The behaviour of the modified Levene’s test when data are not normally distributed | Computational Statistics
Skip to main content

Advertisement

The behaviour of the modified Levene’s test when data are not normally distributed

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Computational Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This is a simulation study that analyzes the robustness properties of tests for equality of variances in terms of both, Type I error rate and power. The well-known Levene’s and Bartlett’s tests, along with different modifications proposed for Levene’s test with and without bootstrapping are examined. Without bootstrapping, some of the modifications may produce better homogeneity tests. Bootstrapping Levene’s test based on the median and this test simultaneously modified by Keyes–Levy’s adjustment and Satterthwaite’s correction are always robust for the significance level under any kind of distribution and combination of sample sizes. None of the tests examined provides protection against extreme values in symmetric distributions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albers W, Boon PC, Kallenberg CM (2000) The asymptotic behavior of tests for normal means based on a variance pre-test. J Stat Plann Inference 88: 47–57

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett MS (1937) Properties of sufficiency and statistical tests. Proc R Soc Ser A A160: 268–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Boos DD, Brownie C (1989) Bootstrap methods for testing homogeneity of variances. Technometrics 31: 69–82

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Box GEP (1954) Some theorems on quadratic forms applied in the study of analysis of variance problems, I. Effect of inequality of variance in the one-way classification. Ann Math Stat 25: 290–302

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Box GEP, Andersen SL (1955) Permutation theory in the derivation of robust criteria and the study of departures from assumption. J R Stat Soc B 17: 1–34

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley JV (1978) Robustness?. Br J Math Stat Psychol 31: 144–152

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Brown MB, Forsythe AB (1974) Robust tests for equality of variances. J Am Stat Assoc 69: 364–367

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll RJ, Schneider H (1985) A note on Levene’s test for equality of variances. Stat Prob Lett 3: 191–194

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Conover WJ, Johnson ME, Johnson MM (1981) A comparative study of tests for homogeneity of variances, with applications to the outer continental shelf bidding data. Technometrics 23: 351–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta VP, Srivastava VK (1993) Upper bound for the size of a test procedure using preliminary tests of significance. J Indian Stat Assoc 7: 26–29

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Keyes TK, Levy MS (1997) Analysis of Levene’s test under design imbalance. J Educ Behav Stat 22: 227–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee SB, Ohk KY (1992) Stock index futures listing and structural change in time-varying volatility. J Futures Mark 12: 493–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levene H (1960) Robust tests for equality of variances. In: Olkin I et al (eds) Contributions to probability and statistics. Essays in honor of harold hotelling. Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp 278–292

  • Li D, Shao-Kung L, Li C (1997) The impact of settlement time on the volatility of stock markets. Appl Financ Econ 7: 689–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim TS, Loh WY (1996) A comparison of tests of equality of variances. Comput Stat Data Anal 22: 287–301

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Loh WY (1987) Some modifications of Levene’s test of variance homogeneity. J Stat Comput Simul 28: 213–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowski CA, Markowski EP (1990) Conditions for the effectiveness of a preliminary test of variance. Am Stat 44: 322–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller RG Jr (1968) Jackknifing variances. Ann Math Stat 39: 567–582

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Milliken GA, Johnson DE (1984) Analysis of Messy data. Vol 1: Designed experiments. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York

  • O’Brien RG (1978) Robust techniques for testing heterogeneity of variance effects in factorial designs. Psychometrika 43: 327–342

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien RG (1979) A general ANOVA method for robust tests of additive models for variances. J Am Stat Assoc 74: 877–880

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Satterthwaite FE (1946) An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components. Biomet Bull 2: 110–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel S, Tukey JW (1960) A nonparametric sum of ranks procedure for relative spread in unpaired samples. J Am Stat Assoc 55:429–444 (corrections appear in vol 56, p 1005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vargha A, Delaney HD (1998) The Kruskal–Wallis test and stochastic homogeneity. J Educ Behav Stat 23: 170–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Yitnosumarto S, O’Neill ME (1986) On Levene’s test of variance homogeneity. Aust J Stat 28: 230–241

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman DW (2004) A note on preliminary tests of equality of variances. Br J Math Stat Psychol 57: 173–181

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isabel Parra-Frutos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parra-Frutos, I. The behaviour of the modified Levene’s test when data are not normally distributed. Comput Stat 24, 671–693 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-009-0154-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-009-0154-z

Keywords