Abstract
In the paper the results of voting by different voting methods are presented and analyzed. Approval voting, disapproval voting, categorization method and classical majority voting are compared using results of a presidential poll conducted over a representative sample. Results differ depending on the voting methods used. However, from the statistical point of view, within the same valuation scope (positive, if voting is constructed so that the vote is “for” the candidate and negative, if the vote is “against”) the order of the candidates remains similar across the methods.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Nurmi, H.: Comparing Voting Systems. D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht (1987)
Hołubiec, J.W., Mercik, J.W.: Inside Voting Procedures, p. 3. Accedo Verlagsgesellschaft, Munich (1994)
Ordeshook, P.: Game Theory and Political Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1986)
Brams, S.J., Fisburn, P.C.: Approval voting. A. Political Sci. Rev. 72(3), 831–847 (1978)
Brams, S., Fisburn, P.C.: Approval Voting. Birkhaser, Boston (1983)
The “Wisnumurti Guidelines” for Selecting a Candidate for Secretary-General (1996)
Felsenthal, D.S.: On combining approval voting with disapproval voting. Behav. Sci. 34, 53–60 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.383040105
Alcantud, J.C., Laruelle, A.: Dis&approval voting: a characterization. Soc. Choice Welf. 43, 1–10 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-013-0766-7
Hillinger, C.: Voting and cardinal aggregation of judgments. Discussion Paper 2004-09, University of Munich (2004)
Hillinger, C.: The case for utilitarian voting. Homo Oeconomicus 22, 295–321 (2005)
Malawski, M., Przybyszewski, K., Sosnowska, H.: Cognitive effort of voters under three different voting methods-an experimental study. Badania Operacyjne i Decyzje (Oper. Res. Decis.) 3–4, 69–79 (2010)
Przybyszewski, K., Sosnowska, H.: Approval voting as a polling method. J. Polit. Mark. (Submitted to 2018)
Chirumbolo, A.: The relationship between need for cognitive closure and political orientation: the mediating role of authoritarianism. Pers. Individ. Differ. 32, 603–610 (2002)
Abdi, H.: Kendall rank correlation. In: Salking, N.J. (ed.) Encyklopedia of measure and statistics. Sage, Thousand Oaks (CA) (2007)
Kendall, M.G.: Rank Correlation Methods. Charles Griffin & Company Limited, London (1948)
Spearman, C.: The proof and measurement of association between two things. Am. J. Psychol. 15, 72–101 (1904)
Przybyszewski, K., Sosnowska, H.: Approval voting as a method of prediction in political votings. Case of polish elections. In: Nguyen, N.T., Kowalczyk, R., Mercik, J. (eds.) Transactions on Computational Collective Intelligence XXIII. LNCS, vol. 9760, pp. 17–28. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-52886-0_2
Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: A framing of decisions and psychology of choice. Science 211, 453–458 (1981)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Przybyszewski, K., Sosnowska, H. (2018). Comparing Results of Voting by Statistical Rank Tests. In: Nguyen, N., Kowalczyk, R., Mercik, J., Motylska-Kuźma, A. (eds) Transactions on Computational Collective Intelligence XXXI. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11290. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58464-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58464-4_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-58463-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-58464-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)