A basin-wide approach for water allocation and dams location-allocation | Annals of Operations Research
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

A basin-wide approach for water allocation and dams location-allocation

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Construction of new dams in undeveloped transboundary basins causes two serious disputes between the stakeholders: conflicts over more water interest and over the new dams’ locations. Hence, water development planning of these basins needs to be done in conjunction with the examination of stakeholders’ new water shares. This study extends the model presented in Roozbahani et al. (Water Resour Manag 31:4539–4556, 2017) to be multi-objective and applies the methodology outlined in Roozbahni et al. (Ann Oper Res 229:657–676, 2015a) to solve the model. The proposed three steps approach determines the equitable allocation of the surface water of an undeveloped transboundary basin while determining optimal number, locations and capacities of new dams. The first step utilizes a mixed-integer-multi-objective model to outline the water shares of stakeholders, as well as optimal dam locations for a given number of dams. Using a sensitivity analysis, the second step pinpoints the required number of dams. The role of third step is the exploration of the dams’ lowest possible capacities. Environmentally, our approach takes the entire watershed’s water requirements into account. We have applied the proposed approach to the Sefidrud Basin, a transboundary basin located in Iran. The results of the approach show that, to significantly improve the security of the Sefidrud Basin’s water supply, three new dams would be optimal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmadi, A., Karamouz, M., Moridi, A., & Han, D. (2012). Integrated planning of land use and water allocation on a watershed scale considering social and water quality issues. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management,138(6), 671–681.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Ansari, N. A. (2016). Hydro politics of the Tigris and Euphrates basins. Engineering,8(3), 140–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anwar, A., & Clarke, D. (2001). Irrigation scheduling using mixed-integer linear programming. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering,127(2), 63–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azarmand, Z., & Neishabouri, E. (2009). Location allocation problem. In M. Hekmatfar (Ed.), R Zanjirani Farahani (pp. 93–109). Heidelberg: Facility location. Physica-Verlag HD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babel, M. S., Das Gupta, A., & Nayak, D. K. (2005). A model for optimal allocation of water to competing demands. Water Resources Management,19(6), 693–712.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brels, S., Coates, D., & Loures, F. (2008). Transboundary water resources management: The role of international watercourse agreements in implementation of the CBD. Montreal, Quebec: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.

  • Cai, X. (2008). Implementation of holistic water resources-economic optimization models for river basin management—Reflective experiences. Environmental Modelling and Software,23(1), 2–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai, X., McKinney, D., & Lasdon, L. (2002). Integrated hydrologic-agronomic-economic model for river basin management. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management,129(1), 4–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai, X., McKinney, D., & Lasdon, L. (2003). Integrated hydrologic-agronomic-economic model for river basin management. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management,129(1), 4–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caruso, C., Colorni, A., & Paruccini, M. (1993). The regional urban solid waste management system: A modelling approach. European Journal of Operational Research,70(1), 16–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohon, J. L., & Marks, D. H. (1975). A review and evaluation of multiobjective programing techniques. Water Resources Research,11(2), 208–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Consoli, S., Matarazzo, B., & Pappalardo, N. (2008). Operating rules of an irrigation purposes reservoir using multi-objective optimization. Water Resources Management,22(5), 551–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai, X. (2016). Dam site selection using an integrated method of AHP and GIS for decision making support in Northern China. M.Sc. thesis, Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science, Lund university.

  • Edirisinghe, N. C. P., Patterson, E. I., & Saadouli, N. (2000). Capacity planning model for a multipurpose water reservoir with target-priority operation. Annals of Operations Research,100, 273–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emch, P., & Yeh, W. (1998). Management model for conjunctive use of coastal surface water and ground water. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management,124(3), 129–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fotakis, D., & Sidiropoulos, E. (2014). Combined land-use and water allocation planning. Annals of Operations Research,219, 169–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Alonso, C., Pérez-Naranjo, L. M., & Fernández-Caballero, J. C. (2011). Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms to identify highly autocorrelated areas: The case of spatial distribution in financially compromised farms. Annals of Operations Research,219, 187–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, M., Codner, G., Weinmann, E., & Schreider, S. (2009). Modelling hydroclimatic uncertainty and short-run irrigator decision making: The goulburn system. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics,53(4), 565–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Housh, M., Ostfeld, A., & Shamir, U. (2013). Limited multi-stage stochastic programming for managing water supply systems. Environmental Modelling and Software,41, 53–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • IBM ILOG CPLEX Optimizer, edited.

  • IRO. (2013). Dams and extinction: Going, going, gone. Oakland: International Rivers Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishfaq, R., & Sox, C. R. (2011). Hub location–allocation in intermodal logistic networks. European Journal of Operational Research,210(2), 213–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaramillo, P., Smith, R., & Andréu, J. (2005). Multi-decision-makers equalizer: A multiobjective decision support system for multiple decision-makers. Annals of Operations Research,138(1), 97–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kallrath, J. (2005). Solving planning and design problems in the process industry using mixed integer and global optimization. Annals of Operations Research,140, 339–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kucukmehmetoglu, M., & Guldmann, J. (2004). International water resources allocation and conflicts: The case of the Euphrates and Tigris. Environment and Planning A,36(5), 783–801.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kucukmehmetoglu, M., & Guldmann, J. (2010). Multiobjective allocation of transboundary water resources: Case of the Euphrates and Tigris. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management,136(1), 95–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kundzewicz, Z. W., & Kindler, J. (1995). Multiple criteria for evaluation of reliability aspects of water resource systems. In Proceedings of the international symposium on modelling and management of sustainable basin-scale water resource systems, Colorado (Vol. 231, pp. 217–224).

  • Ledec, G., & Quintero, J. D. (2003). Good dams and bad dams: Environmental criteria for site selection of hydroelectric projects (English). In Latin America and Caribbean Region Sustainable Development working paper series; no. 16. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.

  • Letcher, R. A., Croke, B. F. W., & Jakeman, A. J. (2007). Integrated assessment modelling for water resource allocation and management: A generalised conceptual framework. Environmental Modelling and Software,22(5), 733–742.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, D., Chen, X., & Lou, Z. (2010). A model for the optimal allocation of water resources in a saltwater intrusion area: A case study in Pearl River Delta in China. Water Resources Management,24(1), 63–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinney, D. C., & Cai, X. (1997). Multiobjective optimization model for water allocation in the Aral Sea Basin. Paper presented at 3-rd Joint USA/CIS Joint Conference on Environmental Hydrology and Hydrogeology.

  • MGC (Mahab Ghods Company). (2011). National water master plan study: The Sefidrud Basin. Tehran: Iranian Ministry of Energy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minatour, Y., Khazaei, J., & Ataei, M. (2012). Earth dam site selection using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP): A case study in the west of Iran. Arabian Journal of Geosciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-012-0602-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muhammad, Y. S., & Pflug, G. C. (2014). Stochastic vs deterministic programming in water management: The value of flexibility. Annals of Operations Research,223, 309–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, C. H., & Aral, M. M. (2004). Multi-objective optimization of pumping rates and well placement in coastal aquifers. Journal of Hydrology,290(1–2), 80–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petheram, C., Gallant, J., & Read, A. (2017). An automated and rapid method for identifying dam wall locations and estimating reservoir yield over large areas. Environmental Modelling and Software,92, 189–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezapour Tabari, M. M., & Yazdi, A. (2014). Conjunctive use of surface and groundwater with inter-basin transfer approach: Case study Piranshahr. Water Resources Management,28(7), 1887–1906.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roozbahani, R., Abbasi, B., & Schreider, S. (2015a). Optimal allocation of water to competing stakeholders in a shared watershed. Annals of Operations Research,229, 657–676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roozbahani, R., Abbasi, B., & Schreider, S. (2017). Detecting location and capacity of dams through economic and environmetal indicators. Water Resources Management,31, 4539–4556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roozbahani, R., Abbasi, B., Schreider, S., & Ardakani, A. (2014). A multi-objective approach for transboundary river water allocation. Water Resources Management,28(15), 5447–5463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roozbahani, R., Schreider, S., & Abbasi, B. (2013). economic sharing of basin water resources between competing stakeholders. Water Resources Management,27(8), 2965–2988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roozbahani, R., Schreider, S., & Abbasi, B. (2015b). Optimal water allocation through a multi-objective compromise between environmental, social, and economic preferences. Environmental Modelling and Software,64, 18–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarker, R., & Ray, T. (2009). An improved evolutionary algorithm for solving multi-objective crop planning models. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture,68(2), 191–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlüter, M., Savitsky, A. G., McKinney, D. C., & Lieth, H. (2005). Optimizing long-term water allocation in the Amudarya River delta: A water management model for ecological impact assessment. Environmental Modelling and Software,20(5), 529–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shariff, S. S. R., Moin, N. H., & Omar, M. (2012). Location allocation modeling for healthcare facility planning in Malaysia. Computers & Industrial Engineering,62(4), 1000–1010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, K., Neelakantan, T., Narayan, P., & Nagarajukumar, C. (1999). Mixed-integer programming model for reservoir performance optimization. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management,125(5), 298–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szemis, J. M., Dandy, G. C., & Maier, H. R. (2013). A multiobjective ant colony optimization approach for scheduling environmental flow management alternatives with application to the River Murray, Australia. Water Resources Research,49(10), 6399–6411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabari, M. M., & Soltani, J. (2013). Multi-objective optimal model for conjunctive use management using SGAs and NSGA-II models. Water Resources Management,27(1), 37–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teegavarapu, R., & Simonovic, S. (2000). Short-term operation model for coupled hydropower reservoirs. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management,126(2), 98–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennant, D. L. (1976). Instream flow regimes for fish, wildlife, recreation and related environment resourcce. Fisheries,1(4), 6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torabi Palatkaleh, S., Estiri, K., & Hafez, B. (2010a). The role of environmental requirements in process of water allocation for watersheds in Iran: Sustainable development approach. In 2nd international conference on water, ecosystems and sustainable development in arid and semi-arid zones, edited, Tehran.

  • Torabi Palatkaleh, S., Roozbahani, R., Hobevatan, M., & Estiri, K. (2010b). Water allocation regulation. Tehran: Iranian Ministry of Energy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Udías, A., Efremov, R., Galbiati, L., & Caṅomón, I. (2014). Simulation and optimization modelling approach for regional water resoration management. Annals of Operations Research,219, 123–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCAP. (2000). Principles and practices of water allocation among water-use sectors, water resources series rep. 80. Bangkok: United Nations, Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific.

    Google Scholar 

  • WCD. (2000). Dams and development: A new framework for decision-making. London: World Commission on Dams.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. L., Reely, B. T., & Cox, M. (1997). The water resource management system (WREMS): Linking data management and operation optimization. Annals of Operations Research,72, 105–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xevi, E., & Khan, S. (2005). A multi-objective optimisation approach to water management. Journal of Environmental Management,77(4), 269–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, W. (2011). A multi-objective optimization approach to allocate environmental flows to the artificially restored wetlands of China’s Yellow River Delta. Ecological Modelling,222(2), 261–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zarghaami, M., & Hajykazemian, H. (2013). Urban water resources planning by using a modified particle swarm optimization algorithm. Resources, Conservation and Recycling,70, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, X., Kang, S., Li, F., Zhang, L., & Guo, P. (2010). Fuzzy multi-objective linear programming applying to crop area planning. Agricultural Water Management,98(1), 134–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, G., Min, H., & Gen, M. (2002). The balanced allocation of customers to multiple distribution centers in the supply chain network: A genetic algorithm approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering,43(1–2), 251–261.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Data to support this article are from the Iran Ministry of Energy. We thank the water manager of the Iran Ministry of Energy: S. Torabi Palatkaleh (S.Torabi@moe.gov.ir), who provided “National Water Master Plan Study: The Sefidrud Basin” report for this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Water Resources Study and Research, Water Research Institute, P.O. Box 16765-313, Tehran, Iran

    Reza Roozbahani

  2. School of Business IT and Logistics, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, 3001, Australia

    Babak Abbasi

  3. School of Sciences, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, 3001, Australia

    Sergei Schreider

  4. Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia

    Zahra Hosseinifard

Authors
  1. Reza Roozbahani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Babak Abbasi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sergei Schreider
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zahra Hosseinifard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reza Roozbahani.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 460 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roozbahani, R., Abbasi, B., Schreider, S. et al. A basin-wide approach for water allocation and dams location-allocation. Ann Oper Res 287, 323–349 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03345-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03345-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation