Abstract
We introduce a hierarchy of problems between the Dominating Set problem and the Power Dominating Set (PDS) problem called the ℓ-round power dominating set (ℓ-round PDS, for short) problem. For ℓ=1, this is the Dominating Set problem, and for ℓ≥n−1, this is the PDS problem; here n denotes the number of nodes in the input graph. In PDS the goal is to find a minimum size set of nodes S that power dominates all the nodes, where a node v is power dominated if (1) v is in S or it has a neighbor in S, or (2) v has a neighbor u such that u and all of its neighbors except v are power dominated. Note that rule (1) is the same as for the Dominating Set problem, and that rule (2) is a type of propagation rule that applies iteratively. The ℓ-round PDS problem has the same set of rules as PDS, except we apply rule (2) in “parallel” in at most ℓ−1 rounds. We prove that ℓ-round PDS cannot be approximated better than \(2^{\log^{1-\epsilon}{n}}\) even for ℓ=4 in general graphs. We provide a dynamic programming algorithm to solve ℓ-round PDS optimally in polynomial time on graphs of bounded tree-width. We present a PTAS (polynomial time approximation scheme) for ℓ-round PDS on planar graphs for \(\ell=O(\frac{\log{n}}{\log{\log{n}}})\) . Finally, we give integer programming formulations for ℓ-round PDS.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aazami A (2008) Domination in graphs with bounded propagation: algorithms, formulations and hardness results. Manuscript (available on arXiv:0802.2130v1)
Aazami A, Stilp MD (2006) Approximation algorithms and hardness for domination with propagation. 22 pages, Submitted to a journal (avaiable on arXiv:0710.2139v1)
Aazami A, Stilp MD (2007) Approximation algorithms and hardness for domination with propagation. In: Proceedings of the 10th international workshop on approximation algorithms for combinatorial optimization problems. LNCS, vol 4627. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–15
Alber J, Bodlaender HL, Fernau H, Kloks T, Niedermeier R (2002) Fixed parameter algorithms for dominating set and related problems on planar graphs. Algorithmica 33(4):461–493
Baker BS (1994) Approximation algorithms for NP-complete problems on planar graphs. J ACM 41(1):153–180
Baldwin TL, Mili L, Boisen MB, Adapa R (1993) Power system observability with minimal phasor measurement placement. IEEE Trans Power Syst 8(2):707–715
Bhargava B (1999) Synchronized phasor measurement system project at Southern California Edison Co. Power Eng Soc Summer Meet 1999 IEEE 1:16–22
Bodlaender HL (1988) Some classes of graphs with bounded treewidth. Bull EATCS 36:116–126
Brueni DJ (1993) Minimal PMU placement for graph observability, a decomposition approach. MS thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA
Brueni DJ, Heath LS (2005) The PMU placement problem. SIAM J Discrete Math 19(3):744–761
Demaine ED, Hajiaghayi MT (2005) Bidimensionality: new connections between FPT algorithms and PTASs. In: Proceedings of the 16th annual ACM-SIAM symposium on discrete algorithms, pp 590–601
Diestel R (2000) Graph theory, 2nd edn. Springer, New York
Dorfling M, Henning MA (2006) A note on power domination in grid graphs. Discrete Appl Math 154(6):1023–1027
Feige U (1998) A threshold of ln n for approximating set cover. J ACM 45(4):634–652
Garey MR, Johnson DS (1979) Computers and intractability: a guide to the theory of NP-completeness. Freeman, New York
Guo J, Niedermeier R, Raible D (2005) Improved algorithms and complexity results for power domination in graphs. In: Proceedings of the 15th international symposium on fundamentals of computation theory. LNCS, vol 3623. Springer, Berlin, pp 172–184 (To appear in Algorithmica)
Haynes TW, Hedetniemi ST, Slater PJ (1998a) Domination in graphs: advanced topics. Marcel Dekker, New York
Haynes TW, Hedetniemi ST, Slater PJ (1998b) Fundamentals of domination in graphs. Marcel Dekker, New York
Haynes TW, Hedetniemi SM, Hedetniemi ST, Henning MA (2002) Domination in graphs applied to electric power networks. SIAM J Discrete Math 15(4):519–529
Johnson DS (1974) Approximation algorithms for combinatorial problems. J Comput Syst Sci 9(3):256–278
Kloks T (1994) Treewidth, computations and approximations. LNCS, vol 842. Springer, Berlin
Kneis J, Mölle D, Richter S, Rossmanith P (2006) Parameterized power domination complexity. Inf Process Lett 98(4):145–149
Kortsarz G (2001) On the hardness of approximating spanners. Algorithmica 30(3):432–450
Liao CS, Lee DT (2005) Power domination problem in graphs. In: Proceedings of the 11th international computing and combinatorics conference. LNCS, vol 3595. Springer, Berlin, pp 818–828
Lund C, Yannakakis M (1994) On the hardness of approximating minimization problems. J ACM 41(5):960–981
Martin KE (2002) Phasor measurements at the Bonneville power administration. Power systems and communications infrastructures for the future
Mili L, Baldwin TL, Phadke AG (1991) Phasor measurements for voltage and transient stability monitoring and control. In: Proceedings of the EPRI-NSF workshop on application of advanced mathematics to power systems
Nuqui RF (2001) State estimation and voltage security monitoring using synchronized phasor measurements, PhD thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, July 2001
Phadke AG (2002) Synchronized phasor measurements—a historical overview. Transm Distrib Conf Exhib 1:476–479
Raz R, Safra S (1997) A sub-constant error-probability low-degree test, and a sub-constant error-probability PCP characterization of NP. In: Proceedings of the 29th annual ACM symposium on theory of computing, pp 475–484
Zhao M, Kang L, Chang GJ (2006) Power domination in graphs. Discrete Math. 306(15):1812–1816
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aazami, A. Domination in graphs with bounded propagation: algorithms, formulations and hardness results. J Comb Optim 19, 429–456 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-008-9176-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-008-9176-7