Abstract
The scientific capabilities and performance profiles of the Faculty of Biological Sciences of the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile were assessed building performance indicators from the ISI's Chile-National Citation Report, 1981–1992. Consistent with the educational goals of the Faculty, the scientific activity which nurtures graduate training, especially at the doctoral level, was examined field by field and compared to Chilean and World scores. The approach rendered a portrait of the Faculty which depicts, trends, strengths and weaknesses, and standards for the evaluation of future activity. The study shows a very competitive performance in most of the fields, relative to national and world average achievements. A remarkable finding was the outstanding performance in applied fields, such as medical and agricultural sciences, and also in biotechnology, with shows that when good basic science takes place, high level goal oriented research also occurs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M. Krauskopf, La investigación universitaria durante los 80. El desafío presente, In:Informe de la Educación Superior, Colección Foro de la Educación Superior, 1994 pp. 191–231.
M. Krauskopf, Scientometric indicators as a means to assess the performance of state supported universities in developing countries: The Chilean case,Scientometrics, 23 (1992) 105–121.
B. R. Clark, The fragmentation of research, teaching, and study. An explorative essay. In:University and Society. Essays on the Social Role of Research and Higher Education,M. Trow,T. Nybom (Eds), Jesica Kingsley Publishers, London, 1991, pp. 101–111.
M. Krauskopf, Epistemometría, a term contributing to express the meaning and potential methodologies of scientometrics in Spanish speaking countries,Scientometrics, 30 (1994) 425–428.
M. J. Lemaitre, El consejo superior de educación: Una experiencia de regulación de instituciones privadas de educación superior. In:Informe de la Educación Superior, Colección Foro de la Educación Superior, 1993, pp. 177–210.
H. R. Kells,Autorregulación en la educación superior chilena, Consejo Superior de Educación, Santiago de Chile, 1993.
B. Oden, Research training and the state. Politics and university research in Sweden. 1890–1975 In:University and Society. Essays on the Social Role of Research and Higher Education,M. Trow,T. Nybom (Eds.), Jesica Kingsley Publishers, London, 1991, pp. 143–155.
M. Krauskopf, Los desafíos del desarrollo científico tecnológico,Documento de Trabajo, No. 14/94, Corporación de Promoción Universitaria, Santiago de Chile, 1994, pp. 1–28.
Cited in “Defining performance indicators in higher education”, In:M. Cave, S. Hanney, M. Kogan,The Use of Performance Indicators in Higher, Education. A Critical Analysis of Developing Practice, Jesica Kingsley Publishers, London, 2nd ed., 1991.
Science Citation Index 1993. Guide & List of Source Publications. Institute for Scientific Information, Philadelphia, 1994, pp. 118–135.
Science Watch, ISI, Philadelphia, April 1993, pp. 7.
Science Watch, ISI, Philadelphia, Novemeber 1993, pp. 1.
L. A. Quesada-Allué, D. S. Gitlin, Scientific output in Argentina, 1966–1983,Scientometrics, 34 (1995) 27–35.
A. Schubert, T. Braun, Reference standards for citation based assessments,Scientometrics, 26 (1993) 21–35.
K. Alewell, Criteria for performance profiles of departments and universities,Scientometrics, 19 (1990) 337–347.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Krauskopf, M., Inés Vera, M. & Albertini, R. Assessment of a university's scientific capabilities and profile: The case of the faculty of biological sciences of the Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile. Scientometrics 34, 87–100 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02019175
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02019175