Energy usage analysis of digital modulations in wireless sensor networks with realistic battery model | Wireless Networks
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Energy usage analysis of digital modulations in wireless sensor networks with realistic battery model

  • Published:
Wireless Networks Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A wireless sensor network is a collection of tiny sensor nodes that are deployed to monitor a physical environment. These sensor nodes are generally powered by non-renewable batteries and maybe deployed in harsh environment. Thus, energy resource is precious that makes protocols design for this kind of networks a crucial challenge. Especially, in physical layer, orthogonal modulations as PPM or FSK are suitable. The commonly used models to investigate the network lifetime are based on a linear battery discharge. Really, the battery discharge is closely bonded to the discharge current, and typically is non-linear. This paper presents a performance analysis of both PPM and FSK modulations used in battery powered wireless sensor node. A Rakhmatov–Vrudhula–Wallach model is used to evaluate the used battery charge for a given instantaneous current load. By numerical results, it is proved that PPM modulation outperforms FSK one in term of battery charge use for different network density and for different M-ary signaling schemes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nguyen, L. T., Defago, X., Beuran, R., & Shinoda, Y. (2008). An energy efficient routing scheme for mobile wireless sensor networks. In IEEE/ISWCS (pp. 568–572).

  2. Yrjola, J. (2005). Summary of energy efficiency communication protocol for wireless micro sensor networks. In T-79.194 seminar on theoretical computer science. Helsinki University of Technology.

  3. Chandrakasan, A., Amirtharajah, R., Cho, S., Goodman, J., Konduri, G., Rabiner, W., & Wang, A. (1999). Design considerations for distributed micro-sensor systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE 1999 custom integrated circuits conference (CICC’99) (pp. 279–286). San Diego, CA, USA.

  4. Estrin, D., Girod, L., Pottie, G., & Srivastava, M. (2001). Instrumenting the world with wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing (ICASSP 2001), vol. 4 (pp. 2033–2036). Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

  5. Estrin, D., Govindan, R., Heidemann, J., & Kumar, S. (1999). Next century challenges: Scalable coordination in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 5th annual ACM/IEEE international conference on mobile computing and networking (MobiCom’99) (pp. 263–270). Seattle Washington, USA.

  6. Martin, T. (1999). Balancing batteries, power, and performance: System issues in CPU speed-setting for mobile computing. Ph.D. Dissertation, August 1999.

  7. Qu, F., Yang, L., & Swami, A. (2007). Battery power efficiency of PPM and OOK in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the acoustics, speech and signal processing, 2007. ICASSP 2007 (pp. III-525–III-528).

  8. Tang, Q., Yang, L., Giannakis, G. B., & Qin, T. (2007). Battery power efficiency of PPM and FSK in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 6(4), 1308–1319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Duan, D., Qu, F., Yang, L., Swami, A., & Principe, J. C. (2010). Modulation selection from a battery power efficiency perspective. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 58(7), 1907–1911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pedram, M., & Wu, Q. (2002). Battery-powered digital CMOS design. IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems, 10(5), 601–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jongerden, M. R., & Haverkort, B. R. (2009). Which battery model to use? IET Software, 3(6), 445–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Doyle, M., Fuller, T. F., & Newman, J. (1993). Modeling of galvano static charge and discharge of the lithium/polymer/insertion cell. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 140(6), 1526–1533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fuller, T., Doyle, M., & Newman, J. (1994). Simulation and optimization of the dual lithium ion insertion cell. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 141(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen, M., & Rincon-Mora, G. A. (2006). Accurate electrical battery model capable of predicting runtime and I–V performance. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 21(2), 504–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chiasserini, C., & Rao, R. (1999). Pulsed battery discharge in communication devices. In Proceedings of the 5th annual ACM/IEEE international conference on mobile computing and networking (pp. 88–95).

  16. Rakhmatov, D., Vrudhula, S., & Chakrabarti, C. (2002). Battery- conscious task sequencing for portable devices including voltage/clock scaling. In Proceedings of the 39th annual design automation conference (DAC) (pp. 189–194). June 2002.

  17. Zhang, Fumin, & Shi, Zhenwu (2009). Optimal and adaptive battery discharge strategies for cyber-physical systems. In Proceedings of the 48th IEEE conference on decision and control, 2009 held jointly with the 2009 28th Chinese control conference. CDC/CCC 2009 (pp. 6232–6237). 15–18 Dec. 2009.

  18. Chau, Chi-Kin, Qin, Fei, Sayed, S., Wahab, M. H., & Yang, Yang. (2010). Harnessing battery recovery effect in wireless sensor networks: Experiments and analysis. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 28(7), 1222–1232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rakhmatov, D., & Vrudhula, S. (2003). Energy management for battery-powered embedded systems. ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems, 2(3), 277–324.

  20. Rao, R., & Vrudhula, S. (2005). Battery optimization vs energy optimization: Which to choose and when?. In IEEE/ACM international conference on computer-aided design, 2005. ICCAD-2005 (pp. 439–445). 6–10 Nov 2005.

  21. Zheng, N., Wu, Z., Lin, M., & Wang, Q. (2008). An iterative computation method for interpreting and extending an analytical battery model. Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A., 9(2), 279–288.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Schwartz, J.D., Azaña, J., Zicha, N., & Plant, D.V. (2009). Design and analysis of a compact UWB pulse generator with programmable pulse shape. In IEEE international conference on ultra-wideband. ICUWB-2009 (pp. 38–42). Sep 2009.

  23. Ye, W., Heidemann, J., & Estrin, D. (2004). Medium access control with coordinated adaptive sleeping for wireless sensor networks. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 12(3), 493–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Systems Engineering Lab, Ibn Tofail Kénitra University, Kenitra, Morocco

    Ouadoudi Zytoune

  2. LRIT lab. URAC29, Faculty of Sciences, Mohamed V University, Rabat, Morocco

    Driss Aboutajdine

Authors
  1. Ouadoudi Zytoune
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Driss Aboutajdine
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ouadoudi Zytoune.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zytoune, O., Aboutajdine, D. Energy usage analysis of digital modulations in wireless sensor networks with realistic battery model. Wireless Netw 22, 2713–2725 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-015-1115-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-015-1115-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation