Energy-efficient node position identification through payoff matrix and variability analysis | Telecommunication Systems Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Energy-efficient node position identification through payoff matrix and variability analysis

  • Published:
Telecommunication Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Applications for mobile ad-hoc networks are heavily dependent on information about the nodes positions. Since the network may include malicious nodes providing bogus data (e.g., fake positions), the reliability of this information is critical. Although this problem has been addressed by some predictive models, challenges still exist regarding (a) the accuracy/security of such models, (b) the potential advantages of combining different prediction models, (c) the power consumption resulting from the simultaneous application of multiple models, and (d) the lack of strategic approaches in the analysis of information aiming to find the most advantageous data and balance divergent results. To address these issues, we analyze in this paper the performance of two prediction methods: linear regression and Grey model. We have evaluated their corresponding energy costs for reliably identifying each node position. The results, obtained via simulations, are added to independent vectors and statistical indicators are gathered to create a game theory payoff matrix. The proposed model allows the evaluation of the predictive methods either individually or collectively, facilitating the identification of the best parameters for a target energy saving profile.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Notes

  1. http://www.ulb.ac.be/di/labo/datasets.html.

  2. http://www.moteiv.com.

References

  1. Basilico, N., Gatti, N., Monga, M., & Sicari, S. (2014). Security games for node localization through verifiable multilateration. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 11(1), 72–85. doi:10.1109/TDSC.2013.30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bhuiyan, M. Z. A., Wang, G., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2015). Local area prediction-based mobile target tracking in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 64(7), 1968–1982. doi:10.1109/TC.2014.2346209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bierman, H. S., & Fernandez, L. (1998). Game theory with economic application. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Borgne, Y. A. L., Santini, S., & Bontempi, G. (2007). Adaptive model selection for time series prediction in wireless sensor networks. Signal Processing, 87(12), 3010–3020. doi:10.1016/j.sigpro.2007.05.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bosman, H. H., Iacca, G., Tejada, A., Wrtche, H. J., & Liotta, A. (2017). Spatial anomaly detection in sensor networks using neighborhood information. Information Fusion, 33, 41–56. doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2016.04.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Capkun, S., & Hubaux, J. P. (2006). Secure positioning in wireless networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 24(2), 221–232. doi:10.1109/JSAC.2005.861380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Deng, J. L. (1989). Introduction to Grey system theory. The Journal of Grey System, 1(1), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Deshpande, N., Grant, E., & Henderson, T. C. (2014). Target localization and autonomous navigation using wireless sensor networks—A pseudo-gradient algorithm approach. IEEE Systems Journal, 8(1), 93–103. doi:10.1109/JSYST.2013.2260631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Doherty, L., Pister, K. S., & Ghaoui, L. E. (2001). Convex position estimation in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM’01 (Vol. 3, pp. 1655–1663).

  10. Draper, N. R., Smith, H., & Pownell, E. (1966). Applied regression analysis (Vol. 3). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dricot, J. M., der Haegen, M. V., Borgne, Y. A. L., & Bontemp, G. (2008). A framework for user localization and tracking using machine learning techniques in wireless sensors networks. In Proceedings of IEEE sensors conference’08 (pp. 1088–1091).

  12. Fiani, R. (2006). Teoria dos jogos: com aplicações em economia, administração e ciências sociais, rev e atual. Rio de Janeiro: Campus Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Furtado, V. H., Gimene, R., Camargo Júnior, J., & Almeida Júnior, J. (2008). Aspectos de segurança na integração de veículos aéreos não tripulados (vant) no espaço aéreo brasileiro. In VII SITRAER, Rio de Janeiro, 2008.

  14. Guo, Y., Schildt, S., & Wolf, L. (2013). Detecting blackhole and Greyhole attacks in vehicular delay tolerant networks. In Proceedings of IEEE COMSNETS’13 (pp. 1–7).

  15. Guo, Z., Guo, Y., Hong, F., Jin, Z., He, Y., Feng, Y., et al. (2010). Perpendicular intersection: Locating wireless sensors with mobile beacon. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 59(7), 3501–3509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gupta, S. K., Kuila, P., & Jana, P. K. (2016). Genetic algorithm for k-connected relay node placement in wireless sensor networks. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer and Communication Technologies, 1, 721–729. doi:10.1007/978-81-322-2517-1.

    Google Scholar 

  17. He, J., Xu, J., Zhu, X., Zhang, Y., Zhang, T., & Fu, W. (2014). Reputation-based secure sensor localization in wireless sensor networks. The Scientific World Journal, 2014(2014), 1–10. doi:10.1155/2014/308341.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Huang, L., Jia, J., Yu, B., Chun, B. G., Maniatis, P., Naik, M. (2010). Predicting execution time of computer programs using sparse polynomial regression. In Advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 883–891).

  19. Kaaniche, H., & Kamoun, F. (2010). Mobility prediction in wireless ad hoc networks using neural networks. Journal of Telecommunications, 2(1), 95–101.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kayacan, E., Ulutas, B., & Kaynak, O. (2010). Grey system theory-based models in time series prediction. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(2), 1784–1789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Khan, S. U., & Ahmad, I. (2009). A cooperative game theoretical technique for joint optimization of energy consumption and response time in computational grids. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 20(3), 346–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kherani, A., & Rao, A. (2010). Performance of node-eviction schemes in vehicular networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 59(2), 550–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kraus, S., Lin, R., & Shavitt, Y. (2008). On self-interested agents in vehicular networks with car-to-car gossiping. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 57(6), 3319–3332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kuiper, E., & Nadjm-Tehrani, S. (2011). Geographical routing with location service in intermittently connected MANETs. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 60(2), 592–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. L’ecuyer, P. (1999). Good parameters and implementations for combined multiple recursive random number generators. Operations Research, 47(1), 159–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu, D., Ning, P., Liu, A., Wang, C., & Du, W. K. (2008). Attack-resistant location estimation in wireless sensor networks. ACM Transactions on Information and System Security, 11(4), 22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu, J., Jiang, X., Nishiyama, H., & Kato, N. (2011). Reliability assessment for wireless mesh networks under probabilistic region failure model. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 60(5), 2253–2264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Luo, X., & Chang, X. (2015). A novel data fusion scheme using Grey model and extreme learning machine in wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, 13(3), 539–546. doi:10.1007/s12555-014-0309-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Miao, C., Dai, G., Ying, K., & Chen, Q. (2015). Collaborative localization and location verification in WSNs. Sensors, 15(5), 10631–10649. doi:10.3390/s150510631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Morettin, P. A., & Toloi, C. (2006). Análise de séries temporais.

  31. Morettin, P. A., & Toloi, C. d. C. (1987). Previsão de séries temporais. São Paulo: Atual.

  32. Muppirisetty, L. S., Svensson, T., & Wymeersch, H. (2016). Spatial wireless channel prediction under location uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 15(2), 1031–1044. doi:10.1109/TWC.2015.2481879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Nadkar, T., Thumar, V., Tej, G. P., Merchant, S. N., & Desai, U. B. (2012). Distributed power allocation for secondary users in a cognitive radio scenario. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 11(4), 1576–1586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Nakayama, H., Kurosawa, S., Jamalipour, A., Nemoto, Y., & Kato, N. (2009). A dynamic anomaly detection scheme for AODV-based mobile ad hoc networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 58(5), 2471–2481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Nirmala, M. B., & Manjunatha, A. S. (2015). Enhanced voting based secure localization for wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Computer Network and Information Security, 7(12), 52–59. doi:10.5815/ijcnis.2015.12.06.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Padmanabhan, K. S. (2013). Energy efficient localization technique in wireless sensor network. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, 3(11), 148–152.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Perkins, C., Belding-Royer, E., & Das, S. (2003). Ad-hoc on-demand distance vector (AODV) routing. Technical report.

  38. Pescaru, D., & Curiac, D. I. (2014). Anchor node localization for wireless sensor networks using video and compass information fusion. Sensors, 14(3), 4211–4224. doi:10.3390/s140304211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Poornima, P., & Rajesh, R. (2016). Mobility control based dual data transmission for load balancing in WSN. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 24, 193–200. doi:10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2016.24.TAET23427.

  40. Raymond, D. R., Marchany, R. C., Brownfield, M., & Midkiff, S. F. (2009). Effects of denial-of-sleep attacks on wireless sensor network MAC protocols. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 58(1), 367–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Shakhakarmi, N., & Vaman, D. R. (2012). Distributed position localization and tracking (DPLT) of malicious nodes in cluster based mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs). arXiv preprint. arXiv:1203.3601.

  42. Silva, A., Pontes, E., Zhou, F., & Kofuji, S. T. (2014). Grey model and polynomial regression for identifying malicious nodes in MANETs. In Proceedings of IEEE GLOBECOM’14 (pp. 162–168).

  43. Yun Su, Y. L. (2010). Prediction of multivariate chaotic time series with local polynomial fitting. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 59(2), 737–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Tan, X., & Lie, T. (2001). Allocation of transmission loss cost using cooperative game theory in the context of open transmission access. In Proceeding of IEEE Power Engineering Society winter meeting’01 (Vol. 3, pp. 1215–1219).

  45. Tseng, F. M., Yu, H. C., & Tzeng, G. H. (2001). Applied hybrid Grey model to forecast seasonal time series. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 67(2), 291–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Wang, H., Sheng, B., & Li, Q. (2006). Elliptic curve cryptography-based access control in sensor networks. International Journal of Security and Networks, 1(3–4), 127–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Wasef, A., & Shen, X. (2009). EDR: Efficient decentralized revocation protocol for vehicular ad hoc networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 58(9), 5214–5224.

  48. Yang, Z., & Liu, Y. (2012). Understanding node localizability of wireless ad hoc and sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 11(8), 1249–1260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Yann-Ael, L., & Gianluca, B. (2005). Round robin cycle for predictions in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of international conference on intelligent sensors, sensor networks and information processing (pp. 253–258). doi:10.1109/SSNIP.2005.1595588.

  50. Yao, Y., Han, Q., Xu, X., & Jiang, N. (2015). A RSSI-based distributed weighted search localization algorithm for WSNs. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 2015, 1–11. doi:10.1155/2015/293403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Ye, F., Luo, H., Lu, S., & Zhang, L. (2005). Statistical en-route filtering of injected false data in sensor networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 23(4), 839–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Yu, A., & Lv, S. (2016). Research into positioning of the least square support vector machine based on Fisher fishing in WSN. International Journal of Future Generation Communication and Networking, 9(6), 145–150. doi:10.14257/ijfgcn.2016.9.6.14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Zhu, S., Setia, S., Jajodia, S., & Ning, P. (2004). An interleaved hop-by-hop authentication scheme for filtering of injected false data in sensor networks. In Proceeding of IEEE symposium on security and privacy’04 (pp. 259–271).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CERI-LIA (Computer Science Laboratory) at the University of Avignon, Avignon, France

    Fen Zhou

  2. Polytechnical School Universidade de Sao Paulo, Universidade Paulista (UNIP) and Instituto de Pesquisas Tecnologicas (IPT), São Paulo, Brazil

    Anderson Silva

  3. Polytechnical School LSI/LARC-USP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

    Elvis Pontes, Marcos A. Simplicio & Sergio Kofuji

  4. PIT, Universidade de Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal

    Rui Aguiar

  5. Universidade do Oeste Paulista (FIPP) and Instituto de Pesquisas Tecnologicas (IPT), São Paulo, Brazil

    Adilson Guelfi

Authors
  1. Anderson Silva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fen Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Elvis Pontes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Marcos A. Simplicio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Rui Aguiar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Adilson Guelfi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Sergio Kofuji
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fen Zhou.

Additional information

Part of this work has been presented at IEEE GLOBECOM 2014 and published in its proceedings [42].

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Silva, A., Zhou, F., Pontes, E. et al. Energy-efficient node position identification through payoff matrix and variability analysis. Telecommun Syst 65, 459–477 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-016-0245-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-016-0245-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation