Abstract
Digital games have become increasingly popular. However, many teachers may not have relevant knowledge and experience of designing and implementing digital game-based teaching in formal classrooms. This study proposed a collaborative design approach to facilitate pre-service teachers’ abilities of designing for learning with a digital game. To evaluate the effects of the proposed approach, a quasi-experiment was carried out at a teachers’ university in Eastern China. This study was implemented in a Fall 2019 educational development course, a total of 100 pre-service teachers from two intact classes participated in it. It is found that the approach is effective in helping the students design digital games-based learning activities. Additionally, the experimental group students developed more constructivist views of game-based teaching practices. It is concluded that engaging pre-service teachers in design, implementation and reflection of innovative technologies-enhanced learning practices is imaginable for our mission of bring children to a cheerful and harvesting journey in classroom.




Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Data availability
The data and materials are available upon request to the corresponding author.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Akcaoglu, M., & Kale, U. (2016). Teaching to teach (with) game design: Game design and learning workshops for preservice teachers. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 16(1), 60–81.
Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT-TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers & Education, 52(1), 154–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.006
Bielak, J., & Pawlak, M. (2013). Applying cognitive grammar in the foreign language classroom: Teaching English tense and aspect. Springer Science & Business Media.
Boschman, F., McKenney, S., & Voogt, J. (2014). Understanding decision making in teachers’ curriculum design approaches. Etr&d-Educational Technology Research and Development, 62(4), 393–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-014-9341-x
Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., Ho, H. N. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2012). Examining preservice teachers’ perceived knowledge of TPACK and cyberwellness through structural equation modeling. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(6), 1000–1019.
Chien, Y. T., Chang, C. Y., Yeh, T. K., & Chang, K. E. (2012). Engaging preservice science teachers to act as active designers of technology integration: A MAGDAIRE framework. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(4), 578–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.12.005
Cober, R., Tan, E., Slotta, J., So, H. J., & Konings, K. D. (2015). Teachers as participatory designers: Two case studies with technology-enhanced learning environments. Instructional Science, 43(2), 203–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-014-9339-0
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale. NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
de Sousa, F., Rasmussen, I., & Pierroux, P. (2018). Zombies and ethical theories: Exploring transformational play as a framework for teaching with videogames. Learning Culture and Social Interaction, 19, 40–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2018.04.011
Denham, A. R. (2019). Using the PCaRD digital game-based learning model of instruction in the middle school mathematics classroom: A case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 415–427. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12582
Eklund-Myrskog, G. (1998). Students’ conceptions of learning in different educational contexts. Higher Education, 35(3), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003145613005
Florida Center for Instructional Technology. (2021). The Technology Integration matrix. https://fcit.usf.edu/matrix/matrix/
Fu, Q. K., Lin, C. J., Hwang, G. J., & Zhang, L. X. (2019). Impacts of a mind mapping-based contextual gaming approach on EFL students’ writing performance, learning perceptions and generative uses in an English course. Computers & Education, 137, 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.005
Garrison, D. R., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.04.001
Gil-Domenech, D., & Berbegal-Mirabent, J. (2019). Stimulating students’ engagement in mathematics courses in non-STEM academic programmes: A game-based learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 56(1), 57–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2017.1330159
Gill, L., & Dalgarno, B. (2017). A qualitative analysis of preservice primary school teachers’ TPACK development over the four years of their teacher preparation programme. Technology Pedagogy and Education, 26(4), 439–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2017.1287124
Hsu, C.-Y., Liang, J.-C., Chai, C.-S., & Tsai, C.-C. (2013). Exploring preschool teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge of educational games. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 49, 461–479. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.49.4.c
Hsu, C. Y., Liang, J. C., & Su, Y. C. (2015). The Role of the TPACK in Game-Based Teaching: Does Instructional Sequence Matter? Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24(3), 463–470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-014-0221-2
Hsu, C. Y., Liang, J. C., & Tsai, M. J. (2020). Probing the structural relationships between teachers’ beliefs about game-based teaching and their perceptions of technological pedagogical and content knowledge of games. Technology Pedagogy and Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1752296
Huang, F., Teo, T., Sanchez-Prieto, J. C., Garcia-Penalvo, F. J., & Olmos-Miguelanez, S. (2019). Cultural values and technology adoption: A model comparison with university teachers from China and Spain. Computers & Education, 133, 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.012
Hussein, M. H., Ow, S. H., Cheong, L. S., & Thong, M.-K. (2019). A Digital Game-Based Learning Method to Improve Students’ Critical Thinking Skills in Elementary Science. IEEE Access, 7, 96309–96318. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2929089
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (2016). Cooperative learning and teaching citizenship in democracies. International Journal of Educational Research, 76, 162–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.11.009
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09339057
Kafai, Y. B., Franke, M., Ching, C. C., & Shih, J. (1998). Game design as an interactive learning environment for fostering students’ and teachers’ mathematical inquiry. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 3(2), 149–184. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009777905226
Kali, Y., McKenney, S., & Sagy, O. (2015). Teachers as designers of technology enhanced learning. Instructional Science, 43(2), 173–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-014-9343-4
Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology. Computers & Education, 49(3), 740–762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.012
Laurillard, D., Kennedy, E., Charlton, P., Wild, J., & Dimakopoulos, D. (2018). Using technology to develop teachers as designers of TEL: Evaluating the learning designer. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(6), 1044–1058. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12697
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
Li, Q. (2012). Understanding enactivism: A study of affordances and constraints of engaging practicing teachers as digital game designers. Etr&d-Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(5), 785–806. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-012-9255-4
Li, Q. (2018). Enactivism and teacher instructional game building: An inquiry of theory adoption and design consideration. Etr&d-Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(6), 1339–1358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9584-z
Michos, K., & Hernandez-Leo, D. (2020). CIDA: A collective inquiry framework to study and support teachers as designers in technological environments. Computers & Education, 143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103679
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
Mor, Y., & Mogilevsky, O. (2013). The learning design studio: Collaborative design inquiry as teachers' professional development. Research in Learning Technology, 21. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v21i0.22054
Nguyen, G. N. H., & Bower, M. (2018). Novice teacher technology-enhanced learning design practices: The case of the silent pedagogy. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(6), 1027–1043. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12681
Papanikolaou, K., Makri, K., & Roussos, P. (2017). Learning design as a vehicle for developing TPACK in blended teacher training on technology enhanced learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0072-z
Parke, H. M., & Coble, C. R. (1997). Teachers designing curriculum as professional development: A model for transformational science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(8), 773–789. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1098-2736(199710)34:8%3c773::aid-tea2%3e3.0.co;2-s
Persico, D., Pozzi, F., & Goodyear, P. (2018). Teachers as designers of TEL interventions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(6), 975–980. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12706
Porras-Hernández, L. H., & Salinas-Amescua, B. (2013). Strengthening TPACK: A broader notion of context and the use of teacher’s narratives to reveal knowledge construction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 48(2), 223–244. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.48.2.f
Sanchez-Mena, A., Marti-Parreno, J., & Aldas-Manzano, J. (2019). Teachers’ intention to use educational video games: The moderating role of gender and age. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 56(3), 318–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2018.1433547
Saubern, R., Henderson, M., Heinrich, E., & Redmond, P. (2020). TPACK - time to reboot? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6378
Schellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2005). Collaborative learning in asynchronous discussion groups: What about the impact on cognitive processing? Computers in Human Behavior, 21(6), 957–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.02.025
Silseth, K. (2012). The multivoicedness of game play: Exploring the unfolding of a student’s learning trajectory in a gaming context at school. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7(1), 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-011-9132-x
Talamo, A., Recupero, A., Mellini, B., & Ventura, S. (2016). Teachers as designers of GBL scenarios: fostering creativity in the educational settings. Interaction Design and Architectures(29), 10–23.
Tondeur, J., Aesaert, K., Prestridge, S., & Consuegra, E. (2018). A multilevel analysis of what matters in the training of preservice teacher’s ICT competencies. Computers & Education, 122, 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.002
Uluay, G., & Dogan, A. (2016). Preservice teachers’ practices towards digital game design for technology integration into science classrooms. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(10), 2483–2498. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.041028
Voogt, J., Laferriere, T., Breuleux, A., Itow, R. C., Hickey, D. T., & McKenney, S. (2015). Collaborative design as a form of professional development. Instructional Science, 43(2), 259–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-014-9340-7
Voogt, J., Westbroek, H., Handelzalts, A., Walraven, A., McKenney, S., Pieters, J., & de Vries, B. (2011). Teacher learning in collaborative curriculum design. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(8), 1235–1244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.07.003
Wouters, P., van Nimwegen, C., van Oostendorp, H., & van der Spek, E. D. (2013). A Meta-Analysis of the Cognitive and Motivational Effects of Serious Games. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 249–265. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031311
Zhu, C., Valcke, M., & Schellens, T. (2010). A cross-cultural study of teacher perspectives on teacher roles and adoption of online collaborative learning in higher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 33(2), 147–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619761003631849
Funding
This research is financially supported by the Croucher Chinese Visitorships 2019-20 of the Croucher Foundation, Hong Kong SAR; and the Educational Science Development Program of Zhejiang Province (NO. 2020SCG030).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Qing-Ke Fu, Di Zou and Haoran Xie. Project administration were performed by Haoran Xie, Di Zou and Gary Cheng. Methodology and supervision were performed Gwo-Jen Hwang and Gary Cheng. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Qing-Ke Fu and Di Zou. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest/Competing interests
There is no potential conflict of interest in this study.
Ethics approval
The ethical requirements for research in this selected university were followed.
Consent to participate
The participants all agreed to take part in this study.
Consent for publication
The publication of this study has been approved by all authors.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fu, QK., Zou, D., Xie, H. et al. Effects of a collaborative design approach on pre-service teachers’ ability of designing for learning with a digital game. Educ Inf Technol 27, 5641–5664 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10818-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10818-3