Immersive multisensory virtual reality technologies for virtual tourism | Multimedia Systems Skip to main content
Log in

Immersive multisensory virtual reality technologies for virtual tourism

A study of the user’s sense of presence, satisfaction, emotions, and attitudes

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Multimedia Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Virtual reality (VR) technologies have been used successfully in tourism marketing. While most conventional VR applications are of an audiovisual nature, the constant evolution of these technologies allows providing enriched multisensory VR content that can further increase the potential of VR applied to the tourism field. To generate insights into the impact of such VR technologies, this manuscript investigates the impact of such multisensory VR setups and gender on the user’s sense of presence, satisfaction, emotions, and attitudes. A user study with a gender-balanced sample (N = 80) was carried where two VR setups (audiovisual vs multisensory) were compared taking into account the user’s gender. Results revealed that the female sample scored significantly higher spatial presence across VR setups and reported more involvement and overall presence in the audiovisual condition. In addition, correlations were found between the pairs Spatial Presence–Emotions, Spatial Presence–Enjoyment, Satisfaction–Involvement, Satisfaction–Enjoyment, and Satisfaction and Usefulness to perceive the destination. Results also suggest that multisensory stimulus can mitigate possible gender differences in passive VR scenarios. We concluded that the capability of the VR system to make users feel physically present in the virtual environment contributes significantly to the development of positive emotions and enjoyment, which can contribute positively to the user’s consumer behaviour towards the touristic products and services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Available at https://sensorycots.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/SCO-Aromas-191023.pdf.

  2. https://massive.inesctec.pt/.

References

  1. Adachi, R., Cramer, E.M., Song, H.: Using virtual reality for tourism marketing: a mediating role of self-presence. Soc. Sci. J. 1–14 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/03623319.2020.1727245

  2. Ahir, K., Govani, K., Gajera, R., Shah, M.: Application on virtual reality for enhanced education learning, military training and sports. Augment. Hum. Res. 5(1), 7 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M.: Attitude-behavior relations: a theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychol. Bull. 84(5), 888 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Baños, R.M., Botella, C., Alcañiz, M., Liaño, V., Guerrero, B., Rey, B.: Immersion and emotion: their impact on the sense of presence. Cyberpsychology Behav. 7(6), 734–741 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Beck, J., Egger, R.: Emotionalise me: self-reporting and arousal measurements in virtual tourism environments. In: Information and communication technologies in tourism 2018, Springer, pp. 3–15 (2018)

  6. Bessa, M., Coelho, H., Melo, M., Pinto, M.: Impact of different display devices and types of virtual environments on emotions and feeling of presence. In: 2017 24\(^\circ\) Encontro Português de Computaço (EPCGI), pp. 1–7 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/EPCGI.2017.8124300

  7. Bethapudi, A.: The role of ICT in tourism industry. J. Appl. Econ. Bus. 1(4), 67–79 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bogicevic, V., Seo, S., Kandampully, J.A., Liu, S.Q., Rudd, N.A.: Virtual reality presence as a preamble of tourism experience: the role of mental imagery. Tour. Manag. 74, 55–64 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bouvier, P.: The five pillars of presence: guidelines to reach presence. SPAGNOLLI, A et GAMBERINI, L, éditeurs: proceedings of presence, pp. 246–249 (2008)

  10. Buttussi, F., Chittaro, L.: Effects of different types of virtual reality display on presence and learning in a safety training scenario. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 24(2), 1063–1076 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chung, N., Lee, H., Kim, J.Y., Koo, C.: The role of augmented reality for experience-influenced environments: the case of cultural heritage tourism in Korea. J. Travel Res. 57(5), 627–643 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cohen, J.: Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic Press, Cambridge (2013)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Coluccia, E., Louse, G.: Gender differences in spatial orientation: a review. J. Environ. Psychol. 24(3), 329–340 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Covaci, A., Zou, L., Tal, I., Muntean, G.M., Ghinea, G.: Is multimedia multisensorial? - a review of mulsemedia systems. ACM Comput. Surv. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3233774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cruz-Neira, C., Fernández, M., Portalés, C.: Virtual reality and games. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 2(1):8 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/mti2010008

  16. Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 319–340 (1989)

  17. De Barros, P.G., Lindeman, R.W.: Performance effects of multi-sensory displays in virtual teleoperation environments. In: Proceedings of the 1st symposium on spatial user interaction, pp. 41–48 (2013)

  18. Eastin, M.S.: Video game violence and the female game player: self-and opponent gender effects on presence and aggressive thoughts. Hum. Commun. Res. 32(3), 351–372 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Felnhofer, A., Kothgassner, O., Beutl, L., Hlavacs, H., Kryspin-Exner, I.: Is virtual reality made for men only? exploring gender differences in the sense of presence. In: International society for presence research annual conference ? ISPR 2012, Philadelphia, PA, USA, we earned the BEST PAPER AWARD! (2012). http://eprints.cs.univie.ac.at/3557/

  20. Freund, R., Wilson, W., Mohr, D.: Data and statistics. In: Statistical methods. Academic Press, Cambridge (2012)

  21. George, D., Mallery, P.: IBM SPSS statistics 26 step by step: a simple guide and reference. Routledge, London (2019)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Gibson, A., O’Rawe, M.: Virtual reality as a travel promotional tool: insights from a consumer travel fair. In: Augmented reality and virtual reality, Springer, pp. 93–107 (2018)

  23. Gonçalves, G., Melo, M., Vasconcelos-Raposo, J., Bessa, M.: Impact of different sensory stimuli on presence in credible virtual environments. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 26(11), 3231–3240 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2019.2926978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Guttentag, D.A.: Virtual reality: applications and implications for tourism. Tour. Manag. 31(5), 637–651 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Guttentag, D.A.: Virtual reality: applications and implications for tourism. Tour. Manag. 31(5), 637–651 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2009.07.003. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261517709001332

  26. Hagelsteen, K., Langegård, A., Lantz, A., Ekelund, M., Anderberg, M., Bergenfelz, A.: Faster acquisition of laparoscopic skills in virtual reality with haptic feedback and 3d vision. Minim. Invasive Ther. Allied Technol. 26(5), 269–277 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Han, D.I.D., Weber, J., Bastiaansen, M., Mitas, O., Lub, X.: Virtual and augmented reality technologies to enhance the visitor experience in cultural tourism. In: Augmented reality and virtual reality, Springer, pp. 113–128 (2019)

  28. Hartmann, T., Klimmt, C.: Gender and computer games: exploring females’ dislikes. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. 11(4), 910–931 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hew, J.J., Leong, L.Y., Tan, G.W.H., Lee, V.H., Ooi, K.B.: Mobile social tourism shopping: a dual-stage analysis of a multi-mediation model. Tour. Manag. 66, 121–139 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hopf, J., Scholl, M., Neuhofer, B., Egger, R.: Exploring the impact of multisensory VR on travel recommendation: a presence perspective. In: Information and communication technologies in tourism 2020, Springer, pp. 169–180 (2020)

  31. Huang, S., Hsu, C.H.: Effects of travel motivation, past experience, perceived constraint, and attitude on revisit intention. J. Travel Res. 48(1), 29–44 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Huang, Y.C., Backman, S.J., Backman, K.F., Moore, D.: Exploring user acceptance of 3d virtual worlds in travel and tourism marketing. Tour. Manag. 36, 490–501 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Huang, Y.C., Backman, K.F., Backman, S.J., Chang, L.L.: Exploring the implications of virtual reality technology in tourism marketing: an integrated research framework. Int. J. Tour. Res. 18(2), 116–128 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hyun, M.Y., O’Keefe, R.M.: Virtual destination image: testing a telepresence model. J. Bus. Res. 65(1), 29–35 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Jaccard, J., Jaccard, J.: Interaction effects in factorial analysis of variance, vol. 118. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1998)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Kang, H.: Impact of VR on impulsive desire for a destination. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 42, 244–255 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Karafotias, G., Korres, G., Teranishi, A., Park, W., Eid, M.: Mid-air tactile stimulation for pain distraction. IEEE Trans. Haptics 11(2), 185–191 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kim, K., Rosenthal, M.Z., Zielinski, D.J., Brady, R.: Effects of virtual environment platforms on emotional responses. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 113(3), 882–893 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kim, T., Biocca, F.: Telepresence via television: two dimensions of telepresence may have different connections to memory and persuasion. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. 3(2), JCMC25 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Klašnja-Milićević, A., Marošan, Z., Ivanović, M., Savić, N., Vesin, B.: The future of learning multisensory experiences: visual, audio, smell and taste senses. In: International conference in methodologies and intelligent systems for technology enhanced learning, Springer, pp. 213–221 (2018)

  41. Lessiter, J., Freeman, J., Keogh, E., Davidoff, J.: A cross-media presence questionnaire: the ITC-sense of presence inventory. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 10(3), 282–297 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Lewis, J.R.: Psychometric evaluation of an after-scenario questionnaire for computer usability studies: the ASQ. ACM Sigchi Bull. 23(1), 78–81 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1145/122672.122692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Macefield, R.: How to specify the participant group size for usability studies: a practitioner’s guide. J. Usability Stud. 34–45 (2009). https://doi.org/10.5555/2835425.2835429

  44. Martins, J., Gonçalves, R., Branco, F., Barbosa, L., Melo, M., Bessa, M.: A multisensory virtual experience model for thematic tourism: a port wine tourism application proposal. J. Destin. Mark. Manag. 6(2), 103–109 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2017.02.002. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212571X16300816. (Special edition on Digital Destinations)

  45. Melo, M., Vasconcelos-Raposo, J., Bessa, M.: Presence and cybersickness in immersive content: effects of content type, exposure time and gender. Comput. Graph. 71, 159–165 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Melo, M., Gonçalves, G., Monteiro, P., Coelho, H., Vasconcelos-Raposo, J., Bessa, M.: Do multisensory stimuli benefit the virtual reality experience? a systematic review. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2020.3010088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Moorhouse, N., tom Dieck, M.C., Jung, T.: Technological innovations transforming the consumer retail experience: a review of literature. In: Augmented reality and virtual reality, Springer, pp. 133–143 (2018)

  48. Murray, N., Lee, B., Qiao, Y., Miro-Muntean, G.: The influence of human factors on olfaction based mulsemedia quality of experience. In: 2016 Eighth international conference on quality of multimedia experience (QoMEX), pp. 1–6 (2016a). https://doi.org/10.1109/QoMEX.2016.7498975

  49. Murray, N., Lee, B., Qiao, Y., Muntean, G.M.: Olfaction-enhanced multimedia: a survey of application domains, displays, and research challenges. ACM Comput. Surv. (2016b). https://doi.org/10.1145/2816454. https://doi.org/10.1145/2816454

  50. Murray, N., Ademoye, O.A., Ghinea, G., Muntean, G.M.: A tutorial for olfaction-based multisensorial media application design and evaluation. ACM Comput. Surv. CSUR 50(5), 1–30 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Nicovich, S.G., Boller, G.W., Cornwell, T.B.: Experienced presence within computer-mediated communications: initial explorations on the effects of gender with respect to empathy and immersion. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. 10(2), JCMC1023 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Patrono, L., Podo, L., Rametta, P.: An innovative face emotion recognition-based platform by using a mobile device as a virtual tour. J. Commun. Softw. Syst. 15(2), 150–158 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Plunkett, D.: Examining the impact of media content, emotions, and mental imagery visualization on pre-trip place attachment. PhD thesis, Arizona State University Phoenix, AZ (2013)

  54. Radde, B.: Digital Guest Experience: tools to help hotels to manage and optimize the digital guest experience. Tredition (2017)

  55. Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T.A., Fromm, J., Wohlgenannt, I.: A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda. Comput. Educ. 147, 103778 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Ragan, E.D., Bowman, D.A., Kopper, R., Stinson, C., Scerbo, S., McMahan, R.P.: Effects of field of view and visual complexity on virtual reality training effectiveness for a visual scanning task. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 21(7), 794–807 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Ranasinghe, N., Jain, P., Karwita, S., Tolley, D., Do, E.Y.L.: Ambiotherm: enhancing sense of presence in virtual reality by simulating real-world environmental conditions. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp. 1731–1742 (2017)

  58. Ranasinghe, N., Jain, P., Thi Ngoc Tram, N., Koh, K.C.R., Tolley, D., Karwita, S., Lien-Ya, L., Liangkun, Y., Shamaiah, K., Eason Wai Tung, C., Yen, C.C., Do, E.Y.L.: Season traveller: multisensory narration for enhancing the virtual reality experience. In: Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, pp. 1–13 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174151

  59. Riva, G., Davide, F., IJsselsteijn, W.A.: Being there: concepts, effects and measurements of user presence in synthetic environments. Ios Press, Amsterdam (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Saleme, E.B., Covaci, A., Assres, G., Comsa, I.S., Trestian, R., Santos, C.A., Ghinea, G.: The influence of human factors on 360 mulsemedia QoE. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 146, 102550 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102550. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S107158192030152X

  61. Schubert, T., Friedmann, F., Regenbrecht, H.: The experience of presence: factor analytic insights. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 10(3), 266–281 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Scott, M.J., Guntuku, S.C., Lin, W., Ghinea, G.: Do personality and culture influence perceived video quality and enjoyment? IEEE Trans. Multimed. 18(9), 1796–1807 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMM.2016.2574623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Skarbez, R., Brooks, F.P., Jr., Whitton, M.C.: A survey of presence and related concepts. ACM Comput. Surv. CSUR 50(6), 1–39 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  64. Slater, M., Wilbur, S.: A framework for immersive virtual environments (five): speculations on the role of presence in virtual environments. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 6(6), 603–616 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Tussyadiah, I.P., Wang, D., Jung, T.H., tom Dieck, M.C.: Virtual reality, presence, and attitude change: empirical evidence from tourism. Tour. Manag. 66, 140–154 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Vasconcelos-Raposo, J., Bessa, M., Melo, M., Barbosa, L., Rodrigues, R., Teixeira, C.M., Cabral, L., Sousa, A.A.: Adaptation and validation of the Igroup presence questionnaire (IPQ) in a Portuguese sample. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 25(3), 191–203 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Wagler, A., Hanus, M.D.: Comparing virtual reality tourism to real-life experience: effects of presence and engagement on attitude and enjoyment. Commun. Res. Rep. 35(5), 456–464 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Wei, W., Qi, R., Zhang, L.: Effects of virtual reality on theme park visitors’ experience and behaviors: a presence perspective. Tour. Manag. 71, 282–293 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Williams, P., Hobson, J.P.: Virtual reality and tourism: fact or fantasy? Tour. Manag. 16(6), 423–427 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-5177(95)00050-X. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/026151779500050X

  70. Witmer, B.G., Singer, M.J.: Measuring presence in virtual environments: a presence questionnaire. Presence 7(3), 225–240 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Yuan, Z., Ghinea, G., Muntean, G.M.: Beyond multimedia adaptation: quality of experience-aware multi-sensorial media delivery. IEEE Trans. Multimed. 17(1), 104–117 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Zhang, M., Li, X., Yu, Z., Chen, Z., Sun, Y., Li, Y.: Virtual range training based on virtual reality. In: 4th International conference on contemporary education, social sciences and humanities (ICCESSH 2019), Atlantis Press, pp. 1556–1561 (2019)

  73. Zyda, M.: From visual simulation to virtual reality to games. Computer 38(9), 25–32 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was financed by the ERDF—European Regional Development Fund through the Operational Programme for Competitiveness and Internationalisation–COMPETE 2020 Programme and by National Funds through the Portuguese funding agency, FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia within project POCI-01-0145-FEDER-031309 entitled “PromoTourVR - Promoting Tourism Destinations with Multisensory Immersive Media”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miguel Melo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by N. Murray.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Melo, M., Coelho, H., Gonçalves, G. et al. Immersive multisensory virtual reality technologies for virtual tourism. Multimedia Systems 28, 1027–1037 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00530-022-00898-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00530-022-00898-7

Keywords

Navigation