14,900 per year
only ¥1,242 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
The EQUATOR Network. https://www.equator-network.org/ (accessed 22 March 2022).
Anderson, J. A., Eijkholt, M. & Illes, J. Nat. Methods 10, 843–845 (2013).
Park, Y. et al. JAMA Netw. Open 4, e213909–e213909 (2021).
McDermott, M. B. A. et al. Sci. Transl. Med. 13, eabb1655 (2021).
Chen, I. Y. et al. Ann. Rev. Biomed. Data Sci. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-092820-114757 (2021).
Nagendran, M. et al. BMJ 368, m689 (2020).
Wawira Gichoya, J., McCoy, L. G., Celi, L. A. & Ghassemi, M. BMJ Heath Care Inform. 28, e100289 (2021).
Birhane, A. Patterns 2, 100205 (2021).
Donia, J. & Shaw, J. in Proc. 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (eds Fourcade, M. et al.) 77 (AACM, 2021).
Vayena, E., Blasimme, A. & Cohen, I. G. PLoS Med. 15, e1002689 (2018).
Park, Y. et al. JAMA Netw. Open 4, e213909 (2021).
WHO. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240029200 (accessed 22 March 2022).
Mittelstadt, B. Nat. Mach. Intell. 1, 501–507 (2019).
Rivera, S. C., Liu, X., Chan, A.-W., Denniston, A. K. & Calvert, M. J. Nat. Med. 26, 1351–1363 (2020).
Liu, X. & Rivera, S. C. Nat. Med. 26, 1364–1374 (2020).
Sounderajah, V. et al. Nat. Med. 26, 807–808 (2020).
Prunkl, C. E. A. et al. Nat. Mach. Intell. 3, 104–110 (2021).
Acknowledgements
Infrastructure support for this research was provided by the National Institute for Health Research Imperial Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), UK.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed equally to the conception, writing and revision of this manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Declaration: The lead author affirms that this manuscript is an honest, accurate and transparent account of the study being reported.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sounderajah, V., McCradden, M.D., Liu, X. et al. Ethics methods are required as part of reporting guidelines for artificial intelligence in healthcare. Nat Mach Intell 4, 316–317 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-022-00479-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-022-00479-3
This article is cited by
-
A scoping review of reporting gaps in FDA-approved AI medical devices
npj Digital Medicine (2024)
-
An ethics assessment tool for artificial intelligence implementation in healthcare: CARE-AI
Nature Medicine (2024)
-
Recommendations for the use of pediatric data in artificial intelligence and machine learning ACCEPT-AI
npj Digital Medicine (2023)