Approximation algorithm for the multicovering problem | Journal of Combinatorial Optimization Skip to main content
Log in

Approximation algorithm for the multicovering problem

  • Published:
Journal of Combinatorial Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Let \(\mathcal {H}=(V,\mathcal {E})\) be a hypergraph with maximum edge size \(\ell \) and maximum degree \(\varDelta \). For a given positive integers \(b_v\), \(v\in V\), a set multicover in \(\mathcal {H}\) is a set of edges \(C \subseteq \mathcal {E}\) such that every vertex v in V belongs to at least \(b_v\) edges in C. Set multicover is the problem of finding a minimum-cardinality set multicover. Peleg, Schechtman and Wool conjectured that for any fixed \(\varDelta \) and \(b:=\min _{v\in V}b_{v}\), the problem of set multicover is not approximable within a ratio less than \(\delta :=\varDelta -b+1\), unless \(\mathcal {P}=\mathcal {NP}\). Hence it’s a challenge to explore for which classes of hypergraph the conjecture doesn’t hold. We present a polynomial time algorithm for the set multicover problem which combines a deterministic threshold algorithm with conditioned randomized rounding steps. Our algorithm yields an approximation ratio of \(\max \left\{ \frac{148}{149}\delta , \left( 1- \frac{ (b-1)e^{\frac{\delta }{4}}}{94\ell } \right) \delta \right\} \) for \(b\ge 2\) and \(\delta \ge 3\). Our result not only improves over the approximation ratio presented by El Ouali et al. (Algorithmica 74:574, 2016) but it’s more general since we set no restriction on the parameter \(\ell \). Moreover we present a further polynomial time algorithm with an approximation ratio of \(\frac{5}{6}\delta \) for hypergraphs with \(\ell \le (1+\epsilon )\bar{\ell }\) for any fixed \(\epsilon \in [0,\frac{1}{2}]\), where \(\bar{\ell }\) is the average edge size. The analysis of this algorithm relies on matching/covering duality due to Ray-Chaudhuri (1960), which we convert into an approximative form. The second performance disprove the conjecture of Peleg et al. for a large subclass of hypergraphs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bar-Yehuda R (2001) Using homogeneous weights for approximating the partial cover problem. J Algorithms 39(2):137–144

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Berge C (1973) Graphs and hypergraphs. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chvatal V (1979) A greedy heuristic for the set-covering problem. Math Oper Res 4:233–235

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dobson G (1982) Worst-case analysis of greedy heuristics for integer programming with nonnegative data. Math Oper Res 7:515–531

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Duh R, Fürer M (1997) Approximating k-set cover by semi-local optimization. In: Proceedings of 29th annual symposium on theory on computing, May, pp 256–264

  • El Ouali M, Fohlin H, Srivastav A (2014) A randomised approximation algorithm for the hitting set problem. Theor Comput Sci 555:23–34

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • El Ouali M, Fohlin H, Srivastav A (2016a) An approximation algorithm for the partial vertex cover problem in hypergraphs. J Comb Optim 31:846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-014-9793-2

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • El Ouali M, Munstermann P, Srivastav A (2016b) Randomized approximation for the set multicover problem in hypergraphs. Algorithmica 74:574

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ferdous et al (2017) Parallel algorithms through approximation: b-edge cover. In: IEEE international parallel and distributed processing symposium (IPDPS)

  • Ferdous et al (2018) New approximation algorithms for minimum weighted edge cover. SIAM workshop on combinatorial scientific computing (SIAM CSC)

  • Fujito T, Kurahashi H (2005) A better-than-greedy algorithm for k-set multicover. In: Erlebach T, Persinao G (eds) Approximation and online algorithms. WAOA. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 3879. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandhi R, Khuller S, Srinivasan A (2004) Approximation algorithms for partial covering problems. J Algorithms 53(1):55–84

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hall NG, Hochbaum DS (1986) A fast approximation algorithm for the multicovering problem. Discrete Appl Math 15:35–40

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hochbaum DS (1982) Approximation algorithms for the set covering and vertex cover problems. SIAM J Comput 11(3):555–556

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson DS (1974) Approximation algorithms for combinatorial problems. J Comput Syst Sci 9:256–278

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Karp RM (1972) Reducibility among combinatorial problems. In: Miller RE, Thatcher JW, Bohlinger JD (eds) Complexity of computer computations. The IBM research symposia series. Springer, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Khot S, Regev O (2008) Vertex cover might be hard to approximate to within 2-epsilon. J Comput Syst Sci 74(3):335–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koufogiannakis C, Young NE (2013) Greedy \(\Delta \)-approximation algorithm for covering with arbitrary constraints and submodular cost. Algorithmica 66:113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00453-012-9629-3

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Krysta P (2005) Greedy approximation via duality for packing, combinatorial auctions and routing. In: Jedrzejowicz J, Szepietowski A (eds) Mathematical foundations of computer science (2005) MFCS 2005, vol 3618. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovász L (1975) On the ratio of optimal integral and fractional covers. Discrete Math 13(4):383–390

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • McDiarmid C (1989) On the method of bounded differences. Surveys in combinatorics (Norwich 1989). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 148–188

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Motwani R, Raghavan P (1995) Randomized algorithms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Peleg D, Schechtman G, Wool A (1993) Approximating bounded 0–1 integer linear programs. In: Proceedings of 2nd Israel symposium on theory of computing and systems, pp 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTCS.1993.253482

  • Peleg D, Schechtman G, Wool A (1997) Randomized approximation of bounded multicovering problems. Algorithmica 18(1):44–66

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Vazirani VV (2001) Approximation algorithms. Springer, Berlin, pp 112–116

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abbass Gorgi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gorgi, A., El Ouali, M., Srivastav, A. et al. Approximation algorithm for the multicovering problem. J Comb Optim 41, 433–450 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-020-00688-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-020-00688-9

Keywords

Navigation