Abstract
This paper aims to clarify the connection between the logic of temporal distinctions and the temporal features of propositions. Contra Prior, it argues that the adoption of tense operators does not commit one to the view that propositions can change their truth value over time.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Armstrong, D. M. (1997). A world of states of affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brogaard, B. (2012). Transient truths: An essay in the metaphysics of propositions. New York: Oxford University Press. See also Meyer (2012).
Cresswell, M. J. (1990). Entities and Indices. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Davidson, D. (1980). The logical form of action sentences. In D. Nicholas Rescher (Ed.), Essays on Actions and Events (pp. 105–122). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Enç, M. (1987). Anchoring conditions for tense. Linguistic Inquiry, 18, 633–657.
Fine, K. (2005). Tense and reality. In J. Almog, J. Perry, & H. Wettstein (Eds.), Modality and Tense (pp. 261–320). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Higginbotham, J. (1999). Tense, indexicality, and consequence. In J. Butterfield (Ed.), The Arguments of Time (pp. 197–215). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Kamp, H., & Reyle, U. (1993). From Discourse to Logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Lewis, D. (1992). Critical notice of D. M. Armstrong, A combinatorial theory of possibility. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 70, 211–224.
Lewis, D. (1998). Index, context, and content. In Papers in Philosophical Logic (pp. 21–44). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Meyer, U. (2009). Times in tense logic. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 50, 201–219.
Meyer, U. (2012). Review of Berit Brogaard, Transient truths (Oxford, 2012). Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, 12(09), 305–321.
Meyer, U. (2013). The Nature of Time. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Montague, R. (1974). Formal Philosophy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Ogihara, T. (1996). Tense, Attitude, and Scope. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Pnueli, A. (1977). The temporal logic of programs. 18th Annual Symposium of Computer Science (pp. 46–57). New York: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
Prior, A. (1957). Time and Modality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Prior, A. (1959). Thank goodness that’s over. Philosophy, 34, 12–17.
Prior, A. (1967). Past, Present and Future. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Prior, A. (1968). Papers on Time and Tense. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Prior, A. (1976). The Doctrine of Propositions and Terms. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
Rescher, N., & Garson, J. (1968). Topological logic. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 33, 537–548.
Rescher, N., & Urquhart, A. (1971). Temporal Logic. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Richard, M. (1981). Temporalism and eternalism. Philosophical Studies, 39, 1–13.
Smith, Q. (1994). General introduction. In N. Oaklander & Q. Smith (Eds.), The New Theory of Time (pp. 1–14). New Haven: Yale University Press.
von Wright, G. H. (1979). A modal logic of place. In E. Sosa (Ed.), The Philosophy of Nicholas Rescher (pp. 65–73). Dordrecht: Reidel.
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank the organizers and participants of the Arthur Prior Centenary Conference at Oxford for three days of stimulating discussions of tense logic. I also benefitted from the very helpful comments of an anonymous referee for Synthese.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Meyer, U. Tense, propositions, and facts. Synthese 193, 3691–3699 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-0910-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-0910-2