Schedulability of Herschel revisited using statistical model checking | International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Schedulability of Herschel revisited using statistical model checking

  • AD-RV
  • Published:
International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Schedulability analysis is a main concern for several embedded applications due to their safety-critical nature. The classical method of response time analysis provides an efficient technique used in industrial practice. However, the method is based on conservative assumptions related to execution and blocking times of tasks. Consequently, the method may falsely declare deadline violations that will never occur during execution. This paper is a continuation of previous work of the authors in applying extended timed automata model checking (using the tool UPPAAL) to obtain more exact schedulability analysis, here in the presence of non-deterministic computation times of tasks given by intervals [BCET,WCET]. Computation intervals with preemptive schedulers make the schedulability analysis of the resulting task model undecidable. Our contribution is to propose a combination of model checking techniques to obtain some guarantee on the (un)schedulability of the model even in the presence of undecidability. Two methods are considered: symbolic model checking and statistical model checking. Since the model uses stop-watches, the reachability problem becomes undecidable so we are using an over-approximation technique. We can safely conclude that the system is schedulable for varying values of BCET. For the cases where deadlines are violated, we use polyhedra to try to confirm the witnesses. Our alternative method to confirm non-schedulability uses statistical model-checking (SMC) to generate counter-examples that are always realizable. Another use of the SMC technique is to do performance analysis on schedulable configurations to obtain, e.g., expected response times. The methods are demonstrated on a complex satellite software system yielding new insights useful for the company.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://people.cs.aau.dk/~marius/Terma/.

  2. In the actual system 16 of them are sporadic, but we model them as periodic to limit non-determinism.

  3. This option is available since version 4.1.16 on Linux.

  4. This procedure decreases drastically the throughput of the exploration of the state space.

References

  1. Ben-Abdallah, H., Choi, J.-Y., Clarke, D., Kim, Y.S., Lee, I., Xie, H.-L.: A process algebraic approach to the schedulability analysis of real-time systems. Real-Time Syst. 15, 189–219 (1998). doi:10.1023/A:1008047130023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Biere, A., Cimatti, A., Clarke, E., Zhu, Y.: Symbolic model checking without BDDs. In: Cleaveland, W.R. (ed.) Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1579, pp. 193–207. Springer, Berlin (1999)

  3. Bulychev, P.E., David, A., Larsen, K.G., Legay, A., Mikučionis, M., Poulsen, D.B.: Checking and distributing statistical model checking. NASA Formal Methods. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 7226, pp. 449–463. Springer, Berlin (2012)

  4. Bradley, S., Henderson, W., Kendall, D.: Using timed automata for response time analysis of distributed real-time systems. In: Systems, 24th IFAC/IFIP Workshop on Real-Time Programming WRTP 99, pp. 143–148 (1999)

  5. Bohnenkamp, H.C., Hermanns, H., Klaren, R., Mader, A., Usenko, Y.S.: Synthesis and stochastic assessment of schedules for lacquer production. In: First International Conference on the Quantitative Evaluation of Systems, 2004. QEST 2004. Proceedings. pp. 28–37 (2004)

  6. Brekling, A., Hansen, M.R., Madsen, J.: MoVES—a framework for modelling and verifying embedded systems. In: International Conference on Microelectronics (ICM), pp. 149–152 (2009)

  7. Burns, A.: Preemptive priority based scheduling: an appropriate engineering approach. In: Principles of Real-Time Systems, pp. 225–248. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1994)

  8. Christensen, S., Kristensen, L., Mailund, T.: A sweep-line method for state space exploration. In: Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems. TACAS 2001, pp. 450–464. Springer, London (2001)

  9. Cassez, F., Larsen, K.G.: The impressive power of stopwatches. In: Palamidessi, C. (ed.) CONCUR. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1877, pp. 138–152. Springer, Berlin (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  10. David, A., Illum, J., Larsen, K.G., Skou, A.: Model-Based Framework for Schedulability Analysis Using UPPAAL 4.1. In: Nicolescu, G., Mosterman, P.J. (eds.) Model-Based Design for Embedded Systems, pp. 93–119. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2010)

  11. David, A., Larsen, K.G., Legay, A., Mikučionis, M., Poulsen, D.B., Vliet, J.Van, Wang, Z.: Statistical model checking for networks of priced timed automata. FORMATS. LNCS, pp. 80–96. Springer, Berlin (2011)

  12. David, A., Larsen, K.G., Legay, A., Wang, Z., Mikučionis, M.: Time for real statistical model-checking: Statistical model-checking for real-time systems. In: CAV, LNCS. Springer, Berlin (2011)

  13. David, A., Larsen, K.G., Legay, A., Mikučionis, M.: Schedulability of Herschel-Planck revisited using statistical model checking. ISoLA (2). LNCS, vol. 7610, pp. 293–307. Springer, Berlin (2012)

  14. Fersman, E., Krčál, P., Pettersson, P., Yi, W.: Task automata: Schedulability, decidability and undecidability. Inf. Comput. 205(8), 1149–1172 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Hérault, T., Lassaigne, R., Magniette, F., Peyronnet, S.: Approximate probabilistic model checking. In: Steffen, B., Levi, G. (eds.) Verification, Model Checking, and Abstract Interpretation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2937, pp. 73–84. Springer, Berlin (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Jeannet, B., Miné, A.: Apron: a library of numerical abstract domains for static analysis. In: Bouajjani, A., Maler, O. (eds.) Computer Aided Verification. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5643, pp. 661–667. Springer, Berlin (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Joseph, M., Pandya, P.K.: Finding response times in a real-time system. Comput. J. 29(5), 390–395 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Katoen, J.-P., Zapreev, I.S., Hahn, E.M., Hermanns, H., Jansen, D.N.: The ins and outs of the probabilistic model checker MRMC. In: Proc. of 6th Int. Conference on the Quantitative Evaluation of Systems (QEST), pp. 167–176. IEEE Computer Society (2009)

  19. Legay, A., Delahaye, B., Bensalem, S.: Statistical model checking: an overview. In: RV, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6418, pp. 122–135. Springer, Berlin (2010)

  20. Mikučionis, M., Larsen, K.G., Rasmussen, J.I., Nielsen, B., Skou, A., Palm, S.U., Pedersen, J.S., Hougaard, P.: Schedulability analysis using Uppaal: Herschel-Planck case study. In: Margaria, T. (ed.) ISoLA 2010–4th International Symposium On Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods. Verification and Validation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Berlin (2010)

  21. Rabih, D., Pekergin, N.: Statistical model checking using perfect simulation. In: Liu, Z., Ravn, A.P. (eds.) Automated Technology for Verification and Analysis. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5799, pp. 120–134. Springer, Berlin (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Sokolsky, O., Lee, I., Clarke, D.: Schedulability analysis of AADL models. In: 20th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, 2006. IPDPS 2006, pp. 8 (2006)

  23. Sen, K., Viswanathan, M., Agha, G.: Statistical model checking of black-box probabilistic systems. In CAV, LNCS 3114, pp. 202–215. Springer, Berlin (2004)

  24. Younes, H.L.S., Simmons, R.G.: Probabilistic verification of discrete event systems using acceptance sampling. In: Brinksma, E., Larsen, K.G. (eds.) Computer Aided Verification. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2404, pp. 223–235. Springer, Berlin (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Younes, H.L.S., Simmons, R.G.: Statistical probabilistic model checking with a focus on time-bounded properties. Inf. Comput. 204(9), 1368–1409 (2006)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Computer Science, Aalborg University, Ålborg, Denmark

    Alexandre David, Kim G. Larsen, Axel Legay & Marius Mikučionis

  2. INRIA/IRISA, Rennes Cedex, France

    Axel Legay

Authors
  1. Alexandre David
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kim G. Larsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Axel Legay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Marius Mikučionis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Axel Legay.

Additional information

This paper is a special issue extension of [13]. The main differences are a more thorough description of the case-study and experiments, and the use of the polyhedra library APron. This work is partially supported by VKR Centre of Excellence MT-LAB, the Sino-Danish basic research center IDEA4CPS, EU ARTEMIS project MBAT, the regional CREATIVE project ESTASE, and the EU projects DANSE and DALI.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

David, A., Larsen, K.G., Legay, A. et al. Schedulability of Herschel revisited using statistical model checking. Int J Softw Tools Technol Transfer 17, 187–199 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10009-014-0331-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10009-014-0331-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation