Development of GA-based models for simulating the ground vibration in mine blasting | Engineering with Computers Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Development of GA-based models for simulating the ground vibration in mine blasting

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Engineering with Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rock blasting is a well-known and common method for the removal of rock masses from an excavation in surface mines and civil projects. Ground vibration is the most hazardous effect induced by blasting operations. Therefore, the level of the blast-induced ground vibration needs to be predicted with a good level of the accuracy. The goal of this paper is to propose two novel practical intelligent models to approximate the ground vibration through genetic algorithm (GA). For comparison aims, the Roy and Rai-Singh empirical models were also employed. The requirement datasets were collected from the Shur river dam, in Iran. Specific charge, distance from the blast face and weight charge per delay were used as the input/independent parameters and peak particle velocity (PPV) was used as the output/dependent parameter. In total, 85 datasets including the mentioned parameters were prepared. Then, the models performance was assessed using statistical indicators, i.e., coefficient correlation (R2) and root mean squared error. According to the obtained results, it was concluded that GA-based models, with the R2 of 0.977 and 0.974 obtained from GA-power and GA-linear models, provide relatively closer predictions as compared to Roy and Rai-Singh empirical models, with the R2 of 0.936 and 0.923, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hasanipanah M, Jahed Armaghani D, Khamesi H, Bakhshandeh Amnieh H, Ghoraba S (2016) Several non-linear models in estimating air-overpressure resulting from mine blasting. Eng Comput 32(3):441–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hasanipanah M, Jahed Armaghani D, Monjezi M, Shams S (2016) Risk assessment and prediction of rock fragmentation produced by blasting operation: a rock engineering system. Environ Earth Sci 75(9):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hasanipanah M, Bakhshandeh Amnieh H, Arab H, Zamzam MS (2016) Feasibility of PSO–ANFIS model to estimate rock fragmentation produced by mine blasting. Neural Comput Appl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2746-1

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hasanipanah M, Shirani Faradonbeh R, Jahed Armaghani D, Bakhshandeh Amnieh H, Khandelwal M (2017) Development of a precise model for prediction of blast-induced flyrock using regression tree technique. Environ Earth Sci 76(1):27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hasanipanah M, Jahed Armaghani D, Bakhshandeh Amnieh H et al (2017) Application of PSO to develop a powerful equation for prediction of flyrock due to blasting. Neural Comput Appl 28:1043–1050. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2434-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Taheri K, Hasanipanah M, Bagheri Golzar S, Abd Majid MZ (2016) A hybrid artificial bee colony algorithm-artificial neural network for forecasting the blast-produced ground vibration. Eng Comput 33(3):689–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hasanipanah M, Monjezi M, Shahnazar A, Jahed Armaghani D, Farazmand A (2015) Feasibility of indirect determination of blast induced ground vibration based on support vector machine. Measurement 75:289–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hasanipanah M, Shahnazar A, Bakhshandeh Amnieh H, Jahed Armaghani D (2017) Prediction of air-overpressure caused by mine blasting using a new hybrid PSO–SVR model. Eng Comput 33(1):23–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Amiri M, Bakhshandeh Amnieh H, Hasanipanah M, Mohammad Khanli L (2016) A new combination of artificial neural network and K-nearest neighbors models to predict blast-induced ground vibration and air-overpressure. Eng Comput 32:631–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Monjezi M, Hasanipanah M, Khandelwal M (2013) Evaluation and prediction of blast-induced ground vibration at Shur River Dam, Iran, by artificial neural network. Neural Comput Appl 22(7–8):1637–1643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hasanipanah M, Shirani Faradonbeh R, Bakhshandeh Amnieh H, Jahed Armaghani D, Monjezi M (2017) Forecasting blast-induced ground vibration developing a CART model. Eng Comput 33(2):307–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hasanipanah M, Naderi R, Kashir J, Noorani SA, Zeynali Aaq Qaleh A (2016) Prediction of blast produced ground vibration using particle swarm optimization. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-016-0462-1

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hasanipanah M et al (2016) Prediction of an environmental issue of mine blasting: an imperialistic competitive algorithm-based fuzzy system. Int J Environ Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-017-1395-y

    Google Scholar 

  14. Davies B, Farmer IW, Attewell PB (1964) Ground vibrations from shallow sub-surface blasts. Engineer 217:553–559

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ambraseys NR, Hendron AJ (1968) Dynamic behavior of rock masses: rock mechanics in engineering practices. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dowding CH (1985) Blast vibration monitoring and control. Prentice-Hall, Englewoods Cliffs, pp 288–290

    Google Scholar 

  17. Roy PP (1993) Putting ground vibration predictors into practice. J Colliery Guard 241:63–67

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rai R, Singh TN (2004) A new predictor for ground vibration prediction and its comparison with other predictors. Indian J Eng Mater Sci 11:178–184

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sharma LK, Vishal V, Singh TN (2017) Predicting CO2 permeability of bituminous coal using statistical and adaptive neuro-fuzzy analysis. J Nat Gas Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2017.02.037

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ahmad M, Ansari MK, Sharma LK, Singh R, Singh TN (2017) Correlation between strength and durability indices of rocks-soft computing approach. Procedia Eng 191:458–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Singh R, Umrao RK, Ahmad M, Ansari MK, Sharma LK, Singh TN (2017) Prediction of geomechanical parameters using soft computing and multiple regression approach. Measurement 99:108–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gao W, Karbasi M, Hasanipanah M, Zhang X, Guo J (2018) Developing GPR model for forecasting the rock fragmentation in surface mines. Eng Comput 34(2):339–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sharma LK, Singh R, Umrao RK, Sharma KM, Singh TN (2017) Evaluating the modulus of elasticity of soil using soft computing system. Eng Comput 33(3):497–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sharma LK, Vishal V, Singh TN (2017) Developing novel models using neural networks and fuzzy systems for the prediction of strength of rocks from key geomechanical properties. Measurement 102:158–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rad HN, Hasanipanah M, Rezaei M, Eghlim AL (2017) Developing a least squares support vector machine for estimating the blast-induced flyrock. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-017-0568-0

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sirdesai NN, Singh A, Sharma LK, Singh R, Singh TN (2017) Development of novel methods to predict the strength properties of thermally treated sandstone using statistical and soft-computing approach. Neural Comput Appl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-3233-z

    Google Scholar 

  27. Umrao RK, Sharma LK, Singh R, Singh TN (2018) Determination of strength and modulus of elasticity of heterogenous sedimentary rocks: An ANFIS predictive technique. Measurement 126:194–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gao W, Karbasi M, Mahmodi Derakhsh A, Jalili A (2018) Development of a novel soft-computing framework for the simulation aims: a case study. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-018-0601-y

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sirdesai NN, Singh A, Sharma LK, Singh R, Singh TN (2018) Determination of thermal damage in rock specimen using intelligent techniques. Eng Geol 239:179–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Khandelwal M, Singh TN (2007) Evaluation of blast-induced ground vibration predictors. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 27:116–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mohamed MT (2011) Performance of fuzzy logic and artificial neural network in prediction of ground and air vibrations. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 48(5):845–851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Jahed Armaghani D, Momeni E, Alavi Nezhad Khalil Abad SV, Khandelwal M (2015) Feasibility of ANFIS model for prediction of ground vibrations resulting from quarry blasting. Environ Earth Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4305-y

    Google Scholar 

  33. Jadav K, Panchal M (2012) Optimizing weights of artificial neural networks using genetic algorithms. Int J Adv Res Comput Sci Electron Eng 1:47–51

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rashidian V, Hassanlourad M (2013) Predicting the shear behavior of cemented and uncemented carbonate sands using a genetic algorithm-based artificial neural network. Geotech Geol Eng 2:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  35. Momeni E, Nazir R, Jahed Armaghani D, Maizir H (2014) Prediction of pile bearing capacity using a hybrid genetic algorithm based ANN. Measurement 57:122–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Monjezi M, Khoshalan HA, Varjani AY (2012) Prediction of flyrock and backbreak in open pit blasting operation: a neuro genetic approach. Arab J Geosci 5(3):441–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Jahed Armaghani D, Hasanipanah M, Mahdiyar A et al (2016) Airblast prediction through a hybrid genetic algorithm—ANN model. Neural Comput Appl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2598-8

    Google Scholar 

  38. Chipperfield A, Fleming P, Pohlheim H et al (2006) Genetic algorithm toolbox for use with MATLAB user’s guide, version 1.2. University of Sheffield, Sheffield

    Google Scholar 

  39. Chambers LD (2010) Practical handbook of genetic algorithms: complex coding systems. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  40. SPSS Inc (2007) SPSS for Windows (Version 16.0). SPSS Inc, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  41. Hasanipanah M, Noorian-Bidgoli M, Jahed Armaghani D, Khamesi H (2016) Feasibility of PSO-ANN model for predicting surface settlement caused by tunneling. Eng Comput 32(4):705–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Faradonbeh RS, Hasanipanah M, Amnieh HB, Armaghani DJ, Monjezi M (2018) Development of GP and GEP models to estimate an environmental issue induced by blasting operation. Environ Monit Assess 190(6):351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hasanipanah M, Armaghani DJ, Amnieh HB, Koopialipoor M, Arab H (2018) A risk-based technique to analyze flyrock results through rock engineering system. Geotech Geol Eng 36(4):2247–2260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Mojtahedi SFF, Ebtehaj I, Hasanipanah M, Bonakdari H, Amnieh HB (2018) Proposing a novel hybrid intelligent model for the simulation of particle size distribution resulting from blasting. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-018-0582-x

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was financial supported by NSFC (Grant no. 61672471). Thanks to Emate for language service. In addition, the authors would like to extend their appreciation to manager, engineers, and personnel of Shur river dam, especially Mr. Ali Taherian who allowed us to use his data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Computer and Communication Engineering, Zhengzhou University of Light Industry, Zhengzhou, 450002, China

    Erlin Tian

  2. School of Software Engineering, Zhengzhou University of Light Industry, Zhengzhou, 450002, China

    Jianwei Zhang

  3. Department of Civil Engineering, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran

    Mehran Soltani Tehrani

  4. School of Electronics, Vignan Foundation for Science, Technology and Research, Guntur, India

    A. Surendar

  5. Tyumen Industrial University, Tyumen, Russia

    Aygul Z. Ibatova

Authors
  1. Erlin Tian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jianwei Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mehran Soltani Tehrani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. Surendar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Aygul Z. Ibatova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erlin Tian.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tian, E., Zhang, J., Soltani Tehrani, M. et al. Development of GA-based models for simulating the ground vibration in mine blasting. Engineering with Computers 35, 849–855 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-018-0635-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-018-0635-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation