Strategic alignment and value maximization for IT project portfolios | Information Technology and Management Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Strategic alignment and value maximization for IT project portfolios

  • Published:
Information Technology and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Managing project portfolios has been a challenge to many IT organizations due to the size and complexity of their initiatives that are often cross-functional, fast changing, and transformational in nature. A governance process on project solicitation, evaluation, and monitoring is thus essential to ensure the resulting portfolio creates tangible values, balances across priorities, and supports business objectives. An optimization model to streamline the decision processes for IT portfolios and programs is proposed. We consider project characteristics such as the extent of strategic alignment, expected benefit, development cost, and cross-project synergy to maximize the portfolio value. We also consider team proficiency and resource availability to determine a project portfolio that could be implemented within the overall development time. The multi-objective model identifies the optimal mix among project types and the solution procedure efficiently produces recommendations that are superior to those found with current empirical techniques. We also describe an evolutionary algorithm to find approximate solutions to the optimization model. Possible extensions on how the optimization procedure can go beyond projects to also streamline decisions such as the renewal or replacement of in-flight applications is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aaker DA, Tyebjee TT (1978) A model for the selection of interdependent R&D projects. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 25(2):30–36

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aloini D, Dulmin R, Mininno V (2007) Risk management in ERP project introduction: review of the literature. Inf Manage 44(6):547–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Apfel AL (2009) Activity cycle overview: program and portfolio management. Technical report, Gartner, Inc., Report ID Number: G00167564

  4. Arya A, Mittendorf B (2006) Project assignments when budget padding taints resource allocation. Manage Sci 52(9):1345–1358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bardhan IR, Kauffman RJ, Naranpanawe S (2006) Optimizing an IT project portfolio with time-wise interdependencies. In: Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on system sciences, Kauai, Hawaii, HICSS’06, p. 168b

  6. Benaroch M, Kauffman RJ (1999) A case for using real options pricing analysis to evaluate information technology project investments. Inf Sys Res 10(1):70–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bohanec M, Rajkovič V, Semolić B, Pogačnik A (1995) Knowledge-based portfolio analysis for project evaluation. Inf Manag 28(5):293–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen J, Askin RG (2009) Project selection, scheduling and resource allocation with time dependent returns. Eur J Oper Res 193(1):23–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cohen I, Golany B, Shtub A (2007) Resource allocation in stochastic, finite-capacity, multi-project systems through the cross entropy methodology. J Sched 10(3):181–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cuellar MJ, Gallivan MJ (2006) A framework for ex ante project risk assessment based on absorptive capacity. Eur J Oper Res 173(3):1123–1138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Deb K (2009) Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. Deblaere F, Demeulemeester E, Herroelen W, Vande Vonder S (2007) Robust resource allocation decisions in resource-constrained projects. Decis Sci 38(1):5–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Doerner KF, Gutjahr WJ, Hartl RF, Strauss C, Stummer C (2006) Pareto ant colony optimization with ILP preprocessing in multiobjective project portfolio selection. Eur J Oper Res 171(3):830–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Eilat H, Golany B, Shtub A (2006) Constructing and evaluating balanced portfolios of R&D projects with interactions: a DEA based methodology. Eur J Oper Res 172(3):1018–1039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Engwall M, Jerbrant A (2003) The resource allocation syndrome: the prime challenge of multi-project management?. Int J Proj Manage 21(6):403–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ghasemzadeh F, Archer N, Iyogun P (1999) A zero-one model for project portfolio selection and scheduling. J Oper Res Soc 50(7):745–755

    Google Scholar 

  17. Granot D, Zuckerman D (1991) Optimal sequencing and resource allocation in research and development projects. Manage Sci 37(2):140–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gustafsson J, Salo A (2005) Contingent portfolio programming for the management of risky projects. Oper Res 53(6):946–956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Heidenberger K, Stummer C (1999) Research and development project selection and resource allocation: a review of quantitative modeling approaches. Int J Manage Rev 1(2):197–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Herroelen W, De Reyck B, Demeulemeester E (1998) Resource-constrained scheduling: a survey of recent developments. Comput Oper Res 25(4):279–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hess SW (1962) A dynamic programming approach to R and D budgeting and project selection. IRE Trans Eng Manag 9(4):170–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Leus R, Herroelen W (2004) Stability and resource allocation in project planning. IIE Trans 36(7):667–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Levine HA (2005) Project portfolio management: a practical guide to selecting projects, managing portfolios, and maximizing benefits. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  24. Liesiö J, Mild P, Salo A (2008) Robust portfolio modeling with incomplete cost information and project interdependencies. Eur J Oper Res 190(3):679–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Linton JD, Walsh ST, Morabito J (2002) Analysis, ranking and selection of R&D projects in a portfolio. R&D Manage 32(2):139–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Maizlish B, Handler R (2005) IT portfolio management step-by-step: unlocking the business value of technology. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  27. Man Z, Wei T, Xiang L, Lishan K (2008) Research on multi-project scheduling problem based on hybrid genetic algorithm. In 2008 International Conference on computer science and software engineering, pp 390–394

  28. Mieritz L, Fitzgerald D (2010) ITS core overview for program and portfolio management. Technical report, Gartner, Inc., Report ID Number: G00205800

  29. Morcos MS (2008) Modelling resource allocation of R&D project portfolios using a multi-criteria decision-making methodology. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 25(1):72–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Nozick LK, Turnquist MA, Xu N (2004) Managing portfolios of projects under uncertainty. Ann Oper Res 132(1-4):243–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sanchez H, Robert B, Pellerin R (2008) Risk-opportunity identification framework. Proj Manag J 39(3):97–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sanwal A (2007) Optimizing corporate portfolio management: aligning investment proposals with organizational strategy. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  33. Shtub A, Bard J, Globerson S (2005) Project management: processes, methodologies, and economics. 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  34. The Enterprise Portfolio Management Council (2009) Project portfolio management: a view from the management trenches. Wiley, New York

  35. Wallace L, Keil M, Rai A (2004) Understanding software project risk: a cluster analysis. Inf Manag 42(1):115–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang Y, Perkins JR, Khurana A (2002) Optimal resource allocation in new product development projects: a control-theoretic approach. IEEE Trans Autom Control 47(8):1267–1276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Yang K-K, Sum C-C (1997) An evaluation of due date, resource allocation, project release, and activity scheduling rules in a multiproject environment. Eur J Oper Res 103(1):139–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Gabelli School of Business, Fordham University, 441 E. Fordham Road, Bronx, NY, 10458, USA

    I. Robert Chiang

  2. School of Business, University of Connecticut, 2100 Hillside Road Unit 1041, Storrs, CT, 06269-1041, USA

    Manuel A. Nunez

Authors
  1. I. Robert Chiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Manuel A. Nunez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. Robert Chiang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chiang, I.R., Nunez, M.A. Strategic alignment and value maximization for IT project portfolios. Inf Technol Manag 14, 143–157 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-012-0126-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-012-0126-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation