Clustering-based data integrity verification approach for multi-replica in a fog environment | The Journal of Supercomputing Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Clustering-based data integrity verification approach for multi-replica in a fog environment

  • Published:
The Journal of Supercomputing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Due to dynamic changes, applications designed for the Internet of Things (IoT) require new storage resources. Storing IoT data in a fog infrastructure is a common practice to guarantee the IoT application’s high performance. Multiple fog nodes spread the data replica to accommodate multiple users and reduce access latency. However, such data replicas are subjected to intentional and accidental corruption. This paper proposes a data integrity verification approach in a distributed fog environment. The proposed work uses fuzzy clustering and consensus mechanism to verify the integrity of multiple replicas stored on distributed fog nodes. Security analysis shows that the proposed approach is highly resistant to replace, replay, and forgery attacks. Performance analysis demonstrates the practicability of the proposed approach in a fog environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

References

  1. Gasmi K, Dilek S, Tosun S et al (2022) A survey on computation offloading and service placement in fog computing-based iot. J Supercomput 78(2):1983–2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-021-03941-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Statista (????) Internet of things (iot) connected devices installed base worldwide from 2015 to 2025 (2016). https://www.statista.com/statistics/471264/iot-number-ofconnected-devices-worldwide/

  3. Talal M, Zaidan A, Zaidan B et al (2019) Smart home-based iot for real-time and secure remote health monitoring of triage and priority system using body sensors: multi-driven systematic review. J Med Syst 43:1–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-019-1158-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dastjerdi AV, Gupta H, Calheiros RN et al (2016) Fog computing: principles, architectures, and applications. In: Internet of Things. Morgan Kaufmann, Massachusetts, pp 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-805395-9.00004-6

  5. Sarkar S, Chatterjee S, Misra S (2015) Assessment of the suitability of fog computing in the context of internet of things. IEEE Trans Cloud Comput 6(1):46–59. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCC.2015.2485206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Singh SP, Nayyar A, Kumar R et al (2019) Fog computing: from architecture to edge computing and big data processing. J Supercomput 75:2070–2105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-018-2701-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang T, Lin W, Li Y et al (2019) A latency-aware multiple data replicas placement strategy for fog computing. J Signal Process Syst 91:1191–1204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11265-019-1444-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kaur J, Kumar R, Agrawal A et al (2022) A neutrosophic ahp-based computational technique for security management in a fog computing network. J Supercomput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-022-04674-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ahmad M, Amin MB, Hussain S et al (2016) Health fog: a novel framework for health and wellness applications. J Supercomput 72:3677–3695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ateniese G, Burns R, Curtmola R et al (2007) Provable data possession at untrusted stores. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp 598–609. https://doi.org/10.1145/1315245.1315318

  11. Li J, Zhang L, Liu JK et al (2016) Privacy-preserving public auditing protocol for low-performance end devices in cloud. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 11(11):2572–2583. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2016.2587242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yu Y, Au MH, Ateniese G et al (2016) Identity-based remote data integrity checking with perfect data privacy preserving for cloud storage. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 12(4):767–778. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2016.2615853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Juels A, Kaliski Jr BS (2007) Pors: proofs of retrievability for large files. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp 584–597. https://doi.org/10.1145/1315245.1315317

  14. Du R, Deng L, Chen J et al (2014) Proofs of ownership and retrievability in cloud storage. In: 2014 IEEE 13th International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications. IEEE, pp 328–335. https://doi.org/10.1109/TrustCom.2014.44

  15. Balmany CE, Asimi A, Bamarouf M et al (2022) Dynamic proof of retrievability based on public auditing for coded secure cloud storage. Multimed Tools Appl 81(27):39,229-39,249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-13089-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Curtmola R, Khan O, Burns R et al (2008) Mr-pdp: multiple-replica provable data possession. In: 2008 the 28th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems. IEEE, pp 411–420. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDCS.2008.68

  17. Su Y, Li Y, Yang B et al (2021) Decentralized self-auditing scheme with errors localization for multi-cloud storage. IEEE Trans Dependable Secur Comput 19(4):2838–2850. https://doi.org/10.1109/TDSC.2021.3075984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Li J, Yan H, Zhang Y (2019) Efficient identity-based provable multi-copy data possession in multi-cloud storage. IEEE Trans Cloud Comput 10(1):356–365. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCC.2019.2929045

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu C, Ranjan R, Yang C et al (2014) Mur-dpa: top-down levelled multi-replica merkle hash tree based secure public auditing for dynamic big data storage on cloud. IEEE Trans Comput 64(9):2609–2622. https://doi.org/10.1109/TC.2014.2375190

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu Z, Liu Y, Yang X et al (2021) Integrity auditing for multi-copy in cloud storage based on red-black tree. IEEE Access 9:75,117-75,131. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3079143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang J, Wei B, Zhang J et al (2021) An optimized transaction verification method for trustworthy blockchain-enabled iiot. Ad Hoc Netw 119(102):526

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang J, Zhong S, Wang J et al (2021) A storage optimization scheme for blockchain transaction databases. Comput Syst Sci Eng 36(3):521–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang J, Zhong S, Wang T et al (2020) Blockchain-based systems and applications: a survey. J Internet Technol 21(1):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wang J, Chen W, Wang L et al (2020) Data secure storage mechanism of sensor networks based on blockchain. Comput Mater Contin 65(3):2365–2384

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Noura H, Salman O, Chehab A et al (2019) Preserving data security in distributed fog computing. Ad Hoc Netw 94(101):937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2019.101937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Shu Y, Dong M, Ota K et al (2018) Binary reed-solomon coding based distributed storage scheme in information-centric fog networks. In: 2018 IEEE 23rd International Workshop on Computer Aided Modeling and Design of Communication Links and Networks (CAMAD). IEEE, pp 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/CAMAD.2018.8514998

  27. Ezugwu AE, Ikotun AM, Oyelade OO et al (2022) A comprehensive survey of clustering algorithms: state-of-the-art machine learning applications, taxonomy, challenges, and future research prospects. Eng Appl Artif Intell 110(104):743

    Google Scholar 

  28. Monga V, Banerjee A, Evans BL (2006) A clustering based approach to perceptual image hashing. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 1(1):68–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lin WC, Ke SW, Tsai CF (2015) Cann: an intrusion detection system based on combining cluster centers and nearest neighbors. Knowl Based Syst 78:13–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zahra SR, Chishti MA (2020) Fuzzy logic and fog based secure architecture for internet of things (flfsiot). J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 1–25

  31. Tukur YM, Thakker D, Awan IU (2019) Multi-layer approach to internet of things (iot) security. In: 2019 7th International Conference on Future Internet of Things and Cloud (FiCloud). IEEE, pp 109–116

  32. Lin J, Yu W, Zhang N et al (2017) A survey on internet of things: architecture, enabling technologies, security and privacy, and applications. IEEE Internet Things J 4(5):1125–1142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Aarika K, Bouhlal M, Abdelouahid RA et al (2020) Perception layer security in the internet of things. Procedia Comput Sci 175:591–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Tukur YM, Ali YS (2019) Demonstrating the effect of insider attacks on perception layer of internet of things (iot) systems. In: 2019 15th International Conference on Electronics, Computer and Computation (ICECCO). IEEE, pp 1–6

  35. Wu X (2016) Data sets replicas placements strategy from cost-effective view in the cloud. Scientific Programming 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1496714

  36. Mayer R, Gupta H, Saurez E et al (2017) Fogstore: toward a distributed data store for fog computing. In: 2017 IEEE Fog World Congress (FWC). IEEE, pp 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/FWC.2017.8368524

Download references

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirappalli, India

    K. Uma Maheswari & S. Mary Saira Bhanu

  2. Department of Computer Applications, National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirappalli, India

    Nickolas Savarimuthu

Authors
  1. K. Uma Maheswari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Mary Saira Bhanu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nickolas Savarimuthu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Each author who made a contribution to the study’s conceptualization and design contributed to the research activity.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Uma Maheswari.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The proposed work does not include any ethically approved human or animal experiments.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maheswari, K.U., Bhanu, S.M.S. & Savarimuthu, N. Clustering-based data integrity verification approach for multi-replica in a fog environment. J Supercomput 80, 3089–3113 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-023-05576-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-023-05576-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation