How does scientific success relate to individual and organizational characteristics? A scientometric study of psychology researchers in the German-speaking countries | Scientometrics Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

How does scientific success relate to individual and organizational characteristics? A scientometric study of psychology researchers in the German-speaking countries

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose: To provide up-to-date bibliometric reference data describing the output and success of psychology researchers in the German-speaking countries, including lifetime publication and citation numbers, and to investigate associations of bibliometric measures with academic status and gender as well as the department characteristics of size and quota of senior researchers. Method Queried literature databases using an extensive online register of academic psychologists in the German-speaking countries, obtaining valid data for 85 % (N = 1742) of the population of interest. Findings Skewed distributions for publications and citations; maximum number of German-language (=native) publications much higher than maximum number of English-language publications; relatively large part of population publishing almost exclusively in German; publication count predictable by academic status, gender, department size, and quota of senior researchers; citation count predictable by publication count, status, department size, and quota of senior researchers; department characteristics interact with individual characteristics to produce specific conditions under which publication count and citation count are higher or lower than expected: combination of female gender, small department size and large quota of senior researchers is associated with particularly increased publication count; female gender and large department size are associated with decreased publication count; high publication count, large department size and low quota of senior researchers are associated with increased citation count; low publication count and large quota of senior researchers are associated with decreased citation count. Conclusions Reference values for scientific output provided in this study provide an anchor for monitoring and international comparison; despite considerable noise in data, we show that interactions of individual and organizational characteristics are relevant for scientific success and should be investigated further, e.g. by adopting various measures of organizational diversity and tracing a population longitudinally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Relevant factors of course depend on the purpose of the assessment, which might just be to compare countries or disciplines.

  2. WoS publication data were only used for data cleaning (see below); publication data reported in the results section exclusively refer to PSYNDEX data.

References

  • Aksnes, D. W., & Rip, A. (2009). Researchers’ perceptions of citations. Research Policy, 38, 895–905. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2009.02.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauserman, R. (1997). International representation in the psychological literature. International Journal of Psychology, 32, 107–112. doi:10.1080/002075997400908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becher, T., & Trowler, P. R. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines (2nd ed.). Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, Y. L. (2010). First publications in refereed English journals: Difficulties, coping strategies, and recommendations for student training. System, 38, 134–141. doi:10.1016/j.system.2009.12.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, R. D., Jadidian, A., Webster, G. D., & Sandell, K. J. (2011). The research productivity of academic psychologists: Assessment, trends, and best practice recommendations. Scientometrics, 89, 207–227. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0452-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (1999). Women and science: Mobilising women to enrich European research.COM (2009) 447 final. Retrieved December 13, 2011, from http://cordis.europa.eu/improving/women/communication.htm.

  • Garfield, E. (1979). Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool? Scientometrics, 1, 359–375. doi:10.1007/BF02019306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, W. W. (1995). Lost science in the third world. Scientific American, 273(2), 76–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G., Rösler, F., Spada, H., Amelang, M., Bierhoff, H. W., Ferstl, R., et al. (1999). Internationalisierung der psychologischen Forschung in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz: Sieben Empfehlungen [Internationalisation of psychological research in Germany, Austria and Switzerland: Seven recommendations]. Psychologische Rundschau, 50, 101–105. doi:10.1026//0033-3042.50.2.101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L. A. (1973). Causal analysis of data from panel studies and other kinds of surveys. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1135–1191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havránek, T., & Lienert, G. A. (1984). Local and regional versus global contingency testing. Biometrical Journal, 26, 483–494.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hoernes, G. E., & Heilweil, M. F. (1964). Introduction to Boolean algebra and logic design. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Horta, H., & Lacy, T. A. (2011). How does size matter for science? Exploring the effects of research unit size on academics’ scientific productivity and information exchange behaviors. Science and Public Policy, 38, 449–462. doi:10.3152/030234211X12960315267813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S. E., & Ruderman, M. N. (1995). Diversity in work teams: Research paradigms for a changing workplace. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Krampen, G., & Schui, G. (2009). ZPID-Monitor 2007 zur Internationalität der Psychologie aus dem deutschsprachigen Bereich: Der Kurzbericht [ZPID-monitor 2007 on the internationality of psychology in the German-speaking countries: Short report]. Psychologische Rundschau, 60, 184–185. doi:10.1026/0033-3042.60.3.184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krampen, G., & Wiesenhütter, J. (1993). Bibliometrische Befunde zur Entwicklung der Teildisziplinen der Psychologie [Bibliometric findings on the development of subdisciplines of psychology]. Psychologische Rundschau, 44, 25–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krampen, G., Montada, L., Müller, M. M., & Schui, G. (2005). Internationalität und Internationalisierung der deutschsprachigen Psychologie [Internationality and internationalization of German-language psychology]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krampen, G., Schui, G., & Bauer, H. (2011a). ZPID-Monitor 2009 zur internationalität der Psychologie aus dem deutschsprachigen Bereich: Der Kurzbericht [ZPID-Monitor 2009 on the internationality of psychology in the German-speaking countries: Short report]. Psychologische Rundschau, 62, 244–248. doi:10.1026/0033-3042/a000094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krampen, G., von Eye, A., & Schui, G. (2011b). Forecasting trends of development of psychology from a bibliometric perspective. Scientometrics, 87, 687–694. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0357-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., & Shin, J. C. (2011). How to evaluate universities in terms of their relative citation impacts: Fractional counting of citations and the normalization of differences among disciplines. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62, 1146–1155. doi:10.1002/asi.21511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lienert, G. A., & Krauth, J. (1975). Configural frequency analysis as a statistical tool for defining types. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 35, 231–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, R. M. (1997). The scientific wealth of nations. Science, 275, 793–796. doi:10.1126/science.275.5301.793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moed, H. F., Luwel, M., Houben, J. A., Spruyt, E., & Berghe, H. (1998). The effects of changes in the funding structure of the Flemish universities on their research capacity, productivity and impact during the 1980’s and early 1990’s. Scientometrics, 43, 231–255. doi:10.1007/BF02458409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montada, L., & Krampen, G. (2001). Internationalität und Internationalisierung der deutschsprachigen Psychologie [Internationality and internationalisation of psychology in the German-speaking countries]. In R. K. Silbereisen & D. Frey (Eds.), Perspektiven der Psychologie. Einführung und Standortbestimmung (pp. 282–300). Weinheim: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navarrete-Cortes, J., Fernandez-Lopez, J. A., Lopez-Baena, A., Quevedo-Blasco, R., & Buela-Casal, G. (2010). Global psychology: A bibliometric analysis of Web of Science publications. Universitas Psychologica, 9, 553–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niederle, M., & Vesterlund, L. (2007). Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122, 1067–1101. doi:10.1162/qjec.122.3.1067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pontille, D., & Torny, D. (2010). The controversial policies of journal ratings: evaluating social sciences and humanities. Research Evaluation, 19, 347–360. doi:10.3152/095820210X12809191250889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruest-Archambault, E. (2008). Benchmarking policy measures for gender equality in science. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, A., & Braun, T. (1996). Cross-field normalization of scientometric indicators. Scientometrics, 36, 311–324. doi:10.1007/BF02129597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schui, G., & Krampen, G. (2007). Zur Internationalität der Pädagogischen Psychologie aus dem deutschsprachigen Bereich. Personen- und fachbezogene bibliometrische Publikations- und Zitationsanalysen [On the internationality of educational psychology in the German-speaking countries. Person- and discipline-centered bibliometric publication and citation analyses]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 21, 97–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smalheiser, N. R., & Torvik, V. I. (2009). Author name disambiguation. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 43, 287–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tack, W. H. (1994). Bericht über Reaktionen auf einen Bericht: Zu Keul, Gigerenzer und Stroebes SSCI-Analyse [reactions to Keul, Gigerenzer and Stroebe’s SSCI analysis]. Psychologische Rundschau, 45, 108–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Raan, A. F. J., Leeuwen, T. N., & Visser, M. S. (2011). Severe language effect in university rankings: particularly Germany and France are wronged in citation-based rankings. Scientometrics, 88, 495–498. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0382-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermunt, J. K. (1997). Log-linear models for event histories. Advanced quantitative techniques in the social sciences. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Eye, A., & Bergman, L. R. (2003). Research strategies in developmental psychopathology: Dimensional identity and the person-oriented approach. Development and Psychopathology, 15, 553–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Eye, A., & Brandtstädter, J. (1982). Systematization of results of configuration frequency analysis by minimizing Boolean functions. In H. Caussinus, P. Ettinger, & J. R. Mathieu (Eds.), COMPSTAT 1982, part II: Short communications, summaries of posters (pp. 91–92). Wien: Physica.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Eye, A., & Gutiérrez Peña, E. (2004). Configural frequency analysis: The search for extreme cells. Journal of Applied Statistics, 31, 981–997. doi:10.1080/0266476042000270545.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • von Eye, A., & Mun, E. Y. (2012). Log-linear modeling—Concepts, interpretation, and applications with SYSTAT, Lem, and R. New York: Wiley. (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • von Eye, A., Mair, P., & Bogat, G. A. (2005). Prediction models for configural frequency analysis. Psychology Science, 47, 342–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Eye, A., Mair, P., & Mun, E.-Y. (2010). Advances in configural frequency analysis. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Tunzelmann, N., Ranga, M., Martin, B., & Geuna, A. (2003). The effects of size on research performance: A SPRU Review. Retrieved December 13, 2011, from http://www.sussex.ac.uk/Users/prff0/Publications/Size%20HE%20research.pdf.

  • Wolszczak-Derlacz, J., & Parteka, A. (2011). Efficiency of European public higher education institutions: a two-stage multicountry approach. Scientometrics, 89, 887–917. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0484-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Leibniz-Institute for Psychology Information (ZPID), University of Trier, 54286, Trier, Germany

    Hans P. W. Bauer, Gabriel Schui & Günter Krampen

  2. Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, 316 Psychology Building, East Lansing, MI, 48824-1116, USA

    Alexander von Eye

Authors
  1. Hans P. W. Bauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gabriel Schui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alexander von Eye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Günter Krampen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hans P. W. Bauer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bauer, H.P.W., Schui, G., von Eye, A. et al. How does scientific success relate to individual and organizational characteristics? A scientometric study of psychology researchers in the German-speaking countries. Scientometrics 94, 523–539 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0760-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0760-3

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

JEL Classification