Investigating the role of an enterprise architecture project in the business-IT alignment in Iran | Information Systems Frontiers Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Investigating the role of an enterprise architecture project in the business-IT alignment in Iran

  • Published:
Information Systems Frontiers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Ensuring that IT and business have a more mature alignment relationship is recognized as being critical to an organization’s success. To achieve alignment leveraging, enterprise architecture (EA) is considered fundamental as a comprehensive approach to planning and managing IT actions within the organization, based on its business requirements. This paper reports on a study to assess the effect of successful EA projects on the business-IT alignment in Iranian organizations, using the Luftman’s maturity model as the assessment tool. The implications of our findings in this study as well as its limitations are discussed to assist in detecting the flaws in the existing EA frameworks and to propose improvements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. \( \alpha = \frac{K}{{K - 1}}\left( {1 - \frac{{\sum\limits_{{i = 1}}^K {S_i^2} }}{{{S^2}}}} \right) \) where K is the number of questions, \( S_i^2 \) is the variance of the question i, and s2 is the variance of all questions.

  2. \( {t_{{1 - \frac{{0.05}}{2}}}}\left( {16 - 1} \right) = 2.13 \)

References

  • Adcock, R., & Collier, D. (2001). Measurement validity: A shared standard for qualitative and quantitative research. The American Political Science Review, 95(3), 529–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allee, V. (2008). Value network analysis and value conversion of tangible and intangible assets. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 9(1), 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological testing (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asthana, H. S., & Bhushan, B. (2007). Statistics For Social Sciences. New Delhi: Prentice-Hall of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahrami, A., Sadowski, D., & Beahrami, S. (1998). Enterprise architecture for business process simulation. In Winter Simulation Conference (WSC) (Vol. 2, pp. 1409–1413). Washington, DC.

  • Baïna, S., Ansias, P. Y., Petit, M., & Castiaux, A. (2008). Strategic Business/IT alignment using goal models. In 3rd International Workshop on Business/IT Alignment and Interoperability (BUSITAL), (pp. 31–43). Montpellier, France.

  • Baker, A. J. L., & Charvat, B. J. (2008). Research methods in child welfare. NY, USA: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharjya, J., & Chang, V. (2006). Evolving IT governance practices for IT and business alignment—a case study in an Australian institution. In 4th Annual Conference on Information Science, Technology and Management (CISTM). Chandigarh, India.

  • Bleistein, S. J., Cox, K., Verner, J., & Phalp, K. T. (2006). B-SCP: A requirements analysis framework for validating strategic alignment of organizational IT based on strategy, context, and process. Information and Software Technology, 48(9), 846–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (Methodology in the Social Sciences). New York: Guilford Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1Buckl, S., Matthes, F., & Schweda, C. M. (2009). Future research topics in enterprise architecture management—a knowledge management perspective. In International Conference on Service-Oriented Computing (ICSOC) (pp. 1–11). Stockholm, Sweden.

  • Camponovo, G., & Pigneur, Y. (2004). Information systems alignment in uncertain environments. In IFIP International Conference on Decision Support Systems (DSS) (pp. 134–146). Prato, Italy.

  • Carvalho, G., & Sousa, P. (2008). Business and Information Systems MisAlignment Model (BISMAM): an holistic model leveraged on misalignment and medical sciences approaches. In 3rd International Workshop on Business/IT Alignment and Interoperability (BUSITAL) (pp. 104–119). Montpellier, France.

  • Chen, H. M. (2008). Towards service engineering: Service orientation and business-IT alignment. In 41st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (pp. 114). Waikoloa, HI.

  • Chen, H. M., Kazman, R., & Garg, A. (2005). BITAM: An engineering-principled method for managing misalignments between business and IT architectures. Science of Computer Programming, 57(1), 5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H. M., Kazman, R., & Perry, O. (2010). From Software architecture analysis to service engineering: an empirical study of methodology development for enterprise SOA implementation. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 3(2), 145–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, L. (2010). Business–IT alignment maturity of companies in China. Information Management, 47, 9–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, W. W., & Newsted, P. R. (1999). Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Statistical strategies for small sample research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIO-Council (2001). A practical guide to federal enterprise architecture, Version 1.0.

  • Clarke, R. (1994). The path of development of strategic information systems theory. http://www.rogerclarke.com/SOS/StratISTh.html.

  • Coleman, P., & Papp, R. (2006). Strategic alignment: Analysis of perspectives. In Southern Association for Information Systems (SAIS) Conference (pp. 242–250). Florida, USA

  • Cotton, L. D., Haase, G. A., Havlicek, J. D., & Thal, A. E. (2009). Value Driven Enterprise Architecture Score (VDEAScore): A means of DoDAF architecture evaluation. In 7th Annual Conference on Systems Engineering Research (CSER). Leicestershire, UK.

  • Craig, D., Kanakamedala, K., & Tinaikar, R. (2007, Spring). The next frontier in IT strategy: A McKinsey Survey. McKinsey Quarterly.

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cumps, B., Viaene, S., Dedene, G., & Vandenbulck, J. (2006). An Empirical Study on Business/ICT alignment in European organisations. In 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) .(p. 195a). HI.

  • Derzsi, Z., & Gordijn, J. (2005). Value-Based Business-ICT alignment: A case study of the mobile industry. In 12th Research Symposium on Emerging Electronic Markets (RSEEM) (pp. 83–95). Amsterdam, Netherlands.

  • DeVon, H. A., Block, M. E., Moyle-Wright, P., & Ernst, D. M. (2007). A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 39(2), 155–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DoD (2007). DoD Architecture Framework (DoDAF), Version 1.5. U.S. Department of Defense.

  • DoT (2000). Treasury enterprise architecture framework, Version 1. U.S. Department of the Treasury.

  • Edwards, B. A. (2000). Chief executive officer behavior: the catalyst for strategic alignment. International Journal of Value-Based Management, 13, 47–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El Kourdi, M., Shah, H., & Atkins, A. (2007). A proposed framework for knowledge discovery in enterprise architecture. In Trends in Enterprise Architecture Research (TEAR) (pp. 41–49). St. Gallen, Switzerland.

  • Fairhead, N., & Good, J. (2009). People-Led enterprise architecture. In P. Saha (Ed.), Advances in government enterprise architecture (pp. 285–306). IGI Global.

  • Fornell, C. (1987). A second generation of multivariate analysis: classification of methods and implications for marketing research. In M. J. Houston (Ed.), Review of marketing. Chicago: American Marketing Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giachetti, R. E. (2010). Design of enterprise systems, theory, architecture, and methods. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Google Google Scholar. www.scholar.google.com. Accessed October 15 2010.

  • Gordijn, J., & Akkermans, H. (2001). Designing and evaluating e-business models. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 16, 11–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordijn, J., & Akkermans, H. (2003). Value-based requirements engineering: exploring innovative ecommerce ideas. Requirements Engineering Journal, 8, 114–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregor, S., & Hart, D. (2007). Enterprise architectures: enablers of business strategy and IS/IT alignment in government. Information Technology & People, 20(2), 96–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson, P., Johnson, P., & Nordstrom, L. (2009). Enterprise architecture: A framework supporting organizational performance analysis. In 20th International Conference and Exhibition on Electricity Distribution (pp. 1–4). Prague, Czech Republic.

  • Gutierrez, A., Orozco, J., & Serrano, A. (2006). Using tactical and operational factors to assess strategic alignment: an SME study. In European and Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems (EMCIS) (pp. 1–10). Costa Blanca, Alicante, Spain.

  • Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakanson, & Johanson (1992). A model of industrial network: A review. In Industrial networks: A new view of reality (pp. 28–34). London, UK: Routledge.

  • Haki, M. K., & Forte, M. W. (2010). Proposal of a service oriented architecture governance model to serve as a practical framework for Business-IT alignment. In 4th International Conference on New Trends in Information Science and Service Science (NISS) (pp. 410–417). Gyeongju.

  • Halpin, T. (2007). Fact-oriented modeling: Past, present and future. In Conceptual modelling in information systems engineering. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

  • Hartley, J. (2004). Case study research. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 323–333). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, J. C., & Venkatraman, N. (1993). Strategic alignment: Leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Systems Journal, 32(1), 472–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IETS Iran e-Tendering System. www.iranets.ir. Accessed February 20 2010.

  • Ireland, V. (2007). Enterprise architecture—a layer between portfolios and organisation strategy. In 4th World Project Management Week Conference. Singapore.

  • ITGI (2007). Control Objectives for Information and related Technology (COBIT), Ver 4.1: IT Governance Institute. www.itgi.org.

  • Jafari, M., Akhavan, P., & Nouranipour, E. (2009). Developing an architecture model for enterprise knowledge: An empirical study based on the Zachman framework in Iran. Management Decision, 47(5), 730–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jahani, B., Seyyed Javadein, S. R., & Jafari, H. A. (2010). Measurement of enterprise architecture readiness within organizations. Business Strategy Series, 11(3), 177–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, D., Lee, J., & Kim, K. (2010). Alignment of business enterprise Architectures using fact-based ontologies. Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 3274–3283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lagerström, R., Sommestad, T., Buschle, M., & Ekstedt, M. (2011). Enterprise architecture management’s impact on information technology success. In 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (pp. 1–10). Kauai, HI.

  • Lindstrom, A., Johnson, P., Johansson, E., Ekstedt, M., & Simonsson, M. (2006). A survey on CIO concerns—do enterprise architecture frameworks support them? Information Systems Frontiers, 8(2), 81–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luftman, J. (1996). Competing in the information age: strategic alignment in practice. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luftman, J. (2000). Assessing Business-IT Alignment Maturity. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4(14).

  • Luftman, J., & Kempaiah, R. (2007). An update on business-IT alignment: “A Line” has been drawn. MIS Quarterly Executive, 6(3), 165–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luftman, J., Lewis, P. R., & Oldach, S. H. (1993). Transforming the enterprise: The alignment of business and information technology strategies. IBM Systems Journal, 32(1), 198–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luftman, J., Papp, R., & Brier, T. (1999). Enablers and inhibitors of business-IT alignment. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 11(3), 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, M. K. (2008). IT and business alignment remains CIO’s top concern. InformationWeek

  • McKeen, J. D., & Smith, H. A. (2003). Making IT Happen: Critical issues in IT management. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

  • Molinaro, L. F. R., Ramos, K. H. C., Cotta Orlandi, T. R., & Abdalla, H. (2010). Enterprise architecture to IT governance: An approach based on component business model and performance levels. In J. E. Quintela Varajão, M. M. Cruz-Cunha, G. D. Putnik and A. Trigo (Eds.), Enterprise information systems, Vol. 110 (pp. 41–51). Communications in Computer and Information Science: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

  • Nakakawa, A., van Bommel, P., & Proper, E. (2010). Towards a theory on collaborative decision making in enterprise architecture. In R. Winter, J. Zhao & S. Aier (Eds.), Global perspectives on design science research, Vol. 6105, (pp. 538–541). (Lecture Notes in Computer Science): Springer Berlin/Heidelberg.

  • O’Leary-Kelly, S. W., & Vokurka, R. J. (1998). The empirical assessment of construct validity. Journal of Operations Management, 16, 387–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OGC. (2007). Official introduction to the ITIL service lifecycle. London: TSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papp, R. (2001). Introduction to strategic alignment. In Strategic information technology: Opportunities for competitive advantage (pp. 1–24). Idea Group Publishing.

  • Pereira, C. M., & Sousa, P. (2005). Enterprise architecture: Business and IT alignment. In ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (pp. 1344–1345). Santa Fe, NM, USA.

  • Plazaola, L., Flores, J., Vargas, N., & Ekstedt, M. (2008). Strategic business and IT alignment assessment: A case study applying an enterprise architecture-based metamodel. In 41st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (p. 398). Waikoloa, HI.

  • PMI. (2008). A guide to the project management body of knowledge. PA, USA: Project Management Institute, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rathnam, R. G., Johnsen, J., & Wen, H. J. (2005). Alignment of business strategy and IT strategy: A case study of a fortune 50 financial services company. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 1–9.

  • Ross, J. W. (2003). Creating a strategic IT architecture competency: Learning in stages. MIS Quarterly Executive, 2(1), 31–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. W. (2006). Enterprise architecture: Driving business benefits from IT MIT Sloan Research Paper.

  • Ross, J. W., Weill, P., & Robertson, D. C. (2006). Enterprise architecture as strategy: Create a foundation for business execution. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saat, J., Franke, U., Lagerström, R., & Ekstedt, M. (2010). Enterprise architecture meta models for IT/business alignment situations. In 14th IEEE International Conference on Enterprise Distributed Object Computing (EDOC) (pp. 14–23). Vitoria, Brazil.

  • Schelp, J., & Stutz, M. (2007). A balanced scorecard approach to measure the value of enterprise architecture. Journal of Enterprise Architecture, 3(4), 8–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott Morton, M. S. (1991). The corporation of the 1990s: Information technology and organizational transformation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sekaran, U. (2003). Research methods for business: A skill building approach (4th ed.). NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, H., & Kourdi, M. E. (2007, September & October). Frameworks for enterprise architecture. IT Professional, pp. 36–41.

  • Shpilberg, D., Berez, S., Puryear, R., & Shah, S. (2007, Avoiding the alignment trap in IT. MIT Sloan Management Review, pp. 50–59.

  • Silva, E., Plazaola, L., & Ekstedt, M. (2006). Strategic business and IT alignment: A prioritized theory diagram. In PICMET (pp. 1–10). Istanbul, Turkey.

  • Silvius, A. J. G. (2008). The impact of national cultures on business & IT alignment. Communications of the IIMA, 8(2), 11–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sledgianowski, D., Luftman, J., & Reilly, R. R. (2006). Development and validation of an instrument to measure maturity of IT business strategic alignment mechanisms. Information Resources Management Journal, 19(3), 18–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spewak, S., & Hill, S. C. (1995). Enterprise architecture planning: Developing a blueprint for data, applications, and technology. New York City: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapia, R. S. (2007). Developing a maturity model for IT alignment in a cross-organizational environment. In 2nd Dutch/Belgian Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (EIS), Groningen, Netherlands.

  • Tapia, R. S., Daneva, M., & van Eck, P. (2007). Validating adequacy and suitability of business-IT alignment criteria in an inter-enterprise maturity model. In 11th IEEE International Conference on Enterprise Distributed Object Computing (EDOC) (pp. 202–213). Annapolis, MD.

  • TBRG (2007). The business motivation model: business governance in a volatile world, release 1.3. The Business Rules Group.

  • TCIA Technical Committee of Information Architecture. www.enterprisearchitecture.ir. Accessed February 21 2010.

  • The-Open-Group (2009). The open group architecture framework (TOGAF), version 9.0.

  • Thode, H. C. (2002). Testing for normality. NY, USA: Marcel Dekkers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vail, E. (2002). Knowledge management & enterprise architecture: An opportunity for synergy. White paper. Quincy: Ptech Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaishnavi, V. K., & Kuechler, W. (2008). Design science research methods and patterns—innovating information and communication technology. NY: Auerbach.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Raadt, B., Bonnet, M., Schouten, S., & van Vliet, H. (2010). The relation between EA effectiveness and stakeholder satisfaction. Journal of Systems and Software, 83, 1954–1969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Eck, P., Blanken, H., & Wieringa, R. (2004). Project GRAAL: towards operational architecture alignment. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, 13(3), 235–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varghese, J., & Kurien, P. (2004). IT imperatives beyond strategic alignment: enterprise architecture flexibility and IT delivery efficiency. Handbook of Business Strategy, 5(1), 275–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veasey, P. W. (2001). Use of enterprise architectures in managing strategic change. Business Process Management, 7(5), 420–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velitchkov, I. (2008). Integration of IT strategy and enterprise architecture models. Paper presented at the 9th International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies and Workshop for PhD Students in Computing, Gabrovo, Bulgaria.

  • Versteeg, G., & Bouwman, H. (2006). Business architecture: A new paradigm to relate business strategy to ICT. Information System Frontier, 8, 91–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitantonio, G. D., Legh-Smith, J., Millar, W., & Wilkinson, M. (2006). Meeting business objectives through adaptive information and communications technology. BT Technology Journal, 24(4), 113–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X., Zhou, X., & Jiang, L. (2008). A method of business and IT alignment based on enterprise architecture. In IEEE International Conference on Service Operations and Logistics, and Informatics (IEEE/SOLI) (pp. 740–745). Beijing.

  • Wegmann, A. (2002). The systemic enterprise architecture methodology business and IT alignment for competitiveness. In EPFL (pp. 1–8). Lausanne, Switzerland.

  • Wegmann, A., Balabko, P., Le, L. S., Regev, G., & Rychkova, I. (2005). A method and tool for business-IT alignment in enterprise architecture. In The 17th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE). Porto, Portugal.

  • Wegmann, A., Regev, G., Rychkova, I., Lê, L. S., & de la Cruz, J. D. (2007). Business and IT alignment with SEAM for enterprise architecture. In 11th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC) (pp. 111–121). Annapolis, MD

  • Weill, P., & Ross, J. W. (2004). IT governance—how top performers manage it decision rights for superior results. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, J. W., & Anderson, D. (2004). Aligning technology and business strategy: Issues & frameworks, a field study of 15 companies. In 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (pp. 1–10). Big Island, HI.

  • Wilkinson, M. (2006). Designing an ‘adaptive’ enterprise. BT Technology Journal, 24(4), 81–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xueying, W., Feicheng, M., & Xiongwei, Z. (2008). Aligning business and IT using enterprise architecture. In 4th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing (WiCOM) (pp. 1–5). Dalian.

  • Yetton, P. W., Johnston, K. D., & Craig, J. F. (1994). Computer-Aided architects: A case study of IT and strategic change. Sloan Management Review, 35(4), 57–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zachman, J. A. (1987). A framework for information systems architecture. IBM Systems Journal, 26(3), 276–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ZIFA (2008). Zachman institute for framework advancement. www.zifa.com.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Engineering and Information Technology, Amirkabir University of Technology, 424 Hafez Ave, Post Box: 15875–4413, Tehran, Iran

    Morteza Alaeddini

  2. Department of Information Technology, Payame Noor University, 19569, Nakhl St., Lashkarak Highway, Post Box: 19395–4697, Tehran, Iran

    Sepideh Salekfard

Authors
  1. Morteza Alaeddini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sepideh Salekfard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Morteza Alaeddini.

Appendix A. Collected data based on the Luftman’s model

Appendix A. Collected data based on the Luftman’s model

Table 8 shows the frequencies of the observed data in this survey. This data was collected from 16 Iranian organizations for two states: before performing their EA project and after that.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alaeddini, M., Salekfard, S. Investigating the role of an enterprise architecture project in the business-IT alignment in Iran. Inf Syst Front 15, 67–88 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-011-9332-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-011-9332-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation