A bibliometric assessment of scientific productivity and international collaboration of the Islamic World in science and technology (S&T) areas | Scientometrics Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

A bibliometric assessment of scientific productivity and international collaboration of the Islamic World in science and technology (S&T) areas

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This case study analyzes scientific research landscape of the Islamic World in order to access the research productivity, scholarly impact and international collaborations across all Science and Technology (S&T) areas over the time period of 2000–2011, using the Scopus database. While Turkey is clearly leading among the Islamic countries, Iran takes 2nd rank in terms of publication output. All S&T subject areas show annual increase in publications by more than 10 %. The highest percentage of publications of the Islamic World falls into the area of Veterinary with respect to the world. Dentistry is the top area with 7 % share of the world’s top 25 % publications with respect to citation count. This undoubtedly shows that the impact of the scientific research of the Islamic World is very less as compared to the other developed nations. We also find that top collaborators of the Islamic World are mainly within Islamic countries. The findings of this case study provide an insight to the research landscape of the Islamic World and useful information to the scientific community as well as to the technology and innovation policy makers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

References

  • Abdullah, A., & Wee, M. C. (2011). Malaysia’s computer science research productivity based on publications in the Web of Science, 2000–2010. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 16(1), 109–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaver, D. D. (2011). Reflections on scientific collaboration. Scientometrics, 52(3), 365–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgman, C. L., & Furner, J. (2002). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36, 3–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, B. (2014). Stanford University News. Accessed from April 9, 2015, from http://news.stanford.edu/news/2014/august/fields-medal-mirzakhani-081214.html.

  • Erfanmanesh, M., Rohani, V. A., & Abrizah, A. (2012). Co-authorship network of scientometrics research collaboration. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 17(3), 73–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garg, K. C., & Padhi, P. (2001). A study of collaboration in laser science and technology. Scientometrics, 51(2), 415–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghobadian, B., Najafi, G., Rahimi, H., & Yusaf, T. F. (2009). Future of renewable energies in Iran. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13(3), 689–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guan, J., & Ma, N. (2007). A bibliometric study of China’s semiconductor literature compared with other major Asian countries. Scientometrics, 70(1), 107–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, J. (2012). International research collaboration among academics in China and South Korea. International Journal of Chinese Education, 1(2), 235–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, S., & Jan, J. M. (2014). Research collaboration networks of two OIC nations: Comparative study between Turkey and Malaysia in the field of ‘Energy Fuels’, 2009–2011. Scientometrics, 98(1), 387–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClellan, J. E. (2003). Specialist control: The publications committee of the Académie Royale Des Sciences (Paris) 1700–1793. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 93(3), 101–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, P. N., Panda, K. C., & Goswami, N. G. (2010). Citation analysis and research impact of National Metallurgical Laboratory, India during 1972–2007: A case study. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 15(1), 91–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moed, H. F. (2002). Measuring China’s research performance using the Science Citation Index. Scientometrics, 53(3), 281–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moin, M., Mahmoudi, M., & Rezaei, N. (2005). Scientific output of Iran at the threshold of the 21st century. Scientometrics, 62(2), 239–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nabil, M. D., & Kenan, B. (2014). Education and scientific development in OIC countries. Retrieved April 11, 2015, from http://www.sesric.org/publications-detail.php?id=263.

  • Narin, F., & Frame, J. D. (1989). The growth of Japanese science and technology. Science, 245(4918), 600–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ong, H. C., Mahlia, T. M. I., & Masjuki, H. H. (2011). A review on energy scenario and sustainable energy in Malaysia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(1), 639–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rinia, E. J., Van Leeuwen, T. N., Van Vuren, H. G., & Van Raan, A. F. (1998). Comparative analysis of a set of bibliometric indicators and central peer review criteria: Evaluation of condensed matter physics in the Netherlands. Research Policy, 27(1), 95–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royal Society. (2011). Knowledge, networks and nations. Global scientific collaboration in the 21st. London, RS policy document 03/11, London.

  • Salton, G., & Bergmark, D. (1979). A citation study of computer science literature. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 3, 393–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, A., & Braun, T. (1986). Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact. Scientometrics, 9(5–6), 281–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S., & Thomas, V. J. (2008). Inter-country R&D efficiency analysis: An application of data envelopment analysis. Scientometrics, 76(3), 483–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Raan, A. F., & Van Leeuwen, T. N. (2002). Assessment of the scientific basis of interdisciplinary, applied research: Application of bibliometric methods in nutrition and food research. Research Policy, 31(4), 611–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zewail, A. H, Adams, J., Hook, D., & King, C. (2011). Global research report of middle east exploring the changing landscape of ARABIAN, PERSIAN AND TURKISH RESEARCH. Thomson Reuters. Accessed March 11, 2011 from http://researchanalytics.thomsonreuters.com/m/pdfs/globalresearchreport-aptme.pdf.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Information Technology University- Punjab, Lahore, 54770, Pakistan

    Raheem Sarwar & Saeed-UI Hassan

Authors
  1. Raheem Sarwar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Saeed-UI Hassan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raheem Sarwar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sarwar, R., Hassan, SU. A bibliometric assessment of scientific productivity and international collaboration of the Islamic World in science and technology (S&T) areas. Scientometrics 105, 1059–1077 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1718-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1718-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation