A decade of learning analytics: Structural topic modeling based bibliometric analysis | Education and Information Technologies Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

A decade of learning analytics: Structural topic modeling based bibliometric analysis

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Learning analytics (LA) has become an increasingly active field focusing on leveraging learning process data to understand and improve teaching and learning. With the explosive growth in the number of studies concerning LA, it is significant to investigate its research status and trends, particularly the thematic structure. Based on 3900 LA articles published during the past decade, this study explores answers to questions such as “what research topics were the LA community interested in?” and “how did such research topics evolve?” by adopting structural topic modeling and bibliometrics. Major publication sources, countries/regions, institutions, and scientific collaborations were examined and visualized. Based on the analyses, we present suggestions for future LA research and discussions about important topics in the field. It is worth highlighting LA combining various innovative technologies (e.g., visual dashboards, neural networks, multimodal technologies, and open learner models) to support classroom orchestration, personalized recommendation/feedback, self-regulated learning in flipped classrooms, interaction in game-based and social learning. This work is useful in providing an overview of LA research, revealing the trends in LA practices, and suggesting future research directions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Notes

  1. https://gephi.org/

References

  • Agrawal, D. (2014). Analytics based decision making. Journal of Indian Business Research, 6(4), 332–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agudo-Peregrina, Á. F., Iglesias-Pradas, S., Conde-González, M. Á., & Hernández-García, Á. (2014). Can we predict success from log data in VLEs? Classification of interactions for learning analytics and their relation with performance in VLE-supported F2F and online learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 542–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldowah, H., Al-Samarraie, H., & Fauzy, W. M. (2019). Educational data mining and learning analytics for 21st century higher education: A review and synthesis. Telematics and Informatics, 37, 13–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aljohani, N. R., & Davis, H. C. (2013, September). Learning analytics and formative assessment to provide immediate detailed feedback using a student centered mobile dashboard. In 2013 Seventh international conference on next generation mobile apps, services and technologies (pp. 262–267). IEEE.

  • Alonso-Fernández, C., Calvo-Morata, A., Freire, M., Martínez-Ortiz, I., & Fernández-Manjón, B. (2019). Applications of data science to game learning analytics data: A systematic literature review. Computers & Education, 141, 103612.

  • Alonso-Fernández, C., Perez-Colado, I., Freire, M., Martínez-Ortiz, I., & Fernández-Manjón, B. (2018, December). Improving serious games analyzing learning analytics data: lessons learned. In International conference on games and learning alliance (pp. 287–296). Springer, Cham.

  • Alonso-Fernández, C., Martínez-Ortiz, I., Caballero, R., Freire, M., & Fernández-Manjón, B. (2020). Predicting students’ knowledge after playing a serious game based on learning analytics data: A case study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(3), 350–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alphen, E. V., & Bakker, S. (2016, May). Lernanto: Using an ambient display during differentiated instruction. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2334–2340).

  • Andres, J. M. A. L., Ocumpaugh, J., Baker, R. S., Slater, S., Paquette, L., Jiang, Y., ... & Biswas, G. (2019, March). Affect sequences and learning in Betty's Brain. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (pp. 383–390).

  • Arnold, K. E., & Pistilli, M. D. (2012, April). Course signals at Purdue: Using learning analytics to increase student success. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 267–270).

  • Avella, J. T., Kebritchi, M., Nunn, S. G., & Kanai, T. (2016). Learning analytics methods, benefits, and challenges in higher education: A systematic literature review. Online Learning, 20(2), 13–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azcona, D., Hsiao, I. H., & Smeaton, A. F. (2018, October). Personalizing computer science education by leveraging multimodal learning analytics. In 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1–9). IEEE.

  • Berland, M., Davis, D., & Smith, C. P. (2015). AMOEBA: Designing for collaboration in computer science classrooms through live learning analytics. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10(4), 425–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosch, N., D'Mello, S. K., Baker, R. S., Ocumpaugh, J., Shute, V., Ventura, M., ... & Zhao, W. (2016, January). Detecting student emotions in computer-enabled classrooms. In IJCAI (pp. 4125–4129).

  • Bull, S., Ginon, B., Boscolo, C., & Johnson, M. (2016, April). Introduction of learning visualisations and metacognitive support in a persuadable open learner model. In Proceedings of the sixth international conference on learning analytics & knowledge (pp. 30–39).

  • Bull, S., & Wasson, B. (2016). Competence visualisation: Making sense of data from 21st-century technologies in language learning. ReCALL, 28(2), 147–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cagliero, L., Farinetti, L., & Baralis, E. (2019). Recommending personalized summaries of teaching materials. IEEE Access, 7, 22729–22739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, B., Resendes, M., Chai, C. S., & Hong, H.-Y. (2017). Two tales of time: Uncovering the significance of sequential patterns among contribution types in knowledge-building discourse. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(2), 162–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G., Rolim, V., Mello, R. F., & Gašević, D. (2020a, March). Let's shine together! a comparative study between learning analytics and educational data mining. In Proceedings of the tenth international conference on learning analytics & knowledge (pp. 544–553).

  • Chen, X., Zou, D., Cheng, G., & Xie, H. (2020b). Detecting latent topics and trends in educational technologies over four decades using structural topic modeling: A retrospective of all volumes of computer & education. Computers & Education, 103855.

  • Chen, X., Zou, D., Xie, H., & Su, F. (2021). Twenty-five years of computer-assisted language learning: A topic modeling analysis. Language Learning & Technology, 25(3), 151–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X., Zou, D., Xie, H., Cheng, G., & Liu, C. (2022). Two decades of artificial intelligence in education: Contributors, collaborations, research topics, challenges, and future directions. Educational Technology & Society, 25(1), 28–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, M. M., & Fujita, N. (2014). Statistical discourse analysis: A method for modeling online discussion processes. Journal of Learning Analytics, 1(3), 61–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conijn, R., Snijders, C., Kleingeld, A., & Matzat, U. (2016). Predicting student performance from LMS data: A comparison of 17 blended courses using Moodle LMS. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 10(1), 17–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corrin, L., & De Barba, P. (2015, March). How do students interpret feedback delivered via dashboards?. In Proceedings of the fifth international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 430–431).

  • Dağhan, G., & Gündüz, A. Y. (2022). Research trends in educational technology journals between 2000 and 2018: a web scraping study. Education and Information Technologies, 1–36. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10639-021-10762-2

  • Daud, A., Aljohani, N. R., Abbasi, R. A., Lytras, M. D., Abbas, F., & Alowibdi, J. S. (2017, April). Predicting student performance using advanced learning analytics. In Proceedings of the 26th international conference on world wide web companion (pp. 415–421).

  • Dillenbourg, P., Nussbaum, M., Dimitriadis, Y., & Roschelle, J. (2013). Design for classroom orchestration. Computers & Education, 69, 485–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doleck, T., Lemay, D. J., Basnet, R. B., & Bazelais, P. (2020). Predictive analytics in education: A comparison of deep learning frameworks. Education and Information Technologies, 25(3), 1951–1963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, X., Yang, J., Shelton, B. E., Hung, J. L., & Zhang, M. (2021). A systematic meta-review and analysis of learning analytics research. Behaviour & Information Technology, 40(1), 49–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ez-Zaouia, M., & Lavoué, E. (2017, March). EMODA: A tutor oriented multimodal and contextual emotional dashboard. In Proceedings of the seventh international learning analytics & knowledge conference (pp. 429–438).

  • Ferguson, R., Wei, Z., He, Y., & Buckingham Shum, S. (2013, April). An evaluation of learning analytics to identify exploratory dialogue in online discussions. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 85–93).

  • Garrick, R. (2018). Flipped classroom video analytics. Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.rit.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1991&context=other

  • Gašević, D., Dawson, S., Rogers, T., & Gasevic, D. (2016). Learning analytics should not promote one size fits all: The effects of instructional conditions in predicting academic success. The Internet and Higher Education, 28, 68–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gedrimiene, E., Silvola, A., Pursiainen, J., Rusanen, J., & Muukkonen, H. (2020). Learning analytics in education: Literature review and case examples from vocational education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 64(7), 1105–1119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerra, J., Hosseini, R., Somyurek, S., & Brusilovsky, P. (2016, March). An intelligent interface for learning content: Combining an open learner model and social comparison to support self-regulated learning and engagement. In Proceedings of the 21st international conference on intelligent user interfaces (pp. 152–163).

  • Hao, T., Chen, X., & Song, Y. (2020). A topic-based bibliometric analysis of two decades of research on the application of technology in classroom dialogue. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(7), 1311–1341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi, Y., Nomura, T., & Hirashima, T. (2019, June). Orchestrating Class Discussion with Collaborative Kit-Build Concept Mapping. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 100–104). Springer, Cham.

  • Hilliger, I., Ortiz‐Rojas, M., Pesántez‐Cabrera, P., Scheihing, E., Tsai, Y. S., Muñoz‐Merino, P. J., ... & Pérez‐Sanagustín, M. (2020). Towards learning analytics adoption: A mixed methods study of data‐related practices and policies in Latin American universities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(4), 915–937.

  • Holmes, M., Latham, A., Crockett, K., & O’Shea, J. D. (2017). Near real-time comprehension classification with artificial neural networks: Decoding e-learner non-verbal behavior. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 11(1), 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooshyar, D., Pedaste, M., Saks, K., Leijen, Ä., Bardone, E., & Wang, M. (2020). Open learner models in supporting self-regulated learning in higher education: A systematic literature review. Computers & Education, 154, 103878.

  • Jiang, W., Pardos, Z. A., & Wei, Q. (2019, March). Goal-based course recommendation. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on learning analytics & knowledge (pp. 36–45).

  • Jivet, I., Scheffel, M., Specht, M., & Drachsler, H. (2018, March). License to evaluate: Preparing learning analytics dashboards for educational practice. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 31–40).

  • Juhaňák, L., Zounek, J., & Rohlíková, L. (2019). Using process mining to analyze students’ quiz-taking behavior patterns in a learning management system. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 496–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kárpáti, A. (2009). Web 2 technologies for Net Native language learners: A “social CALL.” ReCALL, 21(2), 139–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, K. (1975). Thin-film peeling-the elastic term. Journal of Physics d: Applied Physics, 8(13), 1449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J., Jo, I.-H., & Park, Y. (2016). Effects of learning analytics dashboard: Analyzing the relations among dashboard utilization, satisfaction, and learning achievement. Asia Pacific Education Review, 17(1), 13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kizilcec, R. F., Piech, C., & Schneider, E. (2013, April). Deconstructing disengagement: analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses. In Proceedings of the third international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 170–179).

  • Larmuseau, C., Elen, J., & Depaepe, F. (2018, March). The influence of students' cognitive and motivational characteristics on students' use of a 4C/ID-based online learning environment and their learning gain. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 171–180).

  • Lin, C.-J., & Hwang, G.-J. (2018). A learning analytics approach to investigating factors affecting EFL students’ oral performance in a flipped classroom. Educational Technology & Society, 21(2), 205–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C., Zou, D., Chen, X., Xie, H., & Chan, W. H. (2021). A bibliometric review on latent topics and trends of the empirical MOOC literature (2008–2019). Asia Pacific Education Review, 22(3), 515–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Z., Yang, C., Rüdian, S., Liu, S., Zhao, L., & Wang, T. (2019). Temporal emotion-aspect modeling for discovering what students are concerned about in online course forums. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(5–6), 598–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, J. M., Panadero, E., Broadbent, J., & de Barba, P. G. (2018). Supporting self-regulated learning with learning analytics. In Learning analytics in the classroom (pp. 45–55). Routledge.

  • Lonn, S., Krumm, A. E., Waddington, R. J., & Teasley, S. D. (2012, April). Bridging the gap from knowledge to action: Putting analytics in the hands of academic advisors. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 184–187).

  • Mann, H. B. (1945). Nonparametric tests against trend. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 13, 245–259.

  • Martinez-Maldonado, R. (2019). A handheld classroom dashboard: Teachers’ perspectives on the use of real-time collaborative learning analytics. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 14(3), 383–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Maldonado, R., Schneider, B., Charleer, S., Shum, S. B., Klerkx, J., & Duval, E. (2016, April). Interactive surfaces and learning analytics: Data, orchestration aspects, pedagogical uses and challenges. In Proceedings of the Sixth international conference on learning analytics & knowledge (pp. 124–133).

  • Montgomery, A. P., Mousavi, A., Carbonaro, M., Hayward, D. V., & Dunn, W. (2019). Using learning analytics to explore self-regulated learning in flipped blended learning music teacher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 114–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouri, K., Ogata, H., & Uosaki, N. (2015). Analysis of ubiquitous learning logs using social network Müller, W., Rebholz, S., & Libbrecht, P. (2016, October). Automatic inspection of e-portfolios for improving formative and summative assessment. In International Symposium on Emerging Technologies for Education (pp. 480–489). Springer, Cham.

  • Niemann, K., & Wolpers, M. (2014). Creating usage context-based object similarities to boost recommender systems in technology enhanced learning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 8(3), 274–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papoušek, J., Stanislav, V., & Pelánek, R. (2016, April). Evaluation of an adaptive practice system for learning geography facts. In Proceedings of the sixth international conference on learning analytics & knowledge (pp. 134–142).

  • Pardo, A., Jovanovic, J., Dawson, S., Gašević, D., & Mirriahi, N. (2019). Using learning analytics to scale the provision of personalised feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 128–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paredes, W. C., & Chung, K. S. K. (2012, April). Modelling learning & performance: a social networks perspective. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 34–42).

  • Peddycord-Liu, Z., Harred, R., Karamarkovich, S., Barnes, T., Lynch, C., & Rutherford, T. (2018, June). Learning Curve Analysis in a Large-Scale, Drill-and-Practice Serious Math Game: Where Is Learning Support Needed?. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 436–449). Springer, Cham.

  • Perez-Colado, I. J., Perez-Colado, V. M., Freire-Moran, M., Martinez-Ortiz, I., & Fernandez-Manjon, B. (2017, September). Integrating learning analytics into a game authoring tool. In International Conference on Web-Based Learning (pp. 51–61). Springer, Cham.

  • Perez-Colado, V. M., Rotaru, D. C., Freire, M., Martinez-Ortiz, I., & Fernandez-Manjon, B. (2018, April). Learning analytics for location-based serious games. In 2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 1192–1200). IEEE.

  • Pesare, E., Roselli, T., Rossano, V., & Di Bitonto, P. (2015). Digitally enhanced assessment in virtual learning environments. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, 31, 252–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pursel, B. K., Zhang, L., Jablokow, K. W., Choi, G. W., & Velegol, D. (2016). Understanding MOOC students: Motivations and behaviours indicative of MOOC completion. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(3), 202–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rienties, B., & Toetenel, L. (2016). The impact of learning design on student behaviour, satisfaction and performance: A cross-institutional comparison across 151 modules. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 333–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, M. E., Stewart, B. M., & Airoldi, E. M. (2016). A model of text for experimentation in the social sciences. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 111(515), 988–1003.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, M. E., Stewart, B. M., & Tingley, D. (2019). Stm: An R package for structural topic models. Journal of Statistical Software, 91, 1–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, M. E., Stewart, B. M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S. K., Albertson, B., & Rand, D. G. (2014). Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 1064–1082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Triana, M. J., Prieto, L. P., Vozniuk, A., Boroujeni, M. S., Schwendimann, B. A., Holzer, A., & Gillet, D. (2017). Monitoring, awareness and reflection in blended technology enhanced learning: A systematic review. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 9(2–3), 126–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Calleja, A., Dennerlein, S., Kowald, D., Theiler, D., Lex, E., & Ley, T. (2019). An Infrastructure for Workplace Learning Analytics: Tracing Knowledge Creation with the Social Semantic Server. Journal of Learning Analytics, 6(2), 120–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmiedel, T., Müller, O., & vom Brocke, J. (2019). Topic modeling as a strategy of inquiry in organizational research: A tutorial with an application example on organizational culture. Organizational Research Methods, 22(4), 941–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, B. B., Prusak, N., Swidan, O., Livny, A., Gal, K., & Segal, A. (2018). Orchestrating the emergence of conceptual learning: A case study in a geometry class. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 13(2), 189–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siadaty, M., Gašević, D., Jovanović, J., Milikić, N., Jeremić, Z., Ali, L., ... & Hatala, M. (2012, April). Learn-B: A social analytics-enabled tool for self-regulated workplace learning. In Proceedings of the 2Nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 115–119).

  • Siemens, G., & Baker, R. S. D. (2012, April). Learning analytics and educational data mining: towards communication and collaboration. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 252–254).

  • Siemens, G., & Long, P. (2011). Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education. EDUCAUSE Review, 46(5), 30–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva, J. C. S., Zambom, E., Rodrigues, R. L., Ramos, J. L. C., & de Souza, F. D. F. (2018). Effects of learning analytics on students’ self-regulated learning in flipped classroom. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 14(3), 91–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonnenwald, D. H. (2007). Scientific collaboration. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41(1), 643–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, F.-R., Hu, H.-Z., Wan, R.-G., Fu, X., & Wu, S.-J. (2019). A learning analytics approach to investigating pre-service teachers’ change of concept of engagement in the flipped classroom. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–17. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1660996

  • Tabaa, Y., & Medouri, A. (2013). LASyM: A learning analytics system for MOOCs. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 4(5), 113–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamura, K., Lu, M., Konomi, S. I., Hatano, K., Inaba, M., Oi, M., ... & Yamada, Y. (2019, July). Integrating multimodal learning analytics and inclusive learning support systems for people of all ages. In International conference on human-computer interaction (pp. 469–481). Springer, Cham.

  • Tempelaar, D. T., Rienties, B., & Giesbers, B. (2015). In search for the most informative data for feedback generation: Learning analytics in a data-rich context. Computers in Human Behavior, 47, 157–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tibaná-Herrera, G., Fernández-Bajón, M. T., & de Moya-Anegón, F. (2018). Global analysis of the E-learning scientific domain: A declining category? Scientometrics, 114(2), 675–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trinarningsih, W., Anugerah, A. R., & Muttaqin, P. S. (2021). Visualizing and mapping two decades of literature on board of directors research: A bibliometric analysis from 2000 to 2021. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 1994104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, Y.-S., Rates, D., Moreno-Marcos, P. M., Muñoz-Merino, P. J., Jivet, I., Scheffel, M., Drachsler, H., Kloos, C. D., & Gašević, D. (2020). Learning analytics in European higher education–trends and barriers. Computers & Education, 103933.

  • Van Inwegen, E., Adjei, S., Wang, Y., & Heffernan, N. (2015, March). An analysis of the impact of action order on future performance: the fine-grain action model. In Proceedings of the fifth international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 320–324).

  • Viberg, O., Hatakka, M., Bälter, O., & Mavroudi, A. (2018). The current landscape of learning analytics in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 98–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vidal, J. C., Rabelo, T., Lama, M., & Amorim, R. (2018). Ontology-based approach for the validation and conformance testing of xAPI events. Knowledge-Based Systems, 155, 22–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villano, R., Harrison, S., Lynch, G., & Chen, G. (2018). Linking early alert systems and student retention: A survival analysis approach. Higher Education, 76(5), 903–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, D., Luzeckyj, A., Toohey, D., Vanderlelie, J., & Searle, B. (2020). Do academics and university administrators really know better? The ethics of positioning student perspectives in learning analytics. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 60–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise, A. F., Zhao, Y., & Hausknecht, S. N. (2014). Learning Analytics for Online Discussions: Embedded and Extracted Approaches. Journal of Learning Analytics, 1(2), 48–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, B.T.-M., Li, K. C., & Choi, S.P.-M. (2018). Trends in learning analytics practices: A review of higher education institutions. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 15(2), 132–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xing, W., Chen, X., Stein, J., & Marcinkowski, M. (2016). Temporal predication of dropouts in MOOCs: Reaching the low hanging fruit through stacking generalization. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 119–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xing, W., & Gao, F. (2018). Exploring the relationship between online discourse and commitment in Twitter professional learning communities. Computers & Education, 126, 388–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, W., Dowell, N., Holman, C., Welsh, S. S., Choi, H., & Brooks, C. (2019, March). Exploring learner engagement patterns in teach-outs using topic, sentiment and on-topicness to reflect on pedagogy. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (pp. 180–184).

  • Yang, T.-Y., Brinton, C. G., Joe-Wong, C., & Chiang, M. (2017). Behavior-based grade prediction for MOOCs via time series neural networks. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 11(5), 716–728.

    Google Scholar 

  • You, J. W. (2016). Identifying significant indicators using LMS data to predict course achievement in online learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 23–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Zhang, X., Jiang, S., Ordóñez de Pablos, P., & Sun, Y. (2018). Mapping the study of learning analytics in higher education. Behaviour & Information Technology, 37(10–11), 1142–1155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, T., Liu, H., Roeder, K., Lafferty, J., & Wasserman, L. (2012). The huge package for high-dimensional undirected graph estimation in R. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 13, 1059–1062.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, G., Xing, W., Costa, S., Scardamalia, M., & Pei, B. (2019). Exploring emotional and cognitive dynamics of knowledge building in grades 1 and 2. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 29(4), 789–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mathematics and Information Technology, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, 10 Lo Ping Road, Tai Po, New Territories, Hong Kong

    Xieling Chen

  2. Department of English Language Education, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, 10 Lo Ping Road, Tai Po, New Territories, Hong Kong

    Di Zou

  3. Department of Computing and Decision Sciences, Lingnan University, Hong Kong SAR, Tuen Mun, New Territories, Hong Kong

    Haoran Xie

Authors
  1. Xieling Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Di Zou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Haoran Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Di Zou.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

None.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 4 The most up-to-date reviews on LA
Full size table
Table 5 The comparison of the 16- and 17-topic models
Full size table
Table 6 Top publication sources ranked by H-index
Full size table
Table 7 Top countries/regions ranked by H-index
Full size table
Table 8 Top institutions ranked by H-index
Full size table
Table 9 Representative terms for each topics
Full size table

References for Appendix

Aldowah, H., Al-Samarraie, H., & Fauzy, W. M. (2019). Educational data mining and learning analytics for 21st century higher education: A review and synthesis. Telematics and Informatics, 37, 13–49.

Alonso-Fernández, C., Calvo-Morata, A., Freire, M., Martínez-Ortiz, I., & Fernández-Manjón, B. (2019). Applications of data science to game learning analytics data: A systematic literature review. Computers & Education, 141, 103612.

Avella, J. T., Kebritchi, M., Nunn, S. G., & Kanai, T. (2016). Learning analytics methods, benefits, and challenges in higher education: A systematic literature review. Online Learning, 20(2), 13–29.

Banihashem, S. K., Aliabadi, K., Pourroostaei Ardakani, S., Delaver, A., & Nili Ahmadabadi, M. (2018). Learning analytics: A systematic literature review. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences, 9(2), e63024.

Du, X., Yang, J., Shelton, B. E., Hung, J. L., & Zhang, M. (2021). A systematic meta-review and analysis of learning analytics research. Behaviour & information technology, 40(1), 49–62.

El Alfy, S., Gómez, J. M., & Dani, A. (2019). Exploring the benefits and challenges of learning analytics in higher education institutions: a systematic literature review. Information Discovery and Delivery, 47, 25–34.

Hundhausen, C. D., Olivares, D. M., & Carter, A. S. (2017). IDE-based learning analytics for computing education: a process model, critical review, and research agenda. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 17(3), 1–26.

Larrabee Sønderlund, A., Hughes, E., & Smith, J. (2019). The efficacy of learning analytics interventions in higher education: A systematic review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2594–2618.

Mangaroska, K., & Giannakos, M. (2018). Learning analytics for learning design: A systematic literature review of analytics-driven design to enhance learning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 12(4), 516–534.

Peña‐Ayala, A. (2018). Learning analytics: A glance of evolution, status, and trends according to a proposed taxonomy. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 8(3), e1243.

Saqr, M. (2018). A literature review of empirical research on learning analytics in medical education. International Journal of Health Sciences, 12(2), 80–85.

Viberg, O., Hatakka, M., Bälter, O., & Mavroudi, A. (2018). The current landscape of learning analytics in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 98–110.

Vieira, C., Parsons, P., & Byrd, V. (2018). Visual learning analytics of educational data: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Computers & Education, 122, 119–135.

Wong, B. T. M., & Li, K. C. (2020). A review of learning analytics intervention in higher education (2011–2018). Journal of Computers in Education, 7(1), 7–28.

Wong, B. T. M., Li, K. C., & Choi, S. P. M. (2018). Trends in learning analytics practices: a review of higher education institutions. Interactive Technology and Smart Education.

Zhang, J., Zhang, X., Jiang, S., Ordóñez de Pablos, P., & Sun, Y. (2018). Mapping the study of learning analytics in higher education. Behaviour & Information Technology, 37(10–11), 1142–1155.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, X., Zou, D. & Xie, H. A decade of learning analytics: Structural topic modeling based bibliometric analysis. Educ Inf Technol 27, 10517–10561 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11046-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11046-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation