E-commerce system quality assessment using a model based on ISO 9126 and Belief Networks | Software Quality Journal Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

E-commerce system quality assessment using a model based on ISO 9126 and Belief Networks

  • Published:
Software Quality Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As business transitions into the new economy, e-system successful use has become a strategic goal. Especially in business to consumer (e-commerce) applications, users highly evaluate the quality of their interactive shopping experience. However, quality is difficult to define and measure and most importantly, it is difficult to measure its impact on the end-user. Among the many research questions that arise, some of the most important concern the exact nature of the quality attributes that define an e-commerce system, and how one could model these attributes in order to increase its acceptance. Bearing in mind that e-commerce systems are actually user/data-intensive web-based software systems, this work performed a survey which resulted in a theoretical model that helps to measure such systems’ dynamics through their decomposition into primary quality characteristics. The proposed model is based on Bayesian Networks and ISO 9126. Besides the emphasis on specific software quality attributes, it also provides a quality assessment process aiding developers to design and produce e-commerce systems of high quality. Using a Bayesian Network the model can be used to combine different types of evidences and provide reasoning from effect to cause and vice versa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abran, A., Khelifi, A., & Suryn, W. (2003). Usability meanings and interpretations in ISO standards. Software Quality Journal, 11, 325–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adomavicius, G., Tuzhilin, A. (2005). Personalization technologies: A process-oriented perspective. Communications of the ACM, 48(10), 83–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barga, R., Lomet, D., Shegalov, G., & Weikum, G. (2004). Recovery guarantees for internet applications. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology.4(3), 289–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bibi S., & Stamelos, I. (2004). Software process modeling with Bayesian belief networks. Proc. of 10th international software metrics symposium (Metrics 2004), Chicago.

  • Bidgoli, H.(2002). Electronic commerce principles and practice. San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, H., Lee, R., & Dillon, T. 2001. E-commerce fundamentals and applications. John Wiley & Sons.

  • Chen, L., Gillenson, M., & Sherrell, D. (2004). Consumer acceptance of virtual stores: A theoretical model and critical success factors for virtual stores. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 35(2), 8–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. (2002). Software localization for internet software: Issues and methods. IEEE Software, 19(2), 74–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cote, M., Suryn, W., Laporte, C., & Martin, R. (2005) The evolution path for industrial software quality evaluation methods applying ISO/IEC 9126:2001 quality model: Example of MITRE’s SQAE method. Software Quality Journal, 13(1), 17–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elfriede, D., & Rashka, J. (2001). Quality web systems, performance, security, and usability. New York: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenton, N., Krause, P., & Neil, M. (2002). Software measurement uncertainty and causal modelling. IEEE Software, 19(4), 116–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenton, N., Marsh, W., Neil, M., Cates, P.,Forey, S., & Tailor, M. 2004. Making resource decisions for software projects, 26th international conference on software engineering (pp. 397–406). ICSE 2004, May 2004.

  • Heckerman, D. 1995. A tutorial on learning with Bayesian networks. Technical report, MSR-TR-95–06, Microsoft Research. Retrieved from ftp://ftp.research.microsoft.com/pub/tr/tr-95-06.pdf.

  • Henfridsson, O., & Holmstrom, H. (2003). Developing E-commerce in internet-worked organizations: A case of customer involvement throughout the computer gaming value chain. The DATA BASE for the Advances in Information Systems, 33(4), 38–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO (1991). Information technology—evaluation of software—quality characteristics and guides for their use. International Standard: ISO/IEC 9126. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO/IEC 9126 (2001). Software product evaluation—quality characteristics and guidelines for the user. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO/IEC 13335-1 (2004). Information technology—Security techniques— management of information and communications technology security—Part 1: Concepts and models for information and communications technology security management. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, F. (1996). An introduction to Bayesian networks. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P. M., Moffett, M. L., & Pentland, B. T. (2003). Lessons learned from VCommerce. Communications of the ACM, 46(12), 217–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadie, C., Hovel, D., & Horvitz, E. 2001. MSBNx: A component-centric toolkit for modeling and inference with Bayesian networks. Microsoft Research Technical Report MSR-TR-2001-67. Retrieved from http://research.microsoft.com/adapt/MSBNx/MSBNxTechreport.pdf.

  • Lee, W., & Benbasat, I. (2003). Designing an electronic commerce interface: Attention and product memory as elicited by web design. Electronic Commerce Research and Application, 2(3), 240–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohse, G., & Spiller, P. (1998). Electronic Shopping. Communications of the ACM, 41(7), 81–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Losavio, F., Chirinos, L., Matteo, A., Levy, N., & Ramdane, A. (2004). ISO quality standards for measuring architectures. The Journal of Systems and Software, 72, 209–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moores, T. (2005). Do consumers understand the role of privacy seals in E-commerce? Communications of ACM, 48(3), 86–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, J. (2000). Designing web usability, the practice of simplicity. Indianapolis: New Riders Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, J. 2006. Alertbox. Retrieved from http://www.useit.com/alertbox/quantitative_testing.html.

  • Pfleeger, S. L. (2001). Software engineering: Theory and practice (2nd edn.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauro, J., & Kindlund, E. 2005. A method to standardize usability metrics into a single score. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 401–409).

  • Schafer, B., Konstan, J., & Riedl, J. (2001). E-commerce recommendations applications. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 5(1/2), 115–153.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Serva, M., Benamatti, J., & Fuller, M. (2005). Trustworthiness in B2C E-commerce: An examination of alternative models. The DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 36(3), 89–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, N., & DeLone, W. (2002). Sources of dissatisfaction in end-user support: An empirical study. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 33(2), 41–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slyke, C., Belanger, F., & Comunale, C. (2004). Factors influencing the adoption of web–based shopping: The impact of trust. The DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 35(2), 32–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sopitkamol, M. (2004). Ranking configuration parameters in multi–tiered E-commerce sites. ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review, 32(3), 24–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sopitkamol, M., & Menasce, D. 2005. A method for evaluating the impact of software configuration parameters on E-commerce sites. Proceedings of the 5th international workshop on software and performance: Palma (pp. 53–64). Illes Balears, Spain.

  • Stamelos, I., Dimou, p.,& Angelis, L. (2003). On the use of Bayesian belief networks for the prediction of software development productivity. Information & Software Technology, 45, 51–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stefani, A., Stavrinoudis, D., & Xenos, M. 2003. Modeling E-commerce system’s quality with belief networks, In VECIMS 2003: Proceedings of the IEEE international symposium on virtual environments, human-computer interfaces and measurement systems, July 2003, Vol. 1, pp. 13–18.

  • Stefani, A., Stavrinoudis, D., & Xenos, M. 2004. Experimental based tool calibration used for assessing the quality of E-commerce systems, In ICETE 2004: Proceedings of the 1st IEEE international conference on E-business and telecommunication networks, August 2004, Vol. 1, pp. 26–32.

  • Storey, V., Straub, D., Stewart, K., & Welke, R. (2000). A conceptual investigation of the E-commerce industry. Communications of the ACM, 43(7), 117–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terry, J., & Standing, C. (2004). The value of user participation in the E-commerce systems development. Informing Science Journal, 7, 31–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, H. T. (1993). Software process quality. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yong, J. K., & Sanders, L. (2005). From DQ to EQ: Understanding data quality in the context of e-business systems. Communications of the ACM, 48(10), 75–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwass, V. (1996). Structure and macro-level impacts of electronic commerce: From technological infrastructure to electronic marketplaces. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 1(1), 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hellenic Open University, 16 Sachtouri st., Patras, 26222, Greece

    Antonia Stefani & Michalis Xenos

Authors
  1. Antonia Stefani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michalis Xenos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonia Stefani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stefani, A., Xenos, M. E-commerce system quality assessment using a model based on ISO 9126 and Belief Networks. Software Qual J 16, 107–129 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-007-9032-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-007-9032-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation