Adaptive sliding mode control of a pressure relief valve | e+i Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik Skip to main content
Log in

Adaptive sliding mode control of a pressure relief valve

Adaptive Gleitzustandsregelung eines Druckbegrenzungsventils

  • Originalarbeiten
  • Published:
e & i Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this contribution the control of a hydraulic pressure relief valve is discussed. Due to strong nonlinearities of the valve and the influence of a varying oil flow advanced control strategies are mandatory if advanced closed-loop performance is demanded. On the one hand, classical PI-like control structures can be applied to achieve the desired closed-loop performance. However, for this the controller has to utilize nonlinear gains for the P- and I-branch, which results in a large number of parameters to determine. In order to overcome this complexity a second order homogeneous control concept is proposed that achieves the desired control quality. Since modeling of the hydraulic valve is not intended and hence the system’s states cannot be recovered by using an observer-based approach the state recovery by differentiation of the measured system output is discussed. For this, differentiation techniques based on second-order sliding modes are briefly introduced. The performance of the presented control concept is evaluated on a typical pressure relief valve in terms of tracking of different pressure drop trajectories and disturbance rejection caused by a varying oil flow. The results show an improved control quality compared to classical approaches while the complexity of the utilized sliding mode controller is kept low.

Zusammenfassung

In diesem Beitrag wird die Druckregelung eines Druckbegrenzungsventils präsentiert. Aufgrund der auftretenden Nichtlinearitäten des Systems und der variierenden Volumenströme des hydraulischen Mediums sind innovative Regelungsstrategien notwendig, um die geforderte Regelungsgüte zu erzielen. Hierzu können zum einen klassische PI-Regler eingesetzt werden, allerdings müssen derartige Regler um nichtlineare Kennlinien mit einer Vielzahl an verkoppelten Parametern je Zweig ergänzt werden, um die geforderte Güte zu bieten. Um die hohe Komplexität der Regler zu reduzieren, wird in dieser Arbeit ein Gleitzustandsregler zweiter Ordnung vorgestellt, der die geforderte Regelungsgüte erzielt und gleichzeitig eine geringe Anzahl an Parametern aufweist. Da die Modellierung des hydraulischen Ventils nicht beabsichtigt ist und somit die Zustände des Systems nicht messbar sind, wird zudem ein Ansatz zur robusten Schätzung von Ableitungen eines gemessenen Signals eingeführt. Die Leistung des vorgestellten Regelungskonzepts wird anhand typischer Betriebsszenarien eines hydraulischen Druckbegrenzungsventils untersucht. Hierzu wird sowohl das Führungsverhalten für eine Sequenz unterschiedlicher Drücke sowie das Störverhalten für variierende Volumenströme getestet. Die Ergebnisse zeigen im Vergleich zu einem einfachen PI-Regler gleicher Komplexität eine verbesserte Regelungsgüte für den neuen Ansatz auf.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chalanga, A., Kamal, S., Fridman, L., Bandyopadhyay, B., Moreno, J. (2016): Implementation of super-twisting control: super-twisting and higher order sliding mode observer based approaches. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 63(6), 3677–3685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Filippov, A. F., Arscott, F. M. (1988): Differential equations with discontinuous righthand sides. Mathematics and its applications (Soviet series). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Gallardo Hernández, A. G., Fridman, L., Levant, A., Shtessel, Y., Leder, R., Revilla Monsalve, C., Islas Andrade, S. (2013): High-order sliding-mode control for blood glucose: practical relative degree approach. Control Eng. Pract., 21(5), 747–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Komsta, J., van Oijen, N., Antoszkiewicz, P. (2013): Integral sliding mode compensator for load pressure control of die-cushion cylinder drive. Control Eng. Pract., 21(5), 708–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Krettek, J., Braun, J., Hoffmann, F., Bertram, T., Ewald, T., Schubert, H. G., Lausch, H. (2009): Interactive evolutionary multiobjective optimization for hydraulic valve controller parameters. In IEEE/ASME international conference on advanced intelligent mechatronics (pp. 816–821).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Krimpmann, C., Braun, J., Bertram, T., Glowatzky, I., Ewald, T., Lausch, H. (2014): Intuitive objective definition for the automated optimization of hydraulic valves. In 9th international fluid power conference (pp. 68–78).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Krimpmann, C., Schoppel, G., Glowatzky, I., Bertram, T. (2015): Performance evaluation of nonlinear surfaces for sliding mode control of a hydraulic valve. In IEEE multi-conference on systems and control (pp. 822–827).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Krimpmann, C., Makarow, A., Bertram, T., Glowatzky, I., Schoppel, G., Lausch, H. (2016): Simulationsgestützte Optimierung von Gleitzustandsreglern für hydraulische Wegeventile. Automatisierungstechnik, 64(6), 443–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Levant, A. (1993): Sliding order and sliding accuracy in sliding mode control. Int. J. Control, 58(6), 1247–1263.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Levant, A. (1998): Robust exact differentiation via sliding mode technique. Automatica, 34(3), 379–384.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Moreno, J. A., Osorio, M. (2008): A Lyapunov approach to second-order sliding mode controllers and observers. In 47th IEEE conference on decision and control, CDC 2008 (pp. 2856–2861).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Orfanidis, S. J. (1996): Introduction to signal processing. Prentice Hall signal processing series. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Reichhartinger, M., Horn, M. (2009): Application of higher order sliding-mode concepts to a throttle actuator for gasoline engines. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 56(9), 3322–3329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shtessel, Y., Taleb, M., Plestan, F. (2012): A novel adaptive-gain supertwisting sliding mode controller: methodology and application. Automatica, 48(5), 759–769.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to Mr. Daniel Schlattmann, who developed parts of this contribution during his master thesis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christoph Krimpmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Krimpmann, C., Bertram, T., Schoppel, G. et al. Adaptive sliding mode control of a pressure relief valve. Elektrotech. Inftech. 133, 261–265 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00502-016-0421-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00502-016-0421-y

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation