Epistemic neural network based evaluation of online teaching status during epidemic period | Evolutionary Intelligence Skip to main content
Log in

Epistemic neural network based evaluation of online teaching status during epidemic period

  • Special Issue
  • Published:
Evolutionary Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During the epidemic, online teaching became the mainstream. Online teaching evaluation aims to systematically test teachers' teaching process according to certain teaching objectives and standards, and evaluate its value, advantages and disadvantages, so as to improve the quality of teaching. It is not only an important part of the teaching process, but also the basis of all effective and successful teaching. In this paper, we propose an online teaching evaluation method based on Epistemic Neural Network (ENN), which is an evolutionary intelligence method. In terms of uncertainty modeling, ENN's design innovation provides the improvement effect of geometric progression in terms of statistical quality and calculation cost. Therefore, it is very suitable for teaching evaluation, which is an evaluation process guided by a variety of uncertain factors. Specifically, this paper considers the content and grade standards of online teaching evaluation from five aspects. (1) Teachers' syllabus, teaching progress, teaching plan, courseware and other teaching documents and teaching materials; (2) Abide by teaching discipline, the implementation of teaching plan and the completion of teaching tasks; (3) Teaching attitude, teaching investment, teaching and educating people, and the comprehensive quality of teachers; (4) Whether the concepts taught in the course are accurate, the expression is clear, whether the key points are prominent and whether the difficulties are clearly explained; (5) The depth, breadth and frontier of teaching content, and the amount of classroom information. According to the above five evaluation indexes which involves the big data analysis, we train ENN to get an evaluation score that can evaluate the teacher's online teaching process. In addition, we also test the average evaluation time to verify the effectiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Osband I, Wen Z, Asghari M et al. (2021) Epistemic neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.08924

  2. Martin F, Ritzhaupt A, Kumar S et al (2019) Award-winning faculty online teaching practices: course design, assessment and evaluation, and facilitation. Internet High Educ 42:34–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ibrahim AF, Attia AS, Asma’M B et al (2021) Evaluation of the online teaching of architectural design and basic design courses case study: college of architecture at JUST, Jordan. Ain Shams Eng J 12(2):2345–2353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jones RM (2021) Online teaching of forensic medicine and pathology during the COVID-19 pandemic: a course evaluation. J Forensic Leg Med 83:102229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lin H, You J, Xu T (2021) Evaluation of online teaching quality: an extended linguistic MAGDM framework based on risk preferences and unknown weight information. Symmetry 13(2):192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Li M, Su Y (2020) Evaluation of online teaching quality of basic education based on artificial intelligence. Int J Emerg Technol Learn (iJET) 15(16):147–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hou J (2021) Online teaching quality evaluation model based on support vector machine and decision tree. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 40(2):2193–2203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jiang L, Wang X (2020) Optimization of online teaching quality evaluation model based on hierarchical PSO-BP neural network. Complexity. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6647683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lv J, Wang X, Huang M (2017) ACO-inspired ICN routing mechanism with mobility support. Appl Soft Comput 58:427–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Janiesch C, Zschech P, Heinrich K (2021) Machine learning and deep learning. Electron Mark 31(3):685–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Burkov A (2019) The hundred-page machine learning book. Andriy Burkov, Quebec City

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sun S, Cao Z, Zhu H et al (2019) A survey of optimization methods from a machine learning perspective. IEEE Trans Cybern 50(8):3668–3681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Haihong C, Biao H, Feng L, Wenguo C (2017) Machine learning principles and applications. University of Electronic Science and Technology Press, Chengdu, pp 2–19

    Google Scholar 

  14. Anderson JA (1995) An introduction to neural networks. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. He M (2015) Fundamentals of college computer. Southeast University Press, Nanjing

    Google Scholar 

  16. Greydanus S, Dzamba M, Yosinski J (2019) Hamiltonian neural networks. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 32:1–11

  17. What is neural network? https://www.ibm.com/cn-zh/cloud/learn/neural-networks. (2020)

  18. Kiranyaz S, Avci O, Abdeljaber O et al (2021) 1D convolutional neural networks and applications: a survey. Mech Syst Signal Process 151:107398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sherstinsky A (2020) Fundamentals of recurrent neural network (RNN) and long short-term memory (LSTM) network. Phys D 404:132306

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Jospin LV, Laga H, Boussaid F et al (2022) Hands-on Bayesian neural networks—a tutorial for deep learning users. IEEE Comput Intell Mag 17(2):29–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lakshminarayanan B, Pritzel A, Blundell C (2017) Simple and scalable predictive uncertainty estimation using deep ensembles. In: Advances in neural information processing systems, Long Beach, CA, USA, pp. 6405–6416

  22. Gal Y, Ghahramani Z (2016) Dropout as a Bayesian approximation: representing model uncertainty in deep learning. International conference on machine learning 48:1050–1059

  23. Radford A, Kim JW, Hallacy C, Ramesh A, Goh G, Agarwal S, Sastry G, Askell A, Mishkin P, Clark J, Krueger G, Sutskever I (2021) Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In: International conference on machine learning, pp. 8748–8763. PMLR

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ni Yao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that there is no conflicts of interest in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yao, N. Epistemic neural network based evaluation of online teaching status during epidemic period. Evol. Intel. 16, 1565–1572 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12065-022-00789-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12065-022-00789-w

Keywords