Game theory for B5G upper-tier resource allocation using network slicing | Wireless Networks Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Game theory for B5G upper-tier resource allocation using network slicing

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Wireless Networks Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Network slicing (NS) has emerged as a promising solution that enables network operators to slice network resources such as spectrum and bandwidth to adapt to different beyond 5G scenarios. This allows new operators to enter the market: the infrastructure provider (InP), who owns the infrastructure, and the mobile virtual network operator (MVNO), who may purchase a resource slice from the InP to provide a specific service to their end-users. To better deal with the resource allocation problem, efficient algorithms and methods have been done such as the auction model, bidding method, and game theory. This paper presents an upper-tier resource allocation based on game theory. This mechanism considers a single base station (BS) and multi MVNOs-users that share aggregated bandwidth radio access networks to maximize utilized BS resources. The proposed method takes both the bandwidth utilization of BS and the service requirements of MVNO users. Accordingly, the Game Theory solution takes two contradictory objectives: the InP aims to maximize its revenue while the MVNOs want to serve their users by paying the minimum amount. We prove that our proposal achieves an optimal solution from both InP and MVNOs’ in terms of revenue and quality of service .

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Debbabi, F., Jmal, R., Chaari, L., & Aguiar, R. L. (2022). An Overview of inter-slice & intra-slice resource allocation in b5g telecommunication networks. EEE Transactions on Network and Service Management.

    Google Scholar 

  2. International Telecommunication Union Radio communications Sector (ITU-R). (2017). Minimum requirements related to technical performance for imt-2020 radio interface(s), ITU-R Report M.2410-0, November,

  3. Debbabi, F., Jmal, R., & Fourati, L. C. (2021). 5G network slicing: Fundamental concepts, architectures, algorithmics, projects practices, and open issues. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 33(20), e6352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Debbabi, F., Jmal, R., Fourati, L. C., & Ksentini, A. (2020). Algorithmics and modeling aspects of network slicing in 5G and beyonds network: Survey. IEEE Access.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Datar, M., & Altman, E. (2021). Strategic resource management in 5G network slicing, 2021, 33th international teletraffic congress (ITC-33), 1–9. IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Abouaomar, A., Kobbane, A. & Cherkaoui, S. (2022) Matching-game for user-fog assignment. arXiv:2201.11827v1 [cs.NI]

  7. Gorla, P., Paithankar, D. R., Chamola, V., Bitragunta, S., & Guizani, M. (2021). Optimal spectral resource allocation and pricing for 5g and beyond: A game theoretic approach. IEEE Networking Letters, 3(3), 119–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zambianco, M., & Verticale, G. (2020). Interference minimization in 5G physical-layer network slicing. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 68(7), 4554–4564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Khan, Z.H, Ali, M., Rashid, I., Siddiqui, A.M., Muhammad, I. & Shahid, M. (2020). Resource allocation and throughput maximization in decoupled 5G. IEEE wireless communications and networking conference (WCNC).

  10. Ndikumana, A., Ahsan Kazmi, S.M., Kim, K., Shirajum Munirand, Md. Saad, W., Seon Hong, C. et al. (2020). Pricing mechanism for virtualized heterogeneous resources in wireless network virtualization. In International conference on information networking (ICOIN). IEEE pp. 366–371.

  11. Amine, M. Kobbane, A. & Ben-Othman, J. New network slicing scheme for UE association solution in 5G ultra dense HetNets. In ICC 2020-2020 IEEE international conference on communications (ICC), pp. 1–6.

  12. Panagiotis, V., Tsiropoulou, E. E., & Papavassiliou, S. (2019). On controlling spectrum fragility via resource pricing in 5G wireless networks. IEEE Networking Letters, 1(3), 111–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Perveen, A., Patwary, M., Aneiba, A. (2019). Dynamically reconfigurable slice allocation and admission control within 5G wireless networks. In: IEEE 89th vehicular technology conference (VTC2019-Spring) (pp. 1–7).

  14. Kazmi, S. M. A., Tran, N. H., Ho, T. M., & Hong, C. S. (2017). Hierarchical matching game for service selection and resource purchasing in wireless network virtualization. IEEE Communications Letters, 22(121–124), 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Du, J., Jiang, C., Wang, J., Ren, Y., & Debbah, M. (2020). Machine learning for 6G wireless networks: Carrying forward enhanced bandwidth, massive access, and ultrareliable/low-latency service. IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine, 15(4), 122–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pase, F., Giordani, M., Cuozzo, G., Cavallero, S., Eichinger, J., Verdone, R., & Zorzi, M. (2022). Distributed resource allocation for URLLC in IIoT scenarios: A multi-armed bandit approach, arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.12201 (2022).

  17. Filali, A., Mlika, Z. Cherkaoui, S., Kobbane, A. (2022). Dynamic SDN-based radio access network slicing with deep reinforcement learning for URLLC and eMBB services. IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering (2022).

  18. Debbabi, F., Rihab, J., Chaari, L., Aguiar, R.L., Gnichi, R., & Taleb, S. (2022) Overview of AI-based algorithms for network slicing resource management in B5G and 6G. In 2022 International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing (IWCMC). IEEE, pp. 330–335.

  19. Roth, A. E. (2008). Deferred acceptance algorithms: History, theory, practice, and open questions (Vol. 36 (3), pp. 537–569). Springer.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. 3GPP, Study on channel model for frequencies from 0.5 to 100 GHz, 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), Tech. Rep, 38 (2018).

  21. 3GPP, “Evolved universal terrestrial radio access (E-UTRA): Physical layer procedures, Release 11,” Eur. Telecommun. Standards Inst., Tech. Rep. 3GPP TS 36.213, version 11.1.0, December (2012).

  22. Yang, Y., Hiltunen, K., Chernogorov, F. (2021) On the performance of co-existence between public eMBB and non-public URLLC networks. In 2021 IEEE 93rd vehicular technology conference (VTC2021-Spring).

  23. Du, J., Jiang, C., Benslimane, A., Guo, S., Ren, Y. (2022) SDN-based resource allocation in edge and cloud computing systems: An evolutionary Stackelberg differential game approach. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

  24. Clempner, J. B., & Poznyak, A. S. (2019). Solving transfer pricing involving collaborative and non-cooperative equilibria in nash and Stackelberg games: Centralized-decentralized decision making. Computational Economics, 54(2), 477–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Caballero, P., Banchs, A., Veciana, D., & Gustavo and Costa-Perez, Xavier,. (2019). Network slicing games: Enabling customization in multi-tenant mobile networks. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 27(2), 662–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ISITCom, University of Sousse, 4011, Hammam Sousse, Tunisia

    Fadoua Debbabi

  2. Digital Research Center of Sfax (CRNS), Laboratory of Signals systeMs aRtificial Intelligence neTworkS (SM@RTS), University of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia

    Fadoua Debbabi, Rihab Jmal & Lamia Chaari Fourati

  3. Instituto de Telecomunicações, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal

    Fadoua Debbabi & Rui Luis Aguiar

  4. Departamento de Electrónica, Telecomunicações e Informática, Universidade de Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal

    Rui Luis Aguiar

  5. Department of Computer Sciences, ISLAIB, University of Jendouba, Beja, Tunisia

    Rihab Jmal

Authors
  1. Fadoua Debbabi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rui Luis Aguiar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rihab Jmal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lamia Chaari Fourati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fadoua Debbabi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Debbabi, F., Aguiar, R.L., Jmal, R. et al. Game theory for B5G upper-tier resource allocation using network slicing. Wireless Netw 29, 2047–2059 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-023-03243-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-023-03243-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation