Developing a Total Cost of Ownership Model for Semi-Automated, Automated and Electric Vehicles | SN Computer Science Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Developing a Total Cost of Ownership Model for Semi-Automated, Automated and Electric Vehicles

  • Original Research
  • Published:
SN Computer Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Technological changes in the automobile industry accelerate the development of alternative fuel vehicles and automated driving. These changes affect the vehicle fleet mix in urban areas, and affect the total cost of ownership (TCO) per vehicle technology. The goal of this paper is to expand the traditional TCO model to enable the comparison of vehicle technologies. To achieve this goal, a set of indicators is identified to build the TCO model and assess three-vehicle technologies: A Hybrid Electric Vehicle (HEV), an Electric Vehicle (EV) and an Automated Electric Vehicle (AEV). Two levels of automation are used for the AEV: the level three (L3) or “conditional driving automation” and level five (L5) “full automation”. The study applies the developed method using data for the French market. The assessment shows that while the EV is the most economical vehicle when considering the TCO, the HEV is more economical during the first two years. The high purchase cost of the AEV L3 does not compensate during the vehicle lifetime compared to the other two technologies (i.e., HEV and EV), although it profits from lower maintenance and time costs. The TCO for the AEV L5 at the end of its lifetime is lower than the initial purchase value, revealing the social benefits of full automation. The HEV approximates the TCO of the AEV L3 at the end of its lifetime, however, the higher expected resale value of the HEV makes it attractive, in the short-term, for consumers that desire lower purchase cost and higher resale value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Material

Not applicable.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. EC. Emission performance standards for new passenger cars and for new light commercial vehicles. European Commission. 2018. https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/ficheprocedure.do?reference=2017/0293(COD)&l=en. Accessed 20 Apr 2021.

  2. EAFO project. The transition to a zero emission vehicles fleet for cars in the EU by 2050; 2018.

  3. Burch I, Gilchrist J. Survey of global activity to phase out internal combustion engine vehicles, Center for Climate Protection; 2018.

  4. Research and Markets. Autonomous/driverless car market—growth, trends, and forecast (2020–2025); 2020.

  5. Research and Markets. Europe autonomous vehicle (AV) market 2020–2030 by offering, automation level (Level 1–Level 5), vehicle type, power, ADAS feature, ownership, and country: Trend outlook and growth opportunity; 2020.

  6. Research and Markets. Europe autonomous car market research report: by vehicle autonomy, vehicle type, application, regional insight—industry trend, competition analysis and forecast to 2030. 2019.

  7. Bhatti SF, Lim MK, Mak HY. Alternative fuel station location model with demand learning. Ann Oper Res. 2015;230:105–27.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Gnann T, Plotz P. A review of combined models for market diffusion of alternative fuel vehicles and their refueling infrastructure. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2015;47:783–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Xue C, Zhou H, Wu Q, Wu X, Xu X. Impact of incentive policies and other socio-economic factors on electric vehicle market share: a panel data analysis from the 20 countries. Sustainability. 2021;13:2928. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ogunkunbi GA, Al-Zibaree HKY, Meszaros F. Evidence-based market overview of incentives and disincentives in electric mobility as a key to the sustainable future. Future Transp. 2021;1:290–302. https://doi.org/10.3390/futuretransp1020017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Alan J, Jae Hyun L, Scott H, Gil T. An examination of the impact that electric vehicle incentives have on consumer purchase decisions over time. Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt0x28831g, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis, 2019.

  12. Broadbent GH, Metternicht G, Drozdzewski D. An analysis of consumer incentives in support of electric vehicle uptake: An Australian case study. World Electr Veh J. 2019;10(1):11. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj10010011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. EEA. Fuel efficiency improvements of new cars in Europe slowed in 2016, European Environmental Agency; 2016.

  14. Gaton. Electric vehicle and hybrid sales hit record share of 18 per cent in Europe, The Driven. 2020. https://thedriven.io. Accessed 28 Apr 2021.

  15. ICCT. European vehicle market statistics—Pocketbook 2015/16. International Council on Clean Transportation; 2016. https://theicct.org. Accessed 28 Apr 2021.

  16. France 24. Hybrid cars outsell diesel in Europe for the first time. https://www.france24.com/en/europe/20220202-hybrid-cars-outsell-diesel-in-europe-for-the-first-time. Accessed 15 April 2022.

  17. Toyota. Toyota sells 1.52 million electrified vehicles in 2017, three years ahead of 2020 target. 2018. https://global.toyota/en/newsroom. Accessed 25 May 2021.

  18. ACEA. New passenger car registrations by alternative fuel type in the European Union—Quarter 4 2015, European Automobile Manufacturers Association. 2016; https://www.acea.be. Accessed 25 Mar 2021.

  19. AVERE. Hybride: un marché en recul en 2014, l'hybride essence tient le coup" (in French). France Mobilité Électrique; 2014.

  20. Alvarez. The best-selling hynrid cars in France (2020). L’auto journal. 2021; https://www.autojournal.fr/economie/voitureshybrides-plus-vendues-france-2020-260958.html#item=1. Accessed 7 Apr 2021.

  21. Car Sales Statistics. Battery electric and plug-In hybrid car sales per EU, UK, and EFTA Country. https://www.best-selling-cars.com/electric/2021-full-year-europe-battery-electric-and-plug-in-hybrid-car-sales-per-eu-uk-and-efta-country. Accessed 25 May 2021.

  22. Wevolver. Autonomous vehicle technology report, Wevolver; 2020.

  23. UNECE. Report of the sixty-eighth session of the working party on road traffic safety, United Nations Commission for Europe; 2014.

  24. Gawron JH, Keoleian GA, De Kleine RD, Wallington TJ, Kim HC. Life cycle assessment of connected and automated vehicles: Sensing and computing subsystem and vehicle level effects. Environ Sci Technol. 2018;52:3249–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Stephens TS, Gonder J, Chen Y, Lin Z, Liu C, Gohlke D. Estimated bounds and important factors for fuel use and consumer costs of connected and automated vehicles. NREL. National Renewable Energy Laboratory; 2016.

  26. Díaz MM, Soriguera F. Autonomous vehicles: theoretical and practical challenges. Transp Res Proc. 2018;33:275–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2018.10.103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Shetty A, Yu M, Kurzhanskiy A, Grembek O, Tavafoghi H, Varaiya H. Safety challenges for autonomous vehicles in the absence of connectivity. Trans Res C Emerg Technol. 2021;128:103133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2021.103133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. NVIDIA. Self-driving safety report. 2019. https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/self-driving-cars/safety-report. Accessed 23 Feb 2021.

  29. Fleming K, Singer M. Energy implications of current travel and the adoption of automated vehicles, National Renewable Energy Laboratory; 2019.

  30. Taiebat M, Stolper S, Xu M. Forecasting the impact of connected and automated vehicles on energy use: a microeconomic study of induced travel and energy rebound. Appl Energy J. 2019;247:297–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wadud Z, MacKenzie D, Leiby P. Help or hindrance? The travel, energy and carbon impacts of highly automated vehicles. Transp Res A Policy Pract. 2016;86:1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kockelman KM, Lee J. Energy implications of self-driving vehicles. In 98th Annual Meeting of the Transp Res Board, Washington D.C., 2019.

  33. Clements L, Kockelman K. Economic effects of automated vehicles. Transp Res Rec. 2017;2606:106–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Yap MD, Correia G, van Arem B. Preferences for travellers for using automated vehicles as last mile public transit of multimodal train trips. Transp Res A Policy Pract. 2016;94:1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. AIC. Average age of passenger cars in some European countries, Automotive Information Centre. 2020; https://www.aut.fi. Accessed 25 Mar 2021.

  36. Nissan. Official website; 2020. https://www.nissanusa.com. Accessed 23 Feb 2021.

  37. Tesla. Official website. 2020. https://www.tesla.com/en_eu. Accessed 25 May 2021.

  38. Mosquet X, Dauner T, Lang N, Rüßmann M, Agrawal R, Schmieg F, Pochtler AM. Revolution in the driver’s seat: The road to autonomous vehicles. The Boston Consulting Group; 2015.

  39. Bansal P, Kockelman K. Forecasting Americans’ long-term adoption of connected and autonomous vehicle technologies. Transp Res A Policy Pract. 2017;95:49–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Catapult Transport System. Market forecast-for connected and autonomous vehicles, 2017 https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/642813/15780_TSC_Market_Forecast_for_CAV_Report_FINAL.pdf.

  41. Edmunds. Used cars for sale. https://www.edmunds.com. Accessed 15 April 2022.

  42. EC. Emergy, Weekly oil bulletin. European Commission Energy. European Commission. 2020. https://ec.europa.eu/energy/data-analysis/weekly-oil-bulletin_en?redir=1. Accessed 20 Apr 2021.

  43. Pierre M, Karbowski D, Rousseau, A. Impact of connectivity and automation on vehicle energy use. SAE International; 2016.

  44. Danielis R, Giansoldati M, Rotaris L. A probabilistic total cost of ownership model to evaluate the current and future prospects of electric cars uptake in Italy. Energy Policy. 2018;119:268–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hagman J, Ritzén S, Stier J, Susilo Y. Total cost of ownership and its potential implications for battery electric vehicle diffusion. Res Transp Bus Manage. 2016;18:11–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Fleet Europe. New insurance policy launched for EVs. 2019. https://www.fleeteurope.com. Accessed 20 Apr 2021.

  47. Benson AJ, Tefft BC, Svancara AM, Horrey WJ. Potential reductions in crashes, injuries, and deaths from large-scale deployment of advanced driver assistance systems. AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety; 2018.

  48. NHTSA. Automatic vehicle control systems—Tesla motors system. Investigation: PE 16-007. Office of defects investigation. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; 2017.

  49. Prevedouros PD, Mitropoulos LK. Impact of battery performance on total cost of ownership for electric drive vehicle. In: Proceedings of the 21st IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst. November 4–7, 2018, Maui, Hawaii.

  50. DeLuchi MA, Lipman TE. An analysis of the retail and life cycle cost of battery-powered electric vehicles, eScholarship University of California, Davis; 2001. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/50q9060k. Accessed 20 Nov 2020.

  51. Bakker D. Battery electric vehicles performance, CO2 emissions, lifecycle costs and advanced battery technology development. Master thesis. Holland: Sustainable Development, Energy and Resources Copernicus Institute, University of Utrecht; 2010.

  52. Duvall M. Comparing the benefits and impacts of hybrid vehicle options for compact sedan and sport utility vehicles. EPRI; 2002.

  53. Propfe B, Redelbach M, Santini DJ, Friedrich H. Cost analysis of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles including maintenance & repair costs and resale values. In: Proceedings of the EVS26 international battery, hybrid and fuel cell electric vehicle symposium, Los Angeles, CA, May 6–9, 2012.

  54. Bösch PM, Becker F, Beckerm H, Axhausen KW. Cost-based analysis of autonomous mobility services. Transp Policy. 2018;64:76–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Wadud Z. Fully automated vehicles: a cost of ownership analysis to inform early adoption. Transp Res A Policy Pract. 2017;101:163–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Salary Explorer. Average salaries in France 2020. 2020. http://www.salaryexplorer.com. Accessed 5 June 2021.

  57. Purdy JE, Wiegmann JD. Vehicle maintenance cost relationship and estimating methodology. Transp Res Rec. 1987;1140:1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Norauto. Official website. 2020. https://www.norauto.fr. Accessed 23 Feb 2021.

  59. Mitropoulos LK, Prevedouros PD. Life cycle emissions and cost model for urban light duty vehicles. Transp Res D Transp Environ. 2015;41:147–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Expat. France minimum wage versus average salary. 2021. https://expat-in-france.com. Accessed 06 June 2021.

  61. Ministry of Ecological Transition. Observatoire des déplacements à Paris. 2019. https://www.lci.fr/population/roule-t-on-seulement-a-14-km-h-de-moyenne-en-voiture-dans-paris-intra-muros-2156756.html. Accessed 30 May 2021.

  62. Statista. Vitesses moyennes pratiquées de jour par les véhicules de tourisme sur le réseau routier en France en 2018, selon le reseau. 2021. https://fr.statista.com/statistiques/513718/vitesses-moyennes-sur-reseau-le-jour-france. Accessed 31 May 2021.

  63. INRIX. Searching for parking costs Americans $73 billion a year. 2017. https://inrix.com/press-releases/parking-pain-us. Accessed 25 June 2021.

  64. Hilvert O, Toledo T, Bekhor S. Framework and model for parking decisions. Transp Res Rec. 2012;2319:30–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Smart J, Schey S. Battery electric vehicle driving and charging behavior observed early in the EV project. Soc Autom Eng Int. 2012. https://doi.org/10.4271/2012-01-0199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Transport & Environment. Roll-out of public EV charging infrastructure in the EU. 2018. https://www.transportenvironment.org. Accessed 14 April 2021.

  67. Lustgarten P, Le Vine S. Public priorities and consumer preferences for selected attributes of automated vehicles. J Mod Transp. 2018;26:72–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

“This research is co-financed by Greece and the European Union (European Social Fund- ESF) through the Operational Programme «Human Resources Development, Education and Lifelong Learning 2014–2020» in the context of the project “A Total Cost of Ownership Model for Automated and Electric Vehicles (TCO4AEV)” (MIS 5049185).”

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Rural and Surveying Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Athens, Greece

    Lambros Mitropoulos, Konstantinos Kouretas & Konstantinos Kepaptsoglou

  2. School of Civil Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Athens, Greece

    Eleni Vlahogianni

Authors
  1. Lambros Mitropoulos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Konstantinos Kouretas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Konstantinos Kepaptsoglou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Eleni Vlahogianni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: study conception and design: Mitropoulos; data collection: Mitropoulos, Kouretas; analysis and interpretation of results: Mitropoulos, Kouretas; draft manuscript preparation: Mitropoulos, Kouretas, Kepaptsoglou and Vlahogianni.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lambros Mitropoulos.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics Approval

Not applicable.

Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the topical collection “Vehicle Technology and Intelligent Transport Systems” guest edited by Oleg Gusikhin and Markus Helfert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mitropoulos, L., Kouretas, K., Kepaptsoglou, K. et al. Developing a Total Cost of Ownership Model for Semi-Automated, Automated and Electric Vehicles. SN COMPUT. SCI. 3, 322 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-022-01214-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-022-01214-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation