Uncertainty measure in evidence theory with its applications | Applied Intelligence Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Uncertainty measure in evidence theory with its applications

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Uncertainty measure in evidence theory supplies a new criterion to assess the quality and quantity of knowledge conveyed by belief structures. As generalizations of uncertainty measure in the probabilistic framework, several uncertainty measures for belief structures have been developed. Among them, aggregate uncertainty AU and the ambiguity measure AM are well known. However, the inconsistency between evidential and probabilistic frameworks causes limitations to existing measures. They are quite insensitive to the change of belief functions. In this paper, we consider the definition of a novel uncertainty measure for belief structures based on belief intervals. Based on the relation between evidence theory and probability theory, belief structures are transformed to belief intervals on singleton subsets, with the belief function Bel and the plausibility function Pl as its lower and upper bounds, respectively. An uncertainty measure SU for belief structures is then defined based on interval probabilities in the framework of evidence theory, without changing the theoretical frameworks. The center and the span of the interval is used to define the total uncertainty degree of the belief structure. It is proved that SU is identical to Shannon entropy and AM for Bayesian belief structures. Moreover, the proposed uncertainty measure has a wider range determined by the cardinality of discernment frame, which is more practical. Numerical examples, applications and related analyses are provided to verify the rationality of our new measure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Abellán J, Masegosa A (2008) Requirements for total uncertainty measures in Dempster–Shafer theory of evidence. Int J Gen Syst 37(6):733–747

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Awasthi A, Chauhan SS (2011) Using AHP and Dempster-Shafer theory for evaluating sustainable transport solutions. Environ Modell Softw 26(6):787–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dempster A (1967) Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping. Ann Math Stat 38 (2):325–339

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Deng X, Deng Y (2014) On the axiomatic requirement of range to measure uncertainty. Physica A 406:163–168

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Deng X, Xiao F, Deng Y (2016) An improved distance-based total uncertainty measure in belief function theory. Appl Intell 46(4):898–915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Deng Y (2016) Deng entropy. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 91:549–553

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Deng Y, Shi W, Zhu Z, Liu Q (2004) Combining belief functions based on distance of evidence. Decis Support Syst 38(3):489–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Denoeux T (1999) Reasoning with imprecise belief structures. Int J Approx Reason 20(1):79–111

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Dubois D, Prade H (1985) A note on measures of specificity for fuzzy sets. Int J Gen Syst 10(4):279–283

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Dubois D, Prade H (1999) Properties of measures of information in evidence and possibility theories. Fuzzy Sets Syst 100(1):35–49

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Harmanec D, Klir GJ (1994) Measuring total uncertainty in Dempster-Shafer theory. Int J Gen Syst 22 (4):405–419

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Hartley RV (1928) Transmission of information. Bell Syst Tech J 7(3):535–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Höhle U (1982) Entropy with respect to plausibility measures. In: Proceedings of the 12th IEEE international symposium on multiple-valued logic, pp 167–169

  14. Jiang W, Zhan J (2017) A modified combination rule in generalized evidence theory. Appl Intell 46 (3):630–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jousselme AL, Liu C, Grenier D, Bossé É (2006) Measuring ambiguity in the evidence theory. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst Hum 36(5):890–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Klir GJ (2001) Measuring uncertainty and uncertainty-based information for imprecise probabilities. In: International fuzzy systems association (IFSA) world congress and 20th North American fuzzy information processing society (NAFIPS) international conference. IEEE, pp 1927–1934

  17. Klir GJ, Parviz B (1992) A note on the measure of discord. In: Proceedings of the Eighth international conference on Uncertainty in artificial intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., pp 138–141

  18. Klir GJ, Ramer A (1990) Uncertainty in Dempster-Shafer theory: a critical re-examination. Int J Gen Syst 18(2):155–166

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Klir GJ, Smith RM (1999) Recent developments in generalized information theory. Int J Fuzzy Syst 1 (1):1–13

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Klir GJ, Wierman MJ (1999) Uncertainty-based information: elements of generalized information theory, vol 15. Springer Science & Business Media

  21. Klir GJ, Yuan B (1995) Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic: theory and applications. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Klir G, Lewis HW (2008) Remarks on “measuring ambiguity in the evidence theory”. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst Hum 38(4):995–999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Körner R, Näther W (1995) On the specificity of evidences. Fuzzy Sets Syst 71(2):183–196

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu Z, Pan Q, Dezert J, Martin A (2016) Adaptive imputation of missing values for incomplete pattern classification. Pattern Recog 52:85–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu Z, Pan Q, Dezert J, Mercier G (2011) Combination of sources of evidence with different discounting factors based on a new dissimilarity measure. Decis Support Syst 52:133–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu Z, Pan Q, Dezert J, Mercier G (2014) Credal classification rule for uncertain data based on belief functions. Pattern Recog 47(7):2532–2541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu Z, Pan Q, Dezert J, Mercier G (2015) Credal c-means clustering method based on belief functions. Knowl-Based Syst 74:119–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Maeda Y, Nguyen HT, Ichihashi H (1993) Maximum entropy algorithms for uncertainty measures. Int J Uncertainty Fuzzy and Know-Based Syst 1(1):69–93

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Murphy CK (2000) Combining belief functions when evidence conflicts. Decis Support Syst 29(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ramer A (1987) Uniqueness of information measure in the theory of evidence. Fuzzy Sets Syst 24(2):183–196

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Shafer G (1976) A mathematical theory of evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Shannon CE (2001) A mathematical theory of communication. ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Comput Commun Rev 5(1):3–55

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Smets P (2005) Decision making in the TBM: the necessity of the pignistic transformation. Int J Approx Reason 38(2):133–147

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang YM, Yang JB, Xu DL, Chin KS (2006) The evidential reasoning approach for multiple attribute decision analysis using interval belief degrees. Eur J Oper Res 175(1):35–66

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang YM, Yang JB, Xu DL, Chin KS (2007) On the combination and normalization of interval-valued belief structures. Inf Sci 177:1230–1247

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Yager RR (2001) Dempster-Shafer belief structures with interval valued focal weights. Int J Intell Syst 16:497–512

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Yager RR, Alajlan N (2015) Dempster–Shafer belief structures for decision making under uncertainty. Knowl-Based Syst 80:58–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Yager RR (1983) Entropy and specificity in a mathematical theory of evidence. Int J Gen Syst 9(4):249–260

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Yang Y, Han D (2016) A new distance-based total uncertainty measure in the theory of belief functions. Knowl-Based Syst 94:114–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China under grants No. 61273275, No. 60975026, No. 61573375 and No. 61503407.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Air Force Engineering University, Xi’an, 710051, People’s Republic of China

    Xiaodan Wang & Yafei Song

Authors
  1. Xiaodan Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yafei Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yafei Song.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, X., Song, Y. Uncertainty measure in evidence theory with its applications. Appl Intell 48, 1672–1688 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-017-1024-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-017-1024-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation