Abstract
In games with costly signaling, some equilibria are vulnerable to deviations which could be “unambiguously” interpreted as coming from a unique set of Sender-types. This occurs when these types are precisely the ones who gain from deviating for any beliefs the Receiver could form over that set. We show that this idea characterizes a unique equilibrium outcome in two classes of games. First, in monotonic signaling games, only the Riley outcome is immune to this sort of deviation. Our result therefore provides a plausible story behind the selection made by Cho and Kreps’s (Q J Econ 102:179–221, 1987) D1 criterion on this class of games. Second, we examine a version of Crawford and Sobel (Econometrica 50:1431–1451, 1982) model with costly signaling, where standard refinements have no effect. We show that only a Riley-like separating equilibrium is immune to these deviations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Austen-Smith D, Banks J (2000) Cheap talk and burned money. J Econ Theory 91: 1–16
Banks J, Sobel J (1987) Equilibrium selection in signaling games. Econometrica 55: 647–662
Cho I, Kreps D (1987) Signaling games and stable equilibria. Q J Econ 102: 179–221
Cho I, Sobel J (1990) Strategic stability and uniqueness in signaling games. J Econ Theory 50: 381–413
Crawford V, Sobel J (1982) Strategic information transmission. Econometrica 50: 1431–1451
Farrell J (1993) Meaning and credibility in cheap-talk games. Games Econ Behav 5: 514–531
Fudenberg D, Levine D (1993) Self-confirming equilibrium. Econometrica 61: 523–545
Fudenberg D, Tirole J (1991) Game theory. MIT Press, Cambridge
Grossman SJ, Perry M (1986) Perfect sequential equilibrium. J Econ Theory 39: 97–119
Kim Y-G, Sobel J (1995) An evolutionary approach to pre-play communication. Econometrica 63: 1181–1193
Kohlberg E, Mertens J-F (1986) On the strategic stability of equilibria. Econometrica 54: 1003–1038
Matthews S, Okuno-Fujiwara M, Postlewaite A (1991) Refining cheap-talk equilibria. J Econ Theory 55: 247–273
Ramey G (1996) D1 signaling equilibria with multiple signals and a continuum of types. J Econ Theory 69: 508–531
Riley J (1979) Informational equilibrium. Econometrica 47: 331–359
Spence M (1973) Job market signaling. Q J Econ 87: 355–374
van Damme E (1991) Stability and perfection of Nash equilibria. Springer, Berlin
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
We thank David Austen-Smith, Drew Fudenberg, Johannes Hörner, Navin Kartik, Marcin Peski, Phil Reny, Marciano Siniscalchi, Jeroen Swinkels, and anonymous reviewers for helpful comments. We are particularly indebted to Sidartha Gordon and Joel Sobel for their insights. We are also grateful to seminar participants at Columbia, Northwestern, Penn State, Rochester, and the 2006 N. American Econometric Society Meetings.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eső, P., Schummer, J. Credible deviations from signaling equilibria. Int J Game Theory 38, 411–430 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-009-0161-x
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-009-0161-x