Abstract
We prove a lemma characterizing majority preferences over lotteries on a subset of Euclidean space. Assuming voters have quadratic von Neumann–Morgenstern utility representations, and assuming existence of a majority undominated (or “core”) point, the core voter is decisive: one lottery is majority-preferred to another if and only if this is the preference of the core voter. Several applications of this result to dynamic voting games are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aliprantis C, Border K (1999) Infinite dimensional analysis: a Hitchhiker’s guide. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Banks J, Duggan J (2006) A dynamic model of democratic elections in multidimensional policy spaces. University of Rochester, Mimeo
Banks J, Duggan J (2000) A bargaining model of collective choice. Am Polit Sci Rev 94:73–88
Banks J, Duggan J (2005) A general bargaining model of legislative policy-making. Q J Polit Sci 1:49–85
Banks J, Duggan J, Le Breton M (2006) Social choice and electoral competition in the general spatial model. J Econ Theory 126:194–234
Baron D, Ferejohn J (1989) Bargaining in legislatures. Am Polit Sci Rev 83:1181–1206
Bernhardt D, Dubey S, Hughson E (2004) Term limits and pork barrel politics. J Public Econ 88:2383–2422
Black D (1958) The theory of committees and elections. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Calvert R (1985) Robustness of the multidimensional voting model: candidate motivations, uncertainty, and convergence. Am J Polit Sci 29:69–95
Campuzano L (2001) Parties in a repeated elections model. University of Rochester, Mimeo
Cho S, Duggan J (2003) Uniqueness of stationary equilibria in a one-dimensional model of bargaining. J Econ Theory 113:118–130
Davis O, DeGroot M, Hinich M (1972) Social preference orderings and majority rule. Econometrica 40:147–157
Downs A (1957) An economic theory of democracy. Harper and Row, New York
Duggan J (2000) Repeated elections with asymmetric information. Econ Polit 12:109–135
Duggan J, Fey M (2005) Electoral competition with policy-motivated candidates. Games Econ Behav 51:490–522
Duggan J, Fey M (2006) Repeated Downsian electoral competition. Int J Games Theory (forthcoming)
Judd K (1985) The law of large numbers with a continuum of IID random variables. J Econ Theory 35:19–25
Kingman J, Taylor S (1966) Introduction to measure and probability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
McGarvey D (1953) A theorem on the construction of voting paradoxes. Econometrica 21:608–610
McKelvey R (1976) Intransitivities in multidimensional voting models, and some implications for agenda control. J Econ Theory 2:472–482
McKelvey R (1979) General conditions for global intransitivities in formal voting models. Econometrica 47:1086–1112
McKelvey R (1986) Covering, dominance, and institution-free properties of social choice. Am J Polit Sci 30:283–314
McKelvey P, Ordeshook P, Ungar P (1980) Conditions for voting equilibria in continuous voter distributions. SIAM J Appl Math 39:161–168
Meirowitz A (2003) Accountability and representation in repeated elections with uncertain policy constraints. Princeton University, Mimeo
Plott C (1967) A notion of equilibrium and its possibility under majority rule. Am Econ Rev 57:787–806
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This paper was completed after Jeff Banks’s death. John Duggan is deeply indebted to him for his friendship and his collaboration on this and many other projects.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Banks, J.S., Duggan, J. A Social Choice Lemma on Voting Over Lotteries with Applications to a Class of Dynamic Games. Soc Choice Welfare 26, 285–304 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-006-0090-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-006-0090-6