Abstract
The aim of this paper is to explore to what extent social integration influences scientists’ research activity and performance. Data were obtained from a survey of researchers ascribed to the Biology and Biomedicine area of the Spanish Council for Scientific Research, as well as from their curricula vitae. The results provide empirical evidence that researchers who were highly integrated within their teams performed better than their less integrated colleagues in aspects of research activity such as collaboration with the private sector, patenting, participation in domestic funded research and development projects, and supervision of doctoral dissertations. Nevertheless, highly integrated researchers did not seem to be more prestigious than less integrated colleagues, nor did the former’s publications have a higher impact.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrews, F. M. (Ed.) (1979), Scientific Productivity: The Effectiveness of Research Groups in Six Countries. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; UNESCO, Paris.
Asch, S. (1952), Social Psychology. Prentice-Hall, New York.
Back, K. W. (1951), Influence through social communication, Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 46: 9–23.
Budge, S. (1981), Group cohesiveness revisited, Group, 5: 10–18.
Bush, G. P., Hattery, L. H. (1956), Teamwork and creativity in research, Administrative Science Quarterly, 1(3): 361–372.
Carayol, N., Matt, M. (2004), Does research organization influence academic production? Laboratory level evidence from a large European university, Research Policy, 33: 1081–1102.
Carron, A. V., Brawley, L. R. (2000), Cohesion: conceptual and measurement issues, Small Group Research, 31(1): 89–106.
Cartwright, D., Zander, A. (1968), Group Dynamics: Research and Theory, 3rd ed. Harper and Row, New York.
De Lorenzo, V. (2000), La investigación biomédica, Arbor, 653: 17–36. Theme issue ‘El CSIC en los umbrales del siglo XXI’.
Etzkowitz, H. (1992), Individual investigators and their research groups, Minerva, 30: 28–50.
Fox, M. F. (1983), Publication productivity among scientists: A critical review, Social Studies of Science, 13(2): 285–305.
Garland, J., Jones, H., Kolodny, R. L. (1973), A model for stages of development in social work groups. In: Bernstein, S. (Ed.), Exploration in Group Work. Milford House, Boston, pp. 17–71.
Hackman, J. R. (1983), Group influences on individuals. In: Dunette, M. D. (Ed.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. John Wiley, New York, pp. 1455–1526.
Hoogstraten, J., Vorst H. C. M. (1978), Group cohesion, task performance, and the experimenter expectancy effect, Human Relations, 31: 939–956.
Krohn, W., Küppers, G. (1990) Science as a self-organizing system. Outline of a theoretical model. In: Krohn, W., Küppers, G., Nowotny, H. (Eds), Self-organization — Portrait of a Scientific Revolution, vol. XIV, Yearbook in the Sociology of the Sciences. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 208–222.
Levinger, G. (1980), Towards the analysis of close relationships, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16: 510–544.
Lima, M., Liberman, S., Russell, J. M. (2005), Scientific group cohesiveness at the National University of México, Scientometrics, 64(1): 55–66.
Long, J. S., McGinnis, R. (1981), Organizational context and scientific productivity, American Sociological Review, 46: 422–442.
Lott, A. J., Lott, B. E. (1961), Group cohesiveness, communication level, and conformity, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62: 408–412.
Martín-Sempere, M. J., Rey-Rocha, J., Garzón-García, B. (2002), The effect of team consolidation on research collaboration and performance of scientists. Case study of Spanish university researchers in Geology, Scientometrics, 55(3): 377–394.
McGrath, J. E. (1984), Groups: Interaction and Performance. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Merton, R. K. (1968), Behavior patterns of scientists. In: Merton, R. K. (1973), The Sociology of Science. Theoretical and Empirical investigations. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.
Michel, J. G., Hambrick, D. C. (1992), Diversification posture and top management team characteristics, The Academy of Management Journal, 35(1): 9–37.
Moreland, R. L. (1987), The formation of small groups, In: Hendrick, C. (Ed.), Group Processes. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 80–110.
Moreland, R. L., Levine, J. M. (1982), Group socialization: Temporal changes in individual group relations. In: Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 15). Academic Press, New York, pp. 137–192.
Moreland, R. L., Levine, J. M. (1988), Group dynamics over time: Development and socialization in small groups. In: McGrath, J. E. (Ed.), The Psychology of Time: New Perspectives. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 151–181.
Nowotny, H. (1989), Individual autonomy and autonomy of science: the place of the individual in the research system. In: Cozzens, S. E. et al. (Eds), The Research System in Transition. NATO Advanced Science Institutes Series D: Behavioural and Social Sciences. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 331–344.
O’Reilly, C. A., Caldwell, D. F., Barnett, W. P. (1989), Work group demography, social integration, and turnover, Administrative Science Quarterly, 34(1): 21–37.
Rey-Rocha, J., Martín-Sempere, M. J., Garzón-García, B. (2002), Research productivity of scientists in consolidated vs. non-consolidated teams: the case of Spanish University Geologists, Scientometrics, 55(1): 137–156.
Rey-Rocha, Garzón-García, B., Martín-Sempere, M. J. (2006), Scientists’ performance and consolidation of research teams in Biology and Biomedicine at the Spanish Council for Scientific Research, Scientometrics, 69(2): 183–212.
Seashore, S. E. (1977), Group Cohesiveness in the Industrial Work Group. Arno, New York.
Shaw, M. E. (1981), Group Dynamics: The Psychology of Small Group Behaviour, 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Stankiewicz, R. (1980), Leadership and the Performance of Research Groups. RPI Research Policy Institute, University of Lund, Lund (Sweden).
Smith, K. G. et al. (1994), Top management team demography and process: the role of social integration and communication, Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(3): 412–438.
Tuckman, B. W. (1965), Developmental sequences in small groups, Psychological Bulletin, 63: 384–399.
Tuckman, B. W., Jensen, M. A. C. (1997), Stages of small group development revisited, Group and Organizational Studies, 2: 419–427.
Turner, J. C., Haslam, S. A. (2001), Social identity, organizations, and leadership, In: Turner, M. E. (Ed.), Groups at Work: Theory and Research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey, pp. 25–65.
Worchel, S., Coutant-Sassic, D., Grossman, M. (1992), A developmental approach to group dynamics: a model and illustrative research. In: Worchel, S., Wood, W., Simpson, J. A. (Eds), Group Process and Productivity. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 181–202.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rey-Rocha, J., Garzón-García, B. & José Martín-Sempere, M. Exploring social integration as a determinant of research activity, performance and prestige of scientists. Empirical evidence in the Biology and Biomedicine field. Scientometrics 72, 59–80 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1703-2
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1703-2