Comprehensiveness and uniqueness of commercial databases and open access systems | Scientometrics Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Comprehensiveness and uniqueness of commercial databases and open access systems

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, scholarly communication systems provided by commercial services and open access systems are examined on the basis of the comprehensiveness and uniqueness of their coverage. Commercial databases (Web of Science and Scopus) are compared with search engine (Google Scholar), aggregate institutional repositories (OAIster and OpenDOAR), and the open access system for physics research (arXiv). Retrievals were conducted from the six databases or systems, and the output at each location was compared with that at the others. Journal articles published by Nobel laureates in physics from 2001 to 2013 were selected as samples in this study. The study reveals that search engine tend to provide more resources than do commercial databases but also that commercial databases have better coverage than institutional repositories. Institutional repositories showed a zero percentage of uniqueness when compared with Google Scholar. The results of the present study may provide suggestions to researchers, thereby enabling them to select better information and reference sources for scholarly assessment of individual research productivity and influence; consequently, their international visibility and diffusion may be enhanced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bates, J., Best, P., McGuilkin, J., & Taylor, B. (2017). Will web search engines replace bibliographic databases in the systematic identification of research? The Journal of Academic Librarianship,43, 8–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franceschini, F., Maisano, D., & Mastrogiacomo, L. (2016). The museum of errors/horrors in Scopus. Journal of Informetrics,10, 174–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.11.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gusenbauer, M. (2019). Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases. Scientometrics,118, 177–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2958-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Institutional repository. (2019). In Wikipedia. Retrieved July 12, 2019, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institutional_repository.

  • Jacso, P. (2005). As we may search—Comparison of major features of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar citation-based and citation-enhanced databases. Current Science,89(9), 1537–1547.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaBorie, T. (1985). Library and information science abstracting and index service: Coverage, overlap, and context. Library and Information Science Research,7(1), 183–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löhönen, J., Isohanni, M., Nieminen, P., & Miettunen, J. (2010). Coverage of the bibliographic database in mental health research. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry,64(3), 181–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martín-Martína, A., Orduna-Maleab, E., Thelwallc, M., & López-Cózara, E. D. (2018). Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. Journal of Informetrics,12, 1160–1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.09.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martyn, J. (1967). Tests on abstracts journals: Coverage overlap and indexing. Journal of Documentation.,23, 45–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitra, A., & Awekar, A. (2017). On low overlap between search results of academic search engines. In 2017 international World Wide Web conference (pp. 823–824). April 3–7, 2017. http://papers.www2017.com.au.s3-website-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/companion/p823.pdf.

  • Poyer, P. K. (1984). Journal article overlap between Index Medicus, Science Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, and Chemical Abstracts. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association,72(4), 353–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Science watch. (2013). Successful predictions. Retrieved April 5, 2017, from http://ppt.cc/xA6s.

  • Ştirbu, S., Thirion, P., Schmitz, S., Haesbroeck, G., & Greco, N. (2015). The utility of Google Scholar when searching geographical literature: Comparison with three commercial bibliographic databases. The Journal of Academic Librarianship,41, 322–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsay, M., Wu, T., & Tseng, L. (2017). Completeness and overlap in open access systems: Search engines, aggregate institutional repositories and physics-related open sources. PLoS ONE,12(12), e0189751. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J. L., Flanagan, C., & Kennedy, H. E. (1972). Overlap in the List of Journals monitored by BIOSIS, CAS, EI. Journal of the American Society for Information Science,23, 36–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, S., Deng, X., Fang, Q., & Zheng, W. (2008). A study on web searching: Overlap and distance of the search engine results. In J. Wang (Ed.), Data warehousing and mining: Concepts, methodologies, tools and applications (Chapter 4.18, 1926–1937). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. Retrieved from: https://books.google.com.tw/books?id=1bpEifVEi2MC&printsec=.

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by Grant MOST 102-2410-H-004-221-MY2 from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, R.O.C.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate Institute of Library, Information and Archival Studies, National Cheng-Chi University, No. 64 Sec. 2 ZhiNan Rd., Wenshan District, Taipei City, 11605, Taiwan

    Ming-yueh Tsay, Yu-wei Tseng & Tai-luan Wu

Authors
  1. Ming-yueh Tsay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yu-wei Tseng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tai-luan Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ming-yueh Tsay.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 4.

Table 4 The scholar profile of Nobel laureates in physics (2001–2013).
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tsay, My., Tseng, Yw. & Wu, Tl. Comprehensiveness and uniqueness of commercial databases and open access systems. Scientometrics 121, 1323–1338 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03252-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03252-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation