Large-scale coordination: developing a framework to evaluate socio-technical and collaborative issues | Cognition, Technology & Work Skip to main content
Log in

Large-scale coordination: developing a framework to evaluate socio-technical and collaborative issues

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Collaborative logistics, logistics-based networks, focused logistics, and distributed adaptive logistics refer to innovative approaches to logistics planning/execution encompassing automated, adaptive technologies, and proactive human collaboration. Because these approaches are collaborative and distributed in nature, they create novel challenges for coordination and collaboration within socio-technical systems, which encompass the collaborative technologies, the people or machines engaged in collaboration, and the social context of collaboration and coordination. The present challenges need to be met by theoretical models incorporating multidisciplinary perspectives in the study of collaboration. The current paper introduces a collaboration framework which may inform the design and implementation of collaborative technologies and systems, to include distributed logistics teams, from a socio-technical perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Barnes J, Wiley V, Moore J, Ryer D (2004) Solving the aerial fleet refueling problem using group theoretical tabu search. Math Comput Model 39:617–640

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bartone P, Adler A, Vaitkus M (1998) Dimensions in psychological stress in peacekeeping operations. Mil Med 163:587–593

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker-Beck U, Wintermantel M, Borg A (2005) Principles of regulating interaction in teams practicing face-to-face communication versus teams practicing computer-mediated communication. Small Group Res 36:499–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell B, Kozlowski S (2002) A typology of virtual teams: implications for effective leadership. Group Organ Manag 27:14–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs R (2006) On theory-driven design and deployment of collaborative systems. Int J Hum Comput Stud 64:573–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crimiel D, Currie K (2005) Logistics executive agents: enhancing support to the joint warfighter. Air Force J Logistics 29:16–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis A, Valacich J (1993) Computer brainstorms: more heads are better than one. J Appl Psychol 78:531–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dirks K (1999) The effects of interpersonal trust on work group performance. J Appl Psychol 84:445–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gue K (2003) A dynamic distribution model for combat logistics. Comput Oper Res 30:367–381

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hertel G, Geister S, Konradt U (2005) Managing virtual teams: a review of the current empirical research. Hum Resour Manag Rev 15:69–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinds P, Bailey D (2003) Out of sight, out of sync: understanding conflict in distributed teams. Organ Sci 14:615–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janis I, Mann L (1977) Decision making: a psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvenpaa S, Leidner D (1999) Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organ Sci 10:791–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasper-Fuehrer E, Ashkanasy N (2001) Communicating trustworthiness and building trust in interorganizational virtual organizations. J Manag 27:235–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozlowski S, Bell B (2003) Work groups and teams in organizations. In: Borman W, Illgen D (eds) Handbook of psychology: industrial and organizational psychology. Wiley, New York, pp 333–376

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath J (1984) Groups: interaction and performance. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • McQuay W (2005) Distributed collaborative environments for systems engineering. IEEE A&E Syst Mag August Edition 7–12

  • Moore D, Kutzberg T, Thompson L, Morris M (1999) Long and short routes to success in electronically mediated negotiation: group affiliations and good vibrations. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 77:22–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullen B, Cooper C (1994) The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: an integration. Psychol Bull 115:210–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumford E (2000) A socio-technical approach to system design. Requirements Eng 5:125–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Conner B, Fought S (2005) Airdrop and modularity. Air Force J Logistics 29:5–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Force Transformation (2004) Operational sense and respond logistics. Office of the Secretary of Defense

  • Straus S (1997) Technology, group process, and group outcomes: testing the connections in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups. Hum Comput Interact 12:227–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swartz S (2004) A multimethod approach to the combat air forces mix and deployment problem. Math Comput Model 39:773–797

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wainfan L, Davis P (2004) Challenges in virtual collaboration: videoconferencing, audioconferencing, and computer-mediated communications. Research report, RAND Corporation, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicks A, Berman S, Jones T (1999) The structure of optimal trust: moral and strategic implications. Acad Manag Rev 29:99–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jill Ritter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ritter, J., Lyons, J.B. & Swindler, S.D. Large-scale coordination: developing a framework to evaluate socio-technical and collaborative issues. Cogn Tech Work 9, 33–38 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-006-0060-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-006-0060-x

Keywords

Navigation