Abstract
We prove various extensions of the Tennenbaum phenomenon to the case of computable quotient presentations of models of arithmetic and set theory. Specifically, no nonstandard model of arithmetic has a computable quotient presentation by a c.e. equivalence relation. No \(\Sigma _1\)-sound nonstandard model of arithmetic has a computable quotient presentation by a co-c.e. equivalence relation. No nonstandard model of arithmetic in the language \(\{+,\cdot ,\le \}\) has a computably enumerable quotient presentation by any equivalence relation of any complexity. No model of ZFC or even much weaker set theories has a computable quotient presentation by any equivalence relation of any complexity. And similarly no nonstandard model of finite set theory has a computable quotient presentation.
This article is a preliminary report of results following up research initiated at the conference Mathematical Logic and its Applications, held in memory of Professor Yuzuru Kakuda of Kobe University in September 2016 at the Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences (RIMS) in Kyoto. The second author is grateful for the chance twenty years ago to be a part of Kakuda-sensei’s logic group in Kobe, a deeply formative experience that he is pleased to see growing into a lifelong connection with Japan. He is grateful to the organizer Makoto Kikuchi and his other Japanese hosts for supporting this particular research visit, as well as to Bakhadyr Khoussainov for insightful conversations. The first author has been supported by the National Science Centre (Poland) research grant NCN PRELUDIUM UMO-2014/13/N/HS1/02058. He also thanks the Mathematics Program of the CUNY Graduate Center in New York for his research visit as a Fulbright Visiting Scholar between September 2016 and April 2017. Commentary concerning this paper can be made at http://jdh.hamkins.org/computable-quotient-presentations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
This analogy comes with the obvious difference that the computable completeness theorem assumes the theory is decidable.
- 2.
Obviously, a low degree does not have to be c.e. and cannot be in this construction.
- 3.
Apparently, a similar argument appears in [Rab58].
- 4.
Some researchers have also considered another strictly weaker version of this theory, omitting the \(\in \)-induction scheme. But it turns out that this version of the theory is flawed for various reasons: it cannot prove that every set has a transitive closure; it is not bi-interpretable with PA; it does not support the Tennenbaum phenomenon (see [ESV11]). Meanwhile, since all these issues are addressed by the more attractive and fruitful theory \(\text {ZF}^{\lnot \infty }\), we prefer to take this theory as the meaning of ‘finite set theory’.
References
Enayat, A., Schmerl, J., Visser, A.: \(\omega \)-models of finite set theory. In: Kennedy, J., Kossak, R. (eds.) Set Theory, Arithmetic, and Foundations of Mathematics: Theorems, Philosophies. Lecture Notes in Logic, no. 36. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2011)
Khoussainov, B.: Computably enumerable structures: domain dependence, September 2016. Slides for Conference Talk at Mathematical Logic and Its Applications, Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences (RIMS), Kyoto University. http://www2.kobe-u.ac.jp/~mkikuchi/mla2016khoussainov.pdf
Rabin, M.O.: On recursively enumerable and arithmetic models of set theory. J. Symb. Log. 23(4), 408–416 (1958)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany
About this paper
Cite this paper
Godziszewski, M.T., Hamkins, J.D. (2017). Computable Quotient Presentations of Models of Arithmetic and Set Theory. In: Kennedy, J., de Queiroz, R. (eds) Logic, Language, Information, and Computation. WoLLIC 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10388. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55386-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55386-2_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-55385-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-55386-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)