Comparative analysis of traditional and fuzzy FMECA approach for criticality analysis of conventional lathe machine | International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management
Skip to main content

Comparative analysis of traditional and fuzzy FMECA approach for criticality analysis of conventional lathe machine

  • Case studies
  • Published:
International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Criticality analysis is a technique for the assessment of criticality rating for every constitutive part. Failure mode effect and criticality analysis (FMECA) are broadly utilized for characterizing, distinguishing and dispensing with potential failures from system, design, or process for the criticality analysis. The determination of the critical ranking of failure modes for criticality analysis is a vital issue of FMECA. The traditional method of FMECA determines the critical ranking of failure modes using the risk priority numbers, which is the product of evaluation criteria like the occurrence, severity and detection of each failure mode but it may not be realistic in some applications. The practical applications reveal that the criticality analysis using traditional FMECA has been considerably criticized for several reasons. In this paper, first, a detailed FMEA to find out the various failure modes of each component of a conventional lathe machine is performed and thereafter, the Fuzzy FMECA approach is used to perform the criticality analysis. A comparative analysis of fuzzy FMECA with traditional FMECA is also done to find out the most superior approach for the criticality analysis. It was concluded that the fuzzy FMECA approach is the most superior approach for the criticality analysis of a system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ben-daya M, Raouf A (1996) A revised failure mode and effects analysis model. Int J Quality Reliab Manag 13:43–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertolini M (2006) Fuzzy VIKOR criticality analysis approach for FMECA technique. Saf Reliab Manag Risk 1:101–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles JB (2003) An assessment of RPN prioritization in a failure modes effects and criticality analysis. In: Annual reliability and maintainability symposium, pp 380–386

  • Bowles JB, Peldez CE (1995) Fuzzy logic prioritization of failures in a system failure mode, effects and criticality analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 50:203–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braglia M, Frosolini M, Montanari R (2003a) Fuzzy TOPSIS approach for failure mode, effects and criticality analysis. Quality Reliab Eng Int 19:425–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braglia M, Frosolini M, Montanari R (2003b) Fuzzy criticality assessment model for failure modes and effects analysis. Int J Quality Reliab Manag 20:503–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmignani G (2009) An integrated structural framework to cost-based FMECA: the priority-cost FMECA. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94:861–871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catic D, Jeremic B, Djordjevic Z, Miloradovic N (2011) Criticality analysis of the elements of the light commercial vehicle steering tie-rod joint. J Mech Eng 57:495–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang CL, Wei CC, Lee YH (1999) Failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy method and grey theory. Kybernetes 28:1072–1080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang CL, Liu PH, Wei CC (2001) Failure mode and effects analysis using grey theory. Integr Manuf Syst 12:211–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gargama H, Chaturvedi SK (2011) Criticality assessment models for failure mode effects and criticality analysis using fuzzy logic. IEEE Trans Reliab 60:102–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilchrist W (1996) Modelling failure modes and effects analysis. Int J Quality Reliab Manag 10:43–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Juran JM (1989) Quality control handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillay A, Wang J (2003) Modified failure mode and effects analysis using approximate reasoning. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 79:69–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popovic V, Vasic B, Petrovic M (2010) The possibility for FMEA method improvement and its implementation into bus life cycle. J Mech Eng 56:179–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Sankar NR, Prabhu BS (2001) Modified approach for prioritization of failures in a system failure mode and effects analysis. Int J Quality Reliab Manag 18:324–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma RK, Kumar D, Kumar P (2005) Systematic failure mode effect analysis (FMEA) using fuzzy linguistic modelling. Int J Quality Reliab Manag 22:986–1004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma KR, Kumar D, Kumar P (2006) Systematic failure mode effect analysis (FMEA) using fuzzy linguistic modelling. Int J Quality Reliab Manag 22:986–1004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stamatis DH (1995) Failure mode and effect analysis: FMEA. In: Theory to execution. ASQC Quality Press, Milwaukee, WI

  • Teng SH, Ho SY (1996) Failure mode and effects analysis: an integrated approach for product design and process control. Int J Quality Reliab Manag 13:8–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Chin K, Poon G, Ka K, Yang J (2009) Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy weighted geometric mean. Expert Syst Appl 36:1195–1207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu K, Tang L, Xie M, Ho S, Zhu M (2002) Fuzzy assessment of FMEA for engine systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 75:17–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang ZY, Xu BX, Chen F, Hao Q, Zhu X, Jia Y (2010) A new failure mode and effects analysis model of CNC machine tool using fuzzy theory. In: IEEE international conference on information and automation June 20–23, Harbin, China, pp 582–587

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gajanand Gupta.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gupta, G., Mishra, R.P. Comparative analysis of traditional and fuzzy FMECA approach for criticality analysis of conventional lathe machine. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 11 (Suppl 2), 379–386 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-019-00938-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-019-00938-y

Keywords