Entrepreneurial cognition and socially situated approach: a systematic and bibliometric analysis | Scientometrics Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Entrepreneurial cognition and socially situated approach: a systematic and bibliometric analysis

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research on entrepreneurial cognition (EC) has evolved in recent years, and the aim of this contribution is to offer a clear, systematic, and bibliometric review of EC as a field of study from a more dynamic perspective, building on Socially Situated Cognition theory (SSC). Based on a data set that covers 18 years of research, from 1998 to 2016, the present study analyzes all of the 151 papers available in the Web of Science Core Collection and 15 editorials, book chapters, and books directly referring to entrepreneurial cognition. Building on our results, we divided EC studies into two stages, namely the “emerging” (1998–2007) and the “mature” (2008–2016). In addition, with this study we suggest three main topics that should be investigated in future researches: entrepreneurial action should be considered endogenous in the entrepreneurship process and the studies in the field of embodied and distributed cognition should be expanded.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albert, L. S., Dean, T. J., & Baron, R. A. (2016). From social value to social cognition: How social ventures obtain the resources they need for social transformation. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 7(3), 289–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Álvarez, O., Maria, A., Merino, M. T. G., & Álvarez, M. V. S. (2015). Information: The source of entrepreneurial activity. Social Science Information, 54, 280–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appio, F. P., Martini, A., Massa, S., & Testa, S. (2016). Unveiling the intellectual origins of Social Media-based innovation: Insights from a bibliometric approach. Scientometrics, 108(1), 355–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arend, R. J., Cao, X., Grego-Nagel, A., Im, J., Yang, X., & Canavati, S. (2016). Looking upstream and downstream in entrepreneurial cognition: Replicating and extending the Busenitz and Barney (1997) study. Journal of Small Business Management, 54(4), 1147–1170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E. (2001). Role transitions in organizational life: An identity based perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atherton, A. (2009). Rational actors, knowledgeable agents. International Small Business Journal, 27, 470–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Autio, E., George, G., & Alexy, O. (2011). International entrepreneurship and capability development—qualitative evidence and future research directions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35, 11–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldacchino, L., Ucbasaran, D., Cabantous, L., & Lockett, A. (2015). Entrepreneurship research on intuition: A critical analysis and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 17, 212–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. A. (1998). Cognitive mechanisms in entrepreneurship: Why and when entrepreneurs think differently than other people. Journal of Business Venturing, 13, 275–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. A. (2004). The cognitive perspective: A valuable tool for answering entrepreneurship’s basic “why” questions. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(2), 221–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. A. (2006). Opportunity recognition as pattern recognition: How entrepreneurs ‘connect the dots’ to identify new business opportunities. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20, 104–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. A. (2007). Behavioral and cognitive factors in entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurs as the active element in new venture creation. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1, 167–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. A. (2008). The role of affect in the entrepreneurial process. Academy of Management Review, 33, 328–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. A., & Ensley, M. D. (2006). Opportunity recognition as the detection of meaningful patterns: Evidence from comparisons of novice and experienced entrepreneurs. Management Science, 52, 1331–1344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. A., & Henry, R. A. (2010). How entrepreneurs acquire the capacity to excel: Insights from research on expert performance. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 4, 49–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. A., Hmieleski, K. M., & Henry, R. A. (2012). Entrepreneurs’ dispositional positive affect: The potential benefits—and potential costs—of being ‘Up’. Journal of Business Venturing, 27, 310–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. A., & Tang, J. (2011). The role of entrepreneurs in firm-level innovation: Joint effects of positive affect, creativity, and environmental dynamism. Journal of Business Venturing, 26, 49–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. A., & Ward, T. B. (2004). Expanding entrepreneurial cognition’s toolbox: Potential contributions from the field of cognitive science. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28, 553–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barreto, I. (2012). Solving the entrepreneurial puzzle: The role of entrepreneurial interpretation in opportunity formation and related processes. Journal of Management Studies, 49, 356–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, J. R., & Bird, B. J. (2009). The successful intelligence of high-growth entrepreneurs: Links to new venture growth. Organization Science, 21, 397–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, J. R., Bird, B. J., & Singh, S. (2011). The practical intelligence of entrepreneurs: Antecedents and a link with new venture growth. Personnel Psychology, 64, 397–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, J. R., Frese, M., & Baron, R. A. (Eds.). (2014). The psychology of entrepreneurship. New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazerman, M. H., & Neale, M. A. (1986). Heuristics in negotiation: Limitations to effective dispute resolution. In H. R. Arkes & K. R. Hammond (Eds.), Judgment and decision making: An interdisciplinary reader (pp. 311–321). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bingham, C. B. (2009). Oscillating improvisation: How entrepreneurial firms create success in foreign market entries over time. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 3, 321–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bingham, C. B., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Furr, N. R. (2007). What makes a process a capability? Heuristics, strategy, and effective capture of opportunities. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1, 27–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bingham, C. B., & Kahl, S. (2014). Anticipatory learning. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 8, 101–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boukamcha, F. (2015). Impact of training on entrepreneurial intention: An interactive cognitive perspective. European Business Review, 27(6), 593–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyack, K. W., & Klavans, R. (2010). Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12), 2389–2404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brigham, K. H., Mitchell, R. K., & De Castro, J. O. (2010). Cognitive misfit and firm growth in technology-oriented SMEs. International Journal of Technology Management, 52, 4–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. E., Davidsson, P., & Wiklund, J. (2001). An operationalization of Stevenson's conceptualization of entrepreneurship as opportunity-based firm behavior. Strategic Management Journal, 22(10), 953–968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, P. (2007). Self-regulation and decision heuristics in entrepreneurial opportunity evaluation and exploitation. Management Decision, 45, 732–748.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, P. (2009). Self-regulation and moral awareness among entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 24, 505–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caliendo, M., Fossen, F., & Kritikos, A. (2012). Trust, positive reciprocity, and negative reciprocity: Do these traits impact entrepreneurial dynamics? Journal of Economic Psychology, 33, 394–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardon, M. S., Foo, M.-D., Shepherd, D., & Wiklund, J. (2012). Exploring the heart: Entrepreneurial emotion is a hot topic. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(1), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardon, M. S., Grégoire, D. A., Stevens, C. E., & Patel, P. C. (2013). Measuring entrepreneurial passion: Conceptual foundations and scale validation. Journal of Business Venturing, 28, 373–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardon, M. S., Wincent, J., Singh, J., & Drnovsek, M. (2009). The nature and experience of entrepreneurial passion. Academy of Management Review, 34, 511–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carsrud, A. L., & Johnson, R. W. (1989). Entrepreneurship: A social psychological perspective. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 1, 21–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casillas, J., & Acedo, F. (2007). Evolution of the intellectual structure of family business literature: A bibliometric study of FBR. Family Business Review, 20(2), 141–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castagnoli, A. (2014). Across borders and beyond boundaries: How the Olivetti company became a multinational. Business History, 56, 1281–1311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M.-H., Chang, Yu-Yu., & Lo, Y.-H. (2015). Creativity cognitive style, conflict, and career success for creative entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Research, 68, 90610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, J., & Cornelissen, J. (2011). Language, communication, and socially situated cognition in entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Review, 36(4), 776–778.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, A. C. (2005). Experiential learning within the process of opportunity identification and exploitation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 473–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, A. C. (2007). Learning asymmetries and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Journal of Business Venturing, 22, 97–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, A. C., Neck, H. M., & DeTienne, D. R. (2007). How corporate entrepreneurs learn from fledgling innovation initiatives: Cognition and the development of a termination script. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(6), 829–852.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelissen, J. P., & Clarke, J. S. (2010). Imagining and rationalizing opportunities: Inductive reasoning and the creation and justification of new ventures. The Academy of Management Review, 35(4), 539–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelius, B., Landström, H., & Persson, O. (2006). Entrepreneurial studies: The dynamic research front of a developing social science. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(3), 375–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, S. F., Ehrenhard, M. L., Caetano, A., & Santos, S. C. (2016). The role of different opportunities in the activation and use of the business opportunity prototype. Creativity and Innovation Management, 25, 58–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bakker, F. G., Groenewegen, P., & Den Hond, F. (2005). A bibliometric analysis of 30 years of research and theory on corporate social responsibility and corporate social performance. Business & Society, 44(3), 283–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Carolis, D. M., Litzky, B. E., & Eddleston, K. A. (2009). Why networks enhance the progress of new venture creation: The influence of social capital and cognition. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33, 527–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Carolis, D. M., & Saparito, P. (2006). Social capital, cognition, and entrepreneurial opportunities: A theoretical framework. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, 41–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Holan, P. M. (2013). It’s all in your head. Journal of Management Inquiry, 23, 93–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado García, J. B., Quevedo Puente, E., & Blanco Mazagatos, V. (2015). How affect relates to entrepreneurship: A systematic review of the literature and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 17(2), 191–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denes-Raj, V., & Epstein, S. (1994). Conflict between intuitive and rational processing: When people behave against their better judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 819–829.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dew, N., Grichnik, D., Mayer-Haug, K., Read, S., & Brinckmann, J. (2015). Situated entrepreneurial cognition. International Journal of Management Reviews, 17(2), 143–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dew, N., Read, S., Sarasvathy, S. D., & Wiltbank, R. (2009). Effectual versus predictive logics in entrepreneurial decision-making: Differences between experts and novices. Journal of Business Venturing, 24, 287–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding, Y., Rousseau, R., & Wolfram, D. (2014). Measuring scholarly impact. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodd, S. D. (2002). Metaphors and meaning: A grounded cultural model of us entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 17, 519–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drori, I., Honig, B., & Sheaffer, Z. (2009). The life cycle of an internet firm: Scripts, legitimacy, and identity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33, 715–738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutta Dev, K., & Thornhill, S. (2014). Venture cognitive logics, entrepreneurial cognitive style, and growth intentions: A conceptual model and an exploratory field study. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 147(2), 147–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagerberg, J., Fosaas, M., & Sapprasert, K. (2012a). Innovation: Exploring the knowledge base. Research Policy, 41, 1132–1153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagerberg, J., Fosaas, M., & Sapprasert, K. (2012b). Innovation: exploring the knowledge base. Research Policy, 41(7), 1132–1153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falagas, M. E., et al. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, scopus, web of science, and google scholar: Strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB Journal, 22(2), 338–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fassin, Y., Van Rossem, A., & Buelens, M. (2011). Small-business owner-managers” Perceptions of business ethics and CSR-related concepts. Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 425–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felin, T., & Zenger, T. R. (2009). Entrepreneurs as theorists: On the origins of collective beliefs and novel strategies. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 3, 127–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, J. J., Fernandes, C. I., & Kraus, S. (2017). Entrepreneurship research: Mapping intellectual structures and research trends. Review of Managerial Science, 2017, 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, E., & Reuber, A. R. (2011). Social interaction via new social media: (How) Can interactions on twitter affect effectual thinking and behavior? Journal of Business Venturing, 26, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, D. P. (1999). Cognitive approaches to new venture creation. International Journal of Management Reviews, 1, 415–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frese, M. (2007). The psycholsogical actions and entrepreneurial success: An action theory approach. In J. R. Baum, M. Frese, & R. A. Baron (Eds.), The psychology of entrepreneurship (pp. 151–188). Lawrence Erlbaum Associations: Mahwah, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frese, M. (2009). Towards a psychology of entrepreneurship—An action theory perspective. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 5(6), 437–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaglio, C. M., & Katz, J. A. (2001). The psychological basis of opportunity identification: Entrepreneurial alertness. Small Business Economics, 16, 95–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • García, S., & Carlos, J. (2014). Cognitive scripts and entrepreneurial success. Universitas Psychologica, 13, 331–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • García, S., Carlos, J., Boada-Grau, J., Prizmic-Kuzmica, A. J., & Hernández-Sánchez, B. (2014). Pyschometric properties and the factor structure of the Spanish version of the cognitive adaptability scale (MAC). Universitas Psychologica, 13, 311–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, R. P., & Holland, D. V. (2015). Environmental effects on the cognitions of corporate and independent entrepreneurs. Small Business Economics, 45, 369–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gemmell, R. M., Boland, R. J., & Kolb, D. A. (2012). The socio-cognitive dynamics of entrepreneurial ideation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36, 1053–1073.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gielnik, M. M., Krämer, A.-C., Kappel, B., & Frese, M. (2014). Antecedents of business opportunity identification and innovation: Investigating the interplay of information processing and information acquisition. Applied Psychology, 63, 344–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grégoire, D. A., Corbett, A. C., & McMullen, J. S. (2011). The cognitive perspective in entrepreneurship: An agenda for future research. Journal of Management Studies, 48, 1443–1477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grégoire, D. A., Cornelissen, J., Dimov, D., & van Burg, E. (2015). The mind in the middle: Taking stock of affect and cognition research in entrepreneurship. International Journal of Management Reviews, 17, 125–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregoire, D. A., Noel, M. X., Déry, R., & Béchard, J. P. (2011). Is there conceptual convergence in entrepreneurship research? A co-citation analysis of frontiers of entrepreneurship research, 1981–2004. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(3), 333–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grichnik, D., Brinckmann, J., Singh, L., & Manigart, S. (2014). Beyond environmental scarcity: Human and social capital as driving forces of bootstrapping activities. Journal of Business Venturing, 29, 310–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves, K., Vance, C., & Choi, D. (2011). Examining entrepreneurial cognition: An occupational analysis of balanced linear and nonlinear thinking and entrepreneurship success. Journal of Small Business Management, 49, 438–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gu, Y. (2004). Global knowledge management research: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 61(2), 171–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudmundsson, S. V., & Lechner, C. (2013). Cognitive biases, organization, and entrepreneurial firm survival. European Management Journal, 31, 278–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, D. A. (2008). Towards a theory of entrepreneurial teams. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(6), 613–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harquail, C. V., & King, A. W. (2010). Construing organizational identity: The role of embodied cognition. Organization Studies, 31(12), 1619–1648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatten, T. S. (1997). Small business: Entrepreneurship and beyond. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. The American Economic Review, 35, 519–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynie, M., & Shepherd, D. A. (2009). A measure of adaptive cognition for entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 695–714.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynie, J. M., Shepherd, D., Mosakowski, E., & Christopher Earley, P. (2010). A situated metacognitive model of the entrepreneurial mindset. Journal of Business Venturing, 25, 217–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayton, J. C., & Cacciotti, G. (2013). Is there an entrepreneurial culture? A review of empirical research. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 25, 708–731.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayton, J. C., & Cholakova, M. (2012). The role of affect in the creation and intentional pursuit of entrepreneurial ideas. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(1), 41–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hmieleski, K. M., & Baron, R. A. (2008). Regulatory focus and new venture performance: A study of entrepreneurial opportunity exploitation under conditions of risk versus uncertainty. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2, 285–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hmieleski, K. M., Corbett, A. C., & Baron, R. A. (2013). Entrepreneurs improvisational behavior and firm performance: A study of dispositional and environmental moderators. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 7, 138–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkinson, G. P., Sadler-Smith, E., Burke, L. A., Claxton, G., & Sparrow, P. R. (2009). Intuition in organizations: Implications for strategic management. Long Range Planning, 42(3), 277–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, C. (2016). Do the self-employed more likely emerge from sequential or parallel work experience in business-related functions? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40, 307–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, P. N., & Chang, P. L. (2009). An assessment of world-wide research productivity in production and operations management. International Journal of Production Economics, 120, 540–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iederan, O. C., Curseu, P. L., & Vermeulen, P. (2009). Effective decision-making: The role of cognitive complexity in strategic decisions. Studia Psychologica, 51(4), 293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iederan, O. C., Curşeu, P. L., Vermeulen, P. A. M., & Geurts, J. L. A. (2011). Cognitive representations of institutional change: Similarities and dissimilarities in the cognitive schema of entrepreneurs. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24, 9–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iederan, O. C., Curşeu, P. L., Vermeulen, P. A. M., & Geurts, J. L. A. (2013). Antecedents of strategic orientations in Romanian SMEs: An institutional framing perspective. Journal for East European Management Studies, 18, 386–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karri, R., & Goel, S. (2008). Effectuation and over-trust: Response to Sarasvathy and Dew. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(4), 739–748.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasouf, C. J., Morrish, S. C., & Miles, M. P. (2015). The moderating role of explanatory style between experience and entrepreneurial self-efficacy. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. A., & Shepherd, D. A. (2003). Cognitive approaches to entrepreneurship research. Cognitive approaches to entrepreneurship research (pp. 1–10). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmerer, B., Walter, J., Kellermanns, F. W., & Narayanan, V. K. (2012). A judgment-analysis perspective on entrepreneurs’ resource evaluations. Journal of Business Research, 65, 1102–1108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiss, A. N., & Barr, P. S. (2015). New venture strategic adaptation: The interplay of belief structures and industry context. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 1245–1263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiss, A. N., Williams, D. W., & Houghton, S. M. (2013). Risk bias and the link between motivation and new venture post-entry international growth. International Business Review, 22, 1068–1078.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinger, E. (1985). Missing links in action theory. In M. Frese & J. Sabini (Eds.), Goal directed behavior: The concept of action in psychology (pp. 311–321). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosmützky, A., & Putty, R. (2016). Transcending borders and traversing boundaries: A systematic review of the literature on transnational, offshore, cross-border, and borderless higher education. Journal of Studies in International Education, 20(1), 8–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, N. F., Jr. (2003). The cognitive psychology of entrepreneurship. Handbook of entrepreneurship research (pp. 105–140). United States: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, N. F. (2007). What lies beneath? The experiential essence of entrepreneurial thinking. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31, 123–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, N. F., Jr., & Day, M. (2010). Looking forward, looking backward: From entrepreneurial cognition to neuroentrepreneurship. Handbook of entrepreneurship research (pp. 321–357). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuechle, G., Boulu-Reshef, B., & Carr, S. D. (2016). Prediction- and control-based strategies in entrepreneurship: The role of information. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 10, 43–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kullenberg, C., & Kasperowski, D. (2016). What is citizen science?–A scientometric meta-analysis. PloS one, 11(1), e0147152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh. New York: Basic books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landström, H., Harirchi, G., & Åström, F. (2012). Entrepreneurship: Exploring the knowledge base. Research Policy, 41(7), 1154–1181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lejarraga, J., & Martinez-Ros, E. (2014). Size, RandD productivity and decision styles. Small Business Economics, 42, 643–662.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., Carley, S., & Rafols, I. (2013). Global maps of science based on the new web-of-science categories. Scientometrics, 94(2), 589–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Wang, X., Huang, L., & Bai, X. (2013). How does entrepreneurs’ social capital hinder new business development? A relational embeddedness perspective. Journal of Business Research, 66, 2418–2424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, W. B. (2006). A comparative study on the trends of entrepreneurial behaviors of enterprises in different strategies: Application of the social cognition theory. Expert Systems with Applications, 31, 207–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liñán, F., Santos, F. J., & Fernández, J. (2011a). The influence of perceptions on potential entrepreneurs. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7, 373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liñán, F., Urbano, D., & Guerrero, M. (2011b). Regional variations in entrepreneurial cognitions: Start-up intentions of university students in Spain. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 23, 187–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindh, I., & Thorgren, S. (2016). Critical event recognition: An extended view of reflective learning. Management Learning, 47(5), 525–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., & Almor, T. (2016). How culture influences the way entrepreneurs deal with uncertainty in inter-organizational relationships: The case of returnee versus local entrepreneurs in China. International Business Review, 25, 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • López-Fernández, M. C., Serrano-Bedia, Ana Ma., & Pérez-Pérez, M. (2016). Entrepreneurship and family firm research: A bibliometric analysis of an emerging field. Journal of Small Business Management, 54(2), 622–639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malmström, M., Johansson, J., & Wincent, J. (2015). Cognitive constructions of low-profit and high-profit business models: A repertory grid study of serial entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39, 1083–1109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markman, A. B., & Gentner, D. (2001). Thinking. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 223–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, D. R. (2016). From employment to entrepreneurship and back: A legitimate boundaryless view or a bias-embedded mindset? International Small Business Journal, 34(5), 683–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzi, G., Caputo, A., & Dabić, M. (2017a). Management lessons from Italy: A bibliometric analysis of top Italian based scholars and studies published from 1985 to 2015. International Journal of Critical Accounting, 9(4), 269–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzi, G., Dabić, M., Daim, T., & Garces, E. (2017b). Product and process innovation in manufacturing firms: A 30-year bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 113(2), 673–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzi, G., Rialti, R., Marina, D., & Caputo, A. (2017c). A mixed methods bibliometric investigation of the World review of entrepreneurship, management and sustainable development: From qualitative to quantitative data. World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development. In press

  • Mattingly, E. S., Kushev, T. N., Ahuja, M. K., & Ma, D. (2016). Switch or persevere? The effects of experience and metacognition on persistence decisions. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 12(4), 1233–1263.

    Google Scholar 

  • McVea, J. F. (2009). A field study of entrepreneurial decision-making and moral imagination. Journal of Business Venturing, 24, 491–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzger Matthew, L., & King Jesse, S. (2015). Extending constructivist perspectives on opportunity production through an incorporation of effectual logics. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 5(4), 323–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. K., Busenitz, L. W., Bird, B., Gaglio, C. M., McMullen, J. S., Morse, E. A., et al. (2007). The central question in entrepreneurial cognition research 2007. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31, 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. K., Busenitz, L., Lant, T., McDougall, P. P., Morse, E. A., & Brock Smith, J. (2002). Toward a theory of entrepreneurial cognition: Rethinking the people side of entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27, 93–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. K., Busenitz, L., Lant, T., McDougall, P. P., Morse, E. A., & Brock Smith, J. (2004). The distinctive and inclusive domain of entrepreneurial cognition research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28, 505–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. R., Friga, P. N., & Mitchell, R. K. (2005). Untangling the intuition mess: Intuition as a construct in entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 653–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. K., Mitchell, J. R., & Brock Smith, J. (2008). Inside opportunity formation: Enterprise failure, cognition, and the creation of opportunities. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2, 225–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. R., Mitchell, R. K., & Randolph-Seng, B. (Eds.). (2014). Handbook of entrepreneurial cognition. Camberley Surrey, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. K., Randolph-Seng, B., & Mitchell, J. R. (2011). Socially situated cognition: Imagining new opportunities for entrepreneurship research. Academy of Management Review, 36(4), 774–776.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. R., & Shepherd, D. A. (2010). To thine own self be true: images of self, images of opportunity, and entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing, 25, 138–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. K., Smith, B., Seawright, K. W., & Morse, E. A. (2000). Cross-cultural cognitions and the venture creation decision. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 974–993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz-Bullón, F., Sánchez-Bueno, M. J., & Vos-Saz, A. (2015). Nascent entrepreneurs’ personality attributes and the international dimension of new ventures. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11, 473–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murmann, J. P., & Sardana, D. (2013). Successful entrepreneurs minimize risk. Australian Journal of Management, 38, 191–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, M. D. (2013). Qualitative research in business and management. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nambisan, S., & Baron, R. A. (2013). Entrepreneurship in innovation ecosystems: Entrepreneurs’ self-regulatory processes and their implications for new venture success. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37, 1071–1097.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neill, S., Metcalf, L., & York Jonathan, L. (2015). Seeing what others miss: A study of women entrepreneurs in high-growth startups. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 5(4), 293–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls-Nixon, C. L., Cooper, A. C., & Woo, C. Y. (2000). Strategic experimentation: Understanding change and performance in new ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 15, 493–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obloj, T., Obloj, K., & Pratt, M. G. (2010). Dominant logic and entrepreneurial firms” performance in a transition economy. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34, 151–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omorede, A., Thorgren, S., & Wincent, J. (2015). Entrepreneurship psychology: A review. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11, 743–768.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osiyevskyy, O., & Dewald, J. (2015). Inducements, Impediments, and Immediacy: Exploring the cognitive drivers of small business managers’ intentions to adopt business model change. Journal of Small Business Management, 53, 1011–1032.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, N. P., & Bachrach, D. G. (2008a). Scholarly influence in the field of management: A bibliometric analysis of the determinants of university and author impact in the management literature in the past quarter century. Journal of Management, 34, 641–720.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, N. P., & Bachrach, D. G. (2008b). Scholarly influence in the field of management: A bibliometric analysis of the determinants of university and author impact in the management literature in the past quarter century. Journal of Management, 34, 641–720.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prandelli, E., Pasquini, M., & Verona, G. (2016). In user’s shoes: An experimental design on the role of perspective taking in discovering entrepreneurial opportunities. Journal of Business Venturing, 31, 287–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pryor, C., Webb, J. W., Duane Ireland, R., & Ketchen, D. J., Jr. (2016). Toward an integration of the behavioral and cognitive influences on the entrepreneurship process. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 10, 21–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radu, M., & Redien-Collot, R. (2008). The social representation of entrepreneurs in the French Press. International Small Business Journal, 26, 259–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randolph-Seng, B., Mitchell, R. K., Vahidnia, H., Robert Mitchell, H. J., Chen, S., & John Statzer, J. (2015). The microfoundations of entrepreneurial cognition research: Toward an integrative approach. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 11(4), 207–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, S. J. (1987). Constructing causal scenarios: A knowledge structure approach to causal reasoning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 288–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renko, M., Shrader, R. C., & Simon, M. (2012). Perception of entrepreneurial opportunity: A general framework. Management Decision, 50, 1233–1251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, A. T., & Marino, L. D. (2015). Overconfidence and risk perceptions: Do they really matter for venture creation decisions? International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11, 149–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez, J. C., Carballo, T., & Gutiérrez, A. (2011). The entrepreneur from a cognitive approach. Psicothema, 23, 433–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos-Álvarez, M. V., & García-Merino, M. T. (2012). Information interests and exporting: The Spanish natural stone industry. Journal of Management & Organization, 18(6), 845–857.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos-Álvarez, V., & García-Merino, T. (2010). The role of the entrepreneur in identifying international expansion as a strategic opportunity. International Journal of Information Management, 30, 512–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarasvathy, S. D. (2004). Making it happen: Beyond theories of the firm to theories of firm design. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28, 519–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schenkel, M. T., Matthews, C. H., & Ford, M. W. (2009). Making rational use of “irrationality”? Exploring the role of need for cognitive closure in nascent entrepreneurial activity. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 21, 51–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schildt, H. A., Zahra, S. A., & Sillanpää, A. (2006). Scholarly communities in entrepreneurship research: A co-citation analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(3), 399–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweizer, R. (2012). The internationalization process of SMEs: A muddling-through process. Journal of Business Research, 65, 745–751.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, K. G., & Scott, L. R. (1991). Person, process, choice: The psychology of new venture creation Kelly G. Shaver. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 16, 23–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, D. A. (2009). Grief recovery from the loss of a family business: A multi- and meso-level theory. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(1), 81–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, D. A. (2015). Party On! A call for entrepreneurship research that is more interactive, activity based, cognitively hot, compassionate, and prosocial. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(4), 489–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, D. A., McMullen, J. S., & Devereaux Jennings, P. (2007). The formation of opportunity beliefs: Overcoming ignorance and reducing doubt. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1, 75–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. B., Mitchell, J. R., & Mitchell, R. K. (2009). Entrepreneurial scripts and the new transaction commitment mindset: Extending the expert information processing theory approach to entrepreneurial cognition research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33, 815–844.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. R., & Semin, G. R. (2004). Socially situated cognition: Cognition in its social context. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 53–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solymossy, E., & Masters, J. K. (2002). Ethics through an entrepreneurial lens: Theory and observation. Journal of Business Ethics, 38, 227–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommer, L., & Haug, M. (2011). Intention as a cognitive antecedent to international entrepreneurship—Understanding the moderating roles of knowledge and experience. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7(1), 111–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong, M. (2013). Some implications of Hayek’s cognitive theory. Critical Review, 25, 461–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, J., Michele Kacmar, K., & Busenitz, L. (2012). Entrepreneurial alertness in the pursuit of new opportunities. Journal of Business Venturing, 27, 77–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teixeira, A. A. (2011). Mapping the (in) visible college (s) in the field of entrepreneurship. Scientometrics, 89(1), 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe, R., Gold, J., Holt, R., & Clarke, J. (2006). Immaturity. International Small Business Journal, 24, 232–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tumasjan, A., & Braun, R. (2012). In the eye of the beholder: How regulatory focus and self-efficacy interact in influencing opportunity recognition. Journal of Business Venturing, 27, 622–636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkina, E., & Thai, M. T. T. (2015). Socio-psychological determinants of opportunity entrepreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11, 213–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1983). Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychological Review, 90, 293–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ucbasaran, D., Westhead, P., & Wright, M. (2009). The extent and nature of opportunity identification by experienced entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 24, 99–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban, B. (2010). Cognitions and motivations for new venture creation decisions: Linking expert scripts to self-efficacy, a South African study. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21, 1512–1530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uygur, U., & Kim, S. M. (2016). Evolution of entrepreneurial judgment with venture-specific experience. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 10, 169–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaghely, I. P., & Julien, P.-A. (2010). Are opportunities recognized or constructed?: An information perspective on entrepreneurial opportunity identification. Journal of Business Venturing, 25, 73–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Eck, N. J., Ludo, W., Rommert, D., & Van den Berg, J. (2010). A comparison of two techniques for bibliometric mapping: Multidimensional scaling and VOS. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12), 2405–2416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2007). VOS: A new method for visualizing similarities between objects. Advances in Data Analysis. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2009). How to normalize cooccurrence data? An analysis of some well-known similarity measures. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(8), 1635–1651.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: Vosviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Eck, N. J., Waltman, L., Van den Berg, J., & Kaymak, U. (2006). Visualizing the computational intelligence field. IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine, 1(4), 6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen, P. A. M., & Curseuurseu, P. L. (Eds.). (2010). Entrepreneurial strategic decision-making: A cognitive perspective. Camberley Surrey, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volery, T., & Mazzarol, T. (2015). The evolution of the small business and entrepreneurship field: A bibliometric investigation of articles published in the international small business journal. International Small Business Journal, 33(4), 374–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, T. L., Fisher, G., & Pfarrer, M. (2016). How social entrepreneurs facilitate the adoption of new industry practices. Journal of Management Studies, 53, 821–845.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T. B. (2004). Cognition, creativity, and entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 173–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westhead, P., Ucbasaran, D., & Wright, M. (2005). Experience and cognition. International Small Business Journal, 23, 72–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westhead, P., Ucbasaran, D., & Wright, M. (2009). Information search and opportunity identification the importance of prior business ownership experience. International Small Business Journal, 27(6), 659–680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westhead, P., & Wright, M. (2011). David Storey’s optimism and chance perspective: A case of the emperor’s new clothes? International Small Business Journal, 29, 714–729.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. W., & Grégoire, D. A. (2015). Seeking commonalities or avoiding differences? Re-conceptualizing distance and its effects on internationalization decisions. Journal of International Business Studies, 46, 253–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. W., & Wood, M. S. (2015). Rule-based reasoning for understanding opportunity evaluation. Academy of Management Perspectives, 29, 218–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, C. (2014). Toward a dynamic understanding of entrepreneurship education research across the campus—Social cognition and action research. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 4(1), 69–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirtz, P. (2011). The cognitive dimension of corporate governance in fast growing entrepreneurial firms. European Management Journal, 29, 431–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt, U. (2003). Cognition, entrepreneurial conceptions and the theory of the firm. Cognitive Developments in Economics (pp. 177–192). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, M. S., McKelvie, A., & Michael Haynie, J. (2014). Making it personal: Opportunity individuation and the shaping of opportunity beliefs. Journal of Business Venturing, 29, 252–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, M. S., & Williams, D. W. (2014). Opportunity evaluation as rule-based decision making. Journal of Management Studies, 51, 573–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M., & Stigliani, I. (2013). Entrepreneurship and growth. International Small Business Journal, 31, 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Y. (2016). Entrepreneurial social capital, cognitive orientation and new venture innovation. Management Research Review, 39, 498–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, L. (2015). Empirical study on the relationship between entrepreneurial cognitions and strategic change momentum: The moderating effect of organizational knowledge structures. Management Decision, 53, 957–983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., Korri, J. S., & JiFeng, Yu. (2005). Cognition and international entrepreneurship: Implications for research on international opportunity recognition and exploitation. International Business Review, 14, 129–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zellweger, T. M., Nason, R. S., Nordqvist, M., & Brush, C. G. (2013). Why do family firms strive for nonfinancial goals? An organizational identity perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(2), 229–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., Duysters, G., & Cloodt, M. (2014). The role of entrepreneurship education as a predictor of university students’ entrepreneurial intention. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 10, 623–641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, Y. (2012). Unlocking founding team prior shared experience: A transactive memory system perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 27, 577–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, L., Liu, X., He, S., Shi, J., & Pang, M. (2015). Keywords co-occurrence mapping knowledge domain research base on the theory of big data in oil and gas industry. Scientometrics, 105(1), 249–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18, 429–472.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Business and Economics, University of Florence, Via delle Pandette, 32, 50127, Florence, Italy

    Sara Sassetti, Vincenzo Cavaliere & Cristiano Ciappei

  2. Lincoln International Business School, University of Lincoln, Brayford Pool, Lincoln, LN5 7AT, UK

    Giacomo Marzi

Authors
  1. Sara Sassetti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Giacomo Marzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vincenzo Cavaliere
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Cristiano Ciappei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giacomo Marzi.

Appendix

Appendix

In the present appendix, we present all the papers included in the dataset. Please note that Table 5 refers to the period 1998–2007 and Table 6 refers to the period 2008–2016. In the third column, P.Y. refers to publication year.

Table 5 Paper included in the period 1998-2007
Full size table
Table 6 Paper included in the period 2008-2016
Full size table

Finally, Table 7 presents all the materials which are not peer-reviewed papers such as journals such as books, book chapters, and editorials.

Table 7 Not peer-reviewed publications included in the dataset
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sassetti, S., Marzi, G., Cavaliere, V. et al. Entrepreneurial cognition and socially situated approach: a systematic and bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics 116, 1675–1718 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2809-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2809-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation