What motivate learners to continue a professional development program through Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs)?: A lens of self-determination theory | Education and Information Technologies Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

What motivate learners to continue a professional development program through Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs)?: A lens of self-determination theory

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The field of online professional development is in ongoing growth, and motivation has been identified as a critical factor in online courses. Somewhat different from the common courses delivered through MOOCs, this study investigates learning processes in compulsory courses. The study aims to understand the motivational factors influential on the behaviors of faculty members in a compulsory professional development program. The participants included 11 instructors who completed the program. Within the lens of self-determination theory, the motivation of instructors was determined through semi-structured interviews, which were analyzed through content analysis. Prominent factors affecting motivation were found as (a) the nature of professional development, (b) teaching materials, (c) evaluation, (d) learning environment, and (e) external factors (compulsory participation, environmental pressure). Attending a compulsory course is discussed in terms of self-determination theory. The implications of notable findings and directions for future studies are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Data availability

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Abdullatif, H., & Velázquez-Iturbide, J. (2020). Relationship between motivations, personality traits and intention to continue using MOOCs. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 4417–4435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10161-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badali, M., Hatami, J., Banihashem, S. K., Rahimi, E., Noroozi, O., & Eslami, Z. (2022). The role of motivation in MOOCs’ retention rates: A systematic literature review. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 17(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-022-00181-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares, & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 307–337). Information Age Publishing.

  • Barak, M., Watted, A., & Haick, H. (2016). Motivation to learn in massive open online courses: Examining aspects of language and social engagement. Computers & Education, 94, 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaven, T., Codreanu, T., & Creuze, A. (2014a). Motivation in a LMOOC: Issues for course designers. In E. Martín-Monje, & E. Bárcena (Eds.), LMOOCs: Providing learning, transcending boundaries (pp.48–64). De Gruyter Open. https://doi.org/10.2478/9783110420067.4

  • Beaven, T., Hauck, M., Comas-Quinn, A., Lewis, T., & de los Arcos, M. (2014b). MOOCs: Striking the right balance between facilitation and self-determination. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2011.613995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belanger, Y., & Thornton, J. (2013). Bioelectricity: A quantitative approach–Duke University’s first MOOC. EducationXPress, 1(1), 1–18.

  • Brouwer, N., Fleerackers, G., Maciejowska, I., McDonnell, C., & Mocerino, M. (2022). The impact of a professional development MOOC on the teaching beliefs of university science laboratory teachers. Chemistry Teacher International, 4(4), 355–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, K. C., & Jang, S. J. (2010). Motivation in online learning: Testing a model of self-determination theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 741–752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.01.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chopra, N., Sindwani, R., & Goel, M. (2022). A systematic mapping of empirical MOOC studies: Research methods, perspectives, themes and trends. International Journal of Management in Education, 16(3), 235–258. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMIE.2022.122625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane, R. A., & Comley, S. (2021). Influence of social learning on the completion rate of massive online open courses. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 2285–2293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10362-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W., & Tashakkori, A. (2007). Differing perspectives on mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(4), 303–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689807306132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtin, M., & Fossey, E. (2007). Appraising the trustworthiness of qualitative studies: Guidelines for occupational therapists. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 54(2), 88–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Barba, P. G., Kennedy, G. E., & Ainley, M. D. (2016). The role of students’ motivation and participation in predicting performance in a MOOC. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(3), 218–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum Press.

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectical perspective. In E. L. Deci, & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3–33). University of Rochester Press.

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macro-theory of human motivation, development and health. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 182–185. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. (1989). Interpretive biography. Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doo, M. Y., Tang, Y., Bonk, C. J., & Zhu, M. (2020). MOOC instructor motivation and career development. Distance Education, 41(1), 26–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1724770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, D., King, J., Rieckmann, M., Barth, M., Büssing, A., Hemmer, I., & Lindau-Bank, D. (2022). Teacher education for sustainable development: A review of an emerging research field. Journal of Teacher Education, 00224871221105784. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224871221105784

  • Griffiths, M. A., Goodyear, V. A., & Armour, K. M. (2022). Massive open online courses (MOOCs) for professional development: Meeting the needs and expectations of physical education teachers and youth sport coaches. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 27(3), 276–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2021.1874901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakami, N., White, S., & Chakaveh, S. (2017, April). Motivational factors that influence the use of MOOCs: Learners’ perspective. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (pp.323–331).

  • Hartnett, M. K. (2015). Influences that undermine learners’ perceptions of autonomy, competence and relatedness in an online context. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(1). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1526

  • Hew, K. F. (2015). Towards a model of engaging online students: Lessons from MOOCs and four policy documents. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 5(6), 425–431. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJIET.2015.V5.543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, L. (2021). What makes good LMOOCs for EFL learners? Learners’ personal characteristics and Information System Success Model. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(1–2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1899243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, B., & Hew, K. F. (2016). Measuring learners’ motivation level in massive open online courses. International Journal Information and Education Technology, 6(10), 759–764. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJIET.2016.V6.788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2019). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. Sage Publications.

  • Joo, Y. J., So, H. J., & Kim, N. H. (2018). Examination of relationships among students’ self-determination, technology acceptance, satisfaction, and continuance intention to use K-MOOCs. Computers & Education, 122, 260–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, Y., & Lee, J. (2018). Learning engagement and persistence in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCS). Computers & Education, 122, 9–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koukis, N., & Jimoyiannis, A. (2017a). Designing MOOCs for teacher professional development: Analysis of participants’ engagement. In A. Mesquita & P. Peres (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on e-Learning, (pp.271–280). ACPI.

  • Koukis, N., & Jimoyiannis, A. (2017b, October). Designing MOOCs for teacher professional development: Analysis of participants’ engagement and perceptions. In European Conference on e-Learning (pp.271–280). Academic Conferences International Limited.

  • Kumari, A. (2016). MOOCs – an online platform for teacher professional development. Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 4(5), 102–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lan, M., & Hew, K. F. (2020). Examining learning engagement in MOOCs: A self-determination theoretical perspective using mixed method. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-0179-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurillard, D. (2016). The educational problem that MOOCs could solve: Professional development for teachers of disadvantaged students. Research in Learning Technology, 24. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v24.29369

  • Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Adams, A. A., & Williams, S. A. (2013). MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008–2012. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(3), 202–227. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loizzo, J., Ertmer, P. A., Watson, W. R., & Watson, S. L. (2017). Adult MOOC learners as self-directed: Perceptions of motivation, success, and completion. Online Learning, 21(2), 1–24.

  • Lowenthal, P., Snelson, C., & Perkins, R. (2018). Teaching massive, open, online, courses (MOOCs): Tales from the front line. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i3.3505

  • Martin, N. I., Kelly, N., & Terry, P. C. (2018). A framework for self-determination in massive open online courses: Design for autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(2), 35–55. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, R. L., & Wang, C. (2021). Influence of learner motivational dispositions on MOOC completion. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 33(1), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-020-09258-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moos, D. C., & Azevedo, R. (2008). Self-regulated learning with hypermedia: The role of prior domain knowledge. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(2), 270–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological Research Methods. Sage.

  • Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2017). Mobile-Based Assessment: Integrating acceptance and motivational factors into a combined model of self-determination theory and Technology Acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, B., Poole, D., & Nestor, M. (2016). Creating a sticky MOOC. Online Learning, 20(1), 13–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, J. H., & Choi, H. J. (2009). Factors influencing adult learners’ decision to drop out or persist in online learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 207–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rai, L., & Chunrao, D. (2016). Influencing factors of success and failure in MOOC and General Analysis of Learner Behavior. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(4), 262–269. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJIET.2016.V6.697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, J., & Halusic, M. (2009). How K-12 teachers can put self-determination theory principles into practice. Theory and Research in Education, 9, 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878509104319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rigby, C. S., Deci, E. L., Patrick, B. C., & Ryan, R. M. (1992). Beyond the intrinsic-extrinsic dichotomy: Self-determination in motivation and learning. Motivation and Emotion, 16(3), 165–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Publications.

  • Semenova, T. (2022). The role of learners’ motivation in MOOC completion. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 37(3), 273–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svihus, C. L. (2023). Online teaching in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education and Information Technologies, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11971-7

  • Tschofen, C., & Mackness, J. (2012). Connectivism and dimensions of individual experience. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(1), 124–144. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i1.1143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urrutia, M. L. (2016). Professional development through MOOCs in higher education institutions: Challenges and opportunities for PhD students working as mentors. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1, 1–10.

  • Vansteenkiste, M., Sierens, E., Soenens, B., Luyckx, K., & Lens, W. (2009). Motivational profiles from a self-determination perspective: The quality of motivation matters. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 671. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vavouras, T. (2021, April). Motıvatıon to engage in Mooc courses. Proceedings of the MOOCs, Language Learning and Mobility, Design, Integration, Reuse.

  • Wang, W., Zhao, Y., Wu, Y. J., & Goh, M. (2023). Factors of dropout from MOOCs: A bibliometric review. Library Hi Tech, 41(2), 432–453. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-06-2022-0306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watted, A., & Barak, M. (2018). Motivating factors of MOOC completers: Comparing between university-affiliated students and general participants. The Internet and Higher Education, 37, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.12.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yıldırım, B. (2022). MOOCs in STEM education: Teacher preparation and views. Technology Knowledge and Learning, 27(3), 663–688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09481-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, L., & Powell, S. (2013). MOOCs and disruptive innovation: Implications for higher education. eLearning Papers In-depth, 33(2), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, M. (2016). Chinese university students’ acceptance of MOOCs: A self-determination perspective. Computers & Education, 92, 194–203.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Education and Instructional Technology, Fatih Faculty of Education, Trabzon University, Söğütlü, Akçaabat, Trabzon, 61300, Turkey

    Ünal Çakiroğlu & Damla Kutlu

  2. Department of Computer Science, Agri İbrahim Çeçen University, Agri, Turkey

    Adem Özkan & İsak Çevi̇k

  3. Department of Computer Science, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, Rize, Turkey

    Sefa Kahyar

Authors
  1. Ünal Çakiroğlu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Adem Özkan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. İsak Çevi̇k
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Damla Kutlu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sefa Kahyar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ünal Çakiroğlu.

Ethics declarations

Conflicting interest

The authors declared no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Çakiroğlu, Ü., Özkan, A., Çevi̇k, İ. et al. What motivate learners to continue a professional development program through Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs)?: A lens of self-determination theory. Educ Inf Technol 29, 7027–7051 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12087-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12087-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation