Fast Solution to the Fair Ranking Problem Using the Sinkhorn Algorithm | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Fast Solution to the Fair Ranking Problem Using the Sinkhorn Algorithm

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
PRICAI 2024: Trends in Artificial Intelligence (PRICAI 2024)

Abstract

In two-sided marketplaces such as online flea markets, recommender systems for providing consumers with personalized item rankings play a key role in promoting transactions between item providers and consumers. Meanwhile, two-sided marketplaces face the problem of balancing consumer satisfaction and fairness among items to stimulate activity of item providers. Saito and Joachims (2022) devised an impact-based fair ranking method for maximizing the Nash social welfare based on fair division; however, this method, which requires solving a large-scale constrained nonlinear optimization problem, is very difficult to apply to practical-scale recommender systems. We thus propose a fast solution to the impact-based fair ranking problem. We first transform the fair ranking problem into an unconstrained optimization problem and then design a gradient ascent method that repeatedly executes the Sinkhorn algorithm. Experimental results demonstrate that our algorithm provides fair rankings of high quality and is about 1000 times faster than application of commercial optimization software.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 6634
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 8293
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    All these methods were implemented in Python on an Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS computer equipped with Intel Core i9 12900k CPU 5.2 GHz (128 GB RAM) and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 GPU 1.7 GHz (24 GB RAM). Our implementation is available at https://github.com/tubo213/nsw-with-optimal-transport.

References

  1. Altschuler, J., Niles-Weed, J., Rigollet, P.: Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iteration. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 30 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. ApS, M.: The MOSEK optimizer API for Python manual, version 10.2 (2024). https://docs.mosek.com/latest/pythonapi/index.html

  3. Bhatia, K., et al.: The extreme classification repository: multi-label datasets and code (2016). http://manikvarma.org/downloads/XC/XMLRepository.html

  4. Biega, A.J., Gummadi, K.P., Weikum, G.: Equity of attention: amortizing individual fairness in rankings. In: The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 405–414 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Craswell, N., Zoeter, O., Taylor, M., Ramsey, B.: An experimental comparison of click position-bias models. In: Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 87–94 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cuturi, M.: Sinkhorn distances: lightspeed computation of optimal transport. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 26 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kingma, D., Ba, J.: Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. In: International Conference on Learning Representations, San Diego (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Luenberger, D.G., Ye, Y.: Linear and Nonlinear Programming. Springer (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Patro, G.K., Biswas, A., Ganguly, N., Gummadi, K.P., Chakraborty, A.: FairRec: two-sided fairness for personalized recommendations in two-sided platforms. In: Proceedings of the Web Conference 2020, pp. 1194–1204 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pitoura, E., Stefanidis, K., Koutrika, G.: Fairness in rankings and recommendations: an overview. VLDB J. 31, 431–458 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Saito, Y., Joachims, T.: Fair ranking as fair division: impact-based individual fairness in ranking. In: Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 1514–1524 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Singh, A., Joachims, T.: Fairness of exposure in rankings. In: Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 2219–2228 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Togashi, R., Abe, K., Saito, Y.: Scalable and provably fair exposure control for large-scale recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2024, pp. 3307–3318 (2024)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Yoshitsugu Yamamoto for helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Noriyoshi Sukegawa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2025 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Uehara, Y. et al. (2025). Fast Solution to the Fair Ranking Problem Using the Sinkhorn Algorithm. In: Hadfi, R., Anthony, P., Sharma, A., Ito, T., Bai, Q. (eds) PRICAI 2024: Trends in Artificial Intelligence. PRICAI 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 15285. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-0128-8_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-0128-8_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-96-0127-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-96-0128-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics