Abstract
This article deals with the estimation problem in step-stress partially accelerated life test of Maxwell Boltzmann distribution in presence of progressive type-II censoring with binomial removals. The maximum likelihood and Bayes estimators of the parameter are obtained under symmetric and asymmetric loss functions. Furthermore, the performances of the obtained estimators are compared in terms of risks. The proposed methodology is illustrated through the time to failure (in days) of Aluminium reduction cells and survival times (in weeks) for male rats that were exposed to a high level of radiation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aarset MV (1987) How to identify a bathtub hazard rate. IEEE Trans Reliab 36(1):106–108
Abd-Elfattah A, Hassan AS, Nassr S (2008) Estimation in step-stress partially accelerated life tests for the Burr type-XII distribution using type-I censoring. Stat Method 5(6):502–514
Abdel-Ghani M (2004) The estimation problem of the Log Logistic parameters in step partially accelerated life tests using type-I censored data. Natl Rev Social Sci 41(2):1–19
Abushal TA, Soliman AA (2015) Estimating the Pareto parameters under progressive censoring data for constant-partially accelerated life tests. J Stat Comput Simul 85(5):917–934
Akaike H (1978) A Bayesian analysis of the minimum AIC procedure. Ann Inst Stat Math 30(1):9–14
Bai D, Chung S (1992) Optimal design of partially accelerated life tests for the Exponential distribution under type-I censoring. IEEE Trans Reliab 41(3):400–406
Balakrishnan N (2007) Progressive censoring methodology: an appraisal. TEST 16(2):211–259
Balakrishnan N, Balakrishnan N, Aggarwala R (2000) Progressive censoring: theory, methods, and applications. Springer
Balakrishnan N, Sandhu RA (1995) A simple simulational algorithm for generating progressive type-II censored samples. Am Stat 49(2):229–230
Bhattacharyya G, Soejoeti Z (1989) A tampered failure rate model for step-stress accelerated life test. Commun Stat Theory Methods 18(5):1627–1643
Box GE, Tiao GC (2011) Bayesian inference in statistical analysis, vol 40. Wiley
Brooks S (1998) Markov chain monte carlo method and its application. J R Stat Soc Ser D 47(1):69–100
Calabria R, Pulcini G (1990) On the maximum likelihood and least-squares estimation in the inverse Weibull distributions. Stat Appl 2(1):53–66
Chaudhary S, Tomer SK (2018) Estimation of stress-strength reliability for Maxwell distribution under progressive type-II censoring scheme. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 9(5):1107–1119
Cohen AC (1963) Progressively censored samples in life testing. Technometrics 5(3):327–339
DeGroot MH, Goel PK (1979) Bayesian estimation and optimal designs in partially accelerated life testing. Naval Res Log Quarterly 26(2):223–235
Dey S, Maiti SS (2010) Bayesian estimation of the parameter of Maxwell distribution under different loss functions. J Stat Theory Pract 4(2):279–287
Engelhardt M, Bain LJ (1977) Uniformly most powerful unbiased tests on the scale parameter of a Gamma distribution with a nuisance shape parameter. Technometrics 19(1):77–81
Furth J, Upton AC, Kimball AW (1959) Late pathologic effects of atomic detonation and their pathogenesis. Radiat Res Suppl 1:243–264
Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Dunson DB, Vehtari A, Rubin DB (2013) Bayesian data analysis. Chapman and Hall/CRC
Gibbons JD, Chakraborti S (2020) Nonparametric statistical inference, 6th edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Ismail AA (2012) Inference in the generalized Exponential distribution under partially accelerated tests with progressive type-II censoring. Theoret Appl Fract Mech 59(1):49–56
Jain M, Iyengar S, Jain R (2003) Numerical methods for scientific and engineering computation. New Age International Publishers, New Delhi
Kamps U, Cramer E (2001) On distributions of generalized order statistics. Statistics 35(3):269–280
Kumar D, Singh U, Singh SK, Bhattacharyya G (2015) Bayesian estimation of Exponentiated Gamma parameter for progressive type-II censored data with Binomial removals. J Stat Appl Prob 4(2):265–273
Kumar M, Maurya SK, Singh SK, Singh U, Pathak A (2020) Model suitability analysis of survival time to overian cancer patients data. J Stat Appl Prob 9(3):609–620
Kumar M, Pathak A, Soni S (2019) Bayesian inference for Rayleigh distribution under step-stress partially accelerated test with progressive type-II censoring with Binomial removal. Ann Data Sci 6(1):117–152
Kumar M, Singh SK, Singh U (2018) Bayesian inference for poisson-inverse exponential distribution under progressive type-II censoring with binomial removal. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 9(6):1235–1249
Lawless JF (2011) Statistical models and methods for lifetime data, vol 362. Wiley
Maxwell JC (1860) V, Illustrations of the dynamical theory of gases- part I: on the motions and collisions of perfectly elastic spheres. London, Edinburgh Dublin Philosophical Mag J Sci 19(124):19–32
Nelson WB (2009) Accelerated testing: statistical models, test plans, and data analysis, vol 344. Wiley
Pathak A, Kumar M, Singh SK, Singh U (2020) Assessing the effect of E-bayesian inference for poisson inverse exponential distribution parameters under different loss functions and its application. Commun Stat Theory Methods. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2020.1847293
Pathak A, Kumar M, Singh SK, Singh U (2020b) Bayesian inference: Weibull poisson model for censored data using the expectation-maximization algorithm and its application to bladder cancer data. J Appl Stat 10(1080/02664763):1845626
Pathak A, Kumar M, Singh SK, Singh U (2021) Statistical inferences: Based on exponentiated exponential model to assess novel corona virus (covid-19) kerala patient data. Ann Data Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40745-021-00348-7
Schwarz G et al (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat 6(2):461–464
Singh S, Singh U, Kumar M, Vishwakarma P (2014) Classical and Bayesian inference for an extension of the Exponential distribution under progressive type-II censored data with Binomial removals. J Stat Appl Prob Lett 1(3):75–86
Singh SK, Singh U, Kumar M (2013) Estimation of parameters of Generalized Inverted Exponential distribution for progressive type-II censored sample with Binomial removals. J Prob Stat 2013:1–12
Singh SK, Singh U, Kumar M (2016) Bayesian estimation for Poisson-Exponential model under progressive type-II censoring data with Binomial removal and its application to ovarian cancer data. Commun Stat Simul Comput 45(9):3457–3475
Singh SK, Singh U, Sharma VK (2013) Expected total test time and Bayesian estimation for generalized Lindley distribution under progressively type-II censored sample where removals follow the Beta-Binomial probability law. Appl Math Comput 222:402–419
Tomer SK, Panwar M (2015) Estimation procedures for Maxwell distribution under type-I progressive hybrid censoring scheme. J Stat Comput Simul 85(2):339–356
Varian HR (1975) A Bayesian approach to real estate assessment. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Co, 36(1):195–208
Whitmore G (1983) A regression method for censored inverse-Gaussian data. Canadian J Stat 11(4):305–315
Wu SJ, Chang CT (2002) Parameter estimations based on Exponential progressive type II censored data with Binomial removals. Int J Inf Manag Sci 13(3):37–46
Xiong C, Ji M (2004) Analysis of grouped and censored data from step-stress life test. IEEE Trans Reliab 53(1):22–28
Zellner A (1986) Bayesian estimation and prediction using asymmetric loss functions. J Am Stat Assoc 81(394):446–451
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank editors and referees for there constructive comments and suggestions which improved and enriched the presentation of the paper.
Funding
We would like to confirm that we did not have any funding organization/institute/university that funded our research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The corresponding author declares that no conflict of interest emerged among the authors and all co-authors are equally contributed.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants and animal participants performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Proposition 1
The second partial derivatives of the log-likelihood function are calculated as follows:
and
Proof
We have,
Let \(I=\frac{\partial }{\partial \theta }\left( \Gamma (\frac{x_{i}^2}{\theta },\frac{3}{2}) \right) \), we have \(\Gamma (x,a)=\frac{1}{\Gamma (a)}\int _{0}^{x}e^{-w}w^{a-1}dw\), is an incomplete gamma ratio, so that
After putting \(w=\frac{v^2}{\theta }\), \(dw=(\frac{2v}{\theta })dv\), at \(w=0\) and \(w=\frac{x_{i}^2}{\theta }\), \(v=x\), above Eq. 37 becomes
On putting the \(t=\frac{v^2}{\theta }\), \(dt=\frac{2v}{\theta }dv\) at \(v=0,~ t=0\) and \(vx,~ t=\frac{x^2}{\theta } \), Eq. 38 becomes
On putting the value from Eqs. 39 into 36, we get
Again differentiate above equation
where, \(I_{2}=\frac{1}{\theta } \left\{ \Gamma (\frac{x_{i}^2}{\theta },\frac{5}{2})-\Gamma (\frac{x_{i}^2}{\theta },\frac{3}{2}) \right\} \) and \(I_{3}= \left\{ 1- \Gamma (\frac{x_{i}^2}{\theta },\frac{3}{2}) \right\} \); \(i=1,2,\cdots ,n_{1}\).
Similarly, we can obtain the expression for \(\xi _{\theta _2}\) given below
and also, we can obtain the expression for \(\xi '_{\theta _2}\). \(\square \)
Proposition 2
Proof
We know that \(\Gamma (x,a)=\int _{0}^{x}t^{a-1}e^{-t}dt\) and differentiating with respect x i.e. \(\frac{\partial }{\partial x}\Gamma (x,a)=x^{a-1}e^{-x}\). Now
We get,
Again differentiate above equation w. r. t. \(\beta \) and \(\theta \) i.e.
respectively, and we obtain the second derivative given below,
and using the above differentials to obtain given below
respectively. \(\square \)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pathak, A., Kumar, M., Singh, S.K. et al. Bayesian inference for Maxwell Boltzmann distribution on step-stress partially accelerated life test under progressive type-II censoring with binomial removals. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 13, 1976–2010 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-021-01612-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-021-01612-y