Integrated graphical model to evaluate multi-criteria maintenance policies for degradable systems | International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Integrated graphical model to evaluate multi-criteria maintenance policies for degradable systems

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper deals with a system developed that will investigate on the (failure) data input of a given system to decide on its maintenance policies, specifically between breakdown maintenance and preventive maintenance (PM), which can restore the system either by repair or replacement as may be applicable. The system developed has the genesis of Kay’s work. Working on the basic limitations of Kay’s work, a complete system is developed as an integrated graphical tool to be suitable for degradable systems wherein repairing or replacement as applicable, considering three important criteria as suggested by Kay. After evaluating what type of maintenance is possible, the system developed optimizes for optimal period in case of PM is preferred. The algorithm involved in the development of the graphical tool is coded in Matlab 7.0 for in between Weibull shape parameters and numerical integration. The details of the research methodology and analytical issues involved are all presented appropriately in the paper. The system has been applied to four test cases and the utility of the tool has been explained through stepwise procedure and flow chart in the paper with appropriate results and discussions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

f(t):

Time to failure density

R(t):

Reliability function

M:

MTBF, E(t)

M:

Mean maintenance time for BDM

ms :

Mean maintenance time for PM

T:

Scheduled period

T* :

Optimal schedule

\( \overline{\text{T}} \) :

Mean time between replacements or MTTF in period T

h(t):

Hazard function

p:

Net earning rate = total revenue/unit time − cost/unit time

A:

Availability in case of BDM

As :

Availability in case of PM

C:

Maintenance cost rate in case of BDM

cs :

Maintenance cost rate in case of PM

C:

Average maintenance cost per unit time in case of BDM

Cs :

Average maintenance cost per unit time in case of PM

P:

Average earning per unit time in case of BDM

Ps :

Average earning per unit time in case of PM

α:

\( \overline{\text{T}} /{\text{M}} \le 1 \)

γ:

mp/mb ≤ 1

δ:

cp/cb ≤ 1

μ:

mb/M ≤ 1

ω:

cb/pb

θ:

Scale parameter of two parameter Weibull distribution

β:

Shape parameter of two parameter Weibull distribution

T *int :

Value of T where α and 1-kR(T) intersect

T *Δ :

Value of T maximum gap between α and 1-KR(T)

T *cri :

Optimal value of T obtained from criterion function

T *itr :

Optimal value of T obtained from the iterative mechanism

F(t):

Distribution function

References

  • Ahmadi A, Kumar U (2011) Cost based risk analysis to identify inspection and restoration intervals of hidden failures subject to aging. IEEE Trans Reliab 60(1):197–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmadi A, Karim R, Kumar U (2010) Selection of maintenance strategy for aircraft systems using multi-criteria decision making methodologies. Int J Reliab Qual Safe Eng 17(3):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalcante CAV, Ferreira RJP, de Almeida AT (2010) A preventive maintenance decision model based on multi-criteria method PROMETHEE II integrated with Bayesian approach. IMA J Manag Math 21(4):333–348

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrik S (1994) A new approach to optimal times for complex systems. Microelectron Reliab 35:1125–1130

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang R, Ji P (2002) Age replacement policy: a multi-attribute value model. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 76(3):311–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay E (1976) The effectiveness of preventive maintenance. Int J Prod Res 14:329–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai KK, Leung FKN, Tao B, Wang SY (2000) Practices of preventive maintenance and replacement for engines: a case study. Eur J Oper Res 124:294–306

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lofsten H (2000) Measuring maintenance performance- in search for maintenance productivity index. Int J Prod Econ 63:47–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mariappan V, Babu Subash, Hemachandra N (2008) Collaborative maintenance decisions for manufacturing facilities. Int J Perfomab Eng 4(3):225–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Mariappan V, Subash Babu A, Rajasekaran S, Ilayaraja K (2011) Collaborative optimal preventive maintenance schedule using goal programming. Int J Adv Oper Manag 3(2):153–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakagawa T, Mizutani S (2009) Summary of Maintenance policies for a finite interval. Relaiab Eng Syst Safe 94(1):89–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quan G, Greenwood GW, Liu D, Hu S (2007) Searching for multi-objective preventive maintenance schedules: combining preferences with evolutionary algorithms. Eur J Oper Res 177(3):1969–1984

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tabucanon MT, Chareonsuk C, Nagarur N (1997) A multicriteria approach to the selection of PM intervals. Int J Prod Econ 49:55–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vatn J, Hokstad P, Bodsberg L (1996) An overall model for maintenance optimization. Reliab Eng Syst Safes 51:241–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaurio JK (1993) Availability and cost functions for periodically inspected preventively maintained units. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 63:133–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu S, Croome DC (2005) Optimal maintenance policies under different operational schedules. IEEE Trans Reliab 54(2):338–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Agnel Institute of Technology and Design, Assagao-Bardez, Goa, India

    V. Mariappan

  2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Industrial Engineering and Operations Research (IDP), IIT Bombay, Mumbai, 400 076, India

    A. Subash Babu

  3. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Goa College of Engineering, Farmagudi, Ponda, 403 401, Goa, India

    U. J. Amonkar, M. N. Dhawalikar & M. J. Sakhardande

Authors
  1. V. Mariappan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Subash Babu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. U. J. Amonkar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. N. Dhawalikar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. M. J. Sakhardande
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. N. Dhawalikar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mariappan, V., Subash Babu, A., Amonkar, U.J. et al. Integrated graphical model to evaluate multi-criteria maintenance policies for degradable systems. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 4, 67–77 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-012-0138-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-012-0138-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation