Promoting Human Subjects Training for Place-Based Communities and Cultural Groups in Environmental Research: Curriculum Approaches for Graduate Student/Faculty Training | Science and Engineering Ethics
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Promoting Human Subjects Training for Place-Based Communities and Cultural Groups in Environmental Research: Curriculum Approaches for Graduate Student/Faculty Training

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A collaborative team of environmental sociologists, community psychologists, religious studies scholars, environmental studies/science researchers and engineers has been working together to design and implement new training in research ethics, culture and community-based approaches for place-based communities and cultural groups. The training is designed for short and semester-long graduate courses at several universities in the northeastern US. The team received a 3 year grant from the US National Science Foundation’s Ethics Education in Science and Engineering in 2010. This manuscript details the curriculum topics developed that incorporate ethical principles, particularly for group protections/benefits within the field practices of environmental/engineering researchers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Please see p.11 for instructions to accessing these slides.

References

  • Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments. (1995). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.

  • Almany, G. R., Hamilton, R. J., Williamson, D. H., Evans, R. D., Jones, G. P., Matawai, M., et al. (2010). Research partnerships with local communities: Two case studies from Papua New Guinea and Australia. Coral Reefs, 29, 567–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansari, A. (2001). The greening of engineers: A cross-cultural experience. Science and Engineering Ethics, 7, 105–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arqette, M., Cole, M., Cook, K., La France, B., Peters, M., Ransom, J., et al. (2002). Holistic risk-based environmental decision-making: A native perspective. Environmental Health Perspective, 110(Suppl. 2), 259–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Athanassoulis, N., & Ross, A. (2010). The social nature of engineering and its implications for risk taking. Science and Engineering Ethics, 16, 147–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnbaum, D., & Byron, M. (2001). Research ethics, text and readings. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, T., & Childress, J. (2009). Principles of biomedical ethics. London: Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengston, D. N., Schermann, M., Moua, M., & Lee, T. T. (2008). Listening to neglected voices: Hmong and public lands in Minnesota and Wisconsin. Society and Natural Resources, 21, 876–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bento, S. F., Hardy, E., & Jose Duarte Osis, M. (2008). Process for obtaining informed consent: Women’s opinions. Developing World Bioethics, 8, 197–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brugge, D., et al. (2005). Susceptibility of elderly Asian immigrants to persuasion with respect to participation in research. Journal of Immigrant Health, 7(2), 93–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campinha-Bacote, J. (2002). The process of cultural competence in the delivery of health care services: A model of care. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 13, 181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, D. T., Jones, L., & Gelberg, L. (2006). Ethics of clinical research within a community-academic partnered participatory framework. Ethnicity and Disease, 16, S118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coughlin, S. (2006). Ethical issues in epidemiological research and public health practice. Emerging Themes in Epidemiology, 3, 16. doi:10.1186/1742-7622-3-16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS). (1991/2008). International ethical guidelines for biomedical research involving human subjects. Geneva.

  • Dangles, O., Carpio, F. C., Villares, M., Yumisaca, F., Liger, B., Rebaudo, F., et al. (2010). Community-based participatory research helps farmers and scientists to manage invasive pests in the Ecuadorian Andes. Ambio, 39(4), 325–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, M., Leahy, J. E., Anderson, D. H., & Jakes, P. J. (2007). Building trust in natural resource management within local communities: A case study of the Midewin National Tallgrass Prarie. Environmental Management, 39, 353–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denny, C., & Grady, C. (2007). Clinical research with economically disadvantaged populations. Journal of Medical Ethics, 33(7), 382–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emanuel, E., Wendler, D., Killen, J., Grady, C. (2004). What makes clinical research in developing countries ethical? The benchmarks of ethical research. Journal of Infectious Disease, 189, 930–937.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels, J. M. M., Dempewolf, H., & Henson-Apollonio, V. (2011). Ethical considerations in agro-biodiversity research, collecting, and use. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 24, 107–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faden, R., & Beauchamp, T. (1986). A history and theory of informed consent. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, M. W., Bernstein, D., & Carter, T. H. (1998). A model agreement for genetic research in socially identifiable populations. American Journal of Human Genetics, 63(3), 696–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, M. W., Sharp, R., Freeman, W., Chino, M., Bernsten, D., & Carter, T. (1999). The role of community review in evaluating the risks of human genetic variation research. American Journal of Human Genetics, 64, 1720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, W. J., & O’Neill-Carrillo, E. (2008). Engineering ethics in Puerto Rico: Issues and narratives. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14, 417–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gbadegesin, S., & Wendler, D. (2006). Protecting communities from exploitation. Bioethics, 20(5), 248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, A., Harper, B., Stone, D., O’Neill, C., Berger, P., Harris, S., et al. (2012). Conducting research with tribal communities: Sovereignty, ethics, and data-sharing issues (Commentary). Environmental Health Perspectives, 120(1), 6–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, C. E., Jr. (2008). The good engineer: Giving virtue its due in engineering ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14, 153–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, J. L. (2010). Managing for justice in community-based water planning: A conceptual framework. Environmental Conservation, 37(3), 356–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, C., Andrade, S. J., & Byrd, T. (2001). The ethical dimensions of cultural competence in border health care settings. Family and Community Health, 23(4), 38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyder, A. A., Wali, S. A., Kahn, A. N., Teoh, N. B., Kass, N. E., & Dawson, L. (2004). Ethical review of health research: A perspective from developing country researchers. Journal of Medical Ethics, 30(1), 68–72. www.jstor.org/stable.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Labor Organization. (1989). Binding international labor organization’s convention No. 169. http://www.ilo.org/indigenous/Conventions/no169/lang--en/index.htm

  • International Society for Ethnobiology. (2006). International society for ethnobiology code of ethics. http://ise.arts.ubc.ca/global_coalition/ethics.php.

  • Lavery, J., Grady, C., Wahl, E., & Emanuel, E. (2007). Ethical issues in international biomedical research: A casebook. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, W. T., & Ronald, K. (2000). Engineering practice and engineering ethics. Science Technology Human Values, 25, 195. http://www.jstor.org.

  • Manion, M. (2002). Ethics, engineering and sustainable development. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 21(3), 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H., & Richard, K. (2004). The role of ethics in experimental marine biology and ecology. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 300, 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, K. S., & Hall-Arber, M. (2008). Creating a place for “Community” in New England fisheries. Human Ecology Review, 15(2), 161–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthew, D. (2008). Race, religion, and informed consent: Lessons from social science. Journal of Law, Medicine, & Ethics, 36(1), 150–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Measham, T. G., Richards, C., Robinson, C. J., Larson, S., & Brakes, L. (2011). Genuine community engagement in remote dryland regions: Natural resource management in Lake Eyre basin. Geographical Research, 49(2), 171–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). (1976). Geneva, Switzerland. www.ohchr.org.

  • Oguz, N. Y. (2003). Research ethics committees in developing countries and informed consent: With special reference to Turkey. Journal of Laboratory Clinical Medicine, 141(5), 292–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prokopy, L. S. (2008). Ethical concerns in researching collaborative natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources, 21, 258–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quigley, D. (2006). A review of ethical improvements to environmental/public health research: Case examples from native communities. Journal of Health Education, 33(2), 130–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrag, B. (2009). Piercing the veil: Ethical issues in ethnographic research. Science and Engineering Ethics, 15, 135–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, R., & Foster, M. (2002). Ethical issues in environmental health research. Environmental Health Perspectives, 1210(2), 1786–1788.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. S. (1998). Concept analysis: Cultural competence. Journal of Cultural Diversity, 5(1), 4–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swierstra, T., & Katinka, W. (2010). Designing a good life: A matrix for the technological mediation of morality. Science and Engineering Ethics, 18(1), 157–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, H. A., Faden, R. R., & Kass, N. E. (2008). The ethics of public health research. Moral obligations to communities. International Encyclopedia of Public Health, Elsevier, pp. 496–503.

  • Thering, S. (2011). A methodology for a scholarship of transdisciplinary action research in the design professions: Lessons from Indian country. Landscape Journal, Project Muse.

  • United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization. (2003). Universal declaration on bioethics and human rights. www.unesco.org/...human.../bioethics/bioethics-and-human-rights.2003

  • United States National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1978). The belmont report. Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Bethesda, MD: The Commission.

  • van De Poel, I. (2001). Investigating ethical issues in engineering design. Science and Engineering Ethics, 7, 429–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vreeman, R., Kamaara, E., Kamanda, A., Ayuki, D., Nyandiko, W., Atwoli, L., Ayaya, S., Gisore, P., Scanlon, M., Braitstein, P. (2012). A qualitative study using traditional community assemblies to investigate community perspectives on informed consent and research participation in Western Kenya. BMC Medical Ethics, 13, 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waste for Life. (2009). Weblog journal of activities in Buenos Aires: 2007–2009. Accessed June 2009, from www.wasteforlife.org.

  • World Health Organization. (2000). Operational guidelines for ethics committees that review biomedical research. Geneva, Switzerland. www.who.int/tdr/...guidelines.../operational-guidelines-ethics.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The NEEP Project gratefully acknowledges the support of the National Science Foundation’s Ethics Education in Science and Engineering (EESE) Program Grant Geo-1032754. The author would like to thank these colleagues, scholars and graduate students for their contributions to the NEEP progress to date: for teaching, evaluation and program planning support, David A. Sonnenfeld, Ph.D., Professor of Environmental Studies, SUNY-ESF, and subcontract principal investigator; Phil Brown, Ph.D., co-principal investigator from Brown University (2010–2012) and Distinguished Professor of Sociology, Northeastern University (2013); and Linda Silka, Ph.D., Professor of Economics, University of Maine. Also, for assistance with materials review/development and dissemination, NEEP thanks Thomas Amidon, Professor of Engineering, Neil Ringler, Ph.D., Associate Provost of Research, Russ Briggs, Ph.D., Director, Division of Environmental Science, Valerie Luzadis, Ph.D., Professor and Chair, Environmental Studies, SUNY-ESF; Ernest Wallwork, Ph.D. and Phillip Arnold, Ph.D., Professors of Religion, Syracuse University; Sheila Bonde, Ph.D., Professor of History of Art/Architecture, Brown University; Janet Blume, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Engineering at Brown University, J. Timmons Roberts, Ph.D., Professor of Sociology, Brown University, and graduate research assistants, Monique Reeser and Kelly Bancroft from SUNY-ESF Environmental Studies; Soonki Lee, Dept. of Religion, Syracuse University; and Rebecca Keane, Deanna Talerico, Taryn Martinez, Brianna Craft, and Linlang He, Brown University Center for Environmental Studies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Northeast Ethics Education Partnership, Center for Environmental Studies, Brown University, 135 Angell St., PO Box 1943, Providence, RI, 02912, USA

    Dianne Quigley

Authors
  1. Dianne Quigley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dianne Quigley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Quigley, D. Promoting Human Subjects Training for Place-Based Communities and Cultural Groups in Environmental Research: Curriculum Approaches for Graduate Student/Faculty Training. Sci Eng Ethics 21, 209–226 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-013-9508-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-013-9508-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation