Impact of Similarity Measure Functions on the Performance of Coherent Filtering Detection | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Impact of Similarity Measure Functions on the Performance of Coherent Filtering Detection

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Robotics, Vision, Signal Processing and Power Applications

Abstract

Coherent motions depict the collective movements of individuals in crowd, which widely exist in physical and biological systems. In recent years, similarity-based clustering algorithms especially Coherent Filtering (CF) clustering approach has gained high popularity in the field of coherent motions detection. CF finds motion clusters of different scale, density, and shape, in the presence of large amount of noise and outliers. The similarity measure function is utilized as the initial base step for determining the relationships among crowd individuals and thus detecting coherent motion from noisy time series data. In this paper, we evaluated the impact of four different similarity measure functions upon CF clustering approach, namely, Chebyshev, Euclidean, Canberra and Cosine, and the results were compared subsequently. Quantitative evaluation and comparison are conducted on synthetic data in two dimensional space. Results reveal that the Euclidean similarity function emerges as the best measure for capturing coherent motions from crowd clutters, while Cosine similarity function performs the worst.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 34319
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
JPY 42899
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lamba, S., Nain, N.: Crowd monitoring and classification: a survey. In: Bhatia, S.K., Mishra, K.K., Tiwari, S., Singh, V.K. (eds.) Advances in Computer and Computational Sciences. AISC, vol. 553, pp. 21–31. Springer, Singapore (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3770-2_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Li, T., Chang, H., Wang, M., Ni, B., Hong, R., Yan, S.: Crowded scene analysis: a survey. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Video Technol. 25(3), 367–386 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hu, W., Tan, T., Wang, L., Maybank, S.: A survey on visual surveillance of object motion and behaviors. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C (Appl. Rev.) 34(3), 334–352 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Saleh, S.A.M., Suandi, S.A., Ibrahim, H.: Recent survey on crowd density estimation and counting for visual surveillance. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 41, 103–114 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Moussaid, M., Garnier, S., Theraulaz, G., Helbing, D.: Collective information processing and pattern formation in swarms, flocks, and crowds. Top. Cogn. Sci. 1(3), 469–497 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Saleh, S.A.M., Suandi, S.A., Ibrahim, H.: Dominant motion group detection based on dominant motion pattern. In: 2nd Advanced Research in Electronic Engineering and Information Technology International Conference (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhou, B., Tang, X., Wang, X.: Coherent filtering: detecting coherent motions from crowd clutters. In: Fitzgibbon, A., Lazebnik, S., Perona, P., Sato, Y., Schmid, C. (eds.) ECCV 2012. LNCS, pp. 857–871. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33709-3_61

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Shao, J., Loy, C.C., Wang, X.: Scene-independent group profiling in crowd. In: 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 2227–2234 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shao, J., Loy, C.C., Wang, X.: Learning scene-independent group descriptors for crowd understanding. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Video Technol. 27(6), 1290–1303 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Huang, A.: Similarity measures for text document clustering. In: Proceedings of the 6th New Zealand Computer Science Research Student Conference (NZCSRSC 2008), pp. 9–56 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Strehl, A., Ghosh, J.: Cluster ensembles a knowledge reuse framework for combining multiple partitions. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3, 583–617 (2002)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Rand, W.M.: Objective criteria for the evaluation of clustering methods. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 66, 846–850 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work is supported by Universiti Sains Malaysia Research University Individual (RUI) Research Grant 1001/PELECT/8014056.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sami Abdulla Mohsen Saleh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Saleh, S.A.M., Suandi, S.A., Ibrahim, H. (2022). Impact of Similarity Measure Functions on the Performance of Coherent Filtering Detection. In: Mahyuddin, N.M., Mat Noor, N.R., Mat Sakim, H.A. (eds) Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Robotics, Vision, Signal Processing and Power Applications. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 829. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8129-5_77

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics