Abstract
Literature on MOOCs has shown that understanding learners’ perspectives in taking MOOCs is critical if a MOOC needs to be successful. Now that MOOCs have been in wide use, in this study we took an updated look at learners’ perspective of taking MOOCs designed for working professionals and course aspects that these MOOC participants found beneficial. General interest in the topic, personal growth and enrichment, relevance to job, and career change were the top reasons for working professionals to enroll in MOOCs. First-time MOOC takers were more likely to seek a certificate, while MOOC veterans may complete most assignments but did not seek for a certificate. Quality materials from a reputable provider remains an important reason for working professionals to enroll in a MOOC. Offering meaningful ways for MOOC participants to interact with instructors and with each other calls for innovative designs than the current discussion forums in a learning management system can offer. This remains to be a big challenge for MOOC designers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Alario-Hoyos, C., Muñoz-Merino, P. J., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Delgado Kloos, C., & Parada, G. H. A. (2016). Who are the top contributors in a MOOC? Relating participants’ performance and contributions. Journal of Computer Assisted learning,32(3), 232–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12127.
Bell, F., Mackness, J., & Funes, M. (2016). Participant association and emergent curriculum in a MOOC: Can the community be the curriculum? Research in Learning Technology. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v24.29927.
Bennett, Elizabeth E. (2012). A four-part model of informal learning: Extending Schugurensky’s conceptual model, Presented at Adult Education Research Conference. NY: Saratoga Springs.
Bezerra, L. N. M., & da Silva, M. T. (2017). A review of literature on the reasons that cause the high dropout rates in the MOOCS. Revista Espacios, 38(5), 11. Retrieved from http://www.revistaespacios.com/a17v38n05/a17v38n05p11.pdf.
Breslow, L., Pritchard, D. E., DeBoer, J., Stump, G. S., Ho, A. D., & Seaton, D. T. (2013). Studying learning in the worldwide classroom research into edX’s first MOOC. Research & Practice in Assessment, 8, 13–25. Retrieved from http://www.rpajournal.com/dev/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/SF2.pdf.
Christensen, G., Steinmetz, A., Alcorn, B., Bennett, A., Woods, D., & Emanuel, E. (2013). The MOOC phenomenon: Who takes massive open online courses and why? SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2350964.
Creswell, J. W. (2015). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Daniel, J. (2012). Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. Journal of Interactive Media in Education,2012(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.5334/2012-18.
de Barba, P. G., Kennedy, G. E., & Ainley, M. D. (2016). The role of students’ motivation and participation in predicting performance in a MOOC. Journal of Computer Assisted learning,32(3), 218–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12130.
de Freitas, S. I., Morgan, J., & Gibson, D. (2015). Will MOOCs transform learning and teaching in higher education? Engagement and course retention in online learning provision. British Journal of Educational Technology,46(3), 455–471. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12268.
de Lima, M., & Zorrilla, M. E. (2017). Social networks and the building of learning communities: An experimental study of a social MOOC. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning,18(1), 40–64. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i1.2630.
Deng, R., Benckendorff, P., & Gannaway, D. (2019). Progress and new directions for teaching and learning in MOOCs. Computers & Education,129, 48–60.
Dillahunt, T. R., Wang, B. Z., & Teasley, S. (2014). Democratizing higher education: Exploring MOOC use among those who cannot afford a formal education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1841.
Eriksson, T., Adawi, T., & Stöhr, C. (2017). “Time is the bottleneck”: A qualitative study exploring why learners drop out of MOOCs. Journal of Computing in Higher Education,29(1), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-016-9127-8.
Gameel, B. G. (2017). Learner satisfaction with massive open online courses. American Journal of Distance Education,31(2), 98–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2017.1300462.
Gameel, B. G., & Wilkins, K. G. (2019). When it comes to MOOCs, where you are from makes a difference. Computers & Education,136, 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.014.
Gillani, N., & Eynon, R. (2014). Communication patterns in massively open online courses. The Internet and Higher Education,23, 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.05.004.
Heller, R. F. (2014). Learning by MOOC or by crook. The Medical Journal of Australia,200(4), 192–193. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja14.00129.
Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2014). Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges. Educational research review,12, 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2014.05.001.
Ho, A. D., Chuang, I., Reich, J., Coleman, C. A., Whitehill, J., Northcutt, C. G., et al. (2015). HarvardX and MITx: Two years of open online courses fall 2012-Summer 2014. SSRN Electronic Journal,10, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2586847.
Hone, K. S., & El Said, G. R. (2016). Exploring the factors affecting MOOC retention: A survey study. Computers & Education,98, 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.016.
Jung, Y., & Lee, J. (2018). Learning engagement and persistence in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCS). Computers & Education,122, 9–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.013.
Karnouskos, S. (2017). Massive open online courses (MOOCs) as an enabler for competent employees and innovation in industry. Computers in Industry,91, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2017.05.001.
Khalil, H. & Ebner, M. (2014). MOOCs completion rates and possible methods to improve retention—A literature review. In J. Viteli & M. Leikomaa (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia 2014—World conference on educational media and technology (pp. 1305–1313). Tampere, Finland: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/147656/.
Kizilcec, R. F., Piech, C., & Schneider, E. (2013). Deconstructing disengagement: Analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses. In Proceedings of the third international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 170–179). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2460296.2460330.
Knowles, M. (1975). Self-Directed Learning. Chicago: Follet.
Knowles, M. (1984). The adult learner: A neglected species (3rd ed.). Houston: Gulf Publishing.
Li, B., Wang, X., & Tan, S. C. (2018). What makes MOOC users persist in completing MOOCs? A perspective from network externalities and human factors. Computers in Human Behavior,85, 385–395.
Li, K. (2019). MOOC learners’ demographics, self-regulated learning strategy, perceived learning and satisfaction: A structural equation modeling approach. Computers & Education,132, 16–30.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry (Vol. 75). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Littlejohn A., & Margaryan A. (2014) Technology-enhanced professional learning. In: S. Billett, C. Harteis, H. Gruber (Eds.), International handbook of research in professional and practice-based learning. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8902-8_43.
Liu, M., Kang, J., Cao, M. W., Lim, M. H., Ko, Y. J., Myers, R., et al. (2014). Understanding moocs as an emerging online learning tool: Perspectives from the students. The American Journal of Distance Education.,28(3), 147–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2014.926145.
Liu, M., Kang, J., & McKelroy, E. (2015). Examining learners’ perspective of taking a MOOC: Reasons, excitement, and perception of usefulness. Educational Media International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2015.1053289.
Liu, M., McKelroy, E., Kang, J., Harron, J., & Liu, S. (2016). Examining the use of Facebook and Twitter as an additional social space in a MOOC. American Journal of Distance Education,30(1), 14–26.
McAuley, A., Stewart, B., Siemens, G., & Cormier, D. (2010). The MOOC model for digital practice. Charlottetown: University of Prince Edward Island.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Milligan, C., & Littlejohn, A. (2017). Why study on a MOOC? The motives of students and professionals. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i2.3033.
Milligan, C., Littlejohn, A., & Margaryan, A. (2013). Patterns of engagement in connectivist MOOCs. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2). Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol9no2/milligan_0613.pdf.
Nawrot, I., & Doucet, A. (2014). Building engagement for MOOC students: Introducing support for time management on online learning platforms. In Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on world wide web (pp. 1077–1082). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2567948.2580054.
Park, Y., Jung, I., & Reeves, T. C. (2015). Learning from MOOCs: A qualitative case study from the learners’ perspectives. Educational Media International,52(2), 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2015.1053286.
Petronzi, D., & Hadi, M. (2016). Exploring the factors associated with MOOC engagement, retention and the wider benefits for learners. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning,19(2), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1515/eurodl-2016-0011.
Pursel, B. K., Zhang, L., Jablokow, K. W., Choi, G. W., & Velegol, D. (2016). Understanding MOOC students: Motivations and behaviours indicative of MOOC completion. Journal of Computer Assisted learning,32(3), 202–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12131.
Rabin, E., Kalman, Y. M., & Kalz, M. (2019). An empirical investigation of the antecedents of learner-centered outcome measures in MOOCs. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0144-3.
Schugurensky, D. (2000). The forms of informal learning: Towards a conceptualization of the field. WALL working paper #19-2000. Retrieved from http://www.nall.ca/res/19formsofinformal.htm.
Shapiro, H. B., Lee, C. H., Wyman Roth, N. E., Li, K., Çetinkaya-Rundel, M., & Canelas, D. A. (2017). Understanding the massive open online course (MOOC) student experience: An examination of attitudes, motivations, and barriers. Computers & Education,110, 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.03.003.
Stewart, B. (2013). Massiveness + openness = New literacies of participation? MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 228-238. Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol9no2/stewart_bonnie_0613.pdf.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Procedures and techniques for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Tawfik, A. A., Reeves, T. D., Stich, A. E., et al. (2017). The nature and level of learner–learner interaction in a chemistry massive open online course (MOOC). Journal of Computing Higher Education,29(3), 411–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-017-9135-3.
Watson, S. L., Watson, W. R., Richardson, J., & Loizzo, J. (2016). Instructor’s use of social presence, teaching presence, and attitudinal dissonance: A case study of an attitudinal change MOOC. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2379.
Watson, S. L., Watson, W. R., Yu, J. H., Alamri, H., & Mueller, C. (2017). Learner profiles of attitudinal learning in a MOOC: An explanatory sequential mixed methods study. Computers & Education,114, 274–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.005.
Yousef, A. M. F., Chatti, M. A., Schroeder, U., & Wosnitza, M. (2015). A usability evaluation of a blended MOOC environment: An experimental case study. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i2.2032.
Zheng, S., Rosson, M. B., Shih, P. C., & Carroll, J. M. (2015). Understanding student motivation, behaviors and perceptions in MOOCs. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing (pp. 1882–1895). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675217.
Zutshi, S., Ohare, S., & Rodafinos, A. (2013). Experiences in MOOCs: The perspective of students. American Journal of Distance Education,27(4), 218–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2013.838067.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Professor Rosental Calmon Alves, Director of Knight Center for Journalism in the Americas at the University of Texas at Austin for his encouragement and support for this research.
Funding
This study was not funded.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, M., Zou, W., Shi, Y. et al. What do participants think of today’s MOOCs: an updated look at the benefits and challenges of MOOCs designed for working professionals. J Comput High Educ 32, 307–329 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-019-09234-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-019-09234-x