Abstract
As we live in an information era, the needfor gathering, storing and handling enormous amounts of data in apractical and economical way has become more and more important.Classical database systems were introduced in the late fifties and have proved their usefulnes in various domains. However, their inability to deal with vague and imprecise information has led to new database models. On the other hand the use of linguistic terms has also shown its usefulness in several domains. The assignment of linguistic terms to phenomena and the description of the characteristics, properties or conditions of objectsseems something very natural. People make such assessments every day. A drawback of using linguistic terms, however, is that these terms are not always sharply defined and moreover their meaning very often differs for different individuals.Thus, when different individuals consult the same database or information system, which uses such linguistic terms, these differences should somehow be taken into account, in order to avoid inconsistencies.These inconsistencies could have consequences on the decisions based on such data. In this paper we introduce a new database model based on quasi-order relations (reflexive and transitive). The proposed model describes the mathematical background of the assessment of values to database attributes, using the theory of evaluation problems and sets. The constructed model offers the possibility toreduce possible inconsistencies and presents an interesting new approachto the theory of database design and linguistic terms.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Buckles, B.P. and Petry F.E., 1982, A fuzzy representation of data for relational databases, Fuzzy Sets & Systems 7, pp. 213–226.
Buckles, B.P., Petry F.E. and Sachar, H.S., 1986, Design of similarity-based relational databases, In H. Prade & C.V. Negoita (eds.), Fuzzy logic in knowledge engineering (pp. 3–7). Verlag TUV Rheinland.
CEC, 1985 Soil Map of the European Communities, CEC-DG VI, Brussels, Belgium.
Chen, G. and Kerre, E.E., 1992, A General Treatment of Data Redundancy in a Fuzzy Relational Data Model, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43(4), pp. 304–311.
Chen, G., Kerre, E.E. and Vandenbulcke, J., 1994, A Computational Algorithm for the FFD Transitive Closure and a Complete Axiomatization of Fuzzy Functional Dependence (FFD), International Journal of Intelligent Systems, Vol. 9, pp. 421–439.
Codd, E.F., 1970, A relational model for large shared data bankscomm.ACM (13)6, pp. 377–387.
Codd, E.F., 1983, Forword in Schmidt, J.W. & Brodie, M.L., (eds.), Relational Database Systems: analysis and comparison, Springer-Verlag Berlin-Heideberg-New York.
De Baets, B. and Kerre, E.E., 1993, Triangular fuzzy relational compositions revisited, Uncertainty and Intelligent Systems, Elsevier, North-Holland, pp. 257–267.
De Cooman, G., 1991, Evaluation Sets and Mappings: The Order-Theoretic Aspect of the Meaning of Properties, Introduction to the Basic principles of Fuzzy Set Theory and some of its Applications, Communication and Cognition, Kerre, E.E. (ed.), pp. 159–213.
Dubois, D. and Prade H., 1980, Fuzzy sets and systems: theory and applications, New York: Academic Press
Foth, H.D. and Turk L.M., 1972, Fundamentals of Soil Science, Fifth Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Kohout, L.J. and Bandler, W., 1992, Use of fuzzy relations in knowledge represtation, acquisition and processing, Fuzzy logic for the management of uncertainty.
Kerre, E.E., 1978, Fuzzy topologizing with preassigned operations, International Congress for Mathematicians, Helsinki,in: abstracts of Short Communications and Poster Sessions, 61–62.
Kerre, E.E., Zenner R.B.R.C. and De Caluwe R.M.M., 1986, The use of fuzzy set theory in information retrieval and databases: a survey, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37(5), pp. 341–345.
Prade, H., Testemale, C., 1983, Generalizing database relational algebra for the treatment of imcomplete/uncertain information and vague queries, in proc.of 2nd NAFIP workshop, Schenectady, NY.
Roubens, M., Vincke, P., 1985, Preference Modelling, Springer Verlag, Berlin.
Ruan, D., 1991, Critical study of fuzzy implication operators and their influence on approximate reasoning, Introduction to the Basic principles of Fuzzy Set Theory and some of its Applications, Communication and Cognition, Kerre, E.E. (ed.), pp. 214–251.
Rundensteiner, E.A., Hawkes L.W. and Bandler W., 1989, On nearness measures in fuzzy relational data models, Int. J. of Approximate Reasoning, 3, pp. 267–298.
Schweizer, B., Sklar, A., 1961, Associative functions and statistical triangle inequalities, Publ. Math. Debrecen, vol. 8, pp. 169–186.
Umano, M., 1983, Retrieval from fuzzy databases by fuzzy relational algebra, in: Sanchez and Gupta (eds.), Fuzzy Information Knowledge Representation and Decision Analysis, Pergamon press, Oxford, England, pp. 1–6.
Vandenberghe, R., Van Schooten, A., De Caluwe, R. and Kerre. E.E., 1989, Some practical aspects of fuzzy database techniques: an example, Information Systems, 6(14).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Groenemans, R., Kerre, E., de Cooman, G. et al. Fuzzy Database Model Based on Quasi-Order Relations. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 8, 227–243 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008625724323
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008625724323