Project report: Split-Up — A Legal Expert System which determines property division upon divorce | Artificial Intelligence and Law Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Project report: Split-Up — A Legal Expert System which determines property division upon divorce

  • Published:
Artificial Intelligence and Law Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Bench-Capon, T. J. M., Lowes, D. & McEnery, A. M. 1991. Argument-Based Explanation of Logic Programs.Knowledge Based Systems 4(3): 177–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branting, K. 1994. A Computational Model of Ratio Decidendi.Artificial Intelligence & Law 2: 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, J. P. 1991. Representation of Legal Text for Conceptual Retrieval. Proceedings ofThe Third International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 244–253. USA: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingleby, R. 1993Family Law and Society. Sydney: Butterworths.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P. E., Zualkernan, I. A. & Tukey, D. 1993. Types of Expertise: An Invariant of Problem Solving.International Journal of Man Machine Studies 39: 641–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolodner, J. L. & Simpson, R. L. 1989. The MEDIATOR: Analysis of an Early Case Based Problem Solver.Cognitive Science 13: 507–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarty, L. T. 1983. Intelligent Legal Information Systems: Problems and Prospects.Rutgers Computer and Technology Law Journal 9(2): 265–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, C. C. 1989. Representing the Structure of Legal Argument. Proceedings ofThe Second International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. USA: ACM press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meldman, J. A. 1977. A Structural Model for Computer-Aided Legal Analysis.Rutgers Journal of Computers and Law 6:27–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meersman, R., Zeleznikow, J. & Hunter, D. 1994. A formal Model of Legal Negotiation Submitted to Fifth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. Washington, USA.

  • Ross, H. L. 1980.Settled Out of Court. Aldine.

  • Smith, J. C. & Deedman, C. 1987. The Application of Expert Systems Technology to Case-Based Law. In the Proceedings ofThe First International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law 84–93. Boston: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stranieri, A. & Zeleznikow, J. 1992. SPLIT-UP Expert System to Determine Spousal Property Distribution on Litigation in the Family Court of Australia. In the Proceedings ofThe Fifth Australian Artificial Intelligence Conference 51–66. Hobart: World Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stranieri, A., Massey, P. & Zeleznikow, J. 1994. Inferencing with legal knowledge represented as diagrams. In Williams A. W. F (ed)Poster Proceedings of The Seventh Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence AI'94, p. 25–32.

  • Stranieri, A., Gawler, M. & Zeleznikow, J. 1994b. Toulmin Structures as a Higher Level Abstraction for Hybrid Reasoning. In Proceedings ofThe Seventh Australian Artificial Intelligence Congress AI'94, 203–210. Armidale. World Scientific, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sycara, K. 1990. Negotiation Planning: An AI Approach,European Journal of Operations Research 46: 216–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S. 1958.The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vossos, G., Zeleznikow, J., Moore, A. & Hunter, D. 1993. The Credit Act Advisory System (CAAS): Conversion from an Expert System Prototype to a C++ Commercial System. In the Proceedings ofThe Fourth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 180–183. Amsterdam: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeleznikow, J. & Hunter, D. 1994.Building Intelligent Legal Information Systems, Deventer: Kluwer Law and Taxation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeleznikow, J. Hunter, D. & Stranieri, A. 1994. Reasoning in Open Textured Domains: Benefits of Integrating Multiple Reasoning Stragies. In Bramer, M, A. & Macintosh, A, L.Research and Development in Expert Systems XI. Proceedings of Expert Systems 94, 187–198. Cambridge: SGES Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Collaborative Law and Artificial Intelligence Research Project, Database Research Laboratory, Applied Computing Research Institute, La Trobe University, 3083, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia

    John Zeleznikow, Andrew Stranieri & Mark Gawler

Authors
  1. John Zeleznikow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrew Stranieri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mark Gawler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zeleznikow, J., Stranieri, A. & Gawler, M. Project report: Split-Up — A Legal Expert System which determines property division upon divorce. Artif Intell Law 3, 267–275 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00871852

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00871852

Key words

Search

Navigation